• Aucun résultat trouvé

A mechanical and economical based framework to help decision-makers for natural hazards and malicious events impact on infrastructure prevention.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "A mechanical and economical based framework to help decision-makers for natural hazards and malicious events impact on infrastructure prevention."

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-02397218

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02397218

Submitted on 6 Dec 2019

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

A mechanical and economical based framework to help decision-makers for natural hazards and malicious events

impact on infrastructure prevention.

P-J. Tisserand, M. Ragueneau

To cite this version:

P-J. Tisserand, M. Ragueneau. A mechanical and economical based framework to help decision- makers for natural hazards and malicious events impact on infrastructure prevention.. WCRR 2019, 12th World Congress on Railway Research, Oct 2019, Tokyo, France. �hal-02397218�

(2)

A mechanical and economical based framework to help decision-makers for natural hazards and malicious events impact on infrastructure prevention.

Pierre-Jean TISSERAND1,2, Muriel RAGUENEAU2

1 LMT, ENS Paris-Saclay, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, Cachan, FRANCE, 2 Division ISM, Département des OA, DG2I, SNCF RESEAU, Saint-Denis, FRANCE

Context Mechanical approach

(Fragility curves and failure probability)

Economical approach

(failure cost)

Indicators

(Probable cost of failure and participation factor)

Infrastructure components are vulnerable to natural hazards and malicious events.

A relevant prevention plan should be based on relevant indicators

Few indicators are based on mechanical and economical information

Their objectiviy is discutable

=

Formulation of relevant and objective indicators to classify events and infrastructure components

Fragility is the conditional probability for a quantity to pass a threshold

knowing the event intensity.

Failure probability can be obtained for :

a failure mode

all failure mode

Failure probability = mechanical

vulnerability indicator of a component under an event.

Probability mathematical framework

= numerous information about failure probability, by event's intensity, by

component and by group of component.

Economic loss assessment can be split in different parts :

Repairing or rebuilding of damaged components

Tickets refunding and business interruption

Business loss due to reputation loss

GDP loss (casualties, economic flow interruption, ...)

...

Some are correlated to component cost, and some to duration of business interruption.

The cost of failure may consider a plenty of parameters. Decision-maker must choose the scale of economical loss computation.

Probable failure cost = indicator of the money to save each year to atteign equilibrium on long period

Probable cost = classification between railway line or railway network part

Importance factor = participation of a component in line probable cost of failure

Next challenges

Need database of different events probability of occurence (Need to gether)

Computation of all critical components fragility curves

Cost computation for different scale (Infrastructure Manager, State, ...)

Références

Documents relatifs

Whereas GAC corresponds to the strongest form of local reasoning when constraints are treated separately, strong consistencies necessarily involve several constraints (e.g.,

Hazard Forecasting: Provision of Timely Information on the Physical Event Characteristics The United Nations terminology on disaster risk reduction (UNISDR, 2009) defines an

Figure 4 shows the configuration obtained without cross- field flow, V 0 = 0, and without net electric potential differ- ences across the TD interfaces, φ ( ±∞ ) = 0, for a slab

It shows that a strong external electric potential difference in- variably leads to monopolar electric field signatures at both cold–hot and hot–hot interfaces, whereas for smaller

The sensitivity studies, performed on BIRA data of 4 July 2009, revealed several possible optimisations of the HCHO DOAS retrieval, in order to minimise interferences and

3.3 presents how a combination of zenith de- lays and horizontal delay gradients measurements can im- prove the time and space resolution of the 2-D field of delay observed by

Keywords Gullying Infiltration envelope Rainfall simulation Runoff coefficient Soil use Kinshasa Abbreviations IfE Infiltration envelope IfC Infiltration capacity RC

The major regional ozone depletion events that were visible at all coastal stations, and discussed above, can also be seen in Fig. The August event is clearly evident in Site C as