• Aucun résultat trouvé

Schauder estimates for steady compressible Navier-Stokes equations in bounded domains

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Schauder estimates for steady compressible Navier-Stokes equations in bounded domains"

Copied!
16
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

R ENDICONTI

del

S EMINARIO M ATEMATICO

della

U NIVERSITÀ DI P ADOVA

P ATRICK D UTTO

J EAN -L UC I MPAGLIAZZO

A NTONIN N OVOTNY

Schauder estimates for steady compressible Navier- Stokes equations in bounded domains

Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova, tome 98 (1997), p. 125-139

<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=RSMUP_1997__98__125_0>

© Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova, 1997, tous droits réservés.

L’accès aux archives de la revue « Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova » (http://rendiconti.math.unipd.it/) implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions).

Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit conte- nir la présente mention de copyright.

Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques

http://www.numdam.org/

(2)

for Steady Compressible Navier-Stokes Equations

in Bounded Domains.

PATRICK DUTTO - JEAN-LUC IMPAGLIAZZO - ANTONIN NOVOTNY

ABSTRACT -

Using

the method of

decomposition

of the kinetic field to the com-

pressible

and

incompressible

parts, we prove existence of solutions and deri-

ve estimates in Holder classes of continuous functions for

steady compressi-

ble Navier-Stokes

equations

in bounded domains. The result is valid for small external data, e.g. we consider

only

subsonic flows, near the

equilibrium.

1. - Introduction.

In the

present

paper, we

investigate

the

steady compressible

Navier-Stokes

equations

in bounded domains in Holder classes of func- tions. These results are useful for many

applications, especially

for the

investigation

of

large

class of free

boundary

value

problems (1).

As far

as the authors

know, they

have been

missing

in the matematical littera- ture

(2).

The reason of all difficulties in

treating compressible

Navier-

(*) Indirizzo

degli

AA.:

Department

of Mathematics, MS/ETMA,

University

of Toulon and Var, BP 132, 83957 La Garde Cedex, France.

AMS Classification: 35

Q,

76N.

(1) E.g.

for the

incompressible

fluids, the results in Holder spaces made pos- sible to solve a series of free

boundary

value

problems,

see [Sol], [So2], [So3], [Os].

(2)

There exists a series of papers

treating

the

compressible

Navier-Stokes

equations

in Sobolev spaces; see [PI], [Vl], [V2], [BV1], [NP2], ....

(3)

Stokes

equations

in Holder spaces is not in the nature of the nonlinear terms

(they

are estimated more

easily

than in the Sobolev

spaces),

but

in the character of the

corresponding

linearized

systems.

For

incompressible

Navier-Stokes

fluids,

the linearized

problem (which

is the Stokes

problem)

is of

elliptic type

and therefore well in-

vestigated

in Holder classes of functions

(see [ADN], [Gl]).

The

corresponding

linearized

system coming

from

compressible

Navier-Stokes

equations

is of

elliptic hyperbolic type

and the

adequate approach

in Holder spaces does not exist. For the sake of

simplicity,

we

consider an isothermal motion of a

compressible perfect

gas

filling

a

bounded domain

(n

=

2, 3)

with

sufficiently

smooth

boundary 3Q,

i.e. we consider the

following system

of

equations

Here ’V =

(V1,

..., the unknown

velocity

vector

and e

&#x3E; 0 is the unknown

density

while

f

is a

given density

of the external forces and Ill, 112 are the

viscosity

coefficients which

satisfy

the conditions

Since the gas is

perfect

and the motion is

isothermal,

the state

equation

for the pressure reduces

to p

=

kQ,

k &#x3E; 0. Without loss of

generality,

we

assume k =

1 (3).

Due to the condition

( 1.1 )3,

there is no outflow and in-

flow and therefore the conservation of mass

yields

where M is the total mass of the gas. For

simplicity,

and without loss of

generality,

we assume M =

(1)

The

generalization

of our

appproach

to the heat conductive fluids with the constitutive law for the pressure of the form 17 =

77(p,

0) and with the

boundary

conditions

where V

is such that

’V.v

= 0 ( v is the outer normal to the

boundary

8Q) is standard; see

[BV1],

[NoPe].

(4)

2. - The method of

decomposition-Heuristic approach.

