READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE. https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/copyright
Vous avez des questions? Nous pouvons vous aider. Pour communiquer directement avec un auteur, consultez la première page de la revue dans laquelle son article a été publié afin de trouver ses coordonnées. Si vous n’arrivez pas à les repérer, communiquez avec nous à PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca.
Questions? Contact the NRC Publications Archive team at
PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca. If you wish to email the authors directly, please see the first page of the publication for their contact information.
NRC Publications Archive
Archives des publications du CNRC
This publication could be one of several versions: author’s original, accepted manuscript or the publisher’s version. / La version de cette publication peut être l’une des suivantes : la version prépublication de l’auteur, la version acceptée du manuscrit ou la version de l’éditeur.
Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at
Avalanche research by the National Research Council of Canada
Gold, L. W.
https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/droits
L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site
LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB.
NRC Publications Record / Notice d'Archives des publications de CNRC:
https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/object/?id=67f82821-836e-4857-a329-1e4c987fe687 https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/voir/objet/?id=67f82821-836e-4857-a329-1e4c987fe687. .
rm
N21d
National Research
Conseil national
1.1324
ISll
Council Canada
de recherches Canada
* 2
3LD6
Division of Division des- - Building Research recherches en batiment
Avalanche Research by the
National Research Council of Canada
by L.W. GoldANALYZED
Reprinted from
Collected Papers from "Science of Snow" Yamagata International Snow Symposium Japan, 30 January
-
2 February 1984 p. 41 -50(DBR Paper No. 1324)
Price $2.00 NRCC 25013
Le programme d e r e c h e r c h e s s u r l e s a v a l a n c h e s du C o n s e i l n a t i o n a l d e r e c h e r c h e s a dgbutd
2
l a f i n d e s ann'ees 50 a v e c l a c o n s t r u c t i o n d e l a r o u t e t r a n s c a n a d i e n n e q u i d e v a i t f r a n c h i r l e c o l d e Rogers P a s s e n C o l o m b i e B r i t a n n i q u e . h r a i s o n d e l a f a i b l e d e n s i t ' e d e p o p u l a t i o n d a n s l e s montagnes d e l ' 0 u e s t c a n a d i e n , i l a Q'e p o s s i b l e d ' a p p l i q u e r c e r t a i n e s mgthodes d e p r o t e c t i o n a u b a s d e s c o u l o i r s d ' a v a l a n c h e s . L ' o b j e c t i f du programme du CNRC e s t d e m e t t r e a u p o i n t d e s msthodes d e p r ' e v i s i o n d e s r i s q u e s d ' a v a l a n c h e s e t de d'eterminer l e s c a r a c t ' e r i s t i q u e s d e s s i t e s d ' a v a l a n c h e s e t l e s propri'et'es d e s a v a l a n c h e s elles-mgmes pour p o u v o i r p l a n i f i e r , c o n s t r u i r e e t m e t t r e e n o e u v r e d e s s y s t s m e s d e p r o t e c t i o n e f f i c a c e s . C e t t e comnunication p r ' e s e n t e une d e s c r i p t i o n d e s t r a v a u x e t t r a i t e d e s r e c h e r c h e s pr6eentement en c o u r s .Science
of
Snow
Pub.
,
Yamagata-ken, Japan,
1 985
AVALANCHE RESEARCH BY T H E N A T I O N A L RESEARCH C O U N C I L OF CANADA
Lorne W.
Gold
A s s o c i a t e Director, D i v i s i o n o f B u i l d i n g R e s e a r c h N a t i o n a l R e s e a r c h C o u n c i l o f Canada
O t t a w a , Canada
ABSTRACT
The avalanche research program o f t h e N a t i o n a l Research Council o f Canada began w i t h i n v e s t i g a t i o n s i n t h e l a t e 1950's f o r t h e r o u t e o f t h e Trans-Canada Highway through t h e Rogers Pass r e g i o n o f B r i t i sh Columbia. P o p u l a t i o n d e n s i t i e s a r e low i n t h e mountains o f Western Canada, making
i t p o s s i b l e t o apply avalanche defence methods i n t h e lower o r run-out zones o f avalanche s i t e s . The o b j e c t i v e o f t h e NRCC program has been t o estab l i s h t h e ava lanche hazard eval u a t i o n methods, t h e c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s o f avalanche s i t e s and t h e p r o p e r t i e s o f avalanches t h a t a r e r e q u i r e d i n planning, c o n s t r u c t i n g and o p e r a t i n g these defence systems. I n f o r m a t i o n
i s presented on t h i s work and on c u r r e n t research a c t i v i t y .
