CENTRE FOR NEWFOUNDLAND STUDIES
TOTAL OF 10 PAGES ONLY MAY BE XEROXED
(Without Author's Permission)
-._, ·.I "
" ',
.. ~ : ·: ..... ' ....·~.: .. _-·,.··, , , I• ~ .. • . ~
,
. ' . . ~ •' ..
.···. --~·- '
.... · ._ ~
' ... · .· ,. •! • ~ . ' '\ . - . ·;,_'\. ...; . ~
-
~.
-~---_:_ ._i"' - - --.::__
. . --....
---.
... .~'.
~· .· ...
_
'-..:.
\
\,
(
.· .·•
•
. ..
.
. .,.,
...•·
\
~
.. v . . ·.' .. ·
\ .·.- (•' 1 • ....
.. 1
..._
...
. "' .. A
ST~DY OF. SE~~~.TED · F~CTORS -~SOc'IATED
WITH·.THE SUPPLY OF ·AND D~D- FOR .
.
· ' •PUBLIC SCHOOL-TEACHERS AND ADMINISTRATORS
.. --- _,. . \ ' . . . .... ...
. IN . THE
PROVI~CE. OF
NEWFOuNDLAND AND'~RADOR' .
. . ·.FOR-;;-
SCBOO!v.EAR :~-9'85-1986
·.:~-
,. '
- .
' ·.' I
I '
\ \ ...
. '.
..
~ ~ .,· .. ,
·. __ It.·_ ' • . _ ... ;.·- '. ··~·· ~-. . . .. ... ·. . . ~ : . . . '
·. --~ A. th~sis p~r~sei1teq. ·to_ the' · ·:· . . . ' / ·.
Depa_rt.nen:_~· of \Educational"Admini's't.ra~ ·
· : -~Me_fllor .i.a~-:--Uf!.~~~~i ty of Newfoundlancl · . -
' . '"-<~ ... ' ~- ~-
\.· ' -~
. .
.
... •
I· ~-
>
' · -~- -
"<'---~
Submltt'ed 'in partial ·fulfillment of the requirements for the·degree of
· Master of Education' . .
' ~ @ .
)
' . .. '( .
.. .
'·
I v .
Harold L. Press '· · · ,
' ""'
'-Fall, . ; ' 1987 ., ..
... ,.' I
I
. / · .
/
. '
\
\
/
.
\
. · .. · . .. r .· ,•.
. \
_;:~- ~~- -
.··. .
.
..
.-. . '· ~·· ·. ..
· .. \.JI
\
. ' I _j
! .
.
-~•' '
1 : ..
·1 ,., .:
I .,
' _,.
I I
..-
I\, ,!
' •
...
.. ,
: ·.· ' .\ '
....
'• .
.
.
"
~ -~. '.
·.\ ·
·"
' I
.
.
~; ,
~ o I ..._ _ _
' -
_ ,
r !
· - ·
J..
. .
· Permission has.· been graqt~d
·.to ·_the ~NatioJ?.al . Lfb_;a'i:-y · of Canana, / -· to microfilm-• I ·this , t-he-s}s 'an~ ;to .. ·lel)d or. ·s~ll
./:-
~--~-·· f --.
~ ' ' ~:~ -:~. I
• •
~.
. ·;:; ._;Q
.
Y. ...
'
'·-
)• .. 1
•
~•
t · .
.. ,.
L'autorisation a ~t~ aQcord&e~
a
1~ Bibliotheque n~tiqnale.du ..'.Canada· de micro.fi'lmer ·.
cette · these. et de preter· t>U .
. de ·vendre. des . exemplq ires du ·... ... . . , .
...
-
.... : .. ··copies of the .fi~m~ \
~ .
,.. . .
"~
.... · ."·
. .- , '
· ·film: ·. · · ·...., rn · ·
·. ' . . . . ·. \ . . . . . . '
'-. -..__
~ ·.
\
..
'\ '. i,'
!.-.:\' .
l!t,
. .
...
,,'
. .
. • .
' ·The author ('copyright. own~r). L'·a~teur . ( t[tulai)e ·du droit·.·. · .' -'· . . h:as r e s e r v e·d •b 'th'er. d'aut,eur) ' se ·."re-se'rve -1-es ·. ·.·: ·. ·
·. pu bl :i_qa•!; i OlJ.. ' rights,· _and au'tre·s ·droit's 'de:.•p,ubli'catlon: · ""' .··. · :·· · ..
nei·1ther ·, tne ·thesis·· npr · ; : ni .. la the'r;se ni'· fie lorigp · - :·.-.:-
• ·extensive extract·s· from :-l t ' ·.ext'raits de: .. 'cellt!:..cd · ne -
. may be ~rinted ·or_ ·otherwise qoi·vent_· ~-e~re imprim~s · ·ou '-·
.. ·re~roduced .· wi.th_out hi~/~er au~~ement rep~_oduits. saqs son ·
:. wr1t.ten permission. -·autorisation. ecri.te .. .. ~.
·• • .
.
I'·
,·
· ..
'·
...
~ . .
..
-
'
'-
.
. ..
.
' . '. ~ \\ .
.
. ..,
,
I.~BN. . , :-___ ' 0-315-39481~1 . . . ,• '.·· . -
.,.
--.
...._
.
. '
'
I
., I
. .. ...:.
. .
.
..
" ;' <
~~ - · r· . ·
~
. I
~.. \ . · ..
.....
. ' . \"'. ~ ~·:. : ..
:·.
·~··' ~:~·e~. .
' I .. ... -
· c ·. .
' \. .. • ··;.~·.J.:''r'\: _:'~' ...) ~·
. .
ill
,
!''
.
.. s
-- ·.• ~----
\
;.,ABSTRACT.
,.
...
. .
