R ENDICONTI
del
S EMINARIO M ATEMATICO
della
U NIVERSITÀ DI P ADOVA
P ATRICK D UTTO
J EAN -L UC I MPAGLIAZZO
A NTONIN N OVOTNY
Schauder estimates for steady compressible Navier- Stokes equations in bounded domains
Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova, tome 98 (1997), p. 125-139
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=RSMUP_1997__98__125_0>
© Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova, 1997, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova » (http://rendiconti.math.unipd.it/) implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions).
Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit conte- nir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
for Steady Compressible Navier-Stokes Equations
in Bounded Domains.
PATRICK DUTTO - JEAN-LUC IMPAGLIAZZO - ANTONIN NOVOTNY
ABSTRACT -
Using
the method ofdecomposition
of the kinetic field to the com-pressible
andincompressible
parts, we prove existence of solutions and deri-ve estimates in Holder classes of continuous functions for
steady compressi-
ble Navier-Stokes
equations
in bounded domains. The result is valid for small external data, e.g. we consideronly
subsonic flows, near theequilibrium.
1. - Introduction.
In the
present
paper, weinvestigate
thesteady compressible
Navier-Stokes
equations
in bounded domains in Holder classes of func- tions. These results are useful for manyapplications, especially
for theinvestigation
oflarge
class of freeboundary
valueproblems (1).
As faras the authors
know, they
have beenmissing
in the matematical littera- ture(2).
The reason of all difficulties intreating compressible
Navier-(*) Indirizzo
degli
AA.:Department
of Mathematics, MS/ETMA,University
of Toulon and Var, BP 132, 83957 La Garde Cedex, France.
AMS Classification: 35
Q,
76N.(1) E.g.
for theincompressible
fluids, the results in Holder spaces made pos- sible to solve a series of freeboundary
valueproblems,
see [Sol], [So2], [So3], [Os].(2)
There exists a series of paperstreating
thecompressible
Navier-Stokesequations
in Sobolev spaces; see [PI], [Vl], [V2], [BV1], [NP2], ....Stokes
equations
in Holder spaces is not in the nature of the nonlinear terms(they
are estimated moreeasily
than in the Sobolevspaces),
butin the character of the
corresponding
linearizedsystems.
For
incompressible
Navier-Stokesfluids,
the linearizedproblem (which
is the Stokesproblem)
is ofelliptic type
and therefore well in-vestigated
in Holder classes of functions(see [ADN], [Gl]).
The
corresponding
linearizedsystem coming
fromcompressible
Navier-Stokes
equations
is ofelliptic hyperbolic type
and theadequate approach
in Holder spaces does not exist. For the sake ofsimplicity,
weconsider an isothermal motion of a
compressible perfect
gasfilling
abounded domain
(n
=2, 3)
withsufficiently
smoothboundary 3Q,
i.e. we consider thefollowing system
ofequations
Here ’V =
(V1,
..., the unknownvelocity
vectorand e
> 0 is the unknowndensity
whilef
is agiven density
of the external forces and Ill, 112 are theviscosity
coefficients whichsatisfy
the conditionsSince the gas is
perfect
and the motion isisothermal,
the stateequation
for the pressure reduces
to p
=kQ,
k > 0. Without loss ofgenerality,
weassume k =
1 (3).
Due to the condition( 1.1 )3,
there is no outflow and in-flow and therefore the conservation of mass
yields
where M is the total mass of the gas. For
simplicity,
and without loss ofgenerality,
we assume M =(1)
Thegeneralization
of ourappproach
to the heat conductive fluids with the constitutive law for the pressure of the form 17 =77(p,
0) and with theboundary
conditions
where V
is such that’V.v
= 0 ( v is the outer normal to theboundary
8Q) is standard; see[BV1],
[NoPe].2. - The method of
decomposition-Heuristic approach.
We search for the solutions of the
problem (1.1)
asperturbations (a, v )
of the rest state eo =1,
v,, =0,
i.e.The
equations
forv )
readwhere
We are thus
naturally
led toinvestigate
first the linearizedsystem
with
w ) given
andv )
the unknown functions.In virtue of the
approach
ofNovotny,
Padula[NP1],
theequations (2.3)
are solved in thefollowing
way: we arelooking
for a solution in the formThen the
system (2.3)
isequivalent
to thefollowing system
ofequations
Hence the
triplet ( Q,
cp,u )
can be found(formally)
as a fixedpoint
of alinear
operator
which is defined as follows:
i)
For agiven ~,
we solve the Stokesproblem
ii)
Once p isknown,
we find Q as solution of thetransport
equa- tion(2.6).
iii)
When or isknown, cp
is a solution of the Neumannproblem (2.7).
