Institute for Research on Generations and Family:
Youth Research
Crucial components in successfully mastering
the transition into work – Patterns of coping
¿Qué será, será? Adolescent Research into the Future:
Visions and Challenges
Section: Young People in the Transition to the Life of Work
EARA 2016: XV Biennial Conference of the
European Association for Research on Adolescence (EARA) September 16 - 19, 2016, La Barrosa, Càdiz
Dr. Anette SCHUMACHER, University of Luxembourg Daniel WEIS, University of Luxembourg
Institute for Research on Generations and Family:
Some Information about
Luxembourg
Government Unitary
parliamentary
constitutional
monarchy
Official languages Luxembourgish,
German, French
Area 2.586,4 km²
Population 576.249
Proportion of
foreigners 45,9% (2015)
General
unemployment rate 6%
Youth unemployment
rate 22%
Institute for Research on Generations and Family:
International research trends on
transition into the world of work
- Youth phase has extended, age limits are hard to define
- «post adolescence» (Galland, 2003); «emerging adulthood» (Arnett, 2000)
- Postponement, de-standardization, individualization, reversibility
of transition markers (Walther, 2006)
- “[…] adolescence today is characterised by status insecurity. The
status passage does not lead to any fixed endpoint. It has lost the
notion of a secure and safe transition from one social position to
another .” (Hurrelmann & Quenzel, 2013)
Institute for Research on Generations and Family:
Research questions
A) What is the specific situation of young people in
Luxembourg?
B) To what extent support services can help young people
facing problems during their transition into work?
C) What are the varying processes, rationales and patterns
for accomplishing the transition into work and which are
the main influence factors?
Institute for Research on Generations and Family:
Underlying data and scientific
methods
Analysis of
secondary data
1. official data
2. census and survey data 3. research reports
Focus group
discussion
(n=12)
Quantitative data
1. survey of organisations offering support (n=151) 2. standardized survey of
participants in support services (n=1.716)
Qualitative data
1. expert interviews (n=25) 2. interviews with youths (n=77)
3. interviews with disabled young people (n=51)
Youth
Report
Luxembourg
Institute for Research on Generations and Family:
RESULTS
The situation of young people
(15-34years old) in Luxembourg
Institute for Research on Generations and Family:
2011 2007 2003 1999 1995
0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0
Luxem-
bourg (W)
Luxem-
bourg (M)
EU-28 (W)
EU-28 (M)
Female
Male
Source: Statec (2015b): Eurostat (2014b); in percent of population
Institute for Research on Generations and Family:
The specific situation in
Luxembourg –
nationality structure
Nationality structure
of 15 to 34 year-olds
and of total population
in 2011
Source: Census 2011; n=512,353
Institute for Research on Generations and Family:
The specific situation in
Luxembourg – Educational
qualification and nationality
Luxembourg
non-Luxembourg in general
Portuguese
Belgian/German/French
other EU nationalities
other nationalities 0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
20%
36%
64%
7% 11%
39%
41% 22%
25%
19% 19%
25%
37% 40%
9%
72% 69%
33%
Other
Post-secondary
school qualifications
Secondary school
qualifications
no secondary school
qualification
Source: Census 2011; n=63,719
Highest educational qualification of 25 to 34-year-olds by nationality
Institute for Research on Generations and Family:
RESULTS
Subjective benefit of participation in
support services
Institute for Research on Generations and Family:
Subjectively experienced benefit
of support schemes
I can imagine that I will use this skills I have practised in later life What I learnt was what I expected What I learnt on this scheme also helps me with life in general I have improved my carer chances I have acquired many practical things I have learnt a lot of new things
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
11.2%
6.9%
7.6%
8.4%
6.0%
6.8%
5.8%
5.7%
5.8%
4.1%
4.7%
4.3%
9.5%
12.8%
8.1%
8.1%
8.8%
7.8%
15.7%
28.3%
21.5%
22.1%
24.1%
19.2%
24.6%
28.3%
25.6%
28.8%
29.7%
27.5%
33.3%
18.1%
31.4%
28.6%
26.7%
34.5%
Agree completely Mostly agree Tend to agree Tend to disagree Mostly do not agree Do not agree at all
Institute for Research on Generations and Family:
General results of the survey
(n=1162)
