• Aucun résultat trouvé

DOMAIN FORMATION IN FERROMAGNETIC FILMS INCLUDING MAGNETOELASTIC EFFECTS

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "DOMAIN FORMATION IN FERROMAGNETIC FILMS INCLUDING MAGNETOELASTIC EFFECTS"

Copied!
3
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: jpa-00229149

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00229149

Submitted on 1 Jan 1988

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access

archive for the deposit and dissemination of

sci-entific research documents, whether they are

pub-lished or not. The documents may come from

teaching and research institutions in France or

abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est

destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents

scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,

émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de

recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires

publics ou privés.

DOMAIN FORMATION IN FERROMAGNETIC

FILMS INCLUDING MAGNETOELASTIC EFFECTS

W. Wasilewski, M. Gajdek, G. Gehring

To cite this version:

(2)

JOURNAL D E PHYSIQUE

Colloque C8, Supplkment au no 12, Tome 49, dekembre 1988

DOMAIN FORMATION IN FERROMAGNETIC FILMS INCLUDING

MAGNETOELASTIC EFFECTS

W. Wasilewski ( I ) , M. Gajdek ( 2 ) and G. A. Gehring ( 3 ) ( I ) Department of Physics, Technical University, Radom, Poland ( 2 ) Department of Physics, Technical University, Kielce, Poland

( 3 ) Department of Theoretical Physics, Oxford University, Oxford OX1 3NP, G.B.

Abstract. - Static and dynamic properties of a thin ferroelastic film near the phase transition from the state of ho-

mogeneous magnetization and deformation to the state of domain and modulated structures are considered. The phase transition is caused by a change of external magnetic field. Formulae describing magnetic and magnetoelastic susceptibility tensors are derived and discussed.

The aim of this paper is to describe static and dynamic magnetoelastic properties of a thin ferromag- netic film near the phase transition from the state of homogeneous magnetization and homogeneous defor- mation to the state with domain and modulated struc- tures. Let us consider a thin film of thickness L made of uniaxial ferromagnet with the easy magnetization axis perpendicular to the surfaces of the film and par- allel t o the zaxis of the Cartesian coordinate system. Let us assume that the anisotropy energy of the mate- rial is less than the maximum value of the demagnetiz- ing energy. In such kind of films for the film thickness L

<

LC the ground state is the state of homogeneous magnetization in the film plane, i.e. in the hard mag- netic direction. The symbol LC denotes the critical thicknessof the film for which there is the phase tran- sition [I, 21 from the homogeneous magnetization state to the domain structure which is the ground state for L

>

LC. A film of thickness L

>

LC undergoes this transition at a critical value of an external magnetic field lying in the film plane H,' ( L )

.

The energy of the film is described [3] by the func- tional:

The symbol hd denotes the vector of reduced demagne- tizing field connected with the reduced magnetization vector m via Maxwell's equations:

Let us assume that the ground state is the state of homogeneous magnetization m: and homogeneous de- formation E ! ~ determined by:

The excitations pi ( r , t ) and EG (r, t ) are defined as fol- lows:

0 0

p ; ( r , t ) = m ; ( r I t ) - m i , & ; j ( r 1 t ) = e ; j ( r , t ) - e i j .

( 5 )

In the case of strong magnetic surface anisotropy and traction free surfaces the boundary conditions have the form:

where n; is the vector perpendicular to the film sur- faces. R o m an examination of the energy of magnetic and elastic excitations in the q representation, it fol- lows [4] that the postulated ground state is stable if

. .

+

( B I I m?

+

Blarn;) e,= where qo

= (go,, 0, 7rL-l) and

+

(Blarn?

+

~ l l m ; ) e y y

+

B 3 s d e Z z

+2B44 (mym.eyz

+

mzmrexz)

+

2Bssmzmyexy

1 9: = 22n

+ l C l ~ (e:.

+

e:,)

+

C ~ t e . . e ~ ,

where The symbol

P*

denotes the renormalized anisotropy constant. The function hc ( L ) defines the phase bound-

(3)

C8 - 1952 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE

For h = h, ( L ) and q = qo there is a phase transi- tion from the homogeneous magnetization state to the domain structure with an initial period XO = 2nqc. along the *axis.