To solve the nonlinear
problem (2.1)-(2.2),
weproceed
as follows: weshow the existence of solutions of the nonlinear
problem (2.1)-(2.2) by
contraction
principle applied
to thecomposite
mapwhere
(c~, v)
is a solution of the linearsystem (2.3) corresponding
to~=
F(i, w).
3. - Functional spaces.
Let
~=0, 1, 2,
... ,1, 2,
... , 0 a 1.be a bounded domain with the
boundary aQ
of class with theouter normal v. We need the
following
functional spaces:0
Co (Q)
is a set of allinfinitely
differentiable functions with com-pact support
inQ.
0
Ck (Q)
is the Banach space of continuousfunctions,
k-times differ-entiable up to the
boundary equipped
with the norm0
(Q)
is the usual space of Holder continuous functions i.e. acompletion
ofC °° (Q)
in the normwhere
and
is a
subspace
of0 We also define in the standard way the space of Holder continu-
ous funtions on and denote them
by
0 L’(Q)
is the classicalLebesgue
space with theand
L2(Q)
itssubspace
of functions with the zero meanvalue,
i.e.0
Similarly, Wk, 2 (Q) (and Wo ~ 2 ( Q )),
k= 1, 2, ... ,
is the usual Sobolev spaceequipped
with norm11 ’ (index
zero denotes zerotraces)
andW, 2 (Q)
is itssubspace: W ~ 2 ( ~ ) = W k’ 2 ( ~ ) f 1
0 Dual space to is denoted
by W-1°2(Q)
andequipped
with the usual
duality
0 If the norms refer to the domain
~2,
we omit S2 as the further in- dice at the norm:0 In order to
simplify
thenotation,
we use in thesequel,
the follow-ing composed
Banach spaces:These are Banach spaces
equipped
with the norms:Spaces G, 0,
U and V are used for thedescription
of thedensity
field(space G),
thecompressible part
of thevelocity
field(space
the in-compressible part
of thevelocity
field(space !7)
and thevelocity
fields(space V).
0 In the
notation,
we do notdistinguish
between the spaces of scalar and vector valued functions: e.g. denotes eitherR)
or the difference isalways
clear from the context.0 Some remarks on the notation in estimates. In what
follows,
c is ageneric positive
constantdependent only of k,
a, ,u 1 and ~2! it canhave different values even in the same formulas.
4. - Main theorems.
In this
chapter,
wegive
the statements of the main theorems. First theorem deals with the linearizedsystem (2.3)
while the second theo-rem with the
fully
nonlinearsystem (2.1)-(2.2).
THEOREM 4.1. S2 be a bounded
domacin,
and let
Then there exists y 1 such that
if
then there exists
just
one solutionof problem (2.5)-(2.7),
whichsatisfies
the estimateCONSEQUENCE
4.1. Let(or,
cp,u)
be atriplet
from Theorem 4.1.Put v = u + Then the
couple
solves the
system (2.3)
and satisfies the estimate:THEOREM 4.2. Let
k = 1, ... , 0 a 1, ,~ be a
boundeddomain,
, and let
Then there exists y o , y 1 > 0 such that
if
then in the ball
there exists
just
onecouple (Q, v)
which solves theproblem (2.1)-(2.2).
This
couple scctisfies
the estimate:5. -
Auxiliary
linearproblems.
In the first
part
of thissection,
we recall several estimates for the Dirichlet and the Neumannproblems
for theLaplace operator
and forthe Stokes
problem
in Holder spaces, when S~ is bounded. These resultsare
standard,
see[ADN]. They
will be used in theproofs
of Theorem 4.1and 4.2. More detailed
investigation
of the Stokesproblem
can be founde.g. in
[Gl].
Last but notleast,
wegive
the Schauder estimates for thetransport equation
which are due toNovotny [No2].
In the secondpart,
we recall the results for the same
problems
in Sobolev spaces withL 2
structure. This
part
isonly
used to prove that the nonlinearoperator
Nis a contraction. We would be able to avoid
it,
if we would suppose moreregularity
at the r.h.s. in the Theorem4.2, namely f E C2, a (Q)
instead ofC1, a(Q).
Consider the Dirichlet
problem
forLaplacian:
LEMMA 5.1. Let k =
0, 1,
..., 0 a1,
~2 ac bounded domain in Then there existsjust
one solutionof
theproblems (5.1),
whichsatisfies
the estimateFor the Neumann
problem:
we have:
LEMMA 5.2. Let , S2 a bounded domains in
. Then there exists
just
one solutionof
theproblem (5.4),
whichsatisfies the
estimatesFurther consider the
nonhomogenous
Stokesproblem:
We have:
LEMMA 5.3. Let k =
0, 1,
..., 0 a a bounded domain inW,
, i suchthat
Then there exists
just
one solutionof
theproblem (5.7)
whichsatisfies
the estimateLast
equation
to beinvestigated
is thetransport equation
with the characteristics
remaining
inQ,
i.e. with the conditionWe have:
L E MMA 5.4. a bounded domain in
Then there exists y > 0
depending only
onk,
a, 3S such thatif
then there exists
just
one solutionof
theproblem (5.10),
whichsatisfzes
the estimatesFor the estimates and the
regularity
inL 2
spaces, for the Neumannproblem,
we refer to[SiSol],
for the Stokesproblem,
we refer to[Ca]
and for the
transport equation
to[BV2], [BV3], [Nol].
