• Aucun résultat trouvé

Ge clusters in Si matrix: structure and dynamics

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Ge clusters in Si matrix: structure and dynamics"

Copied!
8
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-00148776

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00148776

Submitted on 4 Jun 2007

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access

archive for the deposit and dissemination of

sci-entific research documents, whether they are

pub-lished or not. The documents may come from

teaching and research institutions in France or

abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est

destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents

scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,

émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de

recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires

publics ou privés.

Ge clusters in Si matrix: structure and dynamics

J. Dalla Torre, N. Barriquand, Mehdi Djafari-Rouhani, Georges Landa

To cite this version:

J. Dalla Torre, N. Barriquand, Mehdi Djafari-Rouhani, Georges Landa. Ge clusters in Si matrix:

structure and dynamics. European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems,

Springer-Verlag, 1999, 12 (3), pp.343-346. �10.1007/s100510051014�. �hal-00148776�

(2)

Ge lusters in Si matrix: stru ture and dynami s J.DallaTorre 12 ,N. Barriquand 2 ,M.DjafariRouhani 12 andG.Landa 2 1

Laboratoire de Physique des Solides, Universite Paul Sabatier, 118 route de Narbonne, 31062 Toulouse edex-4, Fran e, ESA5477asso ieeauCNRS

2

Laboratoired'Analyseetd'Ar hite turedesSystemes-CNRS,7avenueduColonelRo he,31077Toulouse edex,Fran e

Re eived:date/Revisedversion:date

Abstra t. We have determined by omputer simulations, some stru tural properties of Ge lusters em-beddedinaSi rystallinehostmatrixfor lustersizesvaryingfrom0.5 to1.5nm.Inorderto des ribe inter-atomi for es we have hosena Valen e For e Field(VFF) semi-empiri alpotential. Next we have al ulated the density of vibrationalstatesby diagonalizationof the dynami almatrixde nedwiththe samepotential.Thein uen eofthevolume/interfa eratioofGeonthevibrationalpropertiesisdis ussed.

PACS. 61,46+w Clusters,nanoparti les,andnano rystallinematerials{63, 50+x Vibrationalstatesin disorderedsystems

1Introdu tion

In re ent years, an in reasing e ort has been developed towardstheunderstandingof surprising physi al

proper-ties of lusters. An exampleof potentialappli ations for semi ondu tor lustersistheirnonlinearopti alproperties

thatusuallydonotappearinthebulkmaterials[1℄.Many theoreti alandparti ularly"AbInitio" al ulationshave

been made in order to determine the stru ture of these

lusters[2,3℄. These ab initio al ulations generally deal withonlyfew atoms.Whilesmallsemi ondu tor lusters

fe ts,largeonesseemtoadoptthe rystalstru ture. Oth-erwise,experimentalobservationsof lustersinahost

ma-trix generally show large luster (few nanometers) with rystallinestru ture[4,5℄.Butthestru ture,inparti ular

at the interfa ebetweenthe matrixand the luster, an be strongly modi ed by the hemi al nature of the

ma-trix, the elaboration te hnique and the elaboration

on-ditions, annealingtemperature,et . Ramanspe tros opy an be useful to de ribe stru turaland dynami

proper-ties of su h lusters[1,5℄. Ourpurpose inthis paperisto showthatusingsimpleValen eFor eField(VFF)

(3)

poten-tials,one may obtainnotonlythe twoaboveproperties,

but also,thedegreeofthelo alizationofthestatesinside

the lusters. In this study, we have onsidered Ge lus-ters embedded in aSi rystalline hostmatrix ontaining

432atoms. Evenifthe lustersizesdis ussedhere anbe produ ed experimentally[4℄, amore typi al size is about

2 to 5 nm[1,5℄. So, ontrary to the alloy ase, the

num-berofatomsin thesuper ellmust beverylargein order to des ribe orre tly the largedefe ts. With a 432atom

super ell,wehavebeenabletotreat lustersofradiusup to 1.5 nm. This luster sizes are somewherebetween the

sizes used in ab initio models and those in real experi-ments, but ontain the general information, parti ularly

onthelo alizationofthestatesattheinterfa e.We

om-pareourresultstoexperimentaldataobtainedinasimilar ase where theSi matrix ispoly rystalline[4℄.The

inter-fa e betweenthe Ge lusters and the Si matrixis taken tobeperfe twithnodanglingbonds.Theorganizationof

thepaperisasfollows.Inse tionIIwepresentthemodel

usedin thispaperanddes ribetheparametersemployed in our al ulations.Inse tionIII,wepresentanddis uss

theresultsobtained.Finallyinse tionIV,wesummarize ourmain on lusions.