The motion equations have forms [5]:

ami/at = Wo Eijk mjhif

-

Two EijkEkln mjmlh:f,

(10)

pa2ui/at2 = Oij,j

+

yij,j, (11) where wo = gMo and

(12) The damping tensor

vijal

has the same structure as the elastic stiffness tensor Cijkl. Solutions of the set of motion equations (10, 11) should fulfil the Maxwell's equations (3) and boundary conditions (6). It has been shown 141 for undamped dispersion relations, that there exists a quasi-acoustic soft mode corresponding t o the structurd phase transition if the quasi equilib- rium condition 6F/6&ij = 0 is fulfilled. In this case the magnetic susceptibility tensor

X;

(q, w ) has the form:

XE

=

-

[(I

+

r2) 6.. (q)

-

irwwO1] 6,' (q, w)

,

x z

=

-

[(I

+

r2) 6xx (q)

-

irww~'] 6': (q, w )

,

xzz

= [(I

+

r2) 6x2 (q)

+

i w w ~ ~ ] '6: (q, w)

,

x,",

= [(I

+

rZ) &Z (9)

-

~WWO'] '6: (q, w) (13) where

2

6,, (q) = aq

+

4 ~ 9 , 2 9 - ~

+

h, 6,. (q) = 4~q,q.q-~, 6,, (q) = aq2

+

-

P*

+

h. (14) The symbol 6. (q, w) is determined as follows:

6s (qr W) = w2wO2

+

irwwi' (6,,

+

SZz)

-

(1 f r2) M ~ ~ A O (q)

.

(15)

The function A0 (q) has been defined by the formula

(7). The magnetoelastic susceptibility tensor defined as

has the form:

Susceptibility tensors (13, 17) are singular

at

the phase transition point w = 0, h = h, ( L ) and q = q o . It means that simultaneously with the appearance of the domain structure there develops the modulated struc- ture of the displacement vector. From an examination of magnetoelastic excitations it follows that they are overdamped near the phase transition point. Excita- tions parametrized by the vector q = qo relax most slowly and become unstable a t the phase transition point h = h, (L)

.

It corresponds t o the nucleation of domain and modulated structures.

Acknowledgment

Work has been supported in part by the University of Lodz, Poland, under contract CPBP 01.08.

[I] Hubert, A., Theorie der Domanenwande in Geordnete Medien (Springer Verlag, Berlin) 1974. [2] Gajdek, M. and Wasilewski, W., J. Magn. Magn.

Mat. 37 (1983) 246; J. Phys.

C

18 (1985) 3557. [3] Brown, W. F., Micromagnetics (John Willey &

Sons, New York-London) 1963.

[4] Gehring, G. A., Waailewski, W. and Gajdek, M., J . Phys.

C

21 (1988) 3545.

Références

Documents relatifs

In this case, domain wall motions are responsible for the sensitivity of the dielectric prop- erties to the driving field and are very dissipative phenomena. In this paper, we

— Assuming a periodical dependence of the magnetization vector along the x, y axes in the film plane, and no restrictions with respect to its dependence on the z normal coordinate,

Our measurements of the static properties of the isotropic liquid crystal phase show a divergence of the magnetic birefringence (analogous to the diver- ging

We found that it was important to consider the magnetoelastic interactions up to 2nd order in the strains and also the 3rd order elastic energy, to explain

However, the existence of the I to IA magnetic structural transition at T close to TN/2 with an observed lack ofassociated distortional effects, internal or external,

In this paper, starting from the classical 3D micromagnetic energy (see W. Lifshitz [18]), we determine, via an asymptotic analysis, the free energy of two joined ferromagnetic

The virgin effect (a delay of the phase transition on first cooling) and associated variation of lattice parameters are analyzed on the assumption of elastic constraints imposed on

Thermal fluctuations are not large enough to allow the itinerant spin to overcome the energy barrier created by the opposite orientation of the clusters in this temperature region..