We search for the solutions of the

problem (1.1)

as

perturbations (a, v )

of the rest state eo =

1,

v,, =

0,

i.e.

The

equations

for

v )

read

where

We are thus

naturally

led to

investigate

first the linearized

system

with

w ) given

and

v )

the unknown functions.

In virtue of the

approach

of

Novotny,

Padula

[NP1],

the

equations (2.3)

are solved in the

following

way: we are

looking

for a solution in the form

Then the

system (2.3)

is

equivalent

to the

following system

of

equations

Hence the

triplet ( Q,

cp,

u )

can be found

(formally)

as a fixed

point

of a

(5)

linear

operator

which is defined as follows:

i)

For a

given ~,

we solve the Stokes

problem

ii)

Once p is

known,

we find Q as solution of the

transport

equa- tion

(2.6).

iii)

When or is

known, cp

is a solution of the Neumann

problem (2.7).

To solve the nonlinear

problem (2.1)-(2.2),

we

proceed

as follows: we

show the existence of solutions of the nonlinear

problem (2.1)-(2.2) by

contraction

principle applied

to the

composite

map

where

(c~, v)

is a solution of the linear

system (2.3) corresponding

to

~=

F(i, w).

3. - Functional spaces.

Let

~=0, 1, 2,

... ,

1, 2,

... , 0 a 1.

be a bounded domain with the

boundary aQ

of class with the

outer normal v. We need the

following

functional spaces:

0

Co (Q)

is a set of all

infinitely

differentiable functions with com-

pact support

in

Q.

0

Ck (Q)

is the Banach space of continuous

functions,

k-times differ-

entiable up to the

boundary equipped

with the norm

0

(Q)

is the usual space of Holder continuous functions i.e. a

completion

of

C °° (Q)

in the norm

(6)

where

and

is a

subspace

of

0 We also define in the standard way the space of Holder continu-

ous funtions on and denote them

by

0 L’(Q)

is the classical

Lebesgue

space with the

and

L2(Q)

its

subspace

of functions with the zero mean

value,

i.e.

0

Similarly, Wk, 2 (Q) (and Wo ~ 2 ( Q )),

k

= 1, 2, ... ,

is the usual Sobolev space

equipped

with norm

11 ’ (index

zero denotes zero

traces)

and

W, 2 (Q)

is its

subspace: W ~ 2 ( ~ ) = W k’ 2 ( ~ ) f 1

0 Dual space to is denoted

by W-1°2(Q)

and

equipped

with the usual

duality

0 If the norms refer to the domain

~2,

we omit S2 as the further in- dice at the norm:

0 In order to

simplify

the

notation,

we use in the

sequel,

the follow-

ing composed

Banach spaces:

(7)

These are Banach spaces

equipped

with the norms:

Spaces G, 0,

U and V are used for the

description

of the

density

field

(space G),

the

compressible part

of the

velocity

field

(space

the in-

compressible part

of the

velocity

field

(space !7)

and the

velocity

fields

(space V).

0 In the

notation,

we do not

distinguish

between the spaces of scalar and vector valued functions: e.g. denotes either

R)

or the difference is

always

clear from the context.

0 Some remarks on the notation in estimates. In what

follows,

c is a

generic positive

constant

dependent only of k,

a, ,u 1 and ~2! it can

have different values even in the same formulas.

4. - Main theorems.

In this

chapter,

we

give

the statements of the main theorems. First theorem deals with the linearized

system (2.3)

while the second theo-

rem with the

fully

nonlinear

system (2.1)-(2.2).

THEOREM 4.1. S2 be a bounded

domacin,

and let

(8)

Then there exists y 1 such that

if

then there exists

just

one solution

of problem (2.5)-(2.7),

which

satisfies

the estimate

CONSEQUENCE

4.1. Let

(or,

cp,

u)

be a

triplet

from Theorem 4.1.

Put v = u + Then the

couple

solves the

system (2.3)

and satisfies the estimate:

THEOREM 4.2. Let

k = 1, ... , 0 a 1, ,~ be a

bounded

domain,

, and let

Then there exists y o , y 1 &#x3E; 0 such that

if

then in the ball

there exists

just

one

couple (Q, v)

which solves the

problem (2.1)-(2.2).