2Model

The frame of our model has been presented before[6℄ in

the ase of amorphous Si and we sket h here only the ne essaryba kground to understand the pro edure.Our

Table 1. Parameters for the di erent distributions under study.Numberof Ge atomsina luster,size of the lusters, numberof lusters and resulting proportion of Ge in the Si matrix.

Numberofatoms/ luster 5 17 29 47 87 Clustersdiameter(nm) 0.49 0.80 0.94 1.23 1.47 Numberof lusters 18 5 3 2 1 %ofGe 20.1 19.7 20.1 21.8 20.1

(a)The rstoneisthe onstru tionofthesystem un-der study. The super ell approa h is hosen in order to

des ribethe stru tural and the hemi al disorder.

A tu-ally, in disordered materials the rystal symmetries are broken due to the introdu tion of non periodi and

ex-tended heterogeneitiesin thepure rystal. Asaresult, a disorderedmaterialshouldbemodeledbyaunique

ma ro-s opi ell,but be auseofthe omputationallimitations,

itisapproximatedbyasuper ellwith periodi boundary onditionskeepingin mind that thesize andthe density

of the heterogeneities are limited by this super ell size. So we have de ned a 6[110℄x6[1-10℄x12[001℄=432atoms

rystalline super ell and we have introdu ed at random positions,Gespheri al lusterswithsizesvarying from

0.5to1.5nm(seetableI)withadiamond-like rystalline

stru ture( g.1a)).

(b)As the Ge latti eparameter islarger thanthe Si

one,atomi positionsmustberelaxed. Forthis, thetotal elasti energyisminimizedandthusthesuper ellvolume

(4)

a

b

[110]

Fig. 1. a) stru turerepresentation ofa 87atoms luster.b) (001) plane ofthe 1024 atoms super ell, passingthroughthe enterofthe luster,darkestandbiggestspheresareGeatoms.

tentialintheMartins'harmoni formulation[7℄:

E s = X bonds k r (r r bond ) 2 + X bondangles k  (  0 ) 2 (1)

whereristhea tualbondlength,r bond

istheequilibrium bond length orresponding to thepure materialsand we

have taken r Si Ge bond = (r Si bond +r Ge bond

)=2 for the heteroge-neousSi-Gebonds.isthea tualanglebetweentwo

adja- entbondsand 0

istheanglebetweentwoadja entbonds

in thediamondperfe tstru ture. k r

andk 

arethefor e parametersrelatedtotheelasti onstantsofthepure

ma-takenformixedparameters,k Si Ge r =(k Si r +k Ge r )=2and k d X Y Z  =k b Y  (X;Y;Z=Sior Ge).

( )Afterthe minimumtotalstrainenergyis rea hed, the vibrational eigenstates or normal mode frequen ies

are determined by diagonalization of the dynami al ma-trixobtained withthe sameVFFinter-atomi potential.

Finally, an approximation of the Density of Vibrational

States(DVS) isobtainedbysampling thevibrational fre-quen iesspe trum.

3Stru tural and dynami al al ulations

In this paper,wehave fo used our omputations onthe

ase of a 20% parti ular on entration of Ge atoms in

the Si matrix. In this ase, Si hara ter of the matrixis almost preserved and the number of Ge atoms inside is

suÆ ienttointrodu edi erentratiosofdisorder depend-ing on their relative arrangement. This allowsthe study

ofdistributions ofdi erentsize andnumberofsu h lus-ters(see table I). The enter of the luster is randomly

determined ataSisite,aradiusisde ned withase ond

Si atomand all theatoms in this sphereare substituted byGeatoms.

First, we are interested in the stru ture al ulations toevaluatethestrainnearthe luster boundaries.Thisis

performed throughtherelaxationof thestru ture. How-ever,itshould bepointedoutthat the relaxedstru ture

only orrespondsto ametastable on guration,i.e. a

lo- al minimum of theelasti energy. This resultsfrom the de nite positivenature of thedynami al matrixin VFF

(5)

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

Ge clusters size (nm)

2.34

2.36

2.38

2.40

2.42

2.44

Bond length (

Å)

Ge−Ge

Si−Ge

average

Si−Si

Fig.2.AveragebonglengthsofSi-Si,Si-GeandGe-Getypes asafun tionofthe lusterssizewhilethetotalGe omposition is kept onstant. The dark diamondsare their valuesfor the al ulated Si

0:8 Ge

0:2 alloy.

lows relatively small atomi displa ements, but not for atomi migrationsalongafewinteratomi distan es.

Theresultisinagreementwithexperimental on gu-rationswhi harealsoin metastablestates.Thequestion

ofwhetherin lusionsarethermodynami allystableornot anonlybeadressedthroughathermalannealing

pro e-dure, bothin experimental andsimulationgrounds.This

questionisbeyondthes opeofthispaper.

Asa rst he kofour al ulationswehave al ulated the average bond length(notedaverage in g. 2) overall

kindofbonds.

