HAL Id: jpa-00206829
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00206829
Submitted on 1 Jan 1969
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.
Reduction of the Kronecker products for rotation groups
P.H. Butler, B.G. Wybourne
To cite this version:
P.H. Butler, B.G. Wybourne. Reduction of the Kronecker products for rotation groups. Journal de
Physique, 1969, 30 (8-9), pp.655-664. �10.1051/jphys:01969003008-9065500�. �jpa-00206829�
655
REDUCTION OF THE KRONECKER PRODUCTS FOR
ROTATION
GROUPS(1) By
P. H. BUTLER and B. G.WYBOURNE,
Physics Department, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
(Reçu
le 14 mars1969.)
Résumé. 2014 Des méthodes pour
analyser
la réduction desproduits
Kronecker pour les groupes de rotationorthogonale
en utilisant des méthodes fonction S de D. E. Littlewood sontdéveloppées.
Lespropriétés
desreprésentations
de la rotation sont discutées sur certainspoints
ainsi que la méthode de différence des caractères utilisés dans le cas des groupes de rotation unidimensionnelle. Ces méthodes sont traduisibles en calcul pour calculatrices élec-troniques (« computer »)
et un programmespécial
a été élaboré. Une méthode pour le calcul des lois dérivées pour lesreprésentations
de rotations sous Rn ~ R3 a été mise aupoint.
Abstract. 2014 Methods have been
developed
foranalyzing
the reduction of the Kroneckerproducts
fororthogonal
and rotation groupsusing
the S-function methods of D. E. Littlewood.The
properties
of thespin representations
are discussed in some detail and the method of difference characters used in the case of the even-dimensional rotation groups. These methodsare amenable to
computer
calculation and aspecial
programme has been written. A method isgiven
forcalculating
thebranching
rules forspin representations
under Rn ~ R3.JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE TOME 30, AOUT-SEPTEMBRE 1969,
1. Introduction. - The
higher
rotation groups,Rn, play
animportant
role in the group theoreticaldescrip-
tion of atomic and nuclear wave functions and inter- actions
[1-4].
Theproperties
of thespin
representa- tions of the rotation groups have been used in thequasi-spin description
of atomic and nuclear shellstructure
[5-10].
Theapplication
of thehigher
rota-tion groups,
especially R,
andR11,
toproblems
inelementary particle physics
isof topical
interest[11-17].
The
analysis
of the reduction of the Kroneckerproducts
for thegeneral
case of thespin representations
of the rotation groups and in
particular
of the repre- sentations of the even-dimensional rotation groupsR2,
has received scant attention
[18-21].
The solution for thespecial
casesof R4, R5 and R6 using
the known iso-morphisms
ofR4
with the doublebinary
group, ofR5
with
SP4,
andof R6
withU4
is well-known[2, 18-21].
Apart
from thespecial
difficulties attendantspin representations
there are theprimary
difficulties thatarise,
in the case of even-dimensional rotation groupsR2.,
from the fact that if the fullorthogonal
group02v
is restricted to the group
R2.
the character(with X, =,4 0) separates
into two irreducible repre- sentations ofR2,1 [À1, À2, ..., Àv]
and[)’1’ X2, - - - - Àv] .
A
partial
solution to theproblem
ofreducing
the(1)
Researchsponsored
in partby
the Air Force Office of Scientific Research, Office ofAerospace
Research, United States Air Force, under AFOSR Grant No. 1275-67.Kronecker
products
forR2,
has beengiven by
Little-wood
[18] using
the method of difference charac-ters
[18, 22-24].
In the present paper wecomplete
Littlewood’s treatment of difference characters to
give
a
general
method for the reduction of the Kroneckerproducts
of both true andspin representations
for therotation groups in an even,
R2v,
orodd, R2,+l,
numberof dimensions.
Throughout
we follow the notation of Littlewood[18].
2. Kronecker
products
for02v
and°2V+l.
- Theirreducible
representations
of the fullorthogonal
groups°2V
andO2v+1 (the
groupsof orthogonal
matriceshaving determinant + 1)
may be labelledby partitions
ofintegers
into not more than v parts and will be desi-gnated
as[À]’ == [À1, À2,
...,XJ’
where we attach aprime
to avoid confusion with thedesignation
ofrotation group
representations.