This

couple scctisfies

the estimate:

5. -

Auxiliary

linear

problems.

In the first

part

of this

section,

we recall several estimates for the Dirichlet and the Neumann

problems

for the

Laplace operator

and for

the Stokes

problem

in Holder spaces, when S~ is bounded. These results

are

standard,

see

[ADN]. They

will be used in the

proofs

of Theorem 4.1

and 4.2. More detailed

investigation

of the Stokes

problem

can be found

e.g. in

[Gl].

Last but not

least,

we

give

the Schauder estimates for the

(9)

transport equation

which are due to

Novotny [No2].

In the second

part,

we recall the results for the same

problems

in Sobolev spaces with

L 2

structure. This

part

is

only

used to prove that the nonlinear

operator

N

is a contraction. We would be able to avoid

it,

if we would suppose more

regularity

at the r.h.s. in the Theorem

4.2, namely f E C2, a (Q)

instead of

C1, a(Q).

Consider the Dirichlet

problem

for

Laplacian:

LEMMA 5.1. Let k =

0, 1,

..., 0 a

1,

~2 ac bounded domain in Then there exists

just

one solution

of

the

problems (5.1),

which

satisfies

the estimate

For the Neumann

problem:

we have:

LEMMA 5.2. Let , S2 a bounded domains in

. Then there exists

just

one solution

of

the

problem (5.4),

which

satisfies the

estimates

Further consider the

nonhomogenous

Stokes

problem:

We have:

(10)

LEMMA 5.3. Let k =

0, 1,

..., 0 a a bounded domain in

W,

, i such

that

Then there exists

just

one solution

of

the

problem (5.7)

which

satisfies

the estimate

Last

equation

to be

investigated

is the

transport equation

with the characteristics

remaining

in

Q,

i.e. with the condition

We have:

L E MMA 5.4. a bounded domain in

Then there exists y &#x3E; 0

depending only

on

k,

a, 3S such that

if

then there exists

just

one solution

of

the

problem (5.10),

which

satisfzes

the estimates

For the estimates and the

regularity

in

L 2

spaces, for the Neumann

problem,

we refer to

[SiSol],

for the Stokes

problem,

we refer to

[Ca]

and for the

transport equation

to

[BV2], [BV3], [Nol].

As far as the Neumann

problem (5.4)

is

concerned,

we have:

LEMMA 5.5. Let bounded domain in

8Q E C2

acnd

f E

(11)

E L2 ( S~ ).

Then there

exists just

one

(strong)

solution

of problem (5.4),

which

satisfxes

the estimate

For the Stokes

problem (5.7) with 1/1

=

0,

we

get:

LEMMA 5.6. Let S a bounded domain in

f E

E

W -1 ~ 2 ( S~ ),

g E

£2 (D) and 1/1

= 0. Then there exists

just

one

(strong)

solutions

of

the

problem (5.7),

which

satisfies

the estimate

Finally,

for the

transport equation

we have:

LEMMA 5.7. Let

assumptions of

Lemma 5.4 be

satisfied

and let

o~ E

Ck, a

be a solution

of

the

problem (5.10)

in S~. Then

6. - Proof of Theorem 4.1.

Let w E V and ff E

Ck, a (Q).

It is clear from Lemmas

5.1-5.5,

that for a

given ~

E

0,

the

familly

of

problems (2.9), (2.6)-(2.7)

posseses a solution

( p,

or, cp,

u ), p E G, (o,

99,

u )

E GOU

provided llwllv

is

sufficiently

small.

Therefore,

the

operator

L

(see (2.8)) is,

for w E

V,

y 1, defined on

0 and

maps 0

onto itself. We show that L is a contraction on 0. If it is so, then L posseses a

unique

fixed

point ~

= cp E 0.

Obviously, 99

and the

corresponding

p, a, ~c solve the linearised

system (2.5)-(2.7).

This is

equivalent

to say that Q, v = u +

Vgg

solve the

problem (2.3).