INTRODUCTION
The D i v i s i o n o f B u i l d i n g Research, N a t i o n a l Research Council o f Canada (DBR/NRCC), began i t s avalanche i n v e s t i g a t i o n s i n 1957 when one o f i t s s t a f f , P.A. Schaerer, undertook an o b s e r v a t i o n program f o r t h e Federal Department o f P u b l i c Works i n Rogers Pass i n t h e mountains o f B r i t i s h
Columbia. Rogers Pass i s about 30 km i n length and has about 100 avalanche paths t o t h e Trans-Canada Highway, then under c o n s t r u c t i o n ( 1
,
2 ) . The experience obtained from t h i s work provided t h e b a s i s f o r t h e avalanche research program t h a t was s t a r t e d by DBR a f t e r completion o f t h e highway. The o b j e c t i v e o f t h e program, some o f t h e r e s u l t s o b t a i n e d t o date, and c u r r e n t research a c t i v i t y a r e described b r i e f l y .OBJECTIVES OF THE PROGRAM
The p o p u l a t i o n d e n s i t y i n t h e mountains o f Western Canada i s low. Avalanches a r e a danger p r i m a r i l y f o r highways, r a i 1 ways, power l ines,
mine s i t e s , r e c r e a t i o n a l a r e a s and t o u r i s t s . There a r e few permanently o c c u p i e d b u i l d i n g s i n t h e p a t h o f avalanches, b u t t h e d e s i r e t o b u i l d i n hazardous a r e a s i s i n c r e a s i n g ( 3 ) . Seven p e o p l e a r e k i l l e d each y e a r i n avalanche a c c i d e n t s , on t h e average, and p r o p e r t y damage ranges from 0.5 t o 1.0 m i l l i o n d o l l a r s p e r y e a r ( 4 ,
5).
Because t h e areas s u b j e c t t o avalanche a c t i v i t y a r e g e n e r a l l y u n i n h a b i t e d and t h e upper r e g i o n s o f avalanche s i t e s a r e r e l a t i v e l y i n a c c e s s i b l e , i t i s u s u a l l y uneconomical t oi n v e s t i n defence systems i n t h e avalanche s t a r t i n g zone, as i s done, f o r
example, i n Japan and S w i t z e r l a n d . I n Canada i t i s more a p p r o p r i a t e t o
use avalanche defence systems t h a t can be a p p l i e d f r o m v a l l e y l o c a t i o n s
such as avalanche run-out zones. The o b j e c t i v e o f t h e DBR r e s e a r c h program
i s t o d e v e l o p t h e knowledge and defence methods r e q u i r e d t o s e l e c t , design, c o n s t r u c t and o p e r a t e such defence systems.
PLANNING AVALANCHE DEFENCE SYSTEMS
The p o s s i b i l i t y t h a t an avalanche w i l l o c c u r depends o n t h e n a t u r e o f t h e t e r r a i n and o n t h e weather. One o f t h e f i r s t t a s k s u n d e r t a k e n i n t h e r e s e a r c h program was t o e s t a b l i s h t h e methods t h a t s h o u l d be a p p l i e d i n Canada t o d e t e r m i n e t h e danger f r o m avalanches a t a g i v e n s i t e and t h e most
a p p r o p r i a t e defence. An avalanche defence system s h o u l d have maximum
e f f e c t i v e n e s s f o r minimum c o s t (61. I n a r r i v i n g a t a d e c i s i o n c o n c e r n i n g t h e p r o p e r b a l a n c e between e f f e c t i v e n e s s and c o s t i t i s necessary t o s p e c i f y t h e purpose o f t h e defence, t h e r i s k t h a t i s a c c e p t a b l e , and t h e c h o i c e o f s u i t a b l e defence methods. As t h e r e i s u s u a l l y l i t t l e i n f o r m a t i o n on t h e avalanche s i t u a t i o n a t most Canadian l o c a t i o n s , e v a l u a t i o n o f t h e hazard i s n o r m a l l y c a r r i e d o u t i n two stages, p a r t i c u l a r l y f o r z o n i n g d e c i s i o n s w i t h r e s p e c t t o t h e l a n d use t h a t w i l l be p e r m i t t e d ( 3 ) . The m e t h o d o l o g i e s t o be used i n t h i s two-stage e v a l u a t i o n have been developed and demonstrated t h r o u g h a p p l i c a t i o n a t s p e c i f i c s i t e s such a s t h o s e a t Rogers Pass.
