HAL Id: hal-03164875
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03164875
Submitted on 10 Mar 2021
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of
sci-entific research documents, whether they are
pub-lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.
Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - NoDerivatives| 4.0
International License
Epidemiology and microbiological profile comparison
between community and hospital acquired infections: A
multicenter retrospective study in Lebanon
R. Matta, Souheil Hallit, R. Hallit, W. Bawab, Anne-Marie Rogues, P.
Salameh
To cite this version:
R. Matta, Souheil Hallit, R. Hallit, W. Bawab, Anne-Marie Rogues, et al.. Epidemiology and
mi-crobiological profile comparison between community and hospital acquired infections: A multicenter
retrospective study in Lebanon. Journal of Infection and Public Health, Elsevier, 2018, 11 (3),
pp.405-411. �10.1016/j.jiph.2017.09.005�. �hal-03164875�
ContentslistsavailableatScienceDirect
Journal
of
Infection
and
Public
Health
j o u r n al ho me p ag e :h t t p : / / w w w . e l s e v i e r . c o m / l oc a t e / j i p h
Epidemiology
and
microbiological
profile
comparison
between
community
and
hospital
acquired
infections:
A
multicenter
retrospective
study
in
Lebanon
Roula
Matta
a,
Souheil
Hallit
a,b,c,d,e,∗,
Rabih
Hallit
e,
Wafaa
Bawab
a,
Anne-Marie
Rogues
f,
Pascale
Salameh
a,f,gaLebaneseUniversity,FacultyofPharmacy,Beirut,Lebanon
bOccupationalHealthEnvironmentResearchTeam,U1219BPHBordeauxPopulationHealthResearchCenterInserm—UniversitédeBordeaux,France cPsychiatricHospitaloftheCross,JalEddib,Lebanon
dSaint-JosephUniversity,FacultyofPharmacy,Beirut,Lebanon
eHolySpiritUniversityofKaslik,FacultyofMedicineandMedicalSciences,Kaslik,Lebanon fUnitéINSERM657,Bordeaux2University,Bordeaux,France
gLebaneseUniversity,FacultyofMedicine,Beirut,Lebanon
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
i
n
f
o
Articlehistory: Received5March2017
Receivedinrevisedform21August2017 Accepted9September2017 Keywords: Hospital Community Acquiredinfections Resistance
a
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
Background:Theobjectiveofthisstudyistoidentifyandcharacterizethespeciesresistanceofdifferent pathogensbetweencommunityacquiredandhospitalacquiredinfectionspointingatpatients’related independentco-morbiditiesandsocio-demographicfactors.
Methods:Itwasaretrospectivecohort,multicenterstudyfromfiveprivatehospitalslocatedinBeirutand MountLebanon.Twohundredfifty-eightadultpatientswereincluded.
Results:110Gramnegativepathogensand26Grampositivepathogenswereimplicatedinhospital acquiredinfections.TheGram-negativebacteriathatshowedapositivecorrelationregardingpatient’s typeofinfectionwerePseudomonasaeruginosa(12%),Klebsiellapneumoniae(6.2%)andAcinetobacter bau-mannii(3.1%).Thesebacteriaweremorefrequentinpatientswithhospitalacquiredinfections(P=0.002, 0.013and0.017respectively).TheratioofmethicillinresistantStaphylococcusaureus,Extended Spec-trumBetaLactamaseproducingEscherichiacoliandK.pneumoniaeandmultidrugP.aeruginosashowed highsignificanceinhospitalacquiredinfections.Thelogisticregression,showedasignificantrelationship betweenresistantbacteriaandage(p<0.001,ORa=5.680,CI[2.344;13.765])andimmunosuppressed state(p=0.003,ORa=3.137,CI[1.485;6.630])andaninverserelationshipforChronicObstructive Pul-monaryDisease(COPD)(p=0.006,ORa=0.403,CI[0.212;0.765]).
Conclusion:Ourresultsconfirmthathospitalacquiredinfections/bacteriahavehigherratesofresistance whencomparedtocommunityacquired;theseratesincreasewithage,immunosuppressionandare inverselyproportionalwithCOPD.Therefore,physiciansshouldbeawareofpatients’comorbiditiesto properlyguideinitialtherapy.
©2017 TheAuthors.PublishedbyElsevierLimitedonbehalfofKingSaudBinAbdulazizUniversity forHealthSciences.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCCBY-NC-NDlicense(http://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Introduction
Hospitalsareathreateningenvironmentbecauseofavariable numberofvirulentpathogensthatarebroughttoitfromthe com-munitythroughadmittedpatients;thesepatientsarethenexposed
∗ Correspondingauthorat: Street8,building560,1stfloor,Biakout, Mount Lebanon,Lebanon.
E-mailaddress:souheilhallit@hotmail.com(S.Hallit).
not only to the indigenous hospital flora but also to the flora ofothersickindividuals[1].Thisisaresultofimpaireddefense mechanismandthecolonizationofresistantmicroorganisms[2]. Hospitalacquiredinfectionsarequiteacommonfeatureinthe hos-pitalsthroughouttheworld.Theprevalenceofhospitalacquired infections isgenerallyhigherin developingcountriesoflimited resources[3].Thesebacteriaaregenerallyresistanttoantibiotics, owingtotheheavyuseofwidespectrumantibioticsinhospital set-tings,whichputsahighselectivepressureonbacteriaandinduces difficulttotreatinfections.Thus,hospitalacquiredinfectionshave
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2017.09.005
1876-0341/©2017TheAuthors.PublishedbyElsevierLimitedonbehalfofKingSaudBinAbdulazizUniversityforHealthSciences.Thisisanopenaccessarticleunderthe CCBY-NC-NDlicense(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
406 R.Mattaetal./JournalofInfectionandPublicHealth11(2018)405–411
beenrecognizedforoveracenturyasacriticalproblemaffecting thequalityofhealthandaprincipalsourceofadversehealthcare outcomes[4].
