• Aucun résultat trouvé

Exercise 1 is perhaps more technical than the other two. You can start by exercise 2 and 3.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Exercise 1 is perhaps more technical than the other two. You can start by exercise 2 and 3."

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Introduction to mathematical finance

Sheet 12 HS 2014

Hand-in your solutions until 17.12.2014, in Martina Dal Borgo’s mailbox on K floor.

Exercise 1 is perhaps more technical than the other two. You can start by exercise 2 and 3.

Exercise 1

In what follows W is a real Brownian motion on the filtered probability space (Ω, F , (F t ) t∈[0,T] , P ) where the usual hypotheses hold. Recall that a stochastic process Y belongs to L p if

- Y is (F t )-adapted,

- Y ∈ L p ([0, T ] × Ω) that is E

Z T

0

|Y s | p ds

= Z T

0

E [|Y s | p ] ds < ∞.

Consider an Itˆ o process, that is a stochastic process X of the form X t = X 0 +

Z t

0

ν s ds + Z t

0

Y s dW s , t ∈ [0, T ],

where X 0 is a F 0 -measurable random variable, ν ∈ L 1 , Y ∈ L 2 . We want to prove that:

X t is a martingale ⇔ ν = 0 a.s

The implication from right to left is obvious from the construction of the stochastic integral seen in class.

Indeed, if ν = 0, X t is only a stochastic integral against Brownian motion, which is a martingale by construction. The implication from left to right requires a little more work.

• Prove that if X is a martingale, then for all times t and s:

E

Z t+s

t

ν u du|F t

= 0

• Deduce that:

ν t = E 1

s Z t+s

t

t − ν s )du|F t

= 1 s

Z t+s

t

E (ν t − ν s |F t ) du

• Assuming for example that ν is a.s continuous and bounded, show that ν = 0 a.s. If possible, you can replace the path-wise continuity and boundedness hypotheses by s 7→ E (|ν s |) continuous on [0, T ].

Exercise 2[Polarisation of Ito isometry]. We know from class that if Y ∈ L 2 , the stochastic integral t 7→ R t

0 Y s dW s is an L 2 -martingale satisfying the Ito isometry:

E

"

Z t

0

Y s dW s 2 #

= E Z t

0

Y s 2 ds

,

Now consider two processes Y, Z ∈ L 2 . Prove the polarised version:

E Z t

0

Y s dW s × Z t

0

Z s dW s

= E Z t

0

Y s Z s ds

, (1)

1

(2)

Hint: Apply the Ito isometry to R t

0 (Y s +Z s ) dW s and R t

0 (Y s − Z s ) dW s , make the difference then develop.

Exercise 3. Let W be a real Brownian motion on a filtered (natural filtration) probability space (Ω, F , (F t ) t∈[0,T ] , P ) where the usual hypotheses hold.

• Apply the Itˆ o formula to

i) X t = W t , f (x) = x n , n ∈ N ; ii) X t = W t , f (x) = e σx , σ ∈ R ; ii) X t = W t , f (t, x) = xt.

to give the explicit decomposition of f (t, X t ) as an Ito process.

• Recall from exercise 1 and the class, that the martingale part has zero expectation. Using the Itˆ o formula and recurrence, compute E [W t 4 ], E [W t 6 ]. Prove that E [W t n ] = 0 if n is odd and

E [W t n ] = t

2

n2

n!

(n/2)! .

2

Références

Documents relatifs

c*) Find up to a normalization constant the wave function of the coherent state in x- representation ϕ α (x) = hx|αi using the representation of the annihilation operator in terms

The only effect of this in the fourth line is complex conjugation of e −10ip , while the integral is left unchanged.. c) Compare the two Wigner functions. Whereas W 1+2 is

The battery pack should be incorporated under the chassis and put inside a metallic box (having a square shape with no cover). In order to built this metallic box, the

Suppose also that the polynomials are not

In a study of mutation in fruit flies, researchers radiate flies with X-rays and determine that the mutation percentage increases linearly with the X-ray dosage D, measured

PHASE 2 - DEVELOP A VISION – WHAT DO WE WANT OUR CLUB TO BE LIKE DÉVELOPPER UNE VISION - QUE VOULONS-NOUS QUE NOTRE CLUB SOIT. • Purpose Statement – How you will be different

On suppose que cette fonction existe et on ne cherchera pas à donner une expression

Implement in Sinalgo the TDMA protocol seen in ANET Class 2.. The sketch of the protocol (in French) can be