The f i r s t s t e p i s t o d e t e r m i n e where t h e avalanches o c c u r t h r o u g h a g e n e r a l survey, u s i n g a e r i a l photographs, t o p o g r a p h i c a l maps and l i m i t e d f i e l d s t u d i e s , i n c l u d i n g , i f p o s s i b l e , o b s e r v a t i o n o f avalanche d e p o s i t s i n t h e s p r i n g a f t e r most o f t h e a v a l a n c h e a c t i v i t y has t a k e n p l a c e . T h i s p r e l i m i n a r y s t u d y p r o v i d e s an a p p r e c i a t i o n o f t h e s e r i o u s n e s s o f t h e avalanche hazard and t h e b a s i s f o r t h e subsequent, more d e t a i l e d survey.
The second s t a g e i s a d e t a i l e d i n v e s t i g a t i o n o f each s i t e a t w h i c h a s e r i o u s a v a l a n c h e may o c c u r t o o b t a i n t h e i n f o r m a t i o n r e q u i r e d f o r d e c i s i o n s c o n c e r n i n g l a n d use and defence systems. O b s e r v a t i o n s a r e made on t h e
c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s o f t h e a v a l a n c h e path, i n c l u d i n g t h e a c c u m u l a t i o n , s t a r t i n g , and r u n - o u t zones. Evidence i s o b t a i n e d f r o m v e g e t a t i o n and o t h e r sources o f t h e e x t e n t o f t h e area t h a t may be a f f e c t e d ( 6 , 7 ) . A l l r e l e v a n t
c l i m a t o l o g i c a l and h i s t o r i c a l d a t a t h a t may p r o v i d e i n f o r m a t i o n o n t h e o c c u r r e n c e and degree o f hazard a r e c o l l e c t e d . An example o f t h i s i s t h e c l i m a t o l o g i c a l and avalanche o c c u r r e n c e s t u d y c a r r i e d o u t by F i t z h a r r i s and Schaerer f o r Rogers Pass area, c o v e r i n g t h e p e r i o d 1909 t o 1977 (8, 9 ) .
I d e a l l y , t h e i n f o r m a t i o n from t h i s i n v e s t i g a t i o n would a l l o w t h e p l a n n e r and e n g i n e e r t o d e t e r m i n e t h e extreme v a l u e s o f t h e i m p o r t a n t p r o p e r t i e s o f avalanches a t each s i t e , f o r example, t h e mass o f an avalanche w i t h a r e t u r n p e r i o d o f 10, 30, o r 100 y e a r s (1 01, o r t h e maximum run-out d i s t a n c e and
p r o v i d e s t a t i s t i c a l data, and f o r most l o c a t i o n s i t has n o t been p o s s i b l e
t o develop such a r e c o r d . Through i t s r e s e a r c h program, DBR i s s e e k i n g ways
i n which s a t i s f a c t o r y d e s i g n v a l u e s can be o b t a i n e d f r o m s h o r t - t e r m o b s e r v a t i o n s .
AVALANCHE C L A S S I F I C A T I O N
r There i s a c o n s i d e r a b l e d i f f e r e n c e o f o p i n i o n as t o how avalanches
s h o u l d be c l a s s i f i e d ( I l l . The approach a p p l i e d s u c c e s s f u l l y i n Canada i s t o c l a s s i f y them a c c o r d i n g t o t h e i r p o t e n t i a l d e s t r u c t i v e e f f e c t s when
I moving a t t h e i r e s t i m a t e d maximum o r t e r m i n a l speed ( s e e T a b l e I ) .