Gram-negative bacteria are largely responsible for acquired infections. Multi-drugresistant strainsare increasingly isolated in thesesettings, including carbapenemase-producingKlebsiella pneumoniae,AcinetobacterandPseudomonasaeruginosa[5]. Acine-tobacterbaumannii hasalsobecomeoneof themostsignificant antibiotic-resistantbacteria causinghospitalacquired infections worldwide [6].One of themain methodsthrough which Gram negative bacteria develop resistance is carrying genes coding for enzymes, such as beta-lactamases, hydrolyzing and inacti-vatingbeta-lactam antibiotics [7],beta-lactams being themost widely used class of antibiotics [8]. A major source of resis-tance in Escherichia coli are plasmid-borne Extended-Spectrum -Lactamases (ESBL], which are classified as enzymes capable of hydrolyzing most -lactams such as penicillins, extended-spectrum cephalosporins, and monobactams; ESBLs are not inhibitedby-lactamaseinhibitorssuchasclavulanicacid, sul-bactam,andtazobactam[9].Basedonthis,community-onsetESBL infectionshavebecomeanimportantpublichealthissue[10].
Furthermore, Staphylococcus aureus gram-positive cocci can withstandharshenvironmentsforextendedperiodsallowing sus-ceptible individuals to become infected through contact with persistentlyortransientlycolonizedpeople[11].Thus,these bac-teria are the most common hospital acquired pathogens with increasedmorbidity[12].Penicillin-resistantstrainsappearedin hospitalizedpatientswithina shorttime aftertheintroduction oftheantibiotic;methicillin,a-lactamase-resistantderivativeof penicillin,subdividesthespeciesintosensitiveandresistant sub-groups.Methicillin-resistantS.aureus(MRSA)appearedin1961, oneyearaftermethicillinwasintroducedintoclinicaluse[13].
Toourknowledge,nostudyhaseveridentifiedcharacteristics ofbacteriacomparingcommunityandhospitalsettingsinLebanon. Thismulticenterstudywasdesignedtoidentifyandcharacterize thespeciesofdifferentpathogensbetweencommunityacquired andhospitalacquiredinfections,pointingonpatients’related inde-pendentco-morbiditiesandsocio-demographicfactors.
Materialsandmethods Studydesign
Thiswasaretrospectivecohort,multicenterstudyfromfive pri-vatehospitalslocatedinBeirutandMountLebanonoveroneyear. Amongthese,threewereuniversityhospitalswhereastwowere non-universityhospital.Thestudydurationwas6months. Populationanddatacollection
Theinclusioncriterionwastheinfectiondiagnosisaccordingto theCentersforDiseaseControl(CDC)criteriainanadultpatient [14].Onlythefirstepisodeofinfectioninthehospitaladmission wascharacterizedforeachpatient.Overall,258adultpatientswere includedfromthefivehospitalsinBeirutandMountLebanon.
Datawere collectedthrough a standardizedsheetof patient identification. The record included patient-specific parameters suchasdemographicdata,underlyingdiseases,andriskfactors. Theinfectionvariablesrecordedpositiveculture,typeofgermsand antibiotictreatmentwithpresenceorabsenceofmulti-resistant bacteria.Hospitalacquiredinfectionswasdefinedasalocalizedor systemicconditionthatresultedfromanadversereactiondueto thepresenceofinfectiousagentswhichoccurred48hormoreafter hospitaladmissionandwasnotincubatingatthetimeof admis-sion.Communityacquiredinfectionsweredefinedasaninfection
detectedwithin48hofhospitaladmittedpatients[15].Agewas classifiedaccordingtothecriteriaofAcutePhysiologyandChronic HealthEvaluation(APACHE)score;forthisreason,agewas cate-gorizedintotwosubgroupslessthan44yearsandmorethan44 years.
Microbiologydata
Allparticipatingmedicalcenterswereresponsibleforisolates identificationandsusceptibilitytesting.Eachlaboratoryperformed susceptibilitytestingaccording totheirown standardized tech-niquesbasedoncurrentNationalCommitteeforClinicalLaboratory standards[16].Datacollectedwereprimarilyqualitative(resistant, intermediateorsusceptible).AllisolatesofE.coliandK.pneumoniae were tested for extended-spectrum beta-lactamase production. S.aureuswastestedformethicillinresistance.P.aeruginosawas testedforitsmultipleresistances.Streptococcuspneumoniaewere testedagainstpenicillinsusceptibility.
Comorbidity
The comorbidity of patients in the study included mainly immunosuppression,administration ofchemotherapy in the12 monthspriortohospitaladmission,radiationtherapy, administra-tionofsteroidsforatleast3monthspriortohospitaladmission, infectionwithhumanimmunodeficiencyvirus,chronicliver dis-ease, chronic heart failure, chronic respiratory disease,chronic renalfailure,hematologicaldisease,cancer,anddiabetesmellitus requiringinsulintherapyororalhypoglycemicagentsbeforethe infection.
