• Aucun résultat trouvé

Phenotypic evolution of different spinach varieties grown and selected under organic conditions

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Phenotypic evolution of different spinach varieties grown and selected under organic conditions"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-01458617

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01458617

Submitted on 5 Jun 2020

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Phenotypic evolution of different spinach varieties grown and selected under organic conditions

Estelle Serpolay-Besson, Nicolas Schermann, Julie Dawson, E.T. Lammerts van Bueren

To cite this version:

Estelle Serpolay-Besson, Nicolas Schermann, Julie Dawson, E.T. Lammerts van Bueren. Phenotypic

evolution of different spinach varieties grown and selected under organic conditions. Congrès interna-

tional de IFOAM, International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements (IFOAM). DEU., Sep

2011, NA, South Korea. 1 p. �hal-01458617�

(2)

Phenotypic evolution of different spinach varieties grown and selected under organic conditions

Serpolay, E[1]., Schermann[1], N., Dawson, J.[2] & Lammerts van Bueren, E.T.[3]

[1] INRA, unité SAD Paysage, 65 rue de Saint-Brieuc, F-35042 Rennes, France [2]INRA, UMR 320 Génétique Végétale, F-91190 Gif sur Yvette, France [3] Louis Bolk Institute, Hoofdstraat 24, NL-3972 LA Driebergen, The Netherlands

corresponding author: Estelle Serpolay - estelle.serpolay@rennes.inra.fr

Plants and methods

During a 3-year experiment (2007 to 2009), different populations varieties of spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) were cultivated and selected by 3 organic farmers (MC, AVO and FD) in contrasting environments (two farmers in Western France and one in The Netherlands). The evolution was assessed on station by comparison of the original seed sample with the variety cultivated and selected on farm for two cycles (Figure 1).

- Varieties tested: European populations of spinach not cultivated anymore, seeds coming from national gene banks (of The Netherlands and France)

- Three steps in the experiment: (i) 2007, choice by each farmer of at least one variety out of 20 to be grown and selected for 3 years; (ii) 2007 and 2008: on-farm mass selection within the chosen variety(ies) (see box 1); (iii) 2009: on-station common evaluation of the varieties chosen and selected by the farmers (Le Rheu, Brittany, France).

- Common trial: split-plot design with 3 replicates, sub-blocks composed of the different versions of one variety, i.e. population N from the gene bank and population(s) N+2 from farmer(s).

- Different phenotypic traits of interest for farmers assessed (see box 2), measured on 15 plants per replicate

- Statistical analyses: performed with R software, ANOVA (quantitative traits), Chi² tests (semi-quantitative traits) and ascending hierarchical classification to assess multitrait evolution of varieties

Context – introduction

Organic agriculture needs flexible varieties to buffer the variability of cultivation conditions, to enhance the self-regulation capacity of organic farming systems (Lammerts van Bueren, 2002) and to adapt to the requirements of each farmer (specific markets for example). More and more farmers are looking for such varieties in order to achieve seed self sufficiency. Populations varieties are genetically more diverse than commercial ones. Many organic farmers are interested in such varieties, in order to adapt them to their own conditions. In Europe, farmers take part in participatory plant breeding (PPB) programmes because it is a selection method that can respond to their different needs.

In this context, we conducted an experiment (in the framework of the European project Farm Seed Opportunities) to investigate the evolutionary capacities of spinach population varieties for phenotypic traits of interest for farmers. Indeed, while diversity among spinach varieties based on molecular markers has been studied, there have not been published studies of the diversity of phenotypic traits which are of direct relevance to farmers.

Results

All varieties showed statistically significant evolution (difference between the original version and the version cultivated by farmers): for only one or few traits (Monarch Long Standing, Verbeterde Hollandia and Viking Matador) or more numerous traits (Alwaro, Viking or Eté de Rueil) and they differ on traits on which they evolved (see Table 1).

All measured traits showed significant evolution for at least one variety. When the same trait evolved for 2 varieties, in most cases it was in the same “direction”.

While showing a certain evolution, the varieties conserved their own identity (the different versions of each variety were always grouped in the AHC) but one, ‘Alwaro’, seemed to evolve really more ('Alwaro' versions always in different groups of AHC).

Conclusion – perspective for Organic Agriculture

Even if further experiment would be needed to explore adaptive response of the varieties to farmers selection, our results points out the flexibility of such varieties, which is of interest for participatory plant breeding because of their potential for differential evolution. On-farm conservation and selection is one strategy to maintain or increase cultivated biodiversity in connection with farmers' needs (each farmer having his/her own breeding objectives). By breeding their own varieties, farmers could adapt them to their own conditions, and it is of great interest for organic and low input farming.

