Gibberellin A 4/7 enhances flowering
of Picea glauca grafts in two consecutive years
R.A. Cecich D.E. Riemenschneider
1 USDA-Forest Service, Columbia, MO 65211, and
2
USDA-Forest Sf-rvice, Rhinelander, WI 54501 U.S.A.
Introduction
Trees that flower
abundantly
in one year and then bearsparsely
or not at all forseveral years are said to show
periodicity
offlowering.
Thisinfrequent, unpredictable flowering
behavior has led to inefficient seedcollecting
and seed orchard opera- tions.Therefore,
treatments to alleviate suchflowering problems
in conifers have been thesubject
of much recentexperi-
mentation.The mixture of
gibberellins A 4
andA 7 (GA
4;7
)
can increaseflowering
in conifers ifapplied
at the correcttime,
duration and concentration(Cecich, 1983; Marquard
and
Hanover, 1984;
Pollard andPortlock, 1983). Except
forMarquard
and Hanover(1985),
allexperiments
withGA 4í7
havebeen done on
plants
neverpreviously
treated. There have been no
reports
ofGA
4i7
being applied
to the same tree orseedling,
or even the samebranches,
intwo consecutive years. Our paper
reports
the results of an
experiment
on Piceaglauca (Moench (Voss)) grafts
in whichGA 4 ,
’7
wasapplied
to the same branchesin two consecutive years in an
attempt
toovercome
periodic flowering.
Materials and Methods
Readers are referred to Cecich
(1985)
fordetails of the
experimental design
and treat-ment
procedures.
The firstGA 4 , 7 applications
were made in 1982. In 1983,
GA 4/7
wasagain sprayed
on the same trees and branches on the same dates.Length
of the terminal shoot on all the treated and control lateral branches wasmeasured in
August
1983 and 1984. Ovulate and staminate strobili were counted inearly May
1983 and 1984.Flowering
data were trans-formed to
log,, (x
+1)
and evaluatedby
a com-bined
analysis
of variance and Duncan’s newmultiple range test.
Simple
correlation coeffi- cients werecomputed
for the 1983 and 1984flowering
and branchlength
data.Results
The 1983
flowering
results for the 5early- flushing (EF)
and 5late-flushing (LF)
whitespruce clones have been
published
else-where
(Cecich 1985),
but treatmentmeans are summarized in Table I for convenience of
comparison
with the 1984mean results. In both years, the
GA 4!T
treated branches on ramets of the EF and LF clones
produced significantly
moreovulate and staminate strobili than
branches on their
paired
control ramets. In1984,
the LF clonesagain produced signi- ficantly
more ovulate strobili than the EF clones. This was reversed for staminatestrobili;
thatis,
the EF clonesproduced
more than the LF clones.
Spraying
withGA 4/7
in 1982 had noeffect on lateral branch
length
of either the EF or LF clones in 1983.However,
in 1984 theGA 4/7 -treated
branches wereabout 25% shorter than the control branches. The EF clones had a mean
length
of 185 mm for the controls and 141 mm for theGA 4» -tr P atca
branches.The LF control !a!nets had an average branch
length
of 217 mm, while the treat-ed branches were 163 mm
long.
Treated branches on EF and LF clones
responded
withsignificant
increases inflowering
in 1983 and 1984(Table I).
Interactions were due to a
change
inmagnitude
of response, rather than to achange
in rank of the treatment combina- tions. Clone x treatment interactions for staminate strobilusproduction tP
<-0.01)
were
apparently
morecomplex
than forovulate strobilus
production (NS)
in thatthey
were not related toflushing type
butto
specific
clones.Ovulate and staminate strobilus
produc-
tions in 1983 and 1984 were
significantly
correlated
(r
=0.760 * ).
Branchlength
wasnegatively
correlated withproduction
ofovulate strobili
(r = -0.758 * )
and staminate strobili(r = -0.931 ** ).
Discussion
This
report
is the first to describe the suc-cessful stimulation of male and female
flowering
in a coniferby
consecutive annual treatments withGA4!7.
The 1984results substantiated the 1983 observa- tions that the treated LF ramets
produced significantly
more ovulate strobili than the treated EF ramets. In1983,
there was nodifference in
s!laminate
strobilusproduc-
tion between EEF and LF clones
but,
in1984,
the EF clonesproduced significantly
more staminate strobili than the LF clones.
In
unpublished experiments, flowering
waspromoted by G A 4 n
in bothflushing types;
but the response was
closely
related to acommon date
(June 20), indicating
a pos- sible environmentalcontrol,
or alarger
than
expected
’window’ for treatmentapplication.
Needles of theelongating
branch
tips
in the EF familiesbegan
toharden on June
13,
1 wk before theopti-
mum treatment date. Needle harden-
ing
was noted 1 wk later in the LF families.Hardening
of the needles couldpotentially
be used to determine when to
apply GA
4 n.
Branch
length
reductionby
aheavy flowering/cone
crop could affect the use ofa certain
percentage
of theprevious year’s growth
as an index of when toapply GA
4n
.
The finallength
of the treated branches in 1984 was 75% of the controllength
and 70&dquo;/° of theprevious year’s
streated branch
length.
If one had used theproposed
index of 90%(Owens
and Mol-der, 1977)
or 75%(Marquard
and Hano-ver,
1984)
forGA 4f7 application,
the ’win-dow’ would have been missed. Under these
circumstances,
calendardates,
needlehardening
and/or budmorphology
may be
preferred
forscheduling
treat-ments.
These results
suggest
thatperiodic
flow-ering
in white spruce can be overcomewith
judicious
sprayapplication
ofGA 4f 7’
Furthermore,
the lack ofsignificant
inter-actions for clone x treatment and clone x
year for ovulate strobili
suggests
thatGA
4f7
can be used to overcome clonalvariation in female
flowering. However, unequal representation
of clones aspollen parents,
asexemplified by
thestrong
clone x treatment
interaction, might
be apossible
concern for an orchard manager.Conclusions
Although
thepresent
data are encour-aging
thatyear-to-year regularity
in seedproduction
can beachieved,
additionalexperiments
arerequired
to determine the number of years in which asignificant
re-sponse can be elicited.
References
Cecich R.A.
(1983) Flowering
in ajack pine seedling
seed orchard increasedby spraying
with
gibberellin A 4/7 -
Can. J. For. Res. 13, 1056- 1062Cecich R.A.
(1985)
White spruce(Picea glau- ca) flowering
in response to sprayapplication
ofgibberellin A 4 , 7 -
Can. J. For. Res. 15, 170-174Marquard
R.D. & Hanover J.W.(1984)
Relation-ship
betweengibberellin A 4n
concentration, time of treatment, and crownposition
on flow-ering
of Piceaglauca.
Can. J. For. Res. 14, 547-553Marquard
R.D. & Hanover J.W.(1985)
Floral response of Piceaglauca
togibberellin A 4/7’
naphthalene
acetic acid, rootpruning,
and bien-nial treatment. Can. J. For. Res. 15, 743-746 Owens J.N. & Molder M.
(1977)
Buddevelop-
ment in Picea
glauca.
11. Cone differentiation andearly development.
Can. J. Bot. 55, 2746- 2760Pollard D.F.W. & Portlock F.T. (1983)
Timing
and duration effects of
gibberellin
and fertilizertreatment on strobilus