I m p o r t a n t f a c t o r s d e t e r m i n i n g t h e c l a s s i f i c a t i o n a r e mass, l e n g t h o f path, and f r e e w a t e r c o n t e n t . A l t h o u g h t h i s method i s s u b j e c t i v e , i t i s m e a n i n g f u l
i n t h a t i t r e l a t e s t o t h e e x t e n t o f p o t e n t i a l damage; t h e s i z e o f t h e o b j e c t t h a t c o u l d be a f f e c t e d i n c r e a s e s w i t h i n c r e a s e i n c l a s s i f i c a t i o n number.
TABLE I . Canadian Snow Avalanche S i z e C l a s s i f i c a t i o n System
and T y p i c a l F a c t o r s
Typ i c a l T y p i c a l Path T y p i c a l Impact
S i z e D e s c r i p t i o n Mass Length, m Pressures, kPa
I R e l a t i v e l y harmless <I O t t o peop l e 2 Could bury, i n j u r e , 1 0 2 t 100 o r k i l l a p e r s o n 3 C o u l d b u r y a c a r , 1 0 3 t 1000 d e s t r o y a smal l b u i l d i n g , o r b r e a k a few t r e e s 4 Cou l d d e s t r o y a r a i l w a y car, l a r g e t r u c k , severa l b l dgs., o r a f o r e s t w i t h an area o f up t o 4 ha (40,000 m2) 5 L a r g e s t snow
ava l anches known; c o u l d d e s t r o y a v i l l age o r a f o r e s t o f 40 ha
S I Z E AND FREQUENCY OF AVALANCHES
One o f t h e p r i n c i p a l aims o f t h e DBR r e s e a r c h program i s t o develop methods o f p r e d i c t i ng t h e frequency o f o c c u r r e n c e and s i ze o f ava lanches
a t a g i v e n s i t e based p r i m a r i l y o n i n f o r m a t i o n o n t e r r a i n and weather ( 7 , 10). The b u i l d - u p o f a c o n d i t i o n t h a t may r e s u l t i n avalanches depends on a
p a r t i c u l a r sequence o f s e v e r a l weather e v e n t s , and t h i s sequence w i l l v a r y from r e g i o n t o r e g i o n .
I t has been found t h a t t h e frequency o f o c c u r r e n c e o f avalanches a t Rogers Pass, f o r example, depends p r i m a r i l y on t h e mean i n c l i n e o f t h e avalanche p a t h from t h e f r a c t u r e l i ne t o t h e t o p o f t h e r u n - o u t zone and on t h e square o f a "wind exposure index" ( 1 0 ) . The w i n d exposure index c o v e r s a s c a l e o f i n c r e a s i n g w i n d e f f e c t i n t h e a c c u m u l a t i o n zone, from c o m p l e t e l y s h e l t e r e d ( i n d e x No. I ) t o f u l l exposure on t h e l e e s i d e o f a wide r i d g e ( i n d e x No. 5 ) . I n g e n e r a l agreement w i t h s t u d i e s i n o t h e r p a r t s o f t h e w o r l d , t h e mean p a t h i n c l i n e has t o be g r e a t e r t h a n a b o u t 25 deg f o r
ava I anches t o occur. F o r i n c l i nes g r e a t e r t h a n a b o u t 42 deg, frequency i s independent o f i n c l i n e . F a c t o r s such as o r i e n t a t i o n , w i d t h and roughness o f t h e avalanche p a t h have l i t t l e i n f l u e n c e o n f r e q u e n c y a t Rogers Pass,
b u t t h e y c o u l d be i m p o r t a n t i n o t h e r r e g i o n s .
One c h a r a c t e r i s t i c o f t h e measurements made i n t h i s s t u d y , and o f a l l measurements o f avalanche p r o p e r t i e s , avalanche s i t e s and weather, i s t h e i r g r e a t v a r i a b i l i t y . T h i s v a r i a b i l i t y r e q u i r e s c a r e f u l t r e a t m e n t when s e e k i n g r e l a t i o n s h i p s among avalanches, t e r r a i n , and weather.
