• Aucun résultat trouvé

A semiclassical approach in the linear response theory

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "A semiclassical approach in the linear response theory"

Copied!
7
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: in2p3-00012232

http://hal.in2p3.fr/in2p3-00012232

Submitted on 7 Apr 2003

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access

archive for the deposit and dissemination of

sci-entific research documents, whether they are

pub-lished or not. The documents may come from

teaching and research institutions in France or

abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est

destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents

scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,

émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de

recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires

publics ou privés.

A semiclassical approach in the linear response theory

M. Combescure, D. Robert

To cite this version:

(2)

A semiclassical Approach in the Linear Response Theory

M. Combescure andD. Robert

Abstract. We consider a quantum system of non-interacting fermions at temperature T,in the frameworkof linear response theory. We show that semiclassicaltheory is an appropriate framework to describe some of their thermodynamicproperties,inparticularthroughasymptoticexpansionsin~ (Planckconstant)ofthedynamicalsusceptibilities. Weshowhowtheorbits oftheclassicalmotioninphasespacemanifestthemselvesintheseexpansions, intheregimewhereTisoftheorderof~.

Considerasystemofnon-interactingfermionscon nedbyanexternal po-tentialandin contactwithanexteriorreservoirat temperatureT. Assumethat a time-varying externalperturbationdrivesthesystemoutto,but nearof, its equi-libriumstate. Theresponseofthisquantumsystemtoanexternaltime-dependent perturbation is asubjectof high physical interest, which canbe investigated ex-perimentally, in particular the so-called \dynamical susceptibility". A complete rigorousanalysis ofthis problemis stilllacking, although recent progressis being madeintheunderstandingofnon-equilibriumstatisticalmechanism,andofitslink withtheunderlyingchaoticdynamics[11,12, 18].

A semi-empiricalroute whichhas beenproposed (seeclassicaltextbooks [14, 15])consists,forsmallperturbation,ofinvestigatingtheresponsefunction\to rst order oftheperturbation",i.e. theso-called\linear response theory". This semi-empirical routehas beengiven a rmer foundation (see thebook byBratelli and Robinson[4])wherealinkwiththeKMSconditionisestablished. (Seealsorecent progressin [18]).

In this paper we rederive, formally, the rst order response function for the quantum fermionic system under study, i.e. the so-called\generalized Kubo for-mula"(seealso[2]andinvestigatesemiclassicalexpansionsofit,assumingsuitable \chaoticity assumptions" on the one-body underlying classical dynamics. These semiclassicalexpansionsaredevelopedinasimilarspiritaspreviousstudiesonthe \semiclassical magnetic response for non-interacting electrons" [1, 5, 7, 10, 13, 16,17]i.e. weexhibitalowtemperatureregimewheretheclosedclassicalorbitsof one-particlemotion manifest themselvesasoscillating correctionsto the response function.

Weshallpresentherethephysicalobjectsunderstudy,andgivesome assump-tionsunderwhich amathematicaltreatmentcanbeapplied.

Consider a system of non-interacting fermions living in IR n

, each fermion being

c

(3)

subjecttoaone-bodyHamiltonian b

H whichistheWeylquantizationofaclassical HamiltonianH(q;p) oftheform

(0.1) H(q;p)= p 2 2m +V(q) withV 2C 1 (IR n )suchthat (0.2) V(q)c 0 (1+q 2 ) s=2 s;c 0 >0: Undertheseassumptions,

b

H isself-adjointinL 2

(IR n

)anditsspectrumispure point,andcontainedin[0;1). Assumeoursystemisincontactwithareservoirat temperatureT,andchemicalpotential, andde ne theFermi-Diracfunction, as usual: (0.3) f(x)=  1+e (x )  1

where = 1=kT (k being the Boltzmann constant). Then the total nomber of fermionsin thesystemisrelatedtoT andby:

(0.4) N =f(

b H)

where thetraceistakenin theoperatorsense inH=L 2

(IR n

),andthetrace-one operator: (0.5) c eq =N 1 f( b H)

isthe"equilibriumstate"forthefermioncsystemunderconsideration.

Assume that this system, being in the far pastprepared in the state(0.5) is submittedadiabaticallytotheone-bodyperturbedHamiltonian

(0.6) b H(t)= b H+ b A F(t) where b Aisself-adjointinL 2 (IR n

)(beingtheWeylquantizationofasymbolA(q;p) thatweshallmakepreciselater),andF isanycontinuousfunctionthatequalsone onthepositiverealaxis,andisintegrableonthenegativerealaxis,forexample:

(0.7) F(t)=e t

t<0 F(t)=1 t0:

In the \linear response theory" we try to solve the following problem : nd a \density matrix" c

eq

(t) (i.e. atrace oneoperator in L 2

(IR n

)) which, to the rst orderin theperturbationsolves

(0.8) i~ @b @t = h b H(t);b i

with\initialcondition"att= 1being

(0.9) lim t! 1 c  eq (t)=c eq :

LetV (t;t )betheunitaryevolutionoperatorinducedby b

(4)

(0.10) i~ dV  (t;t 0 ) dt = b H(t)V  (t;t 0 ) withV  (t 0 ;t 0 )=1),andlet (0.11) U(t):=e it b H=~ :

Weknowusing[19]that V 

(t;t 0

)solutionof(0.10)exists underthefollowing: Assumption 1: A(q)is amultiplicativefunction dominated byC(1+q

2

)in ab-solutevalue.