As one an observe, the result is in total agreement

withtheexpe tedvaluefromtheVegard'slaw(L average = 0:2(L Ge L Si )+L Si 2:37 

A). Thisaveragevalueis

al-mostthe samewhateveristhe distributionofGe atoms,

a lot of small lusters or a few big ones. Moreover we have reported in gure 2 the average bond length over

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Atom number

−5

−4

−3

−2

−1

0

1

2

3

4

Strain (%)

Fig. 3. Strain al ulation along the [110℄ dire tion passing throughthe enterofa87Ge lusterasafun tionoftheatom numberalongthisdire tion( g.1b)).

of the luster diameter. The al ulated bond lengths of

a Si 0:8

Ge 0:2

alloy where Ge are randomly distributed in the matrixare representedbydarkdiamonds and are in

agreementwithprevioussimilarresults[8,9℄.The interest-ingpointisthatasa rstapproximation,bondlengthsare

onstantandindependentofthe lustersizesforthethree kind of bonds. This means that the relaxation for ea h

kindofbond isthesamefromthealloy aseto that ofa

matrixwitha87atoms luster.Thisindi atethatdueto their ovalentnature,ea hkindofbondkeepsitsspe i

hara terindependentlyofthedistribution.

Figure 3presents the bond strain with respe t to Si,

alongthe[110℄dire tion ofthesuper ellpassingthrough the enter ofthe Ge luster.Be ause ofthe dis reteand

non ompa tnatureofthematerialatthiss alethestrain

is al ulated over a very few number of atoms and the (001) se tion passing through the enter of the 87

(6)

lus-Wehavede ned thisstrainatanisiteby" i =(Æx i Æx i+1 )=d Si ,whereÆx i

isthevariationoftheatomi

posi-tionalong the[110℄axis( g. 1b)) andd Si

is thedistan e betweentwoatomsinthisdire tionintheSipure rystal.

Inorder toevaluatethelo alstraindue tothe luster in theSimatrixoveralargerrange,wehaveenlargedthe

su-per ellbyfewmonolayersinea hdire tion.Thisin rease

hasbeenlimitedtokeepalowtime ostofour al ulation. Inthis al ulationtheGe proportionislowerthanin the

previous asesasthisisa87Geatomsina8x8x16=1024 atomsmatrix(8:5%).We anobservearapidvariation

of thestrainfrom approximately3.5% to -3.5%whi h is made overtwoatoms. The strainrea hes 3.5%in the

Ge luster, whi h is 0.5%less than thelatti emismat h

between Ge and Si. This orrespondsto aresidual om-pressionoftheGe lusterbytheSimatrix.Otherwise,the

strainfor theSi matrix rea hes-3.5% at the neighbor-hoodofthe lusterwhi h orrespondstoa ompressionof

theSiatoms.TheabsolutevalueofstrainforSiappearsto

de reasewiththedistan etothe luster.Theseresultsare inquantitativegoodagreementwith al ulationsmadeby

ontinuumtheory[10℄.

Next,wearegoingtodis ussthevibrationalstatesof

theprevioussystems.Asweareinthesuper ellmethod,it wouldbe onvenienttode ne anewwaveve tor on ept

relatedtothenewperiodi ity,leadingsotoanewBrillouin zone.

In order to obtain a smooth Density of Vibrational States (DVS), we aneither average theDVS overaset

0

100

200

300

400

500

DVS (arb. u.)

Wave number (cm

−1

)

5

17

29

47

87

C

GeGe

SiGe

SiSi

Fig.4.Cal ulatedDVSfordi erent lusterssize,from5to87 atoms.TheGe ompositioniskept onstantto 20%,sothe numberof lusters varies (see table I). Thenoted "C" DVS is a linear ombination of the pure Ge and Si DVS. Opti al bands asso iatedto theGe-Ge, Si-Geand Si-Siare indi ated byarrows.

fewwaveve torsinthesuper ellBrillouinzone[6℄.Wehave

adopted this se ond s heme and have used 10 values of the waveve torrandomly distributed inside thesuper ell

Brillouin zone. In Fig. 4,we havereported the DVS for di erent lusters ofvarioussizes, ontainingfrom5to87

atoms.TheGe ontentiskept onstant,andequalto20of lusters presentin thesuper ell. To ompare our results

fordi erentdistributionsofGe lusters,wehavealso

pre-sentedin g.4thelinear ombinationoftheDVSofpureSi andGe.ItsintensityisgivenbyI

ombi =0:8:I Si +0:2:I Ge ,

(7)

