Direct and indirect effects of climate
change on the livestock sector from an
economic and social perspective
UMR SELMET, 2015, coll.
A.Ickowicz, V.Alary, A.Aboul-Naga, J.Lasseur, P.Lecomte, C.Manoli
,
M.A.Osma, I.Touré, A.Wane ….
Actually World animal production provides (FAO 2014):
26% of proteins consumption
13% of calories
1 billion poor people with livelihood
1.3 billion ‘jobs’
Contributes
14,5% of world GHG emissions
Accounts for
23 billion animals
1.4 trillion $
Uses
35% of crop production
30% of ice free land
Global sector view
Distribution of livestock systems
Source :
Livestock Long
Shadow,
FAO-LEAD 2006
Diversity of functions, services and systems
Descheemaeker et al. 2014
Roles of livestock in adaptation process
Livestock part of the NRM at the
regional level:
use of rangelands and marginal lands,
maintaining landscapes and increasing
ecosystems resilience (biodiversity, fire
hazards), natural resource management
(including water)
Livestock part of
household/community livelihoods:
significant contribution in food security and
livelihood improvement
Livestock: creation of links between
families, communities and regions through
transhumance and migration social capital
(protection, insurance, cement between the
cities and its hinterlands)
Effects of Climate Change on Livestock
Systems : Economic and social point of view
Direct effects
Productivity
Ressource availability
Ressource access
Indirect effects
Market prices
Conflicts
Exemples on case studies…
Egypt (ANR Elvulmed) : APRI / ARC;
SDCMR; Icarda
South of France (ANR Elvulmed, Climed)
Sahel (ANR Eclis): PPZS, ISRA, ILRI, CNRS,
IRD
Two case studies: PACA (Provence Alpes- Côte d’Azur, France) and
North Coastal zones (CZWD, Egypt)
Source: Bonnet, P., 2013, QGIS
Main Global Changes in the Mediterranean
Context
Doubling of the population
during the last 40 years in
the Mediterranean basin
Urbanization in the coastal zones
and rural emigration
“hot spots” of climatic
change
(Christensen et al., 2007)
high variability of
temperature and rainfall
109 108 51 247 214 215 34 129 47 84 81 177 274 179 144 80 152 75 73 155 224 150 126 83 191 119 74 128 114 220 80 97 84 226 70 195 96 108 209 62 140 126 101 162 226 275 100 235 260 182 402 107 119 136 108 148 124 109 128 98 105 115 263 137 110 87 186 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 44 -45 46 -47 48 -49 50 -51 52 -53 54 -55 56 -57 58 -59 60 -61 62 -63 64 -65 66 -67 68 -69 70 -71 72 -73 74 -75 76 -77 78 -79 80 -81 82 -83 84 -85 86 -87 88 -89 90 -91 1992 1994 1996 98-99 00-01 02-03 2005 2007 2009 2011 m m /m onth years
CZWD: CC within global changes and vulnerability
1. Climatic change
2. Demography Urbanization
3. Wadi development
4. Market change
5. Tourism and migration
employment, land pressure and
access,
Direct impacts : Strong reduction of flock size
Zones
No of
breeders
a2011
1995
Variation
of flock
1995-2011
Flock size
Rainfed
(From Sidi Barani to
Debaa)
119
73
204
-64%
Newly reclaimed land (El
Hammam+ Borg el Arab)
29
153
162
-6%
Siwa oasis
28
43
62
-31%
Total
176
81
174
-53%
Sheep
Rainfed (From Sidi Barani to
Debaa)
117
91
168
-46%
Newly reclaimed land (El
Hammam+ Borg el Arab)
24
193
172
12%
Siwa oasis
20
28
46
-39%
Total
161
98
154
-36%
Goats
Rainfed (From Sidi Barani to
Debaa)
111
23
42
-45%
Newly reclaimed land (El
Hammam+ Borg el Arab)
20
20
31
-34%
Siwa oasis
19
26
42
-38%
Total
150
23
41
-43%
Direct impacts : Land Cover Change
8700 Hectares of vegetation
cover have been lost due to
Drought
Vegetation
Bare soil
Dry trees
RECOLAD Workshop, Paris, 11-12 February 2015 12
Development of semi intensive poultry systems
Increase in the number of poultry production units between 2007 (1 farm)
and 2012 (54 farms) in the wadi of Naghamish (Matrouh Goverornate).
Vulnerable profiles in the rainfed zone
0% 50% 100% 150% 200% 250% 300% 350%Family
members
head education
rainfed area
wadi area
Ewe number
goat number
gov job
private job
occasional job
net income per
capita
average
profile 1. Most vulnerable
with very weak tribal links
profile 4. highly vulnerable
with strong social tribal
links
profile 2. Less vulnerable
with only tribal links
profile 3. Least vulnerable
with strong out and in-tribal
links
Diversity of adaptation process according to capital
asset profiles
Clusters
Major sources of risk
How do households
respond?