The characters of°2V
or
02v+i
may beexpanded
as S-functionsusing
Littlewood’s result
[18] :
where the sum is over all S-functions of the set
{ y }
whichis
comprised
of all S-functions that arise for theparti-
tions that are in the Frobenius notation of the form :
Article published online by EDP Sciences and available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/jphys:01969003008-9065500
i.e. the
partitions :
and p
is thepartition weight.
An
S-function IXI
may be written in terms oforthogonal
group characters as :where the sum is over all S-functions of the
set {8}
which involves all
partitions
into evenparts only :
e.g.
{0}, {2}, {4}, {22}, {6}, {42}, {23}, {8},
...and the terms
arising
in the S-function division aretaken as
orthogonal
group characters.The results of
equations (1)
and(2) together
withthe rule for the outer
multiplication
of S-functions and Littlewood’s method forexpressing
an S-functioninvolving
> vparts
as a combination of S-functionshaving v parts
allows the Kroneckerproducts
ofthe true
representations
of anyorthogonal
group to bereadily
evaluated. Thus in the case of04
we have :This method of
evaluating
the reduction of the Kroneckerproduct
of the truerepresentations
of theorthogonal
groups is amenable to machine calculation and isincorporated
in ageneral
computer programme writtenby
one of us(P.H.B.).
Extensive tables have beenpublished
elsewhere[2].
3. Kronecker
products
ofspin representations
of02,
and
O2v+1·
- As well as the truerepresentations
ofthe
orthogonal
groups there exist the so-calledspin representations.
Ingeneral
the Kroneckerproduct
oftwo
spin representations yields
truerepresentations
while the Kronecker
product
of aspin representation
with a true
representation yields spin representations.
Associated with
°2’1 or O2v+ 1
there is a basicspin representation
A*
2 ofdegree
2v. It is notdifficult to show that
[18] :
for
O2v,
and :for
02V+ l’
where the asteriskdesignates
the associated characters of the fullorthogonal
group. In the sum-mation over the
orthogonal
group characters on theright-hand-side
ofequation (3 a)
the first summation is restricted tointegers
in the range 02r v
and the second to the range v 2r 2v. Since in all the cases we shall consider the distinction between theordinary
characters and the associated characters is ofnegligible significance
we shall hence forth notmake any discrimination.
Ignoring
this distinction leads to the S-functionexpressions
ofequations (3 b)
and
(3 d).
The
spin
characters for the otherspin representations
of the full
orthogonal
group may all beexpressed
asproducts
of the basicspin representation 2 witch
S-functions
by making
theexpansion [18] :
where the sum is over all S-functions
involving
self-conjugate partitions
ofweight p
and rank r.Thus in the case of
08,
we have :The
product
of a basicspin
character with anS-function may be
expressed
as a sum ofspin
repre- sentation charactersby writing :
where E (n)
appears in the S-functiondivision {X}/{},
the summation
being
over all S-functions{}.
Thusin the case of
08,
we have :Equations (4)
and(5),
used inconjunction
withthe results of
equations (3 a)
and(3 b), provide
asystematic
method for the reduction of the Kroneckerproduct
of anypair
ofspin representations
or of aspin representation
with a truerepresentation.
Theresults may be checked
by
the usual dimensional methods.4. Difference characters and true
representations
of
R2v.
- Therepresentations [À1, À2,
...,Àv]
of02v
remain irreducible upon restriction to the group
R2v
except
in the case whereÀv =1=
0 when the represen-657
tation of
02v separates
into two irreducible represen- tations ofR2. :
Let us define the difference between the two
conju- gate
characters as :Then we have :
and :
From first
principles :
The
product
of the difference characters[1v]"
timesan
S-function {À}
willyield
a differencecharacter, simple
orcompound,
ofR2v.