As far as the Neumannproblem (5.4)
isconcerned,
we have:LEMMA 5.5. Let bounded domain in
8Q E C2
acndf E
E L2 ( S~ ).
Then thereexists just
one(strong)
solutionof problem (5.4),
whichsatisfxes
the estimateFor the Stokes
problem (5.7) with 1/1
=0,
weget:
LEMMA 5.6. Let S a bounded domain in
f E
E
W -1 ~ 2 ( S~ ),
g E£2 (D) and 1/1
= 0. Then there existsjust
one(strong)
solutions
of
theproblem (5.7),
whichsatisfies
the estimateFinally,
for thetransport equation
we have:LEMMA 5.7. Let
assumptions of
Lemma 5.4 besatisfied
and leto~ E
Ck, a
be a solutionof
theproblem (5.10)
in S~. Then6. - Proof of Theorem 4.1.
Let w E V and ff E
Ck, a (Q).
It is clear from Lemmas5.1-5.5,
that for agiven ~
E0,
thefamilly
ofproblems (2.9), (2.6)-(2.7)
posseses a solution( p,
or, cp,u ), p E G, (o,
99,u )
E GOUprovided llwllv
issufficiently
small.Therefore,
theoperator
L(see (2.8)) is,
for w EV,
y 1, defined on0 and
maps 0
onto itself. We show that L is a contraction on 0. If it is so, then L posseses aunique
fixedpoint ~
= cp E 0.Obviously, 99
and thecorresponding
p, a, ~c solve the linearisedsystem (2.5)-(2.7).
This isequivalent
to say that Q, v = u +Vgg
solve theproblem (2.3).
Proof of the contraction:
We start with a
priori
estimates. Lemma 5.3applied
to the Stokesproblem (2.9) yields
existence of U EC k + 2, a,
p Esatisfying
Taking
div of(2.9),
weget (6.2)
which
yields
the estimateLemma 5.4
applied
to theequation (2.6) yields
existence of or ECk + 1, a
and the estimate
provided
1(~,u «sufficiently small»). Taking
theLaplacian
of(2.6),
we haveUsing
the estimate we see that the last two terms on the r.h.s. of(6.5) satisfy
the estimateApplying
Lemma 5.4 to theequation (6.5),
wehave,
in virtue of(6.3), (6.6)
which
gives
in turn with(6.6)
Lemma 5.2
applied
to theequation (2.7) yields
Further, considering
the obviousproblem
we deduce
by
Lemma 5.1 the estimateTherefore, by (6.8), (6.9)
and(6.7),
and
finally by (6.4)
Since L is a linear
operator, (6.11) yields
the contraction of L forThe existence of the fixed
point ~
= cp r= 0 is thusproved.
Afterthis,
the
proof
of the estimate(4.3)
is easy; weonly
add theinequalities (6.1), (6.4)
and(6.11)
written in the fixedpoint
99.7. - Proof of Theorem 4.2.
Denote
by
X =L 2 ( S~ )
xW 1, 2 (,~ )
the B anach space with the norm11(a, v)llx = Mo,2
+ Then GV c X andBY0 (see (4.6))
is a closedsubset of X. We prove that:
i)
for and yosufficiently small,
theoperator
N(see (2.10))
maps
BY0
into itself.ii)
N is a contraction inBY0
in thetopology of X, provided
and y o are
sufficiently
small. If it is so, thenaccording
to the Banachfixed
point principle,
N possesses aunique
fixedpoint (a, v)
EBYO
which
obviously
solves thefully
nonlinearsystem (2.1)-(2.2).
Proof of
i):
Take(r, w)
E GV andWe
start with the ob- vious estimatesApplying
Theorem 4.1 to thesystem (2.5)-(2.7)
with F =F(T, w),
weget
the estimate
(cf. (4.3)-(4.4)):
This means that N maps
Byo
into itselfprovided
Proof
of ii):
Let( i
=1, 2 )
and letVi)
be a solutionof
(2.5)-(2.7) with 5i
= Put 5 = 0~1 - c~ where a stands forWe
compute
Writting
thesystem (2.3)
with 5=F(T, w )
for thedifferences,
weget
Multiply (7. 4 )1 by V
and(7. 4)2 by 0, integrate
over S2 and addtogeth-
er. We
obtain,
after some calculation:Here we have used several
facts,
e.g.E stimates
(7.3)
and(7.5) give
Further consider for
(6,;~)
the Stokesproblem
Applying
to(7.7)
Lemma5.6,
onegets
This
yields
in turn with(7.3)
and(7.6)
This means that the
operator
N:BY0
2013> is a contraction in thetopolo-
gy of X
provided
The fixed
point (Q, v) (which
exists due to the Banach contractionprin- ciple)
solves the nonlinearproblem (2.1)-(2.2).