Dataanalysis
Statisticalevaluationwasconductedthroughbivariateand mul-tivariableriskfactoranalyses,withtheaimofidentifyingselected bacteriaandindependentfactorsassociatedwiththepresenceofa hospitalacquiredinfectioncomparedtopatientswithacommunity acquiredinfection.Datawasenteredandanalyzed,usingStatistical PackageforSocialSciences(SPSS)version22software.Inall anal-ysis,ap-value<0.05wasconsideredsignificant.TheChi2testwas usedforcomparingcategoricalvariablesbetweengroups;when expectedvalueswithincellswere<5,Fisherexacttestwasused.A stepwiseforwardlikelihoodratiomultivariablelogisticregressions wasperformedwiththe type ofinfection (communityhospital acquiredversushospitalacquired)asthedependentvariable,and thecharacteristicspresentingthelowestp-valuesinthebivariate analysisastheindependentones.Thefinalmodelwasselectedafter ensuringmodelsadequacytodatabyHosmer–Lemeshowtest. Results
Population
258patientswereincludedinthis study.Ofallpatients, 142 (55%)hadahospitalacquiredinfectionand116(45%)community acquired.Almosthalfofthepatients(50.8%)patientswerefrom communityhospitalsand(49.2%)fromuniversityhospitals. Correlationbetweenhospital-acquiredinfectionandclinical information
Bivariateanalysiswasdonetoassesstherelationshipbetween hospital acquired infection and patients’ clinical information. Tachycardiawashigherinpatientswithhospitalacquired infec-tions compared to the community (83.6% vs 64.1% p<0.001). Moreover, these patients had higher prevalence of tachypnea
Table1
clinicaloutcomeandbacteriallocalizationincommunityandhospitalacquiredinfection.
Communityacquired Hospitalacquired Total P-value
N=142(55%) N=116(45%) N=258 Temperature>38.3◦C 74(52.1%) 72(62.1%) 146(56.69%) 0.091 Tachycardia>90beats/min 91(64.1%) 97(83.6%) 188(72.9%) <0.001 Tachypnea>20breath/min 47(33.1%) 52(44.8%) 99(38.4%) 0.047 Leucocytes>12,000/mm3/<4000/mm3 93(65.5%) 92(79.3%) 185(71.7%) 0.01 CRP 53(60.2%) 37(86%) 90(34.9%) 0.003 Sepsis 105(73.9%) 115(99.1%) 220(85.3%) <0.001 Severesepsis 56(39.4%) 92(79.3%) 148(57.4%) <0.001 Definedinfection 69(48.6%) 84(72.4%) 153(59.3%) <0.001
Hospitallengthofstay>14days 44(31.2%) 79(68.1%) 123(48%) <0.001
Bacteriallocalization Communityacquired Hospitalacquired Total P-value
Sputum 25(17.6%) 26(22.4%) 51(19.8%) 0.335
Blood 35(24.6%) 39(33.6%) 74(28.7%) 0.113
Urine 64(45.1%) 60(51.7%) 124(48.1%) 0.287
Ascitesfluid 5(3.5%) 7(6%) 12(4.7%) 0.340
Skinandsofttissue 3(2.1%) 5(4.3%) 8(3.1%) 0.256
Catheter 4(2.8%) 14(12.1%) 18(7%) 0.004
Stools 11(7.7%) 16(13.8%) 27(10.5%) 0.114
Bronchoscopyaspiration 4(2.8%) 19(16.4%) 23(8.9%) <0.001
CSF 0 2(1.7%) 2(0.8%) 0.201
(44.8%vs 33.1% p=0.047), leukocytosisor leucopenia (79.3%vs 65.5%p=0.01),highC-reactiveprotein(86%vs50.2% p=0.003). Sepsiswasmoreprevalentinpatientswithhospitalacquired infec-tion(99.1%vs73.9%p<0.001).Themedianofhospitalstaywas14 days;wealsofoundasignificantdifferencebetweenthetwogroups wherepatientswithhospitalacquiredinfectionshadahigher hos-pitalstayabovethemedian(68.1%vs31.2%p<0.001).
Regardingthecharacteristicsofinfections,wehadaround60%of patientsmicrobiologicallydocumentedinfections;thispercentage wassignificantlyhigherinpatientswithhospitalversus commu-nityacquiredinfections(72.4%vs48.6%p<0.001).Positiveculture fromthecatheter(12.1%vs2.8%p=0.004)andfrombronchoscopy (16.4%vs2.8%p<0.001)weremorecommoninhospital-acquired comparedtocommunityinfections.
Mostcommonbacterialisolatesfromdifferentspecimentypes Most isolates were obtainedfrom the following specimens: 48.1% fromurine, 28.7%from blood,19.8% fromsputum, 10.5% fromstools, 8.9% frombronchoscopy, 7% from a catheter, 4.7% fromascitesfluid,3.1%fromaskinandsofttissuesand0.8%from cerebrospinalfluid.Withintheurinarytractinfectionandblood cultureisolates,E.coliwasthemostcommonbacteriainhospital acquiredinfection.Forsputum,A.baumannii,Enterobactercloacae, E.coli,K.pneumoniaeandP.aeruginosawerethemostcommon isolates.Clostridiumspecies fromstoolsand E.coliand Candida albicansspecies fromcatheter were mainlyisolated. Amongall typesof differentspecimencollected, bronchoscopy aspirations andcatheterweresignificantlymorecommonlycollectedamong hospitalacquiredinfections (16.4%vs2.8%)and(12.1%vs 2.8%) respectively(Table1).