DVSofahugheGe lusterinSiandisusedasareferen e

to observethe size e e ts, preferably to apure Ge orSi

DVSreferen e.Con erningthegeneralaspe toftheDVS, weobserveanimportantdi eren ebetweenthis

ombina-tionandtheDVSforsmall lusters.Thisisa onsequen e ofthedisorderindu edbythedispersionoftheGeatoms

in theSi matrix.Thisla kofsymmetriessplito the

de-generate eigenstates and as a result smoothes the DVS. So, when the luster sizes be ome larger,the DVS ome

loser to the ombination DVS,showinga "phase segre-gation"ofGeandSispe ies.We anparti ularlyobserve

inFig.4thattheGe-Gemodeshiftstohigherfrequen ies when lustersizes in rease.A learshiftisseenwhen

go-ing fromthe 87atom luster tothe referen e urve.The

results arein good agreement withexperimental Raman spe traof Ge lusters inSi matrixwhi hshowapeakat

270 m-1attributed to theamorphousGe-Gemode[1,5℄. Moreover,we anseethetypi al"3modes"[12℄behavior,

ofSiGe ompoundsfortheopti albands( g.4).Ea h

op-ti al band is asso iated with one kind of bond: Si-Si ( 520 m 1 ),Si-Ge(380 m 1 )andGe-Ge(270 m 1 ).

Thee e tsoftheinterfa e/volumeratioofGeare parti -ularlyvisibleinthedi erentintensitiesofDVSandshould

beobservedinthe orrespondingRamanspe tra.As the

numberof lusters de reases i.e. their size in reases, the number of Ge-Ge bonds in reases whi h is dire tly

ob-served in theintensityof theGe-Geband. Butwhile in- reasing the luster size, the number of Si-Ge bonds at

the interfa esde reasesand as a result,theSi-Ge signa-turevanishes.

4Con lusion

In on lusion,wehave al ulatedsomestru turaland

dy-nami al properties of Ge lusters in an Si matrix by a

semi-empiri al VFF potential. Inthis study the number and the size of the lusters are varying in order to keep

theGeproportionapproximativelyequalto20%.Despite the small size of the super ell used in the al ulations,

we have shown that even for large lusters, the average

bondsareroughlythesameasalloyvalueswiththesame Ge ompositionandingoodagreementwithexperimental

observations.Wehaveobservedarapidvariationofstrain at the luster interfa e and we have shown that in the

1.47 nm lusters, the ore has a latti e parameter lose to theGepure rystal.Finally,wehavedis ussedthe

Si-Ge interfa ee e tsin theDVS.A tually,wehaveshown

the de rease of the Si-Geand thein rease of the Ge-Ge band intensitiesfor large lusters asaresultofthe

inter-fa e/volumeratioof lusters. Ashiftof theGe-Geband, losetoexperimental results,hasbeenobtained.

Referen es

1. F.Q.Liu,Z.G.Wang,G.H.Li,andG.H.Wang.J.Appl. Phys.,83:3435,1998.

2. M.R.Pederson,K.Ja kson,D.V.Porezag,Z.Hajnal,and T.Frauenheim. Phys.Rev.B,54:2863,1996.

3. J. Song, S.E. Ulloa, and D. A. Drabold. Phys. Rev. B, 53:8042,1996.

(8)

5. M. Za harias, R. Weigand, B. Dietri h, F. Stolze, J.Blasing,P.Veit,T.Drusedau,andJ.Christen.J.Appl. Phys.,81:2384,1997.

6. A.Chehaidar,M.DjafariRouhani,andA.Zwi k.J. Non-Cryst.Solids,192and193:238,1995.

7. R.M.Martin. Phys.Rev.B,1:4005,1970.

8. S.C.Jain,H.J.Osten,B.Dietri h,andH.Ruker. Semi- ond.S i.Te hnol.,10:1289,1995.

9. D. B.Aldri h,R. J.Nemani h,and D.E. Sayers. Phys. Rev.B,50:15026,1994.

10. M. Yang, J. C. Sturm, and J. Prevost. Phys. Rev. B, 56:1973,1997.

11. H.RukerandM.Methfessel.Phys.Rev.B,52:11059,1995. 12. A. Chehaidar,R.Carles, A. Zwi k, C.Meunier, B.Cros,

Figure

Table 1. Parameters for the dierent distributions under study. Number of Ge atoms in a 
luster, size of the 
lusters, number of 
lusters and resulting proportion of Ge in the Si matrix.
Fig. 1. a) stru
ture representation of a 87 atoms 
luster. b) (001) plane of the 1024 atoms super
ell, passing through the 
enter of the 
luster, darkest and biggest spheres are Ge atoms.
Fig. 2. Average bong lengths of Si-Si, Si-Ge and Ge-Ge types as a fun
tion of the 
lusters size while the total Ge 
omposition is kept 
onstant
Fig. 4. Cal
ulated DVS for dierent 
lusters size, from 5 to 87 atoms. The Ge 
omposition is kept 
onstant to 20%, so the number of 
lusters varies (see table I)

Références

Documents relatifs