Estimate(4.7)
follows di-rectly
from(7.2)
with(r, w) = (a, v).
Theproof
of Theorem 4.2 is thuscomplete.
REFERENCES
[ADN] AGMON S. - DOUGLIS A. - NIRENBERG L., Estimates near the
boundary of
solutionsof elliptic partial differential equations satisfying general boundary
conditions II, Comm. PureAppl.
Math., 17 (1964), pp.35-92.
[BV1] BEIRAO DA VEIGA H., An Lp
theory for
the n dimensional,stationary compressible
Navier-Stokesequations
and theincompressible limit for compressible fluids.
Theequilibrium
solutions, Comm. Math.Phys.,
109 (1987), pp. 229-248.
[BV2] BEIRAO DA VEIGA H., Existence results in Sobolev spaces
for
a station-ary transport
equation,
Ricerche di Matematica, Volume in honour ofprof.
C. Miranda (1987).[BV3] BEIRAO DA VEIGA H.,
Boundary
valueproblem for
a classof first
order
partial differential equation
in Sobolev spaces andapplication
to the Euler
flow,
Rend. Sem. Mat. Univ. Padova, 79 (1987), pp.247-273.
[C] CATTABRIGA L., Su un
problema
al contorno relativo al sistema diequazioni
diStokes,
Rend. Sem. Mat. Univ.Padova,
31 (1961), pp.308-340.
[G1] GALDI G. P., An introduction to the mathematical
theory of the
Navier-Stokes
equations.
Vol I: Linearizedstationary problems, Springer
Tracts in Natural
Philosophy,
38 (1994).[No1] NOVOTNY A., About the
steady
transportequation
I, Lpapproach
indomains with smooth
boundaries,
Comm. Mat. Univ.Carolinae,
37, 1 (1996) , pp. 43-89.[No2] NOVOTNY A., About the
steady
transportequation
II, Schauder esti-mates in domains with smooth boundaries (1993), to appear.
[NP1] NOVOTNY A. - PADULA M., Lp
approach
tosteady flows of
viscous com-pressible fluids
in exterior domains, Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal., 126 (1994), pp. 243-297.[NP2] NOVOTNY A. - PADULA M., Existence and
uniqueness of stationary
sol-utions
for
viscouscompressible
heatconductive fluid
withlarge
poten- tial and smallnonpotential external forces,
Sib. Math. J., 34 (1993), pp.120-146.
[NoPe] NOVOTNY A. - PENEL P., Lp
approach
tosteady flows of
viscous heat conductivefluids
on exterior domains, I, II, M3 AS (1994) (in thepress).
[Os] OSMOLOVSKII V., The
free surface of
adrop
in asymmetric force field, Zapiski
Nauchn. Sem. LOMI, 52 (1975), pp. 160-174 (in Russian).[P1] PADULA M., Existence and
uniqueness for
viscoussteady compressible
motions, Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal., 77 (1987), pp. 89-102.[SiSo1] SIMADER CH. - SOHR H., The weak dirichlet
problem for
0394 in Lq inbounded and exterior domains, Stab. Anal. Cont. Media, 2 (1992), pp.
183-202.
[So1] SOLONNIKOV V. A., On a
free boundary problem for
the systemof
Navier-Stokes
equations, Trudy
Sem. S. L. Sobolev, 2 (1978), pp. 127- 140 (in Russian).[So2] SOLONNIKOV V. A., On the Stokes
equation
in domains with nonsmooth boundaries and on a viscous
incompressible flow
with afree surface,
Nonlin. Part. Diff.Eq.,
3,Collège
de France Seminar (1980- 1981), pp. 340-423.[So3] SOLONNIKOV V. A.,
Some free boundary problems for
the Navier- Stokesequations
withmoving
contactpoints
and lines (1995),Preprint.
[V1] VALLI A., On the existence
of stationary
solutions tocompressible
Navier-Stokes
equations,
Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré, 4 (1987), pp. 99- 113.[V2] VALLI A., Periodic and
stationary
solutionsfor compressible
Navier-Stokes
equations
via astability
method, Ann. Sc. Norm.Sup.
Pisa, 4 (1983), pp. 607-647.Manoscritto pervenuto in redazione 1’8 febbraio 1996.