Ingeneral
we find thatthe difference characters associated with the true
representations of R2v
areexpressible
as[18] :
where the sum is over all S-functions of the
set I a I
which in Frobenius notation are of the form :
i.e. the
partitions :
{0}, {12}, {212}, {313}, { 23 }, {414}, {3221},
...and p
is theweight
of thepartition,
Forexample,
in the case of
R8,
wereadily
find that :The
product
of the difference character[1v]"
withan
S-function {À}
may beexpanded
as a series ofdifference characters
of R2v by writing [18] :
[1v]" {X} = 2[
+11
n2 +1, ..., 1) V
+1]" (11)
where
E{n}
appears inf X 1/{ p }
and the sum is overall S-functions of the
set {P}
which involves allparti-
tions into an even number of parts of any
given magni-
tude. For
example
forRs
we find :Equations (8 a), (8 b), (10)
and(11) together
contain sufficient information to make the reduction of the Kronecker
product
of anypair
of true repre-sentations
of R2v provided
we can express the Kronecker square of the difference character[1v]"
in terms ofthe characters of
R2,’
We first note that :a result that follows
immediately
fromequations (6 a)
to
(8 b). By considering
each term on theright-hand
side
separately
we find the somewhatsurprising
results that :
and :
where the
S-functions Xl( pL )
arise in the S-functiondivision {X}/{}
with thepartition (À) defining
theprincipal
part of theproduct (i.e. [2v]
for equa- tion(13 a)
and[2v-1]
forequation (13 b))
and thesummation is
again
over the set of S-functions which involves allcompatible partitions
of thetype { 22r 12S }.
The terms that arise in the Kronecker
product
are the same as those
arising
inequation (13 a)
except that for everypartition
withÀv i=
0 wereplace X, by - Àv.
Thus forR8
wereadily
find that :and :
Let us now illustrate our
preceding
remarksby considering
the calculation of the Kroneckerproduct [2111]
X[211-1]
forR8.
Fromequations (8 a)
and
(8 b) :
Use of
equations (1)
and(2)
leads to the result :while
application of equations (10)
and(14)
leads to :from which we conclude that :
The reduction of
[2111]
X[2111] requires
theevaluation of the
product [2111]’
X[2111]" using equations (1), (2)
and(10)
followedby equation (11)
to
give :
from which we deduce that :
The result for
[211-1]
X[211-1]
will be the same as for[2111]
X[2111] except
that for everypartition
with
Àv =1= 0, X,
isreplaced by - Àv
and vice versa.Again
we wouldpoint
out that these results have beenincorporated
in ourgeneral
computer programme.5. Difference characters and
spin representations
ofR2,.
-Equations (6)
to(8 b)
areequally
valid forthe
spin representations
of the rotation groupR2v.
The basic difference character becomes
[18] :
The difference characters associated with the other
spin representations
ofR2v
may beexpressed
as[18] :
where the sum is over all
S-functions {E} involving self-conjugate partitions
ofweight p
and rank r.It is not difficult to establish that the Kronecker square of the difference character is
expressible
in termsof S-functions as :
and that :
The establishment of these two
results, together
with the use of
equations (3 a)
to(8 b)
and of equa- tions(16)
to(18), gives
asystematic
method forevaluating
the Kroneckerproducts
of anypair
ofspin representations
ofR2v.
As an
example,
let us consider the evaluation of the31 1 1 X 31 1 1
for R8Kronecker
product 2222 222 2
forEquations (6)
to(8 b)
lead to :From
equation (4)
we have :while use of
equations (16)
and(18) gives :
659
Combining
these two results leads to :Using
the result ofequation (18) readily
leads tothe establishment of :
311 1
2The terms
in 2 2 2 2 will be the same as above
except
for thereplacement ofÀv by - Àv
whenÀv #-
0.6. Kronecker
products
of true andspin representa-
tions ofR2v.
- There is nodifficulty
inextending
thepreceding
results to calculate the Kroneckerproduct
of a true
representation
ofR2v
with aspin
represen- tation if the results :and :
are noted
together
with the relation :where E{n}
appearsin {X}/{}
and the sum is overall
S-functions {}.
Using
theseequations together
withequation (18) readily
leads to the establishment of thetypical
resultfor
R8,
that :7. Resolution of the Kronecker square for
02v
and02v +
1.- In a number of
applications
of grouptheory
in
physics,
it is necessary to be able to resolve the termsarising
in the reduction of the Kronecker square ofa
representation
into itssymmetric
andantisymmetric
terms. In the case of the true
representations
of thefull
orthogonal
groups or of the odd-dimensional rotation groupsR2, +
11 thisproblem
may beelegantly
solved
using
Littlewood’s methods ofplethysm [26].
In
general
thesymmetric
terms of the Kronecker square[A]2
arejust
those that arise in theplethysm [A] 0 f 2}
while those of theantisymmetric
terms arisein
[A] { 12 }.
We shall first consider the case of thespin representations
of the fullorthogonal
group.From
equation (4)
we find for thesymmetric
terms :and for the
antisymmetric
terms :The
plethysms involving
theS-functions {11}
maybe evaluated
by
the usualprocedures [18], [26], [27].