Wecancheckthat :

(0.12) (t;b t 0 ;)=V(t;t 0 )b eq V(t 0 ;t) solves(0.12)with(tb 0 )=b eq . Moreover(t;b t 0 ;)hasalimitast 0

! 1,inthetrace-classoperatornormsense, whichiscalledb

eq (t;)

ThenusingDuhamel'sformula,wecanwrite:

(0.13) b eq (t;) b eq =  i~ Z t 1 dt 0 F(t 0 )[b eq ; b A t t 0 ]+o() b A t

beingbyde nition theHeisenbergobservableat timet (fortheevolution gov-ernedby b H) (0.14) b A t =U(t) b AU(t)  :

Equation (0.13) is the linear response formula in this framework. It implies thatif

b

B issomeself-adjointoperatorthatwewanttomeasureinthe\stationary" stateb

eq

(t),the rstorder contributioninas!0totheresult:

(0.15) J(t)=Tr n b B(b eq (t;) b eq ) o isoftheform: (0.16) J L (t)= Z t 1 dt 0 F(t 0 )(t t 0 ) where (t) = 1 i~ Tr  b B h b  eq ; b A t i  (0.17) = 1 i~ Tr  b  eq h b A; b B t i (0.18)

usingthecyclicityof thetrace.

(5)

(0.19)  A;B (!)= Z +1 1 (t)e i!t dt

Ouraimistostudythesemiclassicalbehaviourof A;B indistributionalsense asT !0. Setting: (0.20) = ~ and (0.21) f  (x)=(1+e x ) 1

andgivenanyrealg intheSchwartzclasswehaveformally:

(0.22) Z  A;B (!)g(!)d!= 1 i~ Z +1 1 Tr f  b H  ~ ! h b A ; c B t i ! e g(t)dt

In order to avoid the singularity in x = 0 of f f  (x), ( f f 

being the Fourier Transformoff  )wereplacef  by: (0.23) f ; =f   withe2C 1 0

(IR)andthereforestudyacorresponding"regularizedsusceptibility", orinotherwordsadistribution

A;B

(s;!)intwovariablessand!inD 0

(IR 2

)such that(0.22) isreplacedby:

Z Z  A;B (s;!)e(s)g(!)dsd!= (0.24) 1 2i~ Z Z Tr  e is( b H )=~ h b A; c B t i f f  (s)e(s) eg(t)dsdt Let  t

be the classical ow induced by Hamiltonian (0.1). Consider  

the energysurfaceconservedbythe ow:

(0.25)   =  (q;p)2IR 2n :H(q;p)= We call d 

the Liouville measure on  

, sothat thecorrelation of classical ob-servablesAandB on  isde nedby: (0.26) C A;B (t)= Z   A:B t d  where B t (z) = B[ t

(z)]. Moreover if is any periodic orbit on  

, and  the corresponding primitive orbit, with period T



, we introduce the correlation function (0.27) c  (t)= Z T  0 A s (q;p)B s+t (q;p)ds (q;p)2 

(6)

(0.28) c  (t)= k =+1 X k = 1 c ;k e 2ik t=T 

To each is associatedacorresponding"linearized Poincaremap" called P

, aclassicalactionalong called S

,and aMaslovindex

(see[6]). Letusassumethat

t on



satis esthe: Gutzwiller Assumption:

Assumption2Theperiodicorbits arenon-degenerate,i.ethePoincaremaps donothave1aseigenvalue(which impliesthat theyareisolated).

MoreoverB hasto obey:

Assumption3 j@ q @ p B(q;p)jC j j+j j2 j@ q VjC j j2 Ourresultisasfollows:

Theorem 0.1. Under Assumptions 1,2,3, we have, in distributional sense inD 0 (IR 2 ):  A;B (s;!) i~ n Æ 0 (s) ] C 0 A;B (!)+ X j1 ~ j n  j (s;!) + X :T 6=0 e i(S =~+ =2) ~sinh(T =)jdet(1 P )j 1=2 0 @ Æ T (s) X k c ;k Æ(! 2k T  )+ X j1 ~ j  j; (s;!) 1 A where  j and  j; are distributions in D 0 (IR 2

) such that Supp( j )  f0gIR , Supp( j; )fT gIR .