• Level of education, age and language skills play a major role in the
subjectively assessed success of a support scheme
• Educating support schemes show a higher benefit than employment
schemes
• The greatest benefit according to the findings is gained by younger, poorly
educated participants
• The greatest potential for improvement comes from schemes that are
closely customised to meet the individual level of need
• Some participant regard support schemes as a dead-end, or like being
“kept on hold”
• Others are not aware of the concept of transition behind these schemes
and regard themselves as “working” instead, resulting often in
a “locking-in effect”
• A part of young people with large problems will not be reached by existing
structures
Institute for Research on Generations and Family:
RESULTS
A typology of transition processes and the
patterns for accomplishing them
Institute for Research on Generations and Family:
A typology of transition processes and
the patterns for accomplishing them
A) Direct transition
– successful and speedy accomplishment of the transition
Institute for Research on Generations and Family:
A typology of transition processes and
the patterns for accomplishing them
A) Direct transition
– successful and speedy accomplishment of the transition
B) Alternative transition
– individual, creative accomplishment of the transition, extended
over a longer period for finding the own path
Institute for Research on Generations and Family:
A typology of transition processes and
the patterns for accomplishing them
A) Direct transition
– successful and speedy accomplishment of the transition
B) Alternative transition
– individual, creative accomplishment of the transition, extended
over a longer period for finding the own path
C) Transition requiring support
– transition has not been finished yet, requires help due to major
difficulties
Institute for Research on Generations and Family:
A typology of transition processes and
the patterns for accomplishing them
A) Direct transition
– successful and speedy accomplishment of the transition
B) Alternative transition
– individual, creative accomplishment of the transition, extended
over a longer period for finding the own path
C) Transition requiring support
– transition has not been finished yet, requires help due to major
difficulties
D) Failed transition
– transition cannot be expected to happen in the foreseeable
future, precarious and highly problematic overall situation
Institute for Research on Generations and Family:
A typology of transition processes and
the patterns for accomplishing them
The transition types can be distinguished by:
• social background and family resources
• school career and educational success
• migration experiences and integration
• decision-making and actions
• values and motivation
• personal characteristics (e.g. self-fulfillment)
• attitude to the future
Institute for Research on Generations and Family:
A typology of transition processes and
the patterns for accomplishing them
Social background and family resources
Direct transition Alternative transition Transition requiring support
Failed transition
“My parents are quite wealthy and therefore I didn’t need to work as many German
students have to, and I could focus on my studies.”
(Sam, 25 years)
“My parents never told me what to do, but they somehow supported me by saying ‘do what you want to do’.”
(Égide, 28 years)
“No, I have nobody here. They all went back to France. We are two lost souls living all alone here in Luxembourg.”
(Madeleine, 29 years)
“I’m angry because somehow they (my parents) are
responsable for the difficulties in my life.”
(Mathieu, 25 years)
Institute for Research on Generations and Family:
A typology of transition processes and
the patterns for accomplishing them
School career and educational success
Direct transition Alternative transition Transition requiring support
Failed transition
“Well in school I’ve really been a very good pupil.”
(Lara, 22 years)
“Overall speaking, I didn’t have any problems at school.
But later on I had problems to find out what to study.”
(Marco, 29 years)
“I don’t have good memories concerning my time in school. The first two years were horrible. My teacher hit me when I didn’t know the right answer.
That really killed my motivation.”
(Patricia, 29 years)
“I didn’t finish school. I went to school until I turned 14, then I quit because of many problems at home, I had to help my mum who was sick.”