Descriptivestatisticsoftheinfection
Fifty-eightpointfourpercentoftheinfectionswereduetoone Gramnegativebacteriaatleast,48%duetooneEnterobacteriaceae, 30.7%duetooneanaerobicbacteriaatleastand26.2%duetoone Grampositivebacteriaatleast.Around73%ofpatientshadmore thanoneseveritycriterionand50.8%hadsepsisdiagnosisat48h ormoreafterhospitaladmission.ThemeanICUlengthofstaywas around8days.Itisofnotethat18.2%ofthesepatientsdied.The totalmortalityathospitaldischargewas27.1%(Table2).
Table2
Descriptionoftheinfections.
N (%)
AtleastoneGrampositivebacteria 53 26.2% AtleastoneGramnegativebacteria 118 58.4% Atleastoneenterobacteriaceae 97 48% Atleastoneanaerobicbacteria 62 30.7% Morethanoneseveritycriteria 187 72.5% Interval48hormorebetweenadmissionandsepsis 131 50.8% ICUlengthofstay(indays) 8.245 ±19.6661
ICUmortalitydischarge 47 18.2%
Totalmortalityathospitaldischarge 71 27.5% *ICU=IntensiveCareUnit.
**ICUlengthofstayisexpressedasmean±standarddeviation.
Mostcommonorganismsisolatedimplicatedinhospitalacquired infections
Atotalof221isolatesfromclinicalspecimenswerecollected; 171Gramnegative(77.4%)and50Grampositive(22.6%)isolates weredetected.Amongthem,110(64.3%)oftheGramnegativeand 26(52%)oftheGrampositivepathogenswereimplicatedin hos-pitalacquiredinfections.ThemostcommonGramnegativebacilli includedareE.coli,P.aeruginosa,K.pneumonia,E.cloacaeandA. baumanniithetotalofwhichmadeupto53.5%ofthetotalbacilli isolated.Aflow-chartwasdrawntoindicatethemostcommon bac-teriainvolvedinthecommunityandhospitalacquiredinfections, withtheirrespectivepercentages(Fig.1).
AlthoughE.coliwasthemostfrequentisolatedmicroorganism inbothgroups(24.6%inthecommunityvs32.8%inthehospital setting),therewerenosignificantdifferencesbetween commu-nityandhospitalacquiredinfections.TheGram-negativebacteria thatshowedapositivecorrelationregardingpatient’stypeof infec-tionwereP.aeruginosa(19%versus6.3%)(p=0.002),K.pneumonia (10.3%versus2.8%)(p=0.013)andA.baumannii(6%versus0.7%) (p=0.017);thesegermswerethusmostlyfrequentamongpatients withhospitalacquiredinfections (Table3).Moreover,themost commonGrampositivecocciwereS.aureusandcoagulase neg-ativeStaphylococcus,whichtogetherrepresented13.6%fromcocci isolated.NoneoftheGrampositivebacterialisolatesshoweda sig-nificantrelationshipbetweencommunity andhospitalacquired infections(Table4).
408 R.Mattaetal./JournalofInfectionandPublicHealth11(2018)405–411
Table3
Gramnegativeisolatescollectedfrompatientsinhospitalandcommunityacquiredinfections.
Communityacquired Hospitalacquired Total P-value
N=142(55%) N=116(45%) N=258 Escherichiacoli 35(24.6%) 38(32.8%) 73(28.3%) 0.150 Pseudomonasaeruginosa 9(6.3%) 22(19%) 31(12%) 0.002 Klebsiellapneumoniae 4(2.8%) 12(10.3%) 16(6.2%) 0.013 Enterobactercloacae 3(2.1%) 7(6%) 10(3.9%) 0.104 Acinetobacterbaumanii 1(0.7%) 7(6%) 8(3.1%) 0.017 Proteusmirabilis 2(1.4%) 5(4.3%) 7(2.7%) 0.249 Haemophilusinfluenzae 3(2.1%) 3(2.6%) 6(2.3%) 0.559 Klebsiellaoxytoca 1(0.7%) 2(1.7%) 3(1.2%) 0.447 Serratiaspp 1(0.7%) 1(0.9%) 2(0.8%) 0.698 Stenotrophomonasmaltophilia 1(0.7%) 1(0.9%) 2(0.8%) 0.698 Morganellamorganii 0 2(1.7%) 2(0.8%) 0.201 Pseudomonasspp 0 2(1.7%) 2(0.8%) 0.201 Clostridiumspp 0 2(1.7%) 2(0.8%) 0.201 Burkholderiacepacia 0 1(0.9%) 1(0.4%) 0.450 Citrobacterfreundi 0 1(0.9%) 1(0.4%) 0.450 CorynebacteriumJK 0 1(0.9%) 1(0.4%) 0.450 Enterobacterspp 0 1(0.9%) 1(0.4%) 0.450
Haemophiluspara-influenzae 0 1(0.9%) 1(0.4%) 0.450
Nocardiaspp 0 1(0.9%) 1(0.4%) 0.450
Salmonellaspp 1(0.7%) 0 1(0.4%) 0.550
Fig.1.Flowchartcomparingbacteriaincommunityacquiredandhospital infec-tions.