The p r o p e r t i e s o f an a v a l a n c h e t h a t can be e s t i m a t e d a f t e r i t has o c c u r r e d a r e t h e s i z e and average d e n s i t y o f t h e d e p o s i t , t o t a l mass, w a t e r
c o n t e n t and r u n - o u t d i s t a n c e . DBR has been making such e s t i m a t e s i n Rogers Pass s i n c e 1966 and has developed a method o f p r e d i c t i n g t h e mass o f maximum avalanches f o r t h a t r e g i o n f r o m i n f o r m a t i o n on snowfal l and t e r r a i n . I t has been found t h a t a b o u t once i n 12 y e a r s avalanches w i l l o c c u r w i t h a mass much g r e a t e r t h a n t h e annual average maximum.. Such m a j o r avalanches a r e t r e a t e d a s a s e p a r a t e p o p u l a t i o n i n s t a t i s t i c a l analyses; mass, M, o f t h e s e l a r g e avalanches can be expressed as:
where C i s a c o e f f i c i e n t t h a t depends on t h e i n c l i n e o f t h e s t a r t i n g zone and t h e r e t u r n p e r i o d o f t h e l a r g e avalanche,
S i s t h e 30-year maximum w a t e r e q u i v a l e n t o f t h e snow c o v e r i n t h e a v a l a n c h e path, and
A i s t h e s u r f a c e a r e a o f t h e p a t h .
T h i s e q u a t i o n i s now b e i n g e v a l u a t e d f o r a p p l i c a t i o n i n o t h e r r e g i o n s i n t h e mountains o f Western Canada.
AVALANCHE RUN-OUT DISTANCE
I n f o r m a t i o n o n t h e run-out d i s t a n c e s o f avalanches i s e s s e n t i a l f o r d e c i s i o n s on t h e l o c a t i o n o f highways, b u i l d i n g s , and o t h e r s t r u c t u r e s near an a v a l a n c h e s i t e . Models o f t h e r u n - o u t d i s t a n c e s o f l a r g e avalanches based on t h e dynamics o f t h e m o t i o n and t h e c o e f f i c i e n t o f s l i d i n q f r i c t i o n
between a v a l a n c h e and a v a l a n c h e p a t h a r e b e i n g t e s t e d ( 1 2 , 1 3 ) . The
a p p l i c a t i o n o f t h e s e models i s l i m i t e d , however, because o f l a c k o f i n f o r - m a t i o n o n t h e c o e f f i c i e n t o f s l i d i n g f r i c t i o n , t u r b u l e n t d r a g c o e f f i c i e n t , and mass o f ava l anches.
A second approach i s b e i n g i n v e s t i g a t ' e d i n c o l l a b o r a t i o n w i t h t h e
Norwegian G e o t e c h n i c a l I n s t i t u t e . T h i s i s based o n a s t a t i s t i c a l c o r r e l a t i o n between r u n - o u t d i s t a n c e and c e r t a i n p r o p e r t i e s o f t h e t e r r a i n . The
a n a l y s i s i n d i c a t e s t h a t t h e maximum r u n - o u t d i s t a n c e r e l a t i v e t o a r e f e r e n c e p o i n t up t h e s l o p e can b e p r e d i c t e d w i t h i n g i v e n c o n f i d e n c e l e v e l s , u s i n g t h e p a t h l e n g t h above t h e r e f e r e n c e p o i n t and o t h e r t e r r a i n v a r i a b l e s .
PROPERTIES OF AVALANCHES I N MOTION
One o f t h e f i r s t p r o j e c t s u n d e r t a k e n i n t h e DBR r e s e a r c h program was t o measure t h e speed and i m p a c t p r e s s u r e s o f a v a l a n c h e s . F i g u r e I shows p r e s s u r e c e l I s s e t up i n t h e c e n t e r o f an a v a l a n c h e p a t h . The c e l I s were e n c l o s e d i n c y l i n d r i c a l , s t r e a m l i n e d h o l d e r s and mounted on a s t e e l frame a b o u t 5 m i n h e i g h t . Two s i z e s were used; t h e sur-face a r e a o f one s e t was 645 mm2 and t h a t o f t h e second s e t was 6450 mm2. More r e c e n t l y , p r e s s u r e - m e a s u r i n g d e v i c e s w i t h a s u r f a c e a r e a o f 200,000 mrn2 have been i n s t a l l e d .