Proof: Thecomplete proofis givenin [8]. Theideaisto developthetraceas anintegralovercoherentstatesinH , andto obtaintheasymptoticexpansionsin ~bystationaryphasetheoremsasin[6].

References

[1] O.Agam,Themagneticresponseofchaoticmesoscopicsystems,J.Phys.I(France),4(1994), 697-730.

[2] M.Aizenman,G.M.Graf,Localization bounds foranelectrongas,J.Phys. A(Math. and Gen.),31(1998),6783-6806.

[3] A.Bouzouina,D.Robert,UniformsemiclassicalestimatesforthepropagationofHeisenberg observables,2001,Nantespreprint.

[4] O.BratelliandD.Robinson,OperatorAlgebrasandQuantumStatisticalMechanics,Springer Verlag,volII.

[5] J.D.Butler,Semiclassicalcountingfunctionwithapplicationtoquantumcurrent,2000,Orsay preprint.

[6] M.Combescure,J.Ralston,D.Robert,AproofoftheGutzwillersemiclassicaltraceformula usingcoherentstatesdecomposition,Commun.Math.Phys.,202(1999),463-480.

(7)

[9] Y.Egorov,Oncanonicaltransformationsofpseudodi erentialoperators,UspehiMat.Nauk, 25(1969),235-236.

[10] S.Fournais,Semiclassicsofthequantumcurrent,Commun.inPDE,23(1998),601-628. [11] G. Gallavotti, E.G.Cohen, Dynamical ensemblesin stationary states, J.Stat. Phys.,80

(1995),931-970.

[12] G.Gallavotti,D.Ruelle,SRBstatesandnonequilibriumstatisticalmechanicscloseto equi-librium,Commun.Math.Phys.,190(1997),279-285.

[13] P.Gaspard,S.Jain,Semiclassicaltheoryformany-bodyfermionicsystems,PramanaJournal ofPhysics,48(1997),503-516.

[14] R.Kubo,M.Toda,N. Hashitsume,Statistical PhysicsII,(Nonequilibrium Statistical Me-chanics),Springer-Verlag,Berlin,Heidelberg,NewYork,Tokyo(1978).

[15] L. D. Landau, E. M. Lifshitz, Statistical Physics, Course of Theoretical Physics, vol. 5, PergamonPress,Oxford,NewYork,Toronto,Sydney,Paris,Frankfurt(1980).

[16] B. Mehlig, K. Richter, Semiclassical linear response : far-infrared absorption in ballistic quantumsystems,Phys.Rev.Lett.,80(1998),1936-1939.

[17] K. Richter, D.Ullmo,R.Jalabert, Orbitalmagnetismin theballisticregime : geometrical e ects,Phys.Rep.,276(1996),1-83.

[18] D. Ruelle, General linear response formula in statistical mechanics and the uctuation-dissipationtheoremfarfromequilibrium,Phys.Lett.,A245(1998),220-224.

D.Ruelle,Smoothdynamicsandnewtheoreticalideasinnonequilibriumstatisticalmechanics, J.Stat.Phys.,95(1999),393-468.

D.Ruelle,Naturalnonequilibriumstatesinquantumstatisticalmechanics,J.Stat.Phys.,98 (2000),57-75.

[19] K.Yajima, Schrdingerevolution equations with magnetic elds,Journ.Anal. Mathem.,56 (1991),29-76

LPT B^

at. 210

Universit

eParis-SudF-91405ORSAYFRANCE

Current address: IPNLB^at. Paul Dirac,4 rueEnrico Fermi F-69622VILLEURBANNE FRANCE

E-mailaddress: [email protected] 3.fr D epartementde Math ematiques Universit edeNantes, 2rue dela Houssini ere F-44322NANTESFRANCE

Références

Documents relatifs

we exhibit a low temperature regime where the closed classical orbits of one-particle motion manifest themselves as os- cillating corrections to the response function.. Section

Equations (22), (23), and (27) are the fundamental equations of a unified classical field theory describing electric current, electromagnetic field, and mat- ter in terms of

With the help of the stress field due to an unit point force (Green’s function), one is able to express the displacement field of a line as a surface integral,

An alternative way to derive the MGE2 is to impose that, in the slowly varying density region of nonrelativistic large neutral atoms (i.e., with Z → ∞), the modified gradient

En effet à partir des contributions du chapitre 5 dénommé « la détermination du statut et du niveau de vulnérabilité d’un individu à travers les Réseaux Bayésiens dans

Our theorem can be viewed as the extension of the theorem of Yajima ( [Y1 ]) to the more natural position representation, a result apparently unobtainable by Yajima’s

The purpose of this paper is to relate classical Liouville theory to Liouville conformal field theory (also called quantum Liouville theory) through a semiclassical analysis..

Key words or phrases: Liouville equation, Gaussian multiplicative chaos, semiclassical limit, large deviation principle, Liouville field theory, singular Liouville equation..