Isolatesofmulti-resistantbacteria
ThepercentageofMRSAcausinghospitalacquiredinfections is12.9%, compared to2.8%in communityinfections (p=0.001). ESBLproducingE.coliandK.pneumoniaeoccurredin30.2%and 1.7% respectively in hospital acquired infections compared to 13.4% and 0.7% in the community, respectively (p=0.001 and 0.424). P. aeruginosa showed significance in its resistance to fluoroquinolones(p<0.001),imipenem(p=0.005),overall multi-resistance(p=0.001)andBetalactams(p=0.041)(Table5).
Factorsassociatedwithhospitalacquiredinfections
Bivariate analysis was done to see if there was a rela-tionshipbetweenhospital-acquired infectionandpatient socio-demographicprofileandcomorbidities.Thegenderdistributionof thepatientshavinghospitalacquiredinfectionwas54.2%malesand 41.7%females(p=0.046).Patientswithhospitalacquiredinfection wereolderthanthoseofthecommunityacquiredinfectedpatients inbothagegroups(p=0.003);thesepatientshadhigher preva-lenceofpreviouscomorbiditiesnamelyhematologicmalignancy (12.1% vs 4.9% p=0.037), immunosuppression (24.1% vs 10.6% p=0.004),prioradministrationofsteroids(15.5%vs7.7%p=0.049) andchemotherapy(7.8%vs1.4%).Chronicobstructivepulmonary disease(COPD)waspredominantincommunitypatients(16.4%vs 30.3%p=0.009)(Table6).
Table7summarizestheresultsoftheforwardlikelihood logis-ticregression.Therewasasignificantrelationshipbetweenolder agegroup(ORa=5.680;CI[2.344;13.765]p<0.001)and immune-suppressedstate (ORa=3.137; CI [1.485;6.630] p=0.003) with hospitalversuscommunityacquiredinfections,whilethere was an inverse relationship for COPD (ORa=0.403 CI [0.212;0.765] p=0.006)(morecommonamongcommunityacquiredinfections).
Discussion
In this study,patientswith hospitalacquired infections had higherratesofP.aeruginosaandmulti-drugresistantP.aeruginosa,K. pneumoniaandESBLproducingK.pneumoniaandE.coli,A. bauman-niiandMRSA.Hematologicmalignancy,immunosuppression,prior administration of steroids and chemotherapy were risk factors
Table4
Grampositiveisolatescollectedfrompatientsinhospitalandcommunityacquiredinfections.
Communityacquired Hospitalacquired Total P-value
N=142(55%) N=116(45%) N=258
Staphylococcusaureus 7(4.9%) 12(10.3%) 19(7.4%) 0.098
Staphylococcuscoagulasenegative 7(4.9%) 9(7.8%) 16(6.2%) 0.349
Enterococcusfecalis 3(2.1%) 2(1.7%) 5(1.9%) 0.595
Pneumococcusspp 4(2.8%) 0 4(1.6%) 0.090
Streptococcusagalactiae 1(0.7%) 3(2.6%) 4(1.6%) 0.239
Streptococcuspyogenes 2(1.4%) 0 2(0.8%) 0.302
Table5
Percentageofmultiresistantbacteriainhospitalandcommunityacquiredinfections.
Multiresistantbacteria Communityacquired Hospitalacquired P-value
N=142 N=116
ESBL*gramnegativepathogens 19(13.4%) 35(30.2%) 0.001
KlebsiellaESBL* 1(0.7%) 2(1.7%) 0.424
MRSA** 4(2.8%) 15(12.9%) 0.002
PseudomonasResistanttoImipenem 5(3.5%) 15(12.9%) 0.005
PseudomonasResistanttoAminoglycosides 3(2.1%) 8(6.9%) 0.058 PseudomonasResistanttoFluoroquinolones 3(2.1%) 17(14.7%) <0.001
PseudomonasResistanttobeta-lactamsotherthanimipenem 4(2.8%) 10(8.6%) 0.041
Multi-ResistantPseudomonas 4(2.8%) 16(13.8%) 0.001
StreptococcusResistanttoPenicillin 0 1(0.9%) 0.105
*ExtendedSpectrumbetalactamase. **MethicillinresistantStaphylococcusaureus.
thatshowedapositivecorrelationwithhospitalacquiredinfected patients.
COPD was mainlyinvolved in community infected patients. Theseresultsareinlinewiththoseofotherstudies.Infact,the Mediterranean regionhas beenidentified asan area of hyper-endemicityformulti-drugresistanthospitalpathogens[17].
Theseresultsarealsosimilartowhatwasfoundinboth Euro-pean[18]andnon-Europeancountries[19];asanexample,MRSA prevalencevariedfromlessthan1%inNorthernEuropeto high-estthan40%inSouthernandWesternEurope[18].Withregardto resistantpathogens,(ESBL)-producingE.coliwasmostfrequently recoveredinhospital acquiredpatientsfollowed bycommunity acquiredinfections[20].Moreover,hospitalacquiredP.aeruginosa weresignificantlymoreresistantthancommunityacquiredspecies toallantimicrobialdrugsevaluated.Theseresultsareconsistent withtheconceptthat isolatesacquiredinthehospitalare usu-allymoreresistantthanthose acquiredin thecommunity [21], andthemajorityofinfectionscausedbyresistantpathogenswere describedashospitalacquired[22].Thisisinaccordancewithour resultswherecommunity-acquiredorganismsweremore suscep-tibletoantimicrobialdrugstestedthanhospitalacquiredisolates, butstillwefoundaround13%ofESBLresistanceamongE.coliinthe community.Infact,recentdatasuggestthatinfectionscausedby resistantmicroorganismsareanemergingproblemincommunity patients[20].