The
plethysms
for the basicspin representations
havebeen considered
by
Littlewood[18-20]
from firstprin-
ciples
togive
forO2v :
and for
and :
These two sets of
results,
combined with the results ofequations (22 a)
and(22 b),
allow any Kronecker square of thespin representations
ofO2v
or°2v+l to
be
separated
into theirsymmetric
andantisymmetric
terms. Since the
representations
of°2v+l
are irre-ducible upon restriction of
02v+1 to R2,+l
there is noadded
difficulty
inresolving
the Kronecker squares of thespin representations
ofR2v+1.
8. Resolution of the Kronecker
Squares
forR2v.
-As we saw earlier under the restriction
°2V
-*R2v
theirreducible
representations
of02v with X., =A
0 de-compose into two
conjugate representations
ofR2v
asin
equation (6)
and to evaluate the Kronecker squareswe must make use of the method of difference charac-
ters. If
[À]
is arepresentation
ofR2v
then we may associate thesymmetric
terms of the Kronecker square with theplethysm :
or :
where the
+ sign
occurs ifÀv
> 0 and the -sign
if
Àv
0. Theantisymmetric
terms will arise in theplethysm :
or :
The terms
arising
inM’@{2}
and[À]’ @ {12}
can be evaluated
using
the methods of thepreceding
section while those of
[A]’
X[A]"
follow from the methodsof section
4 for the case of truerepresentations
or section 5 for
spin representations.
Thusonly
theterms in
[XI " Of 2 1
and[X]II & f 12 1
need be consi-dered.
Noting equation (10),
we have ingeneral
for thetrue
representations
ofR2v :
where we have used the usual result for
plethysms involving products
and gp.,, is the coefficient of{{JL}
inthe inner
product f p I X ( m 1.
For thespin
represen-tations of
R2v,
thecorresponding
result is :It should be
apparent
that from the two abov(results that the
problem
of the resolution of the Kro- necker squares forR2v
would becomplete
if theple thysms
[1*1]"Of2}, [Jv]"01121, [(!)V]" @ {i2j
and
2 @ { 12 }
were known.To evaluate the
symmetric
andantisymmetric
terms in the Kronecker square of
2 v]
, let u.,first
put :
and :
We may then write :
and :
Upon noting
the results ofequations (3 a), (22)
and
(23) together
with the fact that :we
readily
find :and :
661
These two results used in
equation (30)
make itpossible
to resolve the Kronecker square of thespin representations
ofR2v
intosymmetric
andantisym-
metric terms.
The evaluation of the
plethysms [lv]" & 112 1
and[1v]" ø {2}
is a somewhat more difficult task. Weproceed by
firstnoting
that :and :
Furthermore :
and :
The terms in
[1v] [1 v-I
-1]
followdirectly
fromequation (13 b)
and we have for v even :and :
while for v odd :
and :
Evaluation of the
plethysms
ofequations (38 a-d),
and use
of equation (28) readily
leads to the evaluationof the
plethysms involving [1v]
and[1 v-I
-1]
inequations (36 a)
and(36 b).
Thus in the case ofRg,
we have :
and since :
Using
these results inequations (36 a)
and(36 b)
leads
directly
to the results :and :
9.
Branching
rules forspin representations
underRn -+ R3.
-Armstrong
andJudd [28]
haverecently
shown that the
spin representations
of the rotation groupsR,, play a
fundamental role in theanalysis
ofthe structure of electron
configurations.
The bran-ching
rules for thedecomposition
of thespin
charactersof Rn
into charactersof R3
areespecially important
intheir treatment.
The
representations
ofR3 depend
on asingle
para- metricangle
0 and the character associated with therepresentation
DEJ3 is :where j
may beintegral
orhalf-integral
and p runsthrough positive integers.
Therepresentations
ofR2v
and
R2v+1
each involve vparametric angles 6g
and inparticular
the character[1]
for the vector represen- tation rlllof R2v
is of the form :while for
R2v+1
thecorresponding
character is :Under the restriction
Rn --+ R3,
the vparametric angles
become related and it is thenpossible
to express the results ofequations (40)
and(41)
in terms of asingle parametric angle
0. If underRn --+ R3,
wehave :
then
comparison
ofequations (40)
and(41)
withequation (42)
allows therelationships
between thev
parametric angles
to be fixedimmediately.