F i g . I S t e e l frame w i t h two l o a d c e l I s
The motion o f avalanches i s very complicated and has n o t y e t been descr i bed s a t i s f a c t o r i l y. The measurements show t h e ex i stence o f t h r e e zones: a dense f l o w a l o n g t h e ground surface, a middle zone o f " I i g h t flow," and an a i r b o r n e , powdered snow zone ( F i g . 2 ) (14). The dense, f l o w i n g zone c o n t a i n s most o f t h e mass o f t h e avalanche. I t produces an i n i t i a l peak pressure t h a t subsequently drops t o a r e l a t i v e l y c o n s t a n t value t h a t remains as long as t h e dense snow f l ows p a s t t h e ce l l s.
\
D E N S E F L O W
/
F R O N T A L S P E E D 2 7 . 7 rn
r - '
S C A L E , m
F i g . 2 P r o f i l e o f t h e avalanche 10 February 1977 a t t h e load c e l l mount (Reproduced from t h e Journal o f G l a c i o l o g y by permission o f t h e l n t e r n a t i o n a l G l a c i o l o g i c a l S o c i e t y )
The middle zone o f l i g h t , f l o w i n g snow i s composed o f powder and o f lumps up t o 60 mm i n diameter t h a t a r e thrown upward by t h e t u r b u l e n t motion o f t h e dense f l o w . Pressures were observed whenever a snow lump s t r u c k a gauge, b u t were zero o r very low a t o t h e r times. The avalanching snow appeared t o flow i n waves, as i l l u s t r a t e d i n F i g u r e 2. A t y p i c a l pressure record i s presented i n F i g u r e 3.
1 - - - i 1 u S M A L L L O A D C E L L . 0 . 3 7 m A B O V E B E D S U R F A C E w u n! L I G H T F L O W -D I -+ D E N S E F L O W - 3 I
,,,
L A R G E L O A D C E L L , 0 . 5 8 m A B O V E B E D S U R F A C E 1 TIME, sF i g . 3 lmpact p r e s s u r e r e c o r d i n g s o f avalanche No. 3 o n 10 December 1977 (Reproduced f r o m t h e J o u r n a l o f GI a c i o l o g y by permi s c ' I on
o f t h e I n t e r n a t i o n a l G l a c i o l o g i c a l S o c i e t y )
The o b s e r v a t i o n s have been analysed, assuming t h a t p r e s s u r e , p, i s g i v e n by t h e f o l l o w i n g e q u a t i o n :
where v i s v e l o c i t y o f f l o w (ms'l)
p i s dens i t y o f t h e f l o w i n g snow ( k g m'3)
c i s a c o e f f i c i e n t t h a t depends o n t h e p r o p e r t i e s o f t h e snow and t h e s i z e o f t h e p r e s s u r e gauge.
Values o f d e n s i t y were e s t i m a t e d f r o m measurements o n t h e d e p o s i t e d snow. Values o f c c a l c u l a t e d f r o m measurements o f t h e peak p r e s s u r e and t h e
r e l a t i v e l y c o n s t a n t p r e s s u r e imposed by t h e dense, flowing-snow l a y e r a r e g i v e n i n T a b l e I I . These v a l u e s a r e based on few o b s e r v a t i o n s . Many more a r e r e q u i r e d t o e s t a b l i s h t h e r e l a t i o n between impact p r e s s u r e and avalanche speed and t o d e t e r m i n e t h e f a c t o r s r e s p o n s i b l e f o r t h e wide v a r i a t i o n i n t h e p r e s s u r e s t h a t were observed.