OurresultsshowedthatStreptococcusinfectionswerenot fre-quentinthecommunitysetting,inopposite topreviousstudies [23,24]thatshowedthat this germwasthemostcommon eti-ological pathogen isolated. This might be due to the fact that currently,S. pyogenesis considered a rarecause of community acquiredpneumonia,beingaclinicalentityseenonlysporadically afteraninfluenzainfection[25].Furthermore,theproportionof CAPattributedtoS.pneumoniaeshowedgreatvariationbetween countries,withaverageratesof24%inJapan,14%inSouthKorea andTaiwan,12%inThePhilippines,8–9%inThailand,Chinaand Indiaand4–5%inMalaysiaandSingapore[26].Alackofrigorous microbiologicalstandards,forexample,specimencollection fol-lowingantibioticuse,delaysinspecimentransport,orcultureof specimenswithinadequatemicroscopicscreeningforwhiteblood
cells,mightbeexpectedtoreducetheisolation ofmore fastidi-ousbacteriasuchasS.pneumoniae[27].Wealsohypothesizethat mostoftheantibioticchoicesareprescribedempiricallytopatients becauseofthetimerequiredtoidentifycommunity-acquired res-piratory tractinfections mainlyin peoplewithcriticalfinancial conditions,andthetimerequiredtofindtheorganism[28].
Asforassociatedfactors,wefoundsignificantclinical parame-tersintermofunderlyingdiseasesthatwoulddistinguishhospital fromcommunityacquiredinfections.Similartoourresults,Haley andSchabergidentifiedage,sex,underlyingdiseaseand immuno-suppressive therapy as intrinsic factors increasing the risk of infections [29].In anotherstudy,theprincipalfactorsthat con-tributed to the risk of acquiring a hospital acquired infection include immunosuppression[30],extensivesurgicalprocedures [31],ageandgender[32],anduseofprolongedantibiotictherapy [33];however,inourstudy,nodifferenceingenderwasreported. Neoplasticdiseases,suchashematologicmalignanciesandsolid tumors, immune-compromised state [34] were also commonly associated conditionin patientswithhospital acquiredinfected patients.OurresultswerealsosimilartoKangetal.[35].Chronic obstructivepulmonarydiseasehadarelationshipwithcommunity acquiredinfectionsduetoitsexacerbationsthatusuallyrequire hospitalization[36].Thus,inordertoreducefailureofinitial antibi-otic therapyinpatientsfromthecommunity,itis importantto takethesefactorsintoaccountandperformadequateantibiotic empiricalcontrol.
Limitations
Ourstudyhaslimitations.Itwasanobservational,retrospective studyconductedonasmallsamplegroupwithashortduration. Prospectivestudiesinvolvingalargenumberofpatientsfrom dif-ferentinstitutionsandgeographicareasarewarrantedtoconfirm ourfindingsandevaluatetheneedtodevelopspecificguidelinesfor thisnewgroupofpatients.Samplingbiasisdetectedbyconvenient samplingfromselectedhospitalswhereuniversityhospitalsare overrepresented[37];inaddition,theseasonoftheyearmayhave asignificantinfluenceonratesofdiseasesandmultidrugresistant bacteria[38];thishastobetakenintoaccountinfuturestudies.
410 R.Mattaetal./JournalofInfectionandPublicHealth11(2018)405–411
Table6
Bivariateanalysisofthepredictivefactorsofhospitalacquiredinfection.
Patients’riskfactors Community acquired142(55%) Hospitalacquired 116(45%) P-value Age <44years 30(21.9%) 107(78.1%) 0.001 >44years 8(7%) 107(93%) Gender Male 65(45.8%) 77(54.2%) 0.046 Female 67(58.3%) 48(41.7%) Obesity No 79(57.7%) 58(42.3%) 0.562 Yes 27(52.9%) 24(41.7%) Hematologicmalignancies No 135(95.1%) 7(4.9%) 0.037 Yes 102(87.9%) 14(12.1%) AIDS No 142(100%) 0 0.450 Yes 115(99.1%) 1(0.9%) Cirrhosis No 139(97.9%) 3(2.1%) 0.473 Yes 111(95.7%) 8(4.3%)
Chronicheartfailure
No 98(69%) 44(31%) 0.365 Yes 86(74.1%) 30(25.9%) Metastaticcancer No 127(89%) 15(10.6%) 0.774 Yes 105(90.5%) 11(9.5%) COPD No 99(69.7%) 43(30.3%) 0.009 Yes 97(83.6%) 19(16.4%) Alcoholism No 139(97.9%) 3(2.1%) 0.183 Yes 110(94.8%) 6(5.2%) Diabetesmellitus No 92(64.8%) 50(35.2%) 0.392 Yes 81(69.8%) 35(30.2%)
Chronicrenalfailure
No 116(81.7%) 26(18.3%) 0.757
Yes 93(80.2%) 23(19.8%)
Osteo-muscularproblem
No 126(88.7%) 16(11.3%) 0.482
Yes 106(91.4%) 10(8.6%) Bonemarrowtransplantation
No 141(99.3%) 1(0.7%) 0.482
Yes 114(98.3%) 2(1.7%)
Immunocompromisedstate
No 127(89.4%) 15(10.6%) 0.004
Yes 88(75.9%) 28(24.1%)
Prioradministrationofprednisone
No 131(92.3%) 11(7.7%) 0.049 Yes 98(8.5%) 18(15.5%) Chemotherapy No 140(98.6%) 2(1.4%) 0.002 Yes 107(92.2%) 9(7.8%) Severemalnutrition No 138(97.2%) 4(2.8%) 0.735 Yes 111(95.7%) 5(4.3%)
Solidorgantransplantation
No 132(93%) 10(7%) 0.746
Yes 109(94%) 7(6%)
Table7
Logisticregressionofpredictorsofhospitalversuscommunityacquiredinfections. Independentvariable ORa 95%CI P-value
Olderageclass 5.680 [2.344;13.765] <0.001 Immuno-compromisedstate 3.137 [1.485;6.630] 0.003
COPD 0.403 [0.212;0.765] 0.006
Overallpercentage:62.7%;Omnibustestsignificant;HosmerLemeshowP=0.709(Not significant).
