• Aucun résultat trouvé

Are farmers interested in involving landscape complexity in their pest regulation strategies?

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Are farmers interested in involving landscape complexity in their pest regulation strategies?"

Copied!
20
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Any correspondence concerning this service should be sent to the repository administrator: staff-oatao@listes-diff.inp-toulouse.fr

Open Archive Toulouse Archive Ouverte (OATAO) OATAO is an open access repository that collects the work of Toulouse researchers and makes it freely available over the web where possible.

This is an author-deposited version published in: http://oatao.univ-toulouse.fr/

Eprints ID: 17485

To cite this version: Salliou, Nicolas and Barnaud, Cécile and Monteil,

Claude and Vialatte, Aude and Choisis, Jean Philippe Are farmers

interested in involving landscape complexity in their pest regulation strategies? (2016) In: International Conference on Ecological Sciences -

Sfécologie 2016, 24 October 2016 - 28 October 2016 (Marseille, France). (Unpublished)

(2)

Are farmers interested in involving

landscape complexity in their pest

regulation strategy?

Salliou Nicolas, Cécile Barnaud, Claude Monteil, Aude Vialatte, Jean-Philippe Choisis

(3)

Ecological function A complex landscape favors natural enemies (Chaplin-Kramer et al. 2011) Landscape management? (Tscharntke et al. 2005)

High potential for collective action (Stallman 2011)

Engineering complex

landscapes ?

Benefit to Farmers (ES) 2

Problema

tic

(4)

« Innovating in agro-ecosystem design often means that

goups and resources are to be built up with

stakeholders themselves » (Berthet 2013)

Innovation in agro-ecosystem

design

3

Problema

tic

(5)

4

Methodolo

gy

Modelling with

stakeholders

A modelling attitude (posture) which actively seeks to get

involved with stakeholders and their social needs

A modelling approach which is iterative, adaptative and

exploratory

Question

Modelling

Question

(6)

5

Study

site

A intensive tree fruit

production area

(7)

6 Modelling

#1

Ecosystemic

dependances?

Is there ecosystemic dependances regarding biological control by

conservation ?

Individual interviews and mental models of local stakeholders

Question :

(8)

7 Modelling #1

Ecosystemic

dependances?

Human Landscap e Natural

enemies Pests Crop Farmer

Producing an ecosystem

service Benefiting from the

ecosystem service

(9)

8 Human Landscap

e

Natural

enemies Pests Crop Farmer Modelling #1

Ecosystemic

dependances?

Very common interactions Regular interactions Almost no interactions

(10)

9 Modelling #1

Ecosystemic

dependances?

For interviewees the landscape is not source of natural enemies but potential damages

(11)

10 Is there ecosystemic dependances

regarding biological control by conservation ?

Individual interviews and mental models of local stakeholders

New question :

Why such a knowledge gap between local stakeholders and landscape ecology

findings?

Modelling #1

(12)

11

Why such a knowledge gap between local stakeholders and landscape ecology

findings?

Participatory Bayesian modelling about individual stakeholder representations (Scientific vs. Locals) Question : Modelling: Modelling #2

Representation-based uncertainty?

(13)

Collective construction of a shared socio-ecological conceptual model Individual parameterization and scenario exploration Modelling #2

Towards individual Bayesian models

(14)

13 Supply chain Agricultura l practicies Modelling #2

Bayesian Network

(15)

14 Landscape variables Ecological variables Modelling #2

Bayesian Network

(16)

15 Modelling

#2

Scenario : complex landscape

Most stakeholders have representation of a complex landscape having an effect on

natural enemies variable and pests

(17)

16 Modelling

#2

Scenario : complex landscape

All stakeholders do not associate a complex landscape with significant

benefits regarding the production variable

(18)

17

Why such a knowledge gap between local stakeholders and landscape ecology

findings?

Participatory Bayesian modelling about indivdual stakeholder representations (Scientific vs. Locals)

Difference of what is « significant »

between scientists and local stakeholders

Modelling #2

(19)

• Landscape complexity does not appear here to be in the

interest of local stakeholders

• Need for more studies linking more explicitly potential

ecological function with social demands

• Questionning the regular approximation that ecological

function = ecosystem services. 18

(20)

Thank you for your attention

More information?

Références

Documents relatifs

The history of changes in soil fertility management practices shows everywhere in the world the same successional stages, starting from early practices requiring large land areas

However, despite of the valuable durability properties they confer, these materials have serious disadvantages—particularly in high volume flyash concrete  that limit

Une autre façon de voir le problème est en termes de demande en ATP ; lors de forte demande, comme dans les conditions anoxiques dû à l’arrêt de la synthèse d’ATP

Nous avons étu- dié parallèlement les propriétés d’une couche mince de MnAs/GaAs(001) et d’une couche de clusters de MnAs dans une matrice de GaAs (GaAs:MnAs), ainsi que le

Les résultats que nous y avons présentés démontrent que la démarche proposée par le portfolio d’apprentissage, plus particulièrement la réflexion sur les processus

The land management strategies of local communities in response to climate hazards also affected the delivery of ecosystem services at regional and global scales, through

With such ambitious hopes, the first objective of this study was to develop analytical and modelling frameworks to express the various rules driving the changes of a complex

A large training population of about 2,000 animals is now available in French Charolais cattle. Therefore, information from this breed was used to determine the adequate