• Aucun résultat trouvé

Elicitation of Experts' Knowledge for Functional Linear Regression

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Elicitation of Experts' Knowledge for Functional Linear Regression"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-02788256

https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02788256

Submitted on 5 Jun 2020

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Elicitation of Experts’ Knowledge for Functional Linear Regression

- Paul-Marie Grollemund, Christophe Abraham, Meïli Baragatti, - Pierre Pudlo

To cite this version:

- Paul-Marie Grollemund, Christophe Abraham, Meïli Baragatti, - Pierre Pudlo. Elicitation of Ex- perts’ Knowledge for Functional Linear Regression. 2018 ISBA World Meeting, Jun 2018, Edinburgh, United Kingdom. 1 p., 2018, �10.13140/RG.2.2.14618.54728�. �hal-02788256�

(2)

Elicitation of Experts’ Knowledge for Functional Linear Regression

Grollemund, P.-M., Abraham, C., Pudlo, P. and Baragatti, M.

paul-marie.grollemund@umontpellier.fr

Abstract

We present an approach to elicit experts’ knowledge about the Bliss model [1] which is a parcimonious Bayesian Functional Linear Regression model. We derive an informative prior from elicited information and we define weights to tune prior information contribution on the estimators.

Sparse Step function

βθ(t) =

K

X

k=1

bk1[ak,bk](t) (1)

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

101234

Bliss

Bayesian Functional Linear Regression with Sparse Step functions aggregates "weak learners" in a Bayesian way.

Data D: yi, xi(·) where xi(·) ∈ L2([0, 1]) Model: see [2, 5]

yi|xi(·), θ ∼ N

µ +

Z 1 0

xi(t)βθ(t) dt, σ2

(2) where βθ(·) is given in (1).

Noninformative Prior π0(·) and MCMC: [1]

Bayesian Estimator with L2-loss:

βˆ(t) = Z

π0(θ|D)βθ(t) dθ (3) where π0(·|D) is the posterior and βθ as in (1).

R Package

Available at

github.com/pmgrollemund/bliss/

Elicitation

Aim:

Collect experts’ knowledge [4] about the coefficient function Various experts provide: De = yie, xei (·), cei

for i = 1, . . . , ne - pseudo data: yie and xei (·)

- certainty: cei for each pseudo observation

Informative prior

Informative prior is defined as a fractional posterior [3] for which:

- the initial prior is the vaguely noninformative prior π0(·) and - the pseudo data model is (2)

πE(θ) = π(θ|D1, . . . , DE; w) ∝ π0(θ)

E

Y

e=1

p(De|θ; w) where p(De|θ; w) =

ne

Y

i=1

p yie|xei (·), θwie Interpretation : a sequential learning approach

- from initial prior, learn from pseudo data to derive an informative prior - from informative prior, learn from observed data to derive a posterior

Tuning Weights

Naive approach: wie = cei

- Overconfidence Bias, see [4]

Deriving weights from important properties:

- Experts’ interactions (re,f ∈ [0, 1] is the dependence between expert e and expert f) - pseudo data weight ≤ observed data weight

wie = cei × (interaction) × (lower ps. data weight) = cei × 1 1 + P

f6=e re,f × n

ne × E

Illustrations

Prior

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

−2024

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

−2024

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

−2024

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

−2024

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

−2024

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

−2024

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

−2024

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

−2024

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

Posterior

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

−2024

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

−2024

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

−2024

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

−2024

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

−2024

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

−2024

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

−2024

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

−2024

two independent experts low certainty (cei ≈ 0)

many dependent experts (naive approach)

many dependent experts a (tuned weights)

The marginal posterior distributions of βθ(t) (for each t) are represented using heat maps. Red (resp. white) colour is used to represent high (resp. low) posterior densities.

Prior expectation for each expert Prior expectation Posterior expectation Posterior expectation without prior information

References

[1] Grollemund, P.-M., Abraham, C., Baragatti, M. and Pudlo, P. (2018) Bayesian Functional Linear Regression with Sparse Step functions, Bayesian Analysis.

[2] Morris (2015) Functional regression, Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application.

[3] O’Hagan (1995) Fractional Bayes factors for model comparison, JRSSB.

[4] O’Hagan, A., Buck, C., Daneshkhah, A., Eiser, J., Garthwaite, P., Jenkinson, D., . . . and Rakow, T. (2006) Uncertain judgements: eliciting experts’ probabilities, John Wiley & Sons.

[5] Reiss, P., Goldsmith, J., Shang, H.L. and Ogden, T. R. (2015) Methods for scalar-on-function regression, International Statistical Review.

View publication stats View publication stats

Références

Documents relatifs

(James 2010).. C3) to varied operational situations, organizations have generalized the usefulness of data by developing charts similar to the one shown in Figure

In such models, a single dependency link is used to represent all the dependencies from one actor to another in one direction, with the dependums written as an itemized

In this paper, we propose an integrated security requirements elicitation method that uses Common Criteria Part 2 [8] as a guideline or knowledge source while require- ments

To this aim we propose a parsimonious and adaptive decomposition of the coefficient function as a step function, and a model including a prior distribution that we name

The reader is referred to the forthcoming display (5) for an immediate illustration and to Mas, Pumo (2006) for a first article dealing with a functional autoregressive model

Although Google scholar covers a variety of publications and patents, additional sources of infor- mation (e.g., the scholar’s active research projects, funding information, etc.)

Knowledge Based Systems A KB can be created in different tools, and different solvers can be used to get a solution for a specific problem.. For my research I selected

A Corpus Builder: Retrieving Raw Data from GitHub for Knowledge Reuse In Requirements Elicitation.. Roxana Lisette Quintanilla Portugal, Hugo Roque, Julio Cesar Sampaio do Prado