These results are also relevant to help policy-makers to adapt the European seed legislation, to recognize on-farm breeding and to take into account evolving populations.

'Alwaro' - year N+2, farmer MC version

'Alwaro' - year N original version 'Verbeterde Hollandia' - year N+2,

farmer MC version

'Verbeterde Hollandia' - year N original version

Original population N Population N+1 Year 1, on-farm

Cultivation, choice of the variety(ies) and breeding

Year 2, on-farm

Cultivation and breeding Year 3, on-station Evaluation

Assessment of the evolution by comparison Population N+2

Original population N

Figure 1: scheme of the experiment

Farmers’ strategies of selection

MC: elimination of the plants not in the type wished (plants wished = big, dark, thick, smooth, lanced shaped and late to bolt)

AVO: conservation of the latest plants to bolt and flower FD: multiplication of all the plants of the variety chosen in order to increase diversity

Box 1

Traits assessed

In italic = quantitative traits, normal = semi-quantitative traits Petiole and leaf length and attitude, leaf width, colour, shape of apex, thickness and blistering, stem anthocyanin, bolting index (3 dates)

Box 2

Figure 2: Ascending Hierarchical Classification (AHC) of the different varieties for the different morphological traits

"This publication was financially supported by the European Commission through the STREP project "Farm Seed Opportunities", contract no. 044345, under the 6th Framework Programme, priority 8.1, "Specific Support to Policies."

Varieties selected by farmers

Monarch Long Standing

Alwaro Superg reen Verbeter

de Hollandi

a Viking Viking

Matad or

Eté de Rueil

Traits Farmers AVO MC FD

Petiole length mN = 84/

mN+2 =75 * 76/

90 ***

80/

71 85/

92 68/

70 89/

95 110/

102 110/

99

Leaf width 135/

127 119/

118 138/

124 * 127/

136 139/

140 113/

123 112/

118 112/

109 Colour "A” -14.3/

-14.1 -12.8/

-13.4*** -12.4/

-12.9 -14.8/

-15.4 ** -13.4/

-14.3 * -14.4/

-14.4 -13.3/

-13.7 -13.3/

-12.6 Petiole attitude 1 -

3 1.82/

1.84 1.91/

2.27 * 1.98/

1.64 2.18/

2.16 2.41/

2.06 **

2.22/

2.32 2.26/

2.30 2.26/

2.21 Thickness 1 - 5 4.20/

4.02 3.96/

3.89 3.43/

3.48 4.36/

4.09 3.68/

3.44 3.44/

3.95 3.74/

4.30 * 3.74/

3.79 Blistering 1 - 5 2.82/

2.69 3.04/

2.96 3.18/

3.11 2.71/

2.78 3.01/

3.43 * 2.27/

2.48 1.74/

1.63 1.74/

1.66 Bolting index (0 to

3) May 22, 2009

1.00/

0.67 0.67/

2.33***

0.67/

1.00 1.67/

1.67 0.33/

0.67 2.67/

3.00*

2.00/

2.50*

2.00/

2.50 *

Table 1: extract iof the complete table of the mean values and statistical significance values of the evolution of varieties after 2 years of cultivation and selection in the common experiment at Le Rheu in 2009: mN / mN+2 where mN+2 is the mean of the farmers' version after 2 growing cycles and mN is the mean of the original seed lot

Références

Documents relatifs

A second potential outcome is rapid adaptive evolution (e.g. Non-adaptive plasticity can facilitate rapid evolution by increasing the strength of selection, and given

We simulated evolution of correlated and uncorrelated quantitative traits with and without trend on hominin phylogenetic tree in order to assess and to compare our new correlation

The present study demonstrates that, if interstellar organic compounds such as HMT had been accreted by chondrite parent bodies, they would have undergone chemical

Les discours médicaux en Iran 58 classifient le transsexualisme comme une maladie d’ordre psychologique connue sous le nom de « trouble de l’identité sexuelle » ou

Long-term evolution of organic matter modified by cultural practices in a cultivated Acrisol - consequences on soil organic carbon stocks. This study has used samples and results

Keywords: RothC, Saria, carbon stock, ferric Acrisol, Burkina, farming practices, organic matter, manure, compost, particle-size

plation et, pour peu que vous en preniez le temps, vous allez, page après page, dans un renversement de perspective, vous trouver face à un homme sensible, Georges Lemoine, auteur

De plus, la couche de surface (couche 1) que nous observons par ellipsométrie a un effet non négligeable lorsque la variation de l’indice de la couche de corrosion (couche 2)