(Nadine, 29 years)
Institute for Research on Generations and Family:
A typology of transition processes and
the patterns for accomplishing them
Migration experiences and integration
Direct transition Alternative transition Transition requiring support
Failed transition
“I speak five
languages fluently, including
luxembourgish. For me it was an
advantage on the job market to prove that I also attended the
portugeese school and that I am proficient in that language as well.”
(Tiago, 25 years)
[migration background
not even mentioned] “When it comes to job interviews, I
sometimes have the impression that if they can choose between
“Paul” and “Paolo”, they would choose
“Paul”.”
(Paolo, 27 years)
“I am sure that my migration background has locked doors.”
(Jeanne, 33 years)
Institute for Research on Generations and Family:
A typology of transition processes and
the patterns for accomplishing them
Decision-making and actions
Direct transition Alternative transition Transition requiring support
Failed transition
“If I start doing
something I always do serious work up to the end, even with sweat and tears, but I never give up and finish what I started.”
(Eva, 25 years)
“I only learned by chance of that opportunity. It was more or less a spontaneous idea.
That’s why I went to South-America.”
(Marco, 29 years)
“To me, an internship is waste of time, because I’ve done so many internships and it didn’t help me at all.
I can’t fill up my CV with internships.”
(Karin, 27 years)
“I’ve had enough of problems at home and at school. (...) I simply quit school. I didn’t want to know anything about it.”
(Chiara, 18 years)
Institute for Research on Generations and Family:
A typology of transition processes and
the patterns for accomplishing them
Values and motivation
Direct transition Alternative transition Transition requiring support
Failed transition
“For me it’s important to make career, to climb on the ladder.
And of course the payment is an extra motivation as well.”
(Eva, 25 years)
“I want a job that makes me satisfied.”
(Danielle, 24 years)
“For me it’s important to have a structure in my everday life. I want to work in order to have a reason to get up in the morning.”
(Simone, 23 years)
“The main thing is to make some money.
(…) Just to have a work and to have a bit of money. (…) I would do anything, I would never refuse a job.”
(Mathieu, 25 years)
Institute for Research on Generations and Family:
A typology of transition processes and
the patterns for accomplishing them
Personal characteristics (e.g. self-fulfillment)
Direct transition Alternative transition Transition requiring support
Failed transition
“I am convinced that when you develop and make progresses, step by step, you will
achieve the goals you want to reach.”
(Gilles, 29 years)
“I know how to present myself, and apart from that there are not so many people in
Luxembourg who have learned that job, that’s why I’ve always been optimistic and
carefree.”
(André, 26 years)
“It fealt like a defeat. If I hat to blame
someone, I would put the blame on myself.”
(Paolo, 27 years)
“What I can do well?
Nothing. Really...
nothing. (…) Until now I have no idea of what I am good at.”
(Jeff, 27 years)
Institute for Research on Generations and Family:
A typology of transition processes and
the patterns for accomplishing them
Attitude to the future
Direct transition Alternative transition Transition requiring support
Failed transition
“We are both state employees with a permanent contract.
So even if I’d decide to stop working and stay at home for a while, I still would have a safe job afterwards.”
(Françoise, 30 years)
“My future is a big question mark. I have no idea, I am relaxed.”
(Rebecca, 29 years)
“I have no choice, I keep going on, of course in the hope of finding something. But when?”
(Madeleine, 29 years)
“I am rather negative. I always think
negatively.”
(Chiara, 18 years)
Institute for Research on Generations and Family:
Institute for Research on Generations and Family:
Problems, trends and developments
Institute for Research on Generations and Family:
Problems and risks of the
transition into work
Individual risk factors
– Low education
– Foreign nationality/Migration background
– Male gender
– Inadequate performance of the three national languages
– Low socio-economic status
– Psychological factors such as self-efficacy
– Socially deprived families
Structural risk factors
– Atypical forms of employment (part-time work, temporary contracts, etc.)