Variablesinitiallyentered:Ageclass,COPD,immuno-compromisedstate,Hematologic malignancyandradiationorchemotherapy.
Conclusion
Ourresultsconfirmthathospitalacquiredinfectionshavehigher ratesofresistantbacteriawhencomparedtocommunityacquired infections.Microbiologistshavetoplayanimportantroleinthe preventionof hospitalacquiredinfections becausetheyarethe first to detect the patients’ bacteriological flora and their pat-ternof resistance. Physicians shouldalso beaware of patients’ comorbiditiestoproperlyguidetheinitialtherapy,particularlyage, immunosuppression,andCOPD;sinceresistanceisattributedto localepidemiologyanduncontrolleduseofantimicrobialagents, furtherresearchinvolvingalargenumberofpatientsfromdifferent hospitalsareneededinordertoconfirmourfindingsandhighlight theneedforantimicrobialstewardship.
Ethicalapproval
TheLebanese University ethicalcommittee waivedapproval ofthestudysinceitisanobservationalnon-invasivestudythat respects participants’ autonomyand anonymity; thestudy fol-lowedprinciplesoftheDeclarationofHelsinkiforsuchtypesof studies. Conflictsofinterest Nonedeclared. Fundingsources Nofundingsources. References
[1]WuCJ,LeeHC,LeeNY,ShihHI,KoNY,WangLR,etal.Predominanceof
Gram-negativebacilliandincreasingantimicrobialresistanceinnosocomial
bloodstreaminfectionsatauniversityhospitalinsouthernTaiwan,1996–2003.
JMicrobiolImmunolInfect2006;39(April(2)):135–43.
[2]ChenY,XuX,LiangJ,LinH.Relationshipbetweenclimateconditionsand
nosocomialinfectionrates.AfrHealthSci2013;13(2):339–43.
[3]AlpE,LeblebiciogluH,DoganayM,VossA.Infectioncontrolpracticeincountries
withlimitedresources.AnnClinMicrobiolAntimicrob2011;10:36.
[4]Cornejo-Jua´ırezP,Vilar-CompteD,Pe´ırez-Jime´ınezC,N˜amendys-SilvaSA,
Sandoval-Herna´ındezS,Volkow-Ferna´ındezP.Theimpactofhospital-acquired
infectionswithmultidrug-resistantbacteriainanoncologyintensivecareunit.
IntJInfectDis2015;31:31–4.
[5]Doyle JS,BuisingKL,ThurskyKA,WorthLJ,RichardsMJ.Epidemiologyof
infections acquired in intensive care units. SeminRespir CritCare Med
2011;32(2):115–38.
[6]BrusselaersN,VogelaersD,BlotS.Therisingproblemofantimicrobial
resis-tanceintheintensivecareunit.AnnIntensiveCare2011;1:47.
[7]HoJ,TambyahPA,PatersonDL.MultiresistantGram-negativeinfections:a
globalperspective.CurrOpinInfectDis2010;23(December(6)):546–53.
[8]YaoJD,MoelleringR.In:MurrayPR,BaronEJ,JorgensenJ,PfallerMA,Yolken
RH,editors.Manualofclinicalmicrobiology.8thed.Washington,DC,USA:ASM
Press;2003.
[9]Rogers B, Sidjabat HE, Paterson DL. Escherichia coli O25b-ST131: a
pan-demic,multiresistant,community-associatedstrain.JAntimicrobChemother
2011;66(January(1)):1–14.
[10]PitoutJDD.ExtraintestinalpathogenicEscherichiacoli:acombinationof
viru-lencewithantibioticresistance.FrontMicrobiol2012;3(January):9.
[11]Ben-DavidD,MermelLA,ParenteauS.Methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus
aureustransmission:thepossibleimportanceofunrecognizedhealthcare
workercarriage.AmJInfectControl2008;36(March(2)):93–7.
[12]NaberaCK.Staphylococcusaureusbacteremia:epidemiology,pathophysiology,
andmanagementstrategies.ClinInfectDis2009;48(Suppl.4):S231–7.
[13]MiallLS,McGinleyNT,BrownleeKG,ConwaySP.Methicillinresistant
Staphylo-coccusaureus(MRSA)infectionincysticfibrosis.ArchDisChild2001;84:160–2.
[14]HoranTC,AndrusM,DudeckMA.CDC/NHSNsurveillancedefinitionofhealth
care-associatedinfectionandcriteriaforspecifictypesofinfectionsintheacute
caresetting.AmJInfectControl2008;36:309–32.
[15]DucelG,FabryJ,NicolleL.Preventionofhospital-acquiredinfections:apractical
guide.2nded.WHO/CDS/CSR/EPH/2002.12;2002.
