• Aucun résultat trouvé

Preface

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Preface"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

The 3 rd International Workshop on Ontology Dynamics – IWOD 2009

The goal of the 3rd International Workshop on Ontology Dynamics was to bring together researchers and students working on the fields of ontology evo- lution, revision and versioning, as well as people from the industry conducting activities (applications, case studies) that involve the dynamic aspects of on- tologies. Following the success of the two previous workshops, IWOD is quickly becoming the core annual event to discuss advances in the broad area of on- tology dynamics, and to track recent work directly or indirectly related to the problem of evolving ontologies.

Ontologies constitute one of the main pillars of the Semantic Web and of semantic applications. With the emergence of new, more accessible semantic technologies, of new needs from applications and with the raising awareness of their potential, more and more people and organisations have started to develop ontologies and applications of ontologies. However, ontologies, just like any structure holding knowledge and information, need to be updated: changes could be initiated because of a change in the world being modeled; or by a change in the users needs which would require a different conceptualization; or by the acquisition of knowledge previously unknown, unclassified or otherwise unavailable; or by the noticing of a design flaw in the original conceptualization.

In all these cases, the representation of knowledge in the ontology should be modified so as to form a more accurate or adequate conceptualization of the do- main. Such a modification presents several difficulties from both practical and theoretical points of view, raising a variety of research questions and develop- ment issues, such as how to support the developers of ontologies in maintaining up-to-date, adequate conceptualizations; how to detect the need for evolution;

how to facilitate the integration of new knowledge in ontologies; how to validate and evaluate the impact of the evolution of an ontology; how to handle evo- lutions triggered from multiple sources and collaborative updates; and how to keep track of (possibly concurrent) versions of ontologies and ensure the delivery of up-to-date and valid knowledge.

Regarding these topics, this year’s IWOD shows significant advances in the area of ontology dynamics. Seven high-quality papers have been selected to be presented at the workshop, which represent a nice mix of theoretical, techni- cal and practical contributions to issues related to, for example, measuring the

1

(2)

relevance or the impact of changes in an ontology, managing the evolution of ontologies, or keeping track of ontology versions.

We would like to thanks all who contributed to the success of the workshop, starting with the authors of the papers. We would also want to thank the other members of the organizing committee, Giorgos Flouris (FORTH, Greece), Jeff Z. Pan (University of Aberdeen, United Kingdom) and Dimitris Plexousakis (FORTH, Greece) for their help. Finally, many thanks to the members of the program committee for taking on their busy time to provide valuable comments and recommendations on the submitted papers:

• Nathalie Aussenac-Gilles

• Alex Borgida

• James Delgrande

• Peter Haase

• Zhisheng Huang

• Pieter De Leenheer

• Thomas Meyer

• Chantal Reynaud

• Marcio Moretto Ribeiro

• Guilin Qi

• Marta Sabou

• Renata Wassermann

• Kewen Wang

We hope you will enjoy reading the proceedings of IWOD 2009 as much as we enjoyed organizing it!

Mathieu d’Aquin and Grigoris Antoniou.

2

Références

Documents relatifs

quantities respectively. 3 represents a zoom of the gel region containing this particular spot for the 12 subjects, illustrating the large variability in abundance of this

We have added new material on the relation between data compression and minimum description length induction, computational learning, and universal prediction; circuit

Joint liability costs of pairing with a risky borrower are higher than those of pairing with a safe one and everyone will want to group with the latter type

Struct~lral energies and forces are determined by the total energy of the system of ions and electrons. Within the adiabatic approximation, the electrons respond

[r]

For a given ‘y’ outcome, resilience is a process, occurring over time, which is characterized by the function of robustness (i.e., the degree of negative departure from the baseline

REFSQ 2019 encouraged researchers and practitioners from the research fields covered by the conference to submit posters and tool demonstrations.. This REFSQ track aims to provide