– Changes of the labor market (employment structure, tertiarization)
Consequences of failed or problematic transition
– Support services careers
– Poverty/social exclusion
– Health problems
– Social follow-up costs
Institute for Research on Generations and Family:
School-to-work transition: trends and
developments in Luxembourg
Transition phase is extended, entry into working life is delayed (about 3 years)
Dynamic labour market, high qualification requirements, very high job
matching
Low level of unemployment, rather high youth unemployment rate
Competitive situation due to large number of cross border commuters
High immigration rate, high population growth (since 1991: +40%)
Segmentation of the employment market according to nationalties
Female activity rate rising but still on average level (2014: 65,5%)
Institute for Research on Generations and Family:
Further results
If you are interested in more detailed information
or additional results… you can find
The Luxembourgish Youth Report
– English short version
– German full version
http://www.jugend-in-
luxemburg.lu/jugendbericht-2015/
Institute for Research on Generations and Family:
Thank you for your kind attention!
Institute for Research on Generations and Family:
Bibliography
– Arnett, J. J. (2001). Conceptions of the Transition to Adulthood: Perspectives From Adolescence Through Midlife. Journal of Adult Development, 8(2), 133–143.
– Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469–480.
– du Bois-Reymond, M. (2009). Models of navigation and life management. In A. Furlong (Ed.), Handbook of youth and young adulthood. New perspectives and agendas (pp. 31–38). London, New York: Routledge.
– Galland, O. (2003). Adolescence, Post-adolescence, Youth: Revised Interpretations. Revue française de sociologie, 5(44), 163–188.
– Hurrelmann, K., & Quenzel, G. (2015). Lost in transition: status insecurity and inconsistency as hallmarks of modern adolescence. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 20(3), 261–270.
– Kohli, M. (2000): Arbeit im Lebenslauf: Alte und neue Paradoxien [Work in the life course: Old and new paradoxes]. In: J. Kocka & C. Offe (Hrsg.), Geschichte und Zukunft der Arbeit. Frankfurt: Campus, S. 362-382.
– Mørch, S. (2003). Youth and education. Young, 11(1), 49–73.
– Rahn, P. (2005): Übergang zur Erwerbstätigkeit: Bewältigungsstrategien in benachteiligten Lebenslagen [Transition to employment: Coping strategies in disadvantaged situations]. Wiesbaden: VS Verl. für Sozialwissenschaften.
– Schumacher, A.; Haas, C.; Weis, D. & Heinen, A. (2015): Übergänge vom Bildungssystem in die Arbeitswelt [Transitions from the educational system to the working world]. In H. Willems (Hrsg.), Übergänge vom Jugend- ins Erwachsenenalter: Verläufe, Perspektiven, Herausforderungen. Luxemburg, 61-162.
– Shanahan, M. J., Porfeli, E. J., Mortimer, J. T., & Erickson Lance D. (2005). Subjective age identity and the transition to adulthood. In R. A. Settersten, F. F. Furstenberg, & R. G. Rumbaut (Eds.), The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Series on Mental Health and Development.
Research Network on Transitions to Adulthood and Public Policy. On the frontier of adulthood. Theory, research, and public policy (pp. 225–255).
Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; University Presses Marketing
– Wallace, C. (1997). How Old is Young and How Young is Old?: The Restructuring of Age and the Life-course in Europe. Wien.
– Walther, A. (2006). Regimes of youth transitions: Choice, flexibility and security in young people’s experiences across different European contexts.
Young, 14(2), 119–139
– Walther, A. & Plug, W. (2006): Transitions from school to work in Europe: Destandardization and policy trends. New Directions for Child & Adolescent Development (113), 77-90.
– Willems, H. (Hrsg.) (2015): Übergänge vom Jugend- ins Erwachsenenalter: Verläufe, Perspektiven, Herausforderungen [Transitions from adolescence to adulthood: Profiles, perspectives, challenges]. Luxemburg.
– Zahn-Waxler, C. (1996). Environment, Biology, and Culture: Implications for Adolescent Development. Developmental Psychology, 32(4), 571–573.