• Aucun résultat trouvé

GBS Key concepts

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "GBS Key concepts"

Copied!
10
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

GBS Key concepts

(2)

Focus on pressures

❑ GBS quantifies the contribution of economical activities to pressures on biodiversity

❑ GBS account for potential impacts on terrestrial and aquatic (freshwater) biodiversity

GBS

(3)

Flexibility for input data

Physical flows Raw materials

Ecological surveys Data on pressures

Inventories

Financial data

Quali ty A v ail abil ity

GHG, land use type and surface (occupation and conversion)…

Crops, cattle, metals… Water consumption, N emissions, …

Turnover split per region and sector

(4)

GBS accounts separately permanent and additional impacts

Static impacts

➢ Biodiversity state

Dynamic impact

=

Dynamic impacts

➢Biodiversity changes

-

(5)

GBS Metric: MSA%

Fore st ec os ystem

MSA = 100%

MSA = 70%

MSA = 50%

MSA = 30%

MSA = 10%

(6)

1 MSA.m² loss

is equivalent to

the artifitialization of 1 m² of pristine natural ecosystem GBS Metric MSA.km²

𝑴𝑺𝑨. 𝒎 2

MSA% value Impacted surface

(7)

Towards quantitative results aggregation:

combining terrestrial and aquatic

PAGE 11

130 million km² 11 million km²

aggregates terrestrial and aquatic impacts by expressing both as a fraction of their respective surface area and multiplying by 10^9 (parts per billion)

MSAppb

Part per billion (ppb): used for proportions, corresponds to a ratio of 10^-9

It can be used for intensities also, e.g. to express MSA.m²/kEUR in MSAppb/bEUR

1 109 Respective areas of terrestrial and

aquatic ecosystems

(8)

❑ Recovery time assumption: 50 years + linear curve

❑ Inline with time integrated metrics such as PDF.m2.yr

Towards quantitative results aggregation:

combining dynamic and static impacts

PAGE 12

• Static impacts can be seen as a missed opportunity for biodiversity recovery

• This opportunity can be estimated to 1/50 over 1 year

• To compare static and dynamic impacts, we divide static impacts by 50 (assuming dynamic impacts are computed over a 1-year period)

MSA

score

(9)

Towards quantitative results aggregation:

example

PAGE 13

Impacts of the company

1 MSA.km² 10 MSA.km²

8 MSAppb 46 MSAppb

Impacts in MSA.km²

Impacts in MSAppb

Impacts in MSA score

88 MSA score Static Dynamic

100 MSA.km²

Static Dynamic 0.5 MSA.km²

800 MSAppb 920 MSAppb

Static Dynamic 54 MSAppb 1720 MSAppb

54 MSA score 34 MSA score

(10)

… that enables to to take into account all sectors and

all scopes

Références

Documents relatifs

Iron is reported to interact with other metals. In addition, it has been shown that genetic background may impact iron metabolism. Our objective was to characterize,

While the main objective of my study was to examine immigrant youths' constructions of health and fitness, I was interested in learning more about their own personal health

A simulation step starts by generating the tool path, the tool size, and the compaction volume from the user- specified parameters.. The simulation step proceeds through

A 28-kDa band representing the FMDV VP1 protein was detected by western blotting with rabbit serum anti-FMDV(Asia1 type) VP1 in rPPRV/VP1-infected Vero cells and JSL/06- infected

h and tensile blob size c are shown, c) Deformation under the assumption that the aggregates are under lateral compression.. Here the height h of the deformed blob is smaller than

random vec- tors which use our identities to provide rates of convergence in information theoretic central limit theorems (both in Fisher information distance and in relative

Toda [ 1992 ] introduces skew division-free arithmetic circuits, which have the property that at least one of the two operands in each multiplication node is either a scalar constant

Lemma 37. We are going to explore all the consequences induced by this constraint.. We are going to explore all the consequences induced by this constraint. When the ring is