For
example,
if underR2l+1
-*Rs,
we have[1]
--->[l]
then
comparison
ofequation (41)
withequation (39)
shows that the
required relationship
is :Thus if
under R9 - R3
we have[1]
-+[4]
thenwe must take :
If, however,
underR9 R3
we have[1]
->[0]
+
[1]
+[2]
thencomparison
ofequation (41)
withequation (42)
leads to the choice :Likewise,
if underR6 -* R3
we have[1]
-*[0]
+
[2],
thencomparison
ofequation (40)
with equa- tion(42) gives
the relations :Having
defined thedecomposition
of the vectorrepresentations
under the restrictionR. -->- R3,
as inequation (42)
we mayimmediately
find the corres-ponding decomposition
for any other true represen- tation[À]
ofRn by evaluating
the terms in theple- thysm [21] :
The character associated with the basic
spin
cha-racter A of
R2’)+1
may beexpressed
in terms of v para- metricangles 6e;
togive :
where the summation is over all
possible
combinations of theplus
and minussigns.
In the case of the even-dimensional rotation group
R2v,
we have :where the summation is over all combinations of
signs involving
an even number of minussigns.
Theconju-
gate
spin
characterA,
is of the same formexcept
that the summation is over allpossible
combinations ofsigns involving
an odd number of minussigns.
If the
decomposition
of the character of the vectorrepresentation
FE’3of R2v
orR2v+1
under the restrictionRn R3
is defined then therelationships
among the vparametric angles
is fixed and may be used inequations (48)
and(49)
as the case may be.Compa-
rison with
equation (39)
leadsimmediately
to thedecomposition
rule for thespin
character.Thus if under
R9 R3
we have[1]
--*[4]
therelationships
between the fourparametric angle
arefixed
by equation (44)
which whenemployed
inequation (48),
and the resultcompared
with equa- tion(39),
leadsimmediately
to the result :which may be verified as
dimensionally
correct.If, however,
underR9 -¿. R3
we have[1]
-->[0]
+[1]
+
[2]
then we must use theparametric angle
relation-ships
ofequation (45) giving :
Likewise,
if underR6 -+ R3
we have[1]
-->[0]
+[2]
then use of
equation (46)
inequation (49) gives
theresult :
The
corresponding
result forA2
is identical to thatfor
Al. Comparison
ofequations (48)
and(49)
withequations (40)
and(41)
leadsimmediately
to the resultthat if under
R2l+1
-*R3
we have[1]
--*[1]
andA -*
Eg, ,[L]
while underR2l+2
-->-R3
we have[1] -+ [0]
+[1]
then alsoA, -->- EgL[L].
The
decomposition
of the basicspin representations
under
R2l+1
--->-R3
when[1]
-->-[l]
isgiven
for I == 2to 10 in table I and some
typical decompositions
forthe basic
spin representation
forR2.
-->-R3
in table II.10. Selection rules and the group
R2,.
- It is well-known that if the
bra A
andket B >
of a matrixelement A I H I B >
transformaccording
to theirreducible
representations rA
andr B
of a group G and theoperator
Haccording
to therepresentation rH
of G then the
vanishing
of the matrix element is assumed unless :In the case of the groups
R2v+1, R4v
andO2v,
the repre- sentations are allself-adjoint
and henceri
=rH.
However,
forR2v
whereX, =A
0 and vodd,
we have :Tables of the numbers
G’(rA rB rH),
i.e. the number of timesrH
occurs inrA
XrB,
for thegroup R6
havebeen
given
earlier[21].
Inusing
these tables fordetermining
selectionrules,
it is essential to note equa- tions(53)
and(54).
Thus the selection rules for the matrix elements of an operatortransforming
as[222]
of
R6
will be found in the table ofG(rA rB[22-2])
and not
c(rA rB[222]).
Similarly,
if we have on operator H(rHYH) that transforms as therH representation
of a group G andas the yH
representation
of asubgroup g
of G thenthe matrix element :
will
certainly vanish,
unless either[26] :
or :
11. Conclusion. - We have
attempted
to demons-trate in this paper the methods
by
which the Kroneckerproducts
of thespin
and truerepresentations
of theorthogonal
and rotation groups may be calculated inan
unambiguous
and self-consistent manner. Theproblem
ofresolving
the Kronecker square into itssymmetric
andantisymmetric
terms has been solvedusing
Littlewood’s methods ofplethysm. Finally,
the
decomposition
of thespin
characters ofRn
into663
TABLE I
DECOMPOSITION OF THE BASIC SPIN REPRESENTATION UNDER .
