• Aucun résultat trouvé

Preparing  the  Way  :  Crea0ng  Future  Compa0ble  Cataloguing  Data  in  a  Transi0onal  Environment

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Preparing  the  Way  :  Crea0ng  Future  Compa0ble  Cataloguing  Data  in  a  Transi0onal  Environment"

Copied!
70
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Preparing  the  Way  :  Crea0ng  Future   Compa0ble  Cataloguing  Data  in  a  

Transi0onal  Environment      

Dean  Seeman  &  Lisa  Goddard  

Memorial  University  of  Newfoundland   Faster,  Smarter,  Richer  Conference    

Rome,  Italy  

February  27th,  2014  

(2)
(3)
(4)

Aspects  of  our  Linked  Data  Future  

Decentraliza0on  

 

Collabora0on  

 

Localiza0on  

 

Richness  

 

Structure  

(5)

Indexes  

eJournals  

eBooks   Digital  Archives  

Research  

Repositories   Data  Sets  

1.  Decentraliza0on  

(6)

Extract,  Transform,  Load  

(7)

Disparate  data  sources  and   incompa0ble  data  structures  

are  among  the  biggest   obstacles  for  21

st

 century  

humani0es  researchers.    

(RIN,  2011)  

(8)
(9)

Decentraliza0on  

Subject  -­‐>  Predicate  -­‐>  Object   Subject  -­‐>  Predicate  -­‐>  Object   Subject  -­‐>  Predicate  -­‐>  Object   Subject  -­‐>  Predicate  -­‐>  Object   Subject  -­‐>  Predicate  -­‐>  Object   Subject  -­‐>  Predicate  -­‐>  Object  

Statements  not  records.  

(10)

http://id.loc.gov http://purl.org/dc

http://viaf.org

#creator  

#Shakespeare       #Macbeth      

Decentraliza0on  

Most  data  stored  remotely.  

(11)

2.  Collabora0on  

(12)

Collabora0on  

(13)

Collabora0on  

(14)

Collabora0on  

(15)

Enhancing  Shared  Records  

(16)

Ontology  Development  

 

Library  Related  Ontologies   RDA  Ontology  

Dublin  Core  Ontology  

Bibliographic  Ontology  (BIBO)   Cita0on  (CITO)  

Provenance  Ontology  (PROV-­‐O)   MODS/MADS  

FRBR  

Holding  Ontology  

(17)

3.  Localiza0on  

“[I]t  is  their  accumulated  special   collec0ons  that  increasingly  define   the  uniqueness  and  character  of   individual  research  libraries.“  

-­‐  ARL,  2009  

(18)

Expose  En0ty  URIs  

hgp://mun.ca/doc123  

hgp://mun.ca/person   hgp://mun.ca/place  

hgp://mun.ca/event  

hgp://mun.ca/org  

hgp://mun.ca/annota0on   Annota0on  

hgp://this.ca/book  

(19)

4.  Richness  

(20)

Define  Rela0onships  

hgp://this.ca/doc  

hgp://this.ca/event   hgp://this.ca/place  

hgp://this.ca/org  

hgp://this.ca/book   hgp://this.ca/film  

employs  

emp

loyed

By  

adaptedFrom   creator  

setIn  

annotates   subjectOf  

hgp://this.ca/annota0on   Annota0on  

hgp://this.ca/person  

(21)

5. Structure

Collabora0on  

Richness   Decentraliza0on  

Localiza0on  

Structure  

(22)

Structured  Data  

(23)

Clothing  

Apparel   Clothes   Dress   Garments  

Beauty,  Personal   Manners  &  customs  

Fashion   Undressing  

         Aprons            Armbands            Belt  toggles            Belts  (Clothing)            Bodices  

         Breechcloths            Burial  clothing            Bugonholes            Bugons            Cahans            Cloaks  

         Collars  

         Color  in  clothing            Costume  

         Coveralls  

         Darts  (Clothing)            Dirndls  

         Doll  clothes            Dresses            Footwear            Fur  garments            Garters  

         Headgear            Hosiery            Jackets            Jumpsuits            Kilts  

         Kimonos            Knitwear            Lapels  

         Latex  garments            Leggings  

         Neckwear  

Same  As   Related  

Broader  

Narrower  

Seman0c  Structure  

(24)

Machine-Actionable Data

(25)

Linked   Data   Non-­‐

Linked   Data  

Discourse

Linked   Data  

Non-­‐

Linked   Data  

Cataloguing Practice

(26)

4 Cataloguer Tasks in Relation to Linked Data

Worry  

Panic  

Weep  

Resign  

(27)

Trust Standard Development?