TABLE 1 1 . C o e f f i c i e n t s o f Impact P r e s s u r e
I n i t i a l Peak Pressure Base Pressure
Number o f Mean Number o f Mean Observations = I Observations C b Small load c e l l Dense flow 8 1.68 8 0.48 L i g h t flow 7 1.50 Large load c e l l Dense flow 2 1.14 4 0.43 L i g h t flow 6 0.99
One o f t h e i m p o r t a n t f a c t o r s r e q u i r e d f o r c a l c u l a t i n g p r e s s u r e s and run-out d i s t a n c e , u s i n g a dynamic model, i s speed o f t h e avalanche. The DBR research group have measured avalanche speed v i s u a l l y and by t i m i n g t h e passage o f t h e avalanche u s i n g geophones s e p a r a t e d b y a known d i s t a n c e 5 6 Experiments a r e now b e i n g conducted on measurement o f avalanche speed u s i n g r a d a r . Measurements have been analysed u s i n g t h e f o l l o w i n g e q u a t i o n : where v i s v e l o c i t y (ms-l) 5 i s c o e f f i c i e n t o f t u r b u l e n t f r i c t i o n (mse2) R i s h y d r a u l i c r a d i u s (m) a i s i n c l i n a t i o n o f s l o p e p i s c o e f f i c i e n t o f k i n e t i c f r i c t i o n a i s a c o e f f i c i e n t o f r e s i s t a n c e t h a t i s independent o f speed. The a n a l y s i s i n d i c a t e d t h a t f o r t h e s i t e s s t u d i e d t h e c o e f f i c i e n t o f r e s i s t a n c e , a, was small and c o u l d p r o b a b l y be n e g l e c t e d . The c o e f f i c i e n t , v, appeared t o decrease w i t h v e l o c i t y and good agreement was found by
s e t t i n g i t equal t o 5/v. F i g u r e 4 g i v e s t h e r e s u l t s o f t h e a n a l y s i s o f o b s e r v a t i o n s made f o r dry, damp, and wet snow c o d i t i o n s . A l e a s t squares f i t o f e q u a t i o n ( 3 ) t o t h e s e o b s e r v a t i o n s g i v e s an average v a l u e o f
5 = 1420 m ~ ' ~ . Geophones have been i n s t a l l e d t o p r o v i d e a b e t t e r v a l u e o f t h e speed a t t h e t i m e t h e avalanche s t r i k e s t h e p r e s s u r e c e l l s .
Fig.4 Observed avalanche speeds (Reproduced t h r o u g h t h e c o u r t e s y o f t h e l n t e r n a t i o n a l A s s o c i a t i o n o f H y d r o l o g i c a l Sciences)
CONCLUDING COMMENTS
I n a d d i t i o n t o o b t a i n i n g i n f o r m a t i o n r e q u i r e d f o r t h e s e l e c t i o n , design, and c o n s t r u c t i o n o f avalanche systems, t h e DBR avalanche r e s e a r c h group has f a k e n a l e a d i n g r o l e i n t h e development o f e d u c a t i o n a l programs.
I t has h e l p e d t o p r e p a r e m a t e r i a l f o r c o u r s e s o n avalanche h a z a r d e v a l u a t i o n and p r e d i c t i o n and t o p r e p a r e guide1 i n e s f o r o b s e r v a t i o n o n weather, snow c o n d i t i o n s , and avalanches (17). T h i s work i s c o n s i d e r e d t o be o f g r e a t
importance because o f t h e i n c r e a s i n g need f o r t e c h n i c a l p e o p l e t o become more knowledgeable c o n c e r n i n g avalanche c o n d i t i o n s i n t h e mountains o f Western Canada. I t i s a l so necessary i n o r d e r t o compi l e t h e r e c o r d s o f weather, t e r r a i n , and avalanche o b s e r v a t i o n s t h a t a r e r e q u i r e d by t h e land use p l a n n e r and t h e e n g i n e e r .
REFERENCES
I
.
Schaerer, P.A. Ava I anche defences f o r t h e Trans-Canada Hi ghway a t Rogers Pass. N a t i o n a l Research C o u n c i l Canada, D i v i s i o n o f B u i l d i n g Research, NRCC 7020, 1962.2. Schaerer, P.A. The avalanche hazard e v a l u a t i o n and p r e d i c t i o n a t Rogers Pass. N a t i o n a l Research C o u n c i l Canada, D i v i s i o n o f Bui l d i n g Research, NRCC 7051, 1962.
3. Freer, G.L. and P.A. Schaerer. Snow-avalanche hazard z o n i n g i n B r i t i s h Columbia, Canada. J. G l a c i o l . , 2 6 ( 9 4 ) , 345-354, 1980.
4. Stethem, C.J. and P.A. Schaerer. Avalanche a c c i d e n t s i n Canada.
I . A s e l e c t i o n o f case h i s t o r i e s o f a c c i d e n t s , 1955 t o 1976. N a t i o n a l Research C o u n c i l Canada, D i v i s i o n o f B u i l d i n g Research, NRCC 17292,1980. 5. Stethem, C. J. and P.A. Schaerer. Avalanche a c c i d e n t s i'n Canada.
