• Aucun résultat trouvé

An Inquiry-Oriented Task Sequence for Eigentheory and Diagonalization in Linear Algebra

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "An Inquiry-Oriented Task Sequence for Eigentheory and Diagonalization in Linear Algebra"

Copied!
3
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-01337889

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01337889 Submitted on 27 Jun 2016

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access

archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-entific research documents, whether they are pub-lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

An Inquiry-Oriented Task Sequence for Eigentheory and

Diagonalization in Linear Algebra

Megan Wawro, Michelle Zandieh

To cite this version:

Megan Wawro, Michelle Zandieh. An Inquiry-Oriented Task Sequence for Eigentheory and Diag-onalization in Linear Algebra. First conference of International Network for Didactic Research in University Mathematics, Mar 2016, Montpellier, France. �hal-01337889�

(2)

An Inquiry-Oriented Task Sequencefor Eigentheory and

Diagonalization in Linear Algebra

Megan Wawro1 and Michelle Zandieh²

1

Virginia Tech of Blacksburg, Virginia, USA, mwawro@vt.edu; Arizona State University of Tempe, Arizona, UZA

We present an innovative task sequence for an introductory linear algebra course that supports students’ reinvention of eigentheory and diagonalization. Grounded in the instructional design theory of Realistic Mathematics Education, the task sequence builds from students’ experience with linear transformations in ℝ2 to introduce the idea of stretch factors and stretch directions. This is leveraged towards defining eigenvalues and eigenvectors, reinventing methods to determine them, and connecting them to change of basis and diagonalization. In the poster, we discuss the development of the task sequence and analyses of students’ work on the tasks, specifically on characterizing their approaches for developing eigentheory methods. Keywords: Linear algebra, task design, eigentheory, inquiry-oriented instruction.

INTRODUCTION

The work presented in this poster stems from a research program focused onstudent reasoning about linear algebra. It grounded in the design-based research paradigm of classroom-based teaching experiments (Cobb, 2000), which involves a cyclical process of (a) investigating student reasoning about specific mathematical concepts and (b) designing and refining tasks that honor and leverage students’ ideas towards the desired learning goals (Gravemeijer, 1994; Wawro, Rasmussen, Zandieh, & Larson, 2013). One product of this research is the Inquiry-Oriented Linear Algebra (IOLA) curricular material, designed for a first course in linear algebra at the university level. In this poster, we detail the eigentheory and diagonalizationIOLA task sequence andpresent analysis of student work, specifically on Tasks 3-4.

THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK AND METHODS

Our theoretical framework for designing instructional materials draws on Realistic Mathematics Education (Freudenthal, 1991). Briefly stated, task sequences should be based on experientially real starting points; classroom activity should support student development of models-of their mathematical activity that can be used as models-for subsequent mathematical activity; and student activity, with instructor guidance, should evolve toward the reinvention of formal notions and ways of reasoning about the mathematics initially investigated.

We operationalize the notion of inquiryboth in terms of what students do and what instructors do in relation to student activity. Students learn mathematics through inquiry as they work on challenging problems that engage them in authentic mathematical practices such as symbolizing, algorithmatizing, and theoremizing (Rasmussen, Wawro, & Zandieh, 2015). Instructors engage in inquiry by listening to

(3)

student ideas, responding to student thinking, and using student thinking to advance the mathematical agenda of the classroom community (Rasmussen & Kwon, 2007). The data presented in our poster come from classroom teaching experiments in two sections of a first course in linear algebra during Fall 2014 at a large US university. The data sources were classroom videos that captured small-group work and whole-class discussion, students’ written work from whole-class, and photos of student work on classroom whiteboards.

RESULTS

In the IOLA task sequence on eigentheory and diagonalization,Task 1 builds from students' experience with linear transformations in ℝ2to introduce the idea of stretch factors and stretch directions and how these create a non-standard coordinate system forℝ2.In Task 2, students create matrices that convert between the coordinate systems

and coordinate with the transformation of Task 1 to reinvent the equation𝐴𝑥 = 𝑃𝐷𝑃−1𝑥 . Task 3 builds from students’ experience with stretch factors and directions

to reinventmethods to determine eigenvalues and eigenvectors. Finally, in Task 4 students work in ℝ3 to develop the characteristic equation as a solution technique and

connect eigentheory to their workwith diagonalization in Tasks 1-2.

The poster highlights student work on Tasks 3-4. For instance, prior to defining eigenvector, eigenvalue, or characteristic equation, students find the “stretch factors” (i.e., eigenvalues) and “stretch directions” (i.e., eigenvectors) of a given 2x2 matrix. Common student approaches include finding eigenvectors first or eigenvalues first through solving a system of equations, and manipulating 𝐴 = 𝑃𝐷𝑃−1.

REFERENCES

Cobb, P. (2000). Conducting classroom teaching experiments in collaboration with teachers. In R. Lesh, & E. Kelly (Eds.), Handbook of research design in

mathematics and science education(pp. 307–333). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Freudenthal, H. (1991). Revisiting mathematics education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Gravemeijer, K. (1994). Educational development and developmental research.

Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25(5), 443-471.

Rasmussen, C., & Kwon, O. N. (2007). An inquiry oriented approach to undergraduate mathematics. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 26, 189–194. Rasmussen, C., Wawro, M., & Zandieh, M. (2015). Examining individual and

collective level mathematical progress. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 88(2), 259-281.

Wawro, M., Rasmussen, C., Zandieh, M.,& Larson, C. (2013). Design research within undergraduate mathematics education: An example from introductory linear algebra. In T. Plomp, & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research – Part B:

Références

Documents relatifs

Emerging themes deduced from the reports indicate a general mixed expectation for higher education, Students’ tenacity in the face of a tense school climate, and a

In EPEE, our Eiffel Parallel Execution Environment, we propose to use a kind of parallelism known as data-parallelism, encapsulated within classes of the Eiffel

Drawing on the distinction between local theories (e.g., what levels of development exist in students’ learning of fractions?), mid- dle range theories (e.g., what is

According to Pittí et. al [8] consider ER as a learning tool that has the potential to improve creativity and learning skills, being its ultimate goal for the student

(a) It is always true (even if ϕ is not self-adjoint) that h· , ·i ϕ is linear in the first variable and sesquilinear in the second. One therefore has to check the third property in

To know which speech coder is used on the user terminal (and thus to know which acoustic model must be used) the information concerning the coder used by the client is encoded in

In his thesis [14], Bae studied the tradeoffs between energy comsumption and transmission delay for half-duplex relay channels for the special case of equal power allocation between

Specifically, in this paper we propose two principles that can be used to support task design in the area of assumptions, we report on an intervention implemented in two classes