• Aucun résultat trouvé

7.7 from the notes

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "7.7 from the notes"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Exercice 1. Write the details of the proof of Prop. 7.7 from the notes.

Exercice 2. Write the details of the proof of Thm. 7.9 from the notes.

Exercice 3. Formulate the conditions for a pair λ± ∈ Lh(Y,Y) to be the complex covariances of a pure gauge invariant state in the fermionic case.

Exercice 4. Let φ1, . . . , φn ∈ B(H) for a Hilbert space H. Abusing the lan- guage one says that {φ1, . . . , φn} is a CAR representation over Rn ifφii and [φi, φj]+ = 2δij1l.

1) Check that thenRn3x7→Pn

i=1xiφiis a representation of CAR(Rn), where we equip Rn with its canonical euclidean structure.

2) We recall the Pauli matrices:

σ1=

0 1 1 0

, σ2=

0 −i i 0

, σ3=

1 0 0 −1

.

Check that {σ1, σ2} is a CAR representation over R2, and {σ1, σ2, σ3} is a CAR representation overR3.

3) Let{φ1, φ2}a CAR representation overR2andI:= iφ1φ2. Show thatI2= 1l, I=I andI6= 1l. LetK= Ker(I−1l). Show that the map

H 3Ψ7→UΨ := (1

2(φ1−φ1I)Ψ,1

2(1l +I)Ψ)∈ K ⊕ K ∼C2⊗ K is unitary.

4) Show thatU φ1U−11⊗1lKandU φ2U−12⊗1lK. Exercice 5. (Jordan-Wigner representation)

1) On B(⊗mC2) we set:

σ(j)i := 1l⊗(j−1)⊗σi⊗1l⊗(m−j), i= 1,2,3, j= 1, . . . , m.

We set also I0:= 1l,Ij:=σ(1)3 · · ·σ3(j)forj= 1, . . . , m. Let now:

(0.1) φJW2j−1:=Ij−1σ(j)1 , φJW2j :=Ij−1σ2(j), j = 1, . . . , m,

Prove that {φJW1 , . . . , φJW2m} is a CAR representation overR2m, called the Jordan- Wigner representation.

2) Prove that{φJW1 , . . . , φJW2m,±Im}are two CAR representations overR2m+1. 3) Prove that these two representations are not equivalent.

1

Références

Documents relatifs

By Elkhadiri and Sfouli [15], Weierstrass division does not hold in quasianalytic systems that extend strictly the analytic system.. Hence the resolu- tion of Childress’

Boiled rice; snails; fast food; fish and chips; pasta; sushi; bread, cheese and wine; paella; beer;. sausages and cabbage; ice-cream; apple crumble (with custard); frogs’

We prove that Lagrangian fibrations on projective hyper-K¨ ahler 2n-folds with max- imal Mumford-Tate group satisfy Matsushita’s conjecture, namely the generic rank of the period

Indeed it is known that characteristic functions of Cheeger sets are, up to a multiplicative constant, normalized first eigenfunctions of the 1-Laplacian and they are obtained as

We would like to solve this problem by using the One-dimensional Convex Integration Theory.. But there is no obvious choice

Later, Brock and Bromberg [BB] extended this result to prove that every finitely generated, freely indecomposable Kleinian group without parabolic elements is an algebraic limit

[7] Chunhui Lai, A lower bound for the number of edges in a graph containing no two cycles of the same length, The Electronic J. Yuster, Covering non-uniform hypergraphs

Wang, Error analysis of the semi-discrete local discontinuous Galerkin method for compressible miscible displacement problem in porous media, Applied Mathematics and Computation,