Proof of the contraction:

We start with a

priori

estimates. Lemma 5.3

applied

to the Stokes

problem (2.9) yields

existence of U E

C k + 2, a,

p E

satisfying

(12)

Taking

div of

(2.9),

we

get (6.2)

which

yields

the estimate

Lemma 5.4

applied

to the

equation (2.6) yields

existence of or E

Ck + 1, a

and the estimate

provided

1

(~,u «sufficiently small»). Taking

the

Laplacian

of

(2.6),

we have

Using

the estimate we see that the last two terms on the r.h.s. of

(6.5) satisfy

the estimate

Applying

Lemma 5.4 to the

equation (6.5),

we

have,

in virtue of

(6.3), (6.6)

which

gives

in turn with

(6.6)

Lemma 5.2

applied

to the

equation (2.7) yields

Further, considering

the obvious

problem

we deduce

by

Lemma 5.1 the estimate

(13)

Therefore, by (6.8), (6.9)

and

(6.7),

and

finally by (6.4)

Since L is a linear

operator, (6.11) yields

the contraction of L for

The existence of the fixed

point ~

= cp r= 0 is thus

proved.

After

this,

the

proof

of the estimate

(4.3)

is easy; we

only

add the

inequalities (6.1), (6.4)

and

(6.11)

written in the fixed

point

99.

7. - Proof of Theorem 4.2.

Denote

by

X =

L 2 ( S~ )

x

W 1, 2 (,~ )

the B anach space with the norm

11(a, v)llx = Mo,2

+ Then GV c X and

BY0 (see (4.6))

is a closed

subset of X. We prove that:

i)

for and yo

sufficiently small,

the

operator

N

(see (2.10))

maps

BY0

into itself.

ii)

N is a contraction in

BY0

in the

topology of X, provided

and y o are

sufficiently

small. If it is so, then

according

to the Banach

fixed

point principle,

N possesses a

unique

fixed

point (a, v)

E

BYO

which

obviously

solves the

fully

nonlinear

system (2.1)-(2.2).

Proof of

i):

Take

(r, w)

E GV and

We

start with the ob- vious estimates

Applying

Theorem 4.1 to the

system (2.5)-(2.7)

with F =

F(T, w),

we

get

the estimate

(cf. (4.3)-(4.4)):

This means that N maps

Byo

into itself

provided

Proof

of ii):

Let

( i

=

1, 2 )

and let

Vi)

be a solution

of

(2.5)-(2.7) with 5i

= Put 5 = 0~1 - c~ where a stands for

(14)

We

compute

Writting

the

system (2.3)

with 5=

F(T, w )

for the

differences,

we

get

Multiply (7. 4 )1 by V

and

(7. 4)2 by 0, integrate

over S2 and add

togeth-

er. We

obtain,

after some calculation:

Here we have used several

facts,

e.g.

E stimates

(7.3)

and

(7.5) give

Further consider for

(6,;~)

the Stokes

problem

(15)

Applying

to

(7.7)

Lemma

5.6,

one

gets

This

yields

in turn with

(7.3)

and

(7.6)

This means that the

operator

N:

BY0

2013&#x3E; is a contraction in the

topolo-

gy of X

provided

The fixed

point (Q, v) (which

exists due to the Banach contraction

prin- ciple)

solves the nonlinear

problem (2.1)-(2.2).

Estimate

(4.7)

follows di-

rectly

from

(7.2)

with

(r, w) = (a, v).

The

proof

of Theorem 4.2 is thus

complete.

REFERENCES

[ADN] AGMON S. - DOUGLIS A. - NIRENBERG L., Estimates near the

boundary of

solutions

of elliptic partial differential equations satisfying general boundary

conditions II, Comm. Pure

Appl.

Math., 17 (1964), pp.

35-92.

[BV1] BEIRAO DA VEIGA H., An Lp

theory for

the n dimensional,

stationary compressible

Navier-Stokes

equations

and the

incompressible limit for compressible fluids.

The

equilibrium

solutions, Comm. Math.

Phys.,

109 (1987), pp. 229-248.

[BV2] BEIRAO DA VEIGA H., Existence results in Sobolev spaces

for

a station-

ary transport

equation,

Ricerche di Matematica, Volume in honour of

prof.

C. Miranda (1987).

[BV3] BEIRAO DA VEIGA H.,

Boundary

value

problem for

a class

of first

order

partial differential equation

in Sobolev spaces and

application

to the Euler

flow,

Rend. Sem. Mat. Univ. Padova, 79 (1987), pp.

247-273.