Most vulnerable (profile 1)
Drought and access on
pastureland (reduction of
plants and shrubs)
Livestock mobility
and animal
transaction
Highly vulnerable (profile 4)
Drought
Economic or political
instability
Diversification in cash crops
(Fig and Olive) thanks to
strong internal and external
family bonds
Less vulnerable (profile 2)
Drought
Economic activity in Marsa
Matrouh
Invest in education
for
diversification out of
agriculture thanks to the
proximity of the city Marsa
Matrouh
Least vulnerable (profile 3)
Drought
Trading activities and
business with Libya
Strong family bonds within
the tribes
• Climate change induce more drought hazard
• In PACA region, livestock system respond through more mobility
toward mountain resources
• In 2000s, sheep owners developed:
• more regular summer transhumance (longer in dry
periods)
• Winter transhumance in plains for mountain production
systems due to decrease in forage production
France PACA : Enhance adaptation capacity
through governance mecanisms at local level
Transhumance patterns modification in Provence
Summer transhumance for « Basse Provence » herds
Winter and summer transhumance for « Alpin » herds
• Modification of livestock spatial density and land use which
need specific governance mecanisms
• Local debates on the appropriate mecanisms (private and/or
collective)
• Competition on spatial resources (tourism, crop,
conservation,…) which need local regulations (Ex: Plan
d’Occupation Pastoral organised by local collective
organisations (CERPAM).
Need for governance mecanisms
Sahel Case study : Possible scenarios
2°C scenario RCP2.6
4°C scenario RCP8.5
Floods or Droughts ???
Key Challenge for the Sahel
Annual variations in the Sahel rainfall index between 1900 and 2010
Intra-annual
variation
Exacerbation of social tensions (1) Competition on
land and natural resources
Strong tension on land and resources with land tenure risks
Young people increasingly removing pastoral activities
Touré et al, 2013
Exacerbation of social tensions (2) Increased
mobility and conflict risks
Summary of recent national and transborder herd movements and
commercial cattle trade channels
Touré et al, 2013
Campement
AMA0
16 WED172
WED20
7 WED13 TES007 TES095 TES071 TES048 TES045 AMA001 TES121 WED200 TES074
WED06 2 AMA 031 AMA034 Activité E E+autrePonc tuel E+Autr ePonct
uel E E E E E E E+Autre E+Autre E+Autre E+ Autre
E+Autr e E+Aut re+ agric E+Autre +Agric
Comm. E E E E(tefo) E(dioula) E (dioula) E (dioula) E (Tab) E (Tab) E (Tab) E (dioula) E
(dioula) E (dioula) E (Tab) E E
Nombre Gall 1 ou 2 1 ou 2 1 ou 2 1 ou 2 1 ou 2 1 ou 2 1 ou 2 1 ou 2 1 ou 2 1 ou 2 1 ou 2 1 ou 2 1 ou 2 1 ou 2 3 ou 4 3 ou 4 Nombre Foyr 1 ou 2 1 ou 2 1 ou 2 1 ou 2 1 ou 2 1 ou 2 3 ou 4 3 ou 4 3 ou 4 3 ou 4 3 ou 4 3 ou 4 3 ou 4 1 ou 2? sup a 4 sup a 4 Pop Adulte P P P P P M M M G M G G G M G G Effectifs PR P P P P M M G G G G G G M M P M Eff. Bovins 0 0 < 20 < 20 21-50 51- > 51- > 51- > 51- > 51 -> 51- > 21-50 21-50 21-50 51- > < 20
Saloum non non non non non oui (fini!) oui oui non non partie partie non non partie non
Orga.Gestion Centr Centr. Centr. Centr. Centr. Coll. Centr. Centr. Centr. Centr. centr. Coll. Coll. Centr. Centr . Centr. Entraide FP FP FP FP FP FP FP I I FP FP FP FP I FP ?
Small-holders
focused on
livestock
activities.
Vulnerable
Diversified livestock
keepers.
Least vulnerable
Small
capital.
Diversified
Vulnerable
Small traders Technical livestock keepers
Large herd and family with external activities
Manoli, 2012
Exacerbation of market problems and shocks
low local market prices during
crisis
effect on terms of trade
trade exchanges correlated to
harvest and rainfall (in Mali in
2010,
terms
of
trade
equivalent to those of the
worst year of the decade)
delayed transmission of rising
food prices from international
to local markets
lack
of
harmonized
information on markets
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 J u ly A u g u s t S e p te m b re Oc to b e r N o v e mbe r D e c e mbe r J a n u a ry Feb ru a ry M a rc h A p ril M a y J u n eGAO Central
- 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 J ul y A ug us t S ep tem bre O c tob er Nov em be r Dec em be r J an ua ry F eb rua ry Ma rc h A pril May Jun e MENAKA2002-2003 (bad year) 2007-2008 (good year) 2009-2010
Exacerbation of regulation instability
(-) no shared vision
(-) disparities of legal texts,
pastoral codes and regulation
modes : conflicts
(-)
weakness
of
law
enforcement agencies
(+) progressive recognition of
the role and function of
pastoralism
(+) recognition of the need to
harmonize regional legal texts
Conclusions
Economical and social adaptation strategies of
livestock systems are diverse and dependant on
capital and context
Need to adapt a diversity of resources (animal,
forage, feed,….) to changing environment with
different pathways
Institutions and regulations have to adapt to new
situations and dynamics (mobility, land use,
markets, conflict resolution,…)
RECOLAD Workshop, Paris, 11-12 February 2015 27