I I . A s e l e c t i o n o f case h i s t o r i e s o f a c c i d e n t s , 1943 t o 1978. N a t i o n a l Research C o u n c i l Canada, D i v i s i o n o f B u i l d i n g Research, NRCC 18525, 1980. 6. Schaerer, P.A. P l a n n i n g defences a g a i n s t avalanches. Can. Geotech. J.,
7 ( 4 ) , 397-404, 1970.
7. Schaerer, P.A. Analyses o f snow avalanche t e r r a i n . Can. Geotech. J., 16(3), 281-287, 1977.
8. F i t z h a r r i s, B.B. and P.A. Schaerer. Frequency o f ma j o r avalanche w i n t e r s . J. G l a c i o l . , 2 6 ( 9 4 ) , 43-52, 1980.
9. F i t z h a r r i s , B.B. Frequency and c l i m a t o l o g y o f m a j o r avalanches a t Rogers Pass, 1909-1977. N a t i o n a l Research C o u n c i l Canada, D i v i s i o n o f Bu i l d i ng Research, NRCC 19020, 198 1
.
10. Schaerer, P.A. and B.B. F i t z h a r r i s . E s t i m a t i o n o f t h e mass o f l a r g e snow avalanches. Can. J. C i v i l Eng., 1 1 ( 1 ) , 79-81, 1984.
I I . McClung, D.M. and P.A. Schaerer. Snow-avalanche s i z e c l a s s i f i c a t i o n , I n Proc. o f Avalanche Workshop, Vancouver, B.C. N a t i o n a l Research Council Canada, A s s o c i a t e Comnittee on Geotechnical Research, TM 133,
12. McCl ung, D.M. and P.A. Schaerer. D e t e r m i n a t i o n o f avalanche dynamics f r i c t i o n c o e f f i c i e n t s f r o m measured speeds. Annals o f G l a c i o l . , 4,
170-173, 1983.
13. McClung, D.M. D e r i v a t i o n o f V o e l l m y ' s maximum speed and run-out e s t i m a t e s f r a n a c e n t e r o f mass model. J. G l a c i o l . , 29(102), 350-352,
1983.
14. Schaerer, P.A. and A.A. Salway. Seismic and impact-pressure m o n i t o r i n g
o f f l o w i n g avalanches. J . G l a c i o l . , 2 6 ( 9 4 ) , 179-187, 1980.
15. Schaerer, P.A. F r i c t i o n c o e f f i c i e n t s and speed o f f l o w i n g avalanches. Proc. Symposium on Snow Mechanics, G r i n d e l w a l d , 1974, IAHS P u b l i c a t i o n No. 114, 1975, p. 425-432.
16. Salway, A.A. A s e i s m i c and t r a n s d u c e r system f o r m o n i t o r i n g v e l o c i t i e s and impact p r e s s u r e s o f snow avalanches. A r c t i c and A l p i n e Res.,
1 O( 4 1, 769-774, 1978.
17. G u i d e l i n e s f o r weather, snowpack and avalanche o b s e r v a t i o n s . N a t i o n a l Research Counci l Canada, A s s o c i a t e Committee on Geotechn i ca l Research, TM 132, 1982.
T h i s p a p e r , w h i l e b e i n g d i s t r i b u t e d i n r e p r i n t form by t h e D i v i s i o n of B u i l d i n g R e s e a r c h , remains t h e c o p y r i g h t of t h e o r i g i n a l p u b l i s h e r . It s h o u l d n o t be r e p r o d u c e d i n whole o r i n p a r t w i t h o u t t h e p e r m i s s i o n of t h e p u b l i s h e r . A l i s t of a l l p u b l i c a t i o n s a v a i l a b l e from t h e D i v i s i o n may be o b t a i n e d by w r i t i n g t o t h e P u b l i c a t i o n s S e c t i o n , D i v i s i o n of B u i l d i n g R e s e a r c h , N a t i o n a l R e s e a r c h C o u n c i l of C a n a d a , O t t a w a , O n t a r i o ,