TABLE II
DECOMPOSITIONS OF BASIC SPIN REPRESENTATIONS UNDER
those of
R3
has been shown to bereadily
amenableto calculation.
The elaboration of the above methods has made it
possible
for one of us(P.H.B.)
tocomplete
a computer programme which notonly
handles the charactertheory
of the truerepresentations
of theunitary,
ortho-gonal
andsymplectic
groups but also thespin
charactertheory
of the rotation groups. This programme isbeing
usedextensively
in a number ofapplications
in atomic
physics
and the authors will bepleased
toconsider
specific requests
for extensions toexisting
tabulations of group character
properties.
Acknowledgement.
- We aregrateful
toMr
J.
G.Cleary
formaking
thecomputations
fortables I and II on the
University
ofCanterbury’s
IBM
360/44 computer.
REFERENCES
[1] JUDD (B. R.), Operator Techniques
in AtomicSpec- troscopy, 1963,
McGraw-Hill BookCompany,
Inc.,New York.
[2]
WYBOURNE(B. G.), Symmetry Principles
and Ato-mic
Spectroscopy,
1970,John Wiley
and Sons, Inc., New York.[3] JAHN (H. A.),
Proc. Roy. Soc.(London), 1950,
A 201,516.
[4]
ELLIOTT(J. P.),
Proc. Roy. Soc.(London),
1958, A 245, 128.[5] JUDD (B. R.),
SecondQuantization
in AtomicSpec- troscopy,
1967, TheJohns Hopkins
Press, Balti-more,
Maryland.
[6]
FLOWERS(B. H.)
and SZPIKOWSKI(S.),
Proc. Phys.Soc.
(London),
1964, 84, 193.[7]
FLOWERS(B. H.)
and SZPIKOWSKI(S.),
Proc. Phys.Soc.
(London),
1964, 84, 673.[8]
HELMERS(K.),
NuclearPhys.,
1965, 69, 593.[9]
HECHT(K. T.), Phys.
Rev., 1965, 139, 794.[10]
SZPIKOWSKI(S.),
ActaPhys.
Pol., 1966, 29, 853.[11]
GURSEY(F.),
Annals of Physics, 1961, 12, 91.[12]
NE’EMAN(Y.), Phys.
Letters, 1963, 4, 81.[13]
PEASLEE(D. C.), J.
Math.Phys.,
1963, 4, 910.[14]
COCHO(G.),
Phys. Rev., 1965, 137, B 1255.[15]
JOSEPH(D. W.), Phys.
Rev., 1965, 139, B 1406.[16] JOSEPH
(D.W.)
and SMALLEY(L. L.), Phys.
Rev., 1966, 150, 1209.[17]
NE’EMAN(Y.)
and OZSVATH(I.),
Phys. Rev., 1965, 138, B 1474.[18]
LITTLEWOOD (D.E.),
TheTheory
ofGroup
Charac- ters, 2nd ed., 1950, OxfordUniversity
Press, London.[19]
LITTLEWOOD(D. E.),
Proc. Lond. Math. Soc., 1947, 49(2),
307.[20]
LITTLEWOOD(D. E.),
Proc. Lond. Math. Soc., 1948, 50(2),
349.[21]
WYBOURNE(B. G.)
and BUTLER(P. H.), J. Physique,
1969, 30, 181.[22]
MURNAGHAN(F. D.),
TheTheory
ofGroup Repre-
sentations, 1938, TheJohns Hopkins
Press, Bal- timore,Maryland.
[23]
MURNAGHAN(F. D.),
TheUnitary
and RotationGroups,
1962,Spartan
Books,Washington,
D.C.[24]
NEWELL(M. J.),
Proc.Roy.
Irish Acad., 1951, A 54, 143.[25]
BUTLER(P. H.)
and WYBOURNE(B. G.), J.
Phy-sique,
1969, 30, 181.[26]
SMITH(P. R.)
and WYBOURNE(B. G.), J.
Math.Phys., 1967, 8, 2434.
[27]
SMITH(P. R.)
and WYBOURNE(B. G.), J.
Math.Phys., 1968, 9, 1040.