[C] CATTABRIGA L., Su un

problema

al contorno relativo al sistema di

equazioni

di

Stokes,

Rend. Sem. Mat. Univ.

Padova,

31 (1961), pp.

308-340.

[G1] GALDI G. P., An introduction to the mathematical

theory of the

Navier-

Stokes

equations.

Vol I: Linearized

stationary problems, Springer

Tracts in Natural

Philosophy,

38 (1994).

[No1] NOVOTNY A., About the

steady

transport

equation

I, Lp

approach

in

domains with smooth

boundaries,

Comm. Mat. Univ.

Carolinae,

37, 1 (1996) , pp. 43-89.

(16)

[No2] NOVOTNY A., About the

steady

transport

equation

II, Schauder esti-

mates in domains with smooth boundaries (1993), to appear.

[NP1] NOVOTNY A. - PADULA M., Lp

approach

to

steady flows of

viscous com-

pressible fluids

in exterior domains, Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal., 126 (1994), pp. 243-297.

[NP2] NOVOTNY A. - PADULA M., Existence and

uniqueness of stationary

sol-

utions

for

viscous

compressible

heat

conductive fluid

with

large

poten- tial and small

nonpotential external forces,

Sib. Math. J., 34 (1993), pp.

120-146.

[NoPe] NOVOTNY A. - PENEL P., Lp

approach

to

steady flows of

viscous heat conductive

fluids

on exterior domains, I, II, M3 AS (1994) (in the

press).

[Os] OSMOLOVSKII V., The

free surface of

a

drop

in a

symmetric force field, Zapiski

Nauchn. Sem. LOMI, 52 (1975), pp. 160-174 (in Russian).

[P1] PADULA M., Existence and

uniqueness for

viscous

steady compressible

motions, Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal., 77 (1987), pp. 89-102.

[SiSo1] SIMADER CH. - SOHR H., The weak dirichlet

problem for

0394 in Lq in

bounded and exterior domains, Stab. Anal. Cont. Media, 2 (1992), pp.

183-202.

[So1] SOLONNIKOV V. A., On a

free boundary problem for

the system

of

Navier-Stokes

equations, Trudy

Sem. S. L. Sobolev, 2 (1978), pp. 127- 140 (in Russian).

[So2] SOLONNIKOV V. A., On the Stokes

equation

in domains with non

smooth boundaries and on a viscous

incompressible flow

with a

free surface,

Nonlin. Part. Diff.

Eq.,

3,

Collège

de France Seminar (1980- 1981), pp. 340-423.

[So3] SOLONNIKOV V. A.,

Some free boundary problems for

the Navier- Stokes

equations

with

moving

contact

points

and lines (1995),

Preprint.

[V1] VALLI A., On the existence

of stationary

solutions to

compressible

Navier-Stokes

equations,

Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré, 4 (1987), pp. 99- 113.

[V2] VALLI A., Periodic and

stationary

solutions

for compressible

Navier-

Stokes

equations

via a

stability

method, Ann. Sc. Norm.

Sup.

Pisa, 4 (1983), pp. 607-647.

Manoscritto pervenuto in redazione 1’8 febbraio 1996.

Références

Documents relatifs

[12] Marius Mitrea and Sylvie Monniaux, On the analyticity of the semigroup generated by the Stokes operator with Neumann-type boundary conditions on Lipschitz subdomains of

Mimicking the previous proof of uniqueness (given in Sec. 2.2) at the discrete level it is possible to obtain error esti- mates, that is an estimate between a strong solution (we

Ziane, Navier Stokes equations in three dimensional thin domains with various boundary conditions, Advances in Differential Equations, 1 (1996), 499–546.

The main features of the CDO face-based schemes are recalled: a hybrid velocity discretization with degrees of freedom at faces and cells, a stabilized velocity gradient

a problem the unknown angular velocity co for the appropriate coordinate system in which the solution is stationary can be determined by the equilibrium

L’accès aux archives de la revue « Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa, Classe di Scienze » ( http://www.sns.it/it/edizioni/riviste/annaliscienze/ ) implique l’accord

In all these works, global existence for arbitrary large data is shown by combining the standard energy estimate, which holds for general solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations,

We first establish the existence and uniqueness of the solution for the two-dimensional unsteady linearized compressible Navier–Stokes equations in a rectangle with