(28)

Collabora0on  

Richness   Decentraliza0on  

Localiza0on  

Structure  

(29)

The greatest consumer of our data is going to be the machine.

We have to make our data machine

understandable.

(30)

Automa0c  Data     Normaliza0on  

MARC   Linked  Data  

Formats  

(31)

Collabora0on  

Richness   Decentraliza0on  

Localiza0on  

Structure   Automa0c  Data    

Normaliza0on  

(32)

“In computer terms, we have a data normalization problem.”

Ross Singer

(33)

Collabora0on  

Richness   Decentraliza0on  

Localiza0on  

Structure   Automa0c  Data    

Normaliza0on  

Manual  Data  Crea0on  (Cataloguing)     Good   Data  

(34)

Ochoa,  X.,  &  Duval,  E.  (2009).  Automa0c  Evalua0on  of  Metadata  Quality  in  Digital  Repositories,  10(2),  67–91.  doi:

10.1007/s00799-­‐009-­‐0054-­‐4  

What is Good Data?

(35)

A Few Markers of Good Data for Data Normalization

Discrete  

Each  element  asserts  a  single  thing  

 

Seman8cally  Unambiguous  

 

Data  should  be  clear  in  its  meaning  and  minimize   mul7ple  interpreta7ons  

 

Consistent  

Predictable  values  

(36)

Helps  us  in  our  current  environment    

Helps  the  process  of  data  normaliza0on    

Helps  the  future  …  even  if  it  isn’t  Linked  Data  

This kind of data …

(37)

Looking at the future ...

... what can cataloguers

practically do to

plug into it?

(38)
(39)

Authorities &

Controlled

Access Points

(40)

Authorities

Contain  mostly  differen7ated  values    

       

Better for machine processing

(41)

Authorities  

(42)

hgp://www.worldcat.org/

oclc/827974267   hgp://rdvocab.info/

roles/authorWork   hgp://viaf.org/viaf/

101362857/rdf.xml  

Tom  Stoppard   Author  of  Work   Parade’s  End  

Controlled Access Points

(MARC 1xx, 6xx, 7xx)

Automa0cally  Normalized  /  Translated  into  URIs  

(43)

Beger  to  have  this  

compacted  in  one  statement  

As  opposed  to  spread   throughout  the  record  

Controlled Access Points

(44)

AUTHORIZED  

UNAUTHORIZED  

(45)

But in our Current Cataloguing

Environment, It May Be the Best

We Can Do

(46)

Vocabularies &

Differentiated

Values

(47)

Vocabularies

Provide  Consistent  Values  for  Normaliza7on  

(48)

Already Equipped with URIs

(49)

Differentiable Values  

Example:  Exercise  the  op0on  at  RDA  2.8.2.3  for   place  of  publica0on  

… make the implicit explicit  

(50)

Local

(51)

Local  Catalogue  

(52)

Unique

Assertions > Ubiquitous Assertions

Future Value  

(53)

Richness  

Smart  Fields   and  Values  

Authori0es  

Controlled  access  points   Vocabularies  

Differen0able  values   Local  Authori0es  

Local  &  Unique   Resources  

Local  Aspects  of   Ubiquitous  

Localiza0on  

(54)

Some practices DO NOT prepare

us for the future.

(55)

Trapping Data in Free Text Fields Spread Throughout the Record

(56)

Addicted to Keystrokes

(57)

Addicted to Keystrokes

Principle of Common Usage or Practice (RDA 0.4.3.7)

“illustrations” instead of “ill.”

“pages” instead of “p.”

“publisher not identified” instead of “s.n.”

 

(58)

Addicted  to  Keystrokes  

Principle  of  Representa0on  (RDA  0.4.3.4)      

 Increased  transcrip0on  of  text  

(59)

Problems with Keystrokes

More  Time  and   Effort  

Greater  Amount  of   Error  (Bad  for   Normaliza0on)  

(in  case  of  RDA)  Of   Unproven  User  

Value  

(60)

“I think a good rule of thumb is that if you’re having to type data, and you haven’t been transported back in time, then you’re doing it wrong.”

