• Aucun résultat trouvé

DELICAS-Association mapping and model phenotyping in sugarcane

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "DELICAS-Association mapping and model phenotyping in sugarcane"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)!"#$%&'( !"#$%&'( %))*+,-.,*/'0-11,/2'-/3' 0*345'164/*.71,/2',/')82-9+-/4  

(2)  

(3)          ! " #  $ %

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incident temperature   40'52 radiation PLANT MODEL   52 ' 5 0' irrigation and rain 0/   INTERCEPTION INTERCEPTION   )' 0 / 5/  WATER BALANCE CONVERSION CONVERSION MODEL temperature / 2) 2 )' 0300   ' PARTITION PARTITION : 043 3  ' stalks roots leaves (fiber, sugar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eaf Area Index. intercepted radiation. biomasse. %))*+,-.,*/'0-11,/2',/')82-9+-/4 - '  4 '   '2 08  ' #0) 3 )8 /:  / 0   ; 4 '/ /053 )8   $  ) /5 208 ' )8    ? ' 0 05'   2' 22 2/05/0'5!3 4  3  )/0 2 04//  22  08  053  00 '/ 5 )2 )XQGLQJ )8     /. S. officinarum 2n = 80 (X = 10). S. spontaneum 2n = 40 - 128 S. barberi. K-9./49)6,1 71/0 /4 /  / 3 '' -  0 00 '5 *<0 ' )/4 =0/  -   ')2' '5 3 )2  2- 9 > ' - '   ' ,- . 

(5)  2n ~ 120. (X = 8). G64'4?.4/.'*I'" ',/')82-9+-/4' ,)'.64'+*/)4L84/+4'*I'.64' 94+4/.'<42,//,/2'*I'<9443,/2' *I'.6,)'+9*1F';/57'I4H' 24/49-.,*/)')41-9-.4'0*349/' +85.,>-9)'I9*0'-'5,0,.43'/80<49' *I'I*8/349')82-9+-/4'+5*/4)A' 5,0,.,/2'.64'/80<49'*I'04,*),)' -/3'+*/)4L84/.57'.64' *11*9.8/,.7'*I'+69*0*)*04' 94+*0<,/-.,*/F'.

(6)

Références

Documents relatifs

In our experiment, a significant proportion of the phenotypic variance not captured by the SNP cofactors could be explained by relatedness accounting for polygenic effects (15–58%

To determine whether a small organic sugarcane farming system is profitable or not, especially in terms of productivity, control of bioagressors (weeds, rats and pests) and

In that context, crop models are particularly useful tools to assess the agronomic and environmental performances of simple (monoculture) or complex (multi-species)

2 Position of genes and QTLs for root cone angle or related traitsIn black, genes from the literature listed in Additional file 1: Table S1 and candidate genes from Table 9; in

To map the crop type and harvest mode we used ground survey and factory data over 1280 fields, digitized field boundaries, and spectral indices (the Normalized Difference Vegetation

Marker-trait associations were detected using i/ general linear models (GLM) that took population structure into account with either a Q matrix from STRUCTURE software or principal

The variability of the panel and the absence of strong link between phenotype and genetic structure show the panel is adapted for association studies and future breeding program

The markers found to surround Bru1 within a 12 cM window were surveyed in 405 international sugarcane cultivars that were also phenotyped for rust resistance in Réunion Island