[16]NationalCommitteeforClinicalLaboratoryStandards.Performancestandards
forantimicrobialdisksusceptibilitytests:approvedstandardM2-A6.Wayne,
[17]GurD,UnalS.ResistancetoantimicrobialagentsinMediterraneancountries.
IntJAntimicrobAgents2001;17:21–6.
[18]Tiemersma EW,BronzwaerSL,LyytikainenO, DegenerJE,Schrijnemakers
P,BruinsmaN,etal.Methicillin-resistantStaphylococcusaureusinEurope,
1999–2002.EmergInfectDis2004;10:1627–34.
[19]BorgMA,deKrakerM,SciclunaE,vandeSande-BruinsmaN,TiemersmaE,
MonenJ,etal.Prevalenceofmethicillin-resistantStaphylococcusaureus(MRSA)
ininvasiveisolatesfromsouthernandeasternMediterraneancountries.J
AntimicrobChemother2007;60:1310–5.
[20]SonJS,SongJH,KoKS,YeomJS,KiHK,KimSW,etal.Bloodstreaminfections
andclinicalsignificanceofhealthcareassociatedbacteremia:amulticenter
surveillancestudyinKoreanhospitals.JKoreanMedSci2010;25:992–8.
[21]GuembeM,CercenadoE,MarinM,InsaR,BouzaE.Evolutionofantimicrobial
susceptibilitypatternsofaerobicandfacultativegram-negativebacillicausing
intra-abdominalinfections:resultsfromtheSMARTstudies2003–2007.Rev
EspQuimioter2008;21(3):166–73.
[22]Zaman R,DibbWL.MethicillinresistantStaphylococcusaureusisolatedin
SaudiArabia:epidemiologyandantimicrobialresistancepatterns.JHospInfect
1994;26(4):297–300.
[23]MenonRU,GeorgeAP,MenonUK.Etiologyandanti-microbialsensitivityof
organismscausingcommunityacquiredpneumonia:asinglehospitalstudy.J
FamMedPrimCare2013;2(July(3)):244.
[24]BansalS,KashyapS,PalLS,GoelA.Clinicalandbacteriologicalprofileof
com-munityacquiredpneumoniainShimla,HimachalPradesh.IndianJChestDis
AlliedSci2004;46(March(1)):17–22.
[25]Musher DM,ThornerAR.Community-acquiredpneumonia.NEngl JMed
2014;371(October(17)):1619–28.
[26]PetoL,NadjmB,HorbyP,NganTT,vanDoornR,KinhNV,etal.The
bacte-rialaetiologyofadultcommunity-acquiredpneumoniainAsia:asystematic
review.TransRSocTropMedHyg2014;108(April(6)):326–37.
[27]BartlettJG.Diagnostictestsforagentsofcommunity-acquiredpneumonia.Clin
InfectDis2011;52(May(Suppl.4)):S296–304.
[28]DaoudZ,KouraniM,SaabR,NaderMA,HajjarM.ResistanceofStreptococcus
pneumoniaeisolatedfromLebanesepatientsbetween2005and2009.RevEsp
Quimioter2011;24(2):84–90.
[29]HaleyRW,SchabergDR.Prevalenceandimportanceofhospitalacquired
infec-tion.AmJMed1981;70:51.CitedinPrinciplesofBacteriology,Virologyand
Immunity,Edi.ByTopley&Wilson,8thEd.1990,3:142.
[30]KlasterskyJ.Infectionsincompromisedhosts:considerationsonprevention.
EurJCancerClinOncol1989;25(Suppl.2):S53–61.
[31]BrettW, Masters PJ,Lang SD,Ikram RB, Hatch SH, Gordon MS.
Antibi-oticsusceptibilityofStreptococcuspneumoniaeinNewZealand.NZMedJ
1999;74(8):112–83.
[32]BarbutF,PetitJC.EpidemiologyofClostridiumdifficile-associatedinfections.
ClinMicrobiolInfect2001;7(8):405–10.
[33]YassinSF,Young-FadokTM,ZeinNN,PardiDS.Clostridiumdifficile-associated
diarrheaandcolitis.MayoClinProc2001;76(7):725–30.
[34]CardosoT,RibeiroO,AragaoI,Costa-PereiraA,SarmentoA.Differencesin
microbiologicalprofilebetweencommunity-acquired,healthcare-associated
and hospital-acquired infections. Acta Med Port 2013;26(July–August
(4)):377–84.
[35]KangCI,KimSH,BangJW,KimHB,KimNJ,KimEC,etal.Community-acquired
versusnosocomialKlebsiellapneumoniaebacteremia:clinicalfeatures,
treat-mentoutcomes,andclinicalimplicationofantimicrobialresistance.JKorean
MedSci2006;21:816–22.
[36]AuDH,BrysonCL,ChienJW,SunH,UdrisEM,EvansLE,etal.Theeffectsof
smokingcessationontheriskofchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
exac-erbations.JGenInternMed2009;24(4):457–63.
[37]LauplandKB,RossT,PitoutJD,ChurchDL,GregsonDB.Investigationofsources
ofpotentialbiasinlaboratorysurveillanceforanti-microbialresistance.Clin
InvestMed2007;30:E159–66.
[38]Rossello-UrgellJ,Vaque-RafartJ,Armadans-GilLL,Vaquero-PuertaJL,
Elorza-RicartJM,Quintas-FernándezJC,etal.Theimportanceofthedayoftheweek
anddurationofdatacollectioninprevalencesurveysofnosocomialinfections.