Richard Cotton, Bad Data Handbook

 

(61)

Punctuation

We  Need  To  Focus  on   Values,  Not  Display  

(62)

LC-­‐PCC  PS  1.7.1  

No  490,  no  period  to  end   300  

490  present,  300  field  ends   in  a  “.”  

Punctuation

(63)

Local Practice

 Genre/Form  terms  in  Topical  Heading   fields  (MARC  650)  

Seman0c    Ambiguity  

“About”  Musical  Films  OR  

“Is  a”  Musical  Film?  

(64)
(65)

Focus on ...

Structure Statements

Differentiable Values Vocabularies

Authorities

Controlled Access Points Local Data

---

Good Data

(66)

... and start to focus less on

•  Punctuation

•  Free Text Fields

•  The Data we Can’t Easily Normalize

•  The Data Machines Can’t Use

(67)
(68)

Thank you.

(69)

References

Allemang,  Dean  and  James  A.  Hendler.  2011.  Seman0c  Web  for  the  Working:  Modeling  in  RDF,  RDFS  and  OWL,  2nd  ed.  Amsterdam;  Boston:  Elsevier/

Morgan  Kaufmann  

American  Research  Libraries  (ARL).  March  2009.  Special  Collec0ons  in  ARL  Libraries:  A  Discussion  Report  from  the  ARL  Working  Group  on  Special   Collec0ons.  Washington,  DC:ARL.  hgp://www.arl.org/storage/documents/publica0ons/scwg-­‐report-­‐mar09.pdf  

Bowen,  Jennifer  B.  2010.  “Moving  Library  Metadata  Toward  Linked  Data:  Opportuni0es  Provided  by  the  eXtensible  Catalog.”  Interna0onal  Conference  on   Dublin  Core  and  Metadata  Applica0ons  0  (0)  (September  20):  44–59.  

Cole,  Timothy  W.,  Myung-­‐Ja  Han,  William  Fletcher  Weathers,  and  Eric  Joyner.  2013.  “Library  Marc  Records  Into  Linked  Open  Data:  Challenges  and   Opportuni0es.”  Journal  of  Library  Metadata  13  (2-­‐3):  163–96.  doi:10.1080/19386389.2013.826074.  

Coyle,  Karen.  2011.  “Library  Linked  Data,  Part  I:  Introduc0on  to  the  Seman0c  Web  (Mar.  8,  2011)”  March  8.  hgp://www.kcoyle.net/presenta0ons/asis0.pdf.  

Hilliker,  Robert  J.,  Melanie  Wacker,  and  Amy  L.  Nurnberger.  2013.  “Improving  Discovery  of  and  Access  to  Digital  Repository  Contents  Using  Seman0c  Web   Standards:  Columbia  University’s  Academic  Commons.”  Journal  of  Library  Metadata  13  (2-­‐3):  80–94.  doi:10.1080/19386389.2013.826036.  

Kincy,  Chamya  P.,  and  Michael  A.  Wood.  2012.  “Rethinking  Access  with  RDA  (Resource  Descrip0on  and  Access).”  Journal  of  Electronic  Resources  in  Medical   Libraries  9  (1):  13–34.  doi:10.1080/15424065.2012.651573.  

Lahanas,  Stephen.  March  9,  2009.  “Understanding  The  Seman0c  Value  Proposi0on.”  Seman0cweb.com,  hgp://seman0cweb.com/understanding-­‐the-­‐

seman0c-­‐value-­‐proposi0on_b11492?red=su  

Lawson,  Mark.  August  9,  2005.  “Berners-­‐Lee  on  the  read/write  web”,  BBC  News.  hgp://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/4132752.stm  

Online  Computer  Library  Centre  (OCLC).  2011.  “Percep0ons  of  Libraries,  2010:  Context  and  Community”.  Dublin,OH:OCLC.  hgp://www.oclc.org/content/

dam/oclc/reports/2010percep0ons/2010percep0ons_all.pdf  

Research  Informa0on  Network.  April  2011.  Reinven0ng  Research?  Informa0on  Prac0ces  in  the  Humani0es.  hgp://www.rin.ac.uk/our-­‐work/using-­‐and-­‐

accessing-­‐informa0on-­‐resources/informa0on-­‐use-­‐case-­‐studies-­‐humani0es  

Schreur,  Philip  Evan.  2012.  “The  Academy  Unbound:  Linked  Data  as  Revolu0on.”  Library  Resources  &  Technical  Services  56  (4)  (October  1):  227.  

Singer,  Ross.  2009.  “Linked  Library  Data  Now!”  Journal  of  Electronic  Resources  Librarianship  21  (2):  114–126.  doi:10.1080/19411260903035809.  

Tilleg,  Barbara  B.  2011.  “Keeping  Libraries  Relevant  in  the  Seman0c  Web  with  Resource  Descrip0on  and  Access  (RDA).”  Serials:  The  Journal  for  the  Serials   Community  24  (3)  (November  1):  266–272.  doi:10.1629/24266.  

W3C  Library  Linked  Data  Incubator  Group  (W3C).  2011.  Library  Linked  Data  Incubator  Group  Final  Report.  October  5.  

hgp://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/XGR-­‐lld-­‐20111025/.  

Welsh,  Anne,  and  Sue  Batley.  2013.  Prac0cal  Cataloging.  AACR,  RDA  and  MARC21.  American  Library  Associa0on.    

Zeng,  Marcia  Lei,  Karen  F.  Gracy,  and  Laurence  Skirvin.  2013.  “Naviga0ng  the  Intersec0on  of  Library  Bibliographic  Data  and  Linked  Music  Informa0on   Sources:  A  Study  of  the  Iden0fica0on  of  Useful  Metadata  Elements  for  Interlinking.”  Journal  of  Library  Metadata  13  (2-­‐3):  254–278.  doi:

10.1080/19386389.2013.827513.  

 

(70)

Image  Credits  

hgp://gregbrainos.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/denmark-­‐outlet.jpg   hgp://framehawk.com/wp-­‐content/uploads/2012/10/Focus.jpeg   hgp://www.stencilease.com/gif/CC0094.jpg  

RDA  Toolkit  

hgp://access.rdatoolkit.org/rdachp3_rda3-­‐2029.html   RDA  Metadata  Registry  

hgp://metadataregistry.org/concept/list/vocabulary_id/37.html   RDA  Toolkit  

hgp://access.rdatoolkit.org/rdachp2_rda2-­‐6453.html  

hgp://www.codeforest.net/wp-­‐content/uploads/2010/09/Database_1.png  

hgp://corrupteddevelopment.com/wp-­‐content/uploads/2012/06/trash-­‐bin-­‐icon-­‐psd.jpg   hgp://3dwri0ngservices.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/scagered-­‐keyboard-­‐bugons2.jpg   hgp://www.proprofs.com/quiz-­‐school/user_upload/ckeditor/do%20not%20enter(1).jpg   hgp://www.clker.com/cliparts/U/9/E/y/L/Z/sad-­‐computer-­‐md.png  

hgp://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/

File:Saint_John_the_Bap0st_Preaching_to_the_Masses_in_the_Wilderness_oil_on_oak_panel_by_Piet er_Brueghel_the_Younger.jpg  

     

Références

Documents relatifs

FlipFlop is a Hedge strategy in the sense that it uses exponential weights defined by (9), but the learning rate η t ff now alternates between infinity, such that the algorithm

Essentially, the obligation of public sector bodies to make PSI available to the citizens stems from national and international regulations on access to

Prior to asking users to rate the two explanation rules, users saw a web page that told them: that they would see a recommendation; that they should pretend that the recommended

In this paper, we demonstrate how ODRL can be used not only to represent access policies but also to specify access requests, offers and agreements, and propose an approach to

N0 alternatives from which to choose. And if something is infinitely divisible, then the operation of halving it or halving some part of it can be performed infinitely often.

In Report from the Interior by Paul Auster the personal pronoun you is used in an unconventional manner as it places the readers in a position that is both uncomfortable

To explore the effects of accented speech in emotional word processing, we used Event Related Potentials (ERPs) and recorded the cerebral activity of Spanish native listeners who

“Library Marc Records Into Linked Open Data: Challenges and Opportunities.” Journal of Library Metadata 13 (2-3): 163–96. “Library Linked Data, Part I: Introduction to the