-The,
importance of reliable i.n.formation about teacher supply .and. de~an~ ~h~·s been .well ~tattlish~d. In' recent ..\ ·. · ·yr/is·, the
educ~nal
system has undergone a dyRamicsh~~
·:--:
- - -~ ---- . fr~m .
a chronic shor'tage of·~eacbers
-t-o' ana~py-ent .·
surplus:· · ..·.--;he impaCt .of.
~his :.:~an~e ha~ implicati~r
Plamring ·arid•.
. I
. .
'• ·
. '
·..J . . ·
\'
\'
. .
· ·deVelopment
~Y
university fioculti'es,.9o
e,rru.;entpl~n~e[s, -~·
...""; te:cher. recruits and ·.school administrato~s .•. :. . . .. .• . •.
. ,. ·.·
,Th~ lit~ratu[e
aha related re ...ar~h
regardte~che ~ . --~
': ·-.. s~pP.f.'Ya~~nd demand as cd.tica~ to the tp_tal planning proces/. . . ~
~ . . . ' . . .
,esearchers. have concluded that the problem is. 'riot. s'o m~ch .. • ...
.
.
. ' .f surpluses and shortag·es in abso'Iute ·.terms but short. ter~ ;::_·.
.
.
. ... var ia·nces in gec5gr~phi.c regions. and ·subject areas.. The
.
· - .
j.: purpQ~~
of~hi~ study, ~as
tbide~tify f~ct~t; ~ssoci~ted
~ :
:. wiih-:thel supply of a·l_lddema~d:- :fa"; t~ach~;~ ~nd
. .f _
·.
. ~ ..
. administrators ·_in ord~r ·to demon.st.r~te pot.ent.ial_ reg~<Juil
, · • •• ' • • ; I .. "-, ' • . ) .
al)d academi~ imbalances.:. More specifically_, this ~tudy was
.. .. . ..
/...
. . '
.
. .. ,
•. ai:t a~t t'o -~dentify . the reasons for jo~ yac~ncies,. the.
. . . . .
.
subject and administrative a_reas· and geographic•locations
I .
· ~ncompassing t~-~~her deman.d, ·and the characteri~tics of the _'p6tentf~l '· and· ~~tu~l $Upply of new teachers.
.:
'
I
'·
. '/
A~ instr~ment was'_des~ne~ to obtain data relative to'~·
job vacancies· in ·individual $Chools and school districts,/ .
. ~ \ .
and the ·individ~als who fflle·d those jobs. Results of. th'e
. . . ~ ~ . . , I
. . . . . . . I
. anal_y_~is. o~ data ~·eveal_ed a·. g~ne_ral sur'plus ·of. te~ch~/.. ·
. . \ ~ . • • • • f . ii . . • • • /'/ 1
. .
\
I· I
'·
t·
• I
I
I /
' .
.I
/
. '
;-
/
/--
. ..
. .
._~ • ' I
' '
: i
( /. '
,. I
i -'
I ~
.- I
I -.
·f·· . . '
I -:
'· ,,•
/"<
. '
~ .. '
· '
.
(...
·::
.
· ... \. ,
.....
''
..
~ : . '. ~ ~
' -~'
. .
..
.
.. .' \
.,
.,
_)ov~r
. 6·, 600 l''app1i~tions
. were • .. '~-e~eived
..
forl-569. . •·vaca~cies
for. .. . " \ . • ' • j
·.teachers and admiri\str~tors between September 1, 1985 and
. ~. '
.· • ' . ' * - .
~-August 31, ,1986. On the other hand, a shortage was evident
I ' • ~ ' ' - , • - t
1
in
edUc~~~th~r:PY
and potential sliOi"tagej ingui~nce
and muslc~ . . , . / . . .
. - . J, . .
The findings. of-this .study strting1y .s~ggest ~hat .the ··
teache·r workforce is a dynamic .
enter~rise
. . \~
'·.Con~lder~ble
. : ; . .. . ,.:' • ' •. 't \ ' ' •• < . • • '
took 'place between.schools, d~str~cts
·' ~. . . .
...
·.· ( 'and pro~(n6e~ p6tentia ·- c~eatin~ jobr for -those ·~ot in· ~he
'
..,.
..~ ,·
' '
,..
workforce.
..
'I .
.
The_: study found that . t.here · wefe. vacancies in cl11. r~gioils . ,
~
. '
..,
. .. '
I . ' . . .
I I
. ~
' rates bei'ng· in communi,t'i_es ~i th
a
'popu1~t-ion of le~s=-s=--'. t""ht:"a""'n=--:-.-.-~'-,--:---SQQ. It.was found t.hat
d~n{and
wa$ .. highest inLabrad~r (i5.a
percent), the. most isolated -r~g"ion of the _P~ovince o
. • I
. It was found that school,districts were-seeking both
• • • • 1 ' • • •• ~
generaiist and sptlt:ialist
empioyee~> .
. Demandw~s
. . greatest. for ed~at·~on~l t~erapis_ts· ·<53· ·pe_~cent) and ·French··. Immer~i~n
• - f • ' • -~ .·
teachers ( 44 o fj '·perc·en~), while li_ttle ·demand was· experienced
... ' . - ' . '
.
. . ' . . .. ~for~dministrators· (3o2 p~r~'ent> < ' ·
Fem4tfs comprised ·th7 m~jority _of-,teachers hired
. . . . . • . 1-ft
males. comprised the majority .
- ot'
adminitltratot:s.
. ~ ... . hir~d.I , .... • • ,.
&
-~11,;j-
1 • • ::i ·~
iii . . ~ _);·
and· Four
•
i .r
.·
l·.:~ ' ..
p'.t
•' ·';, ,•
. ..
•
·.
. 1
0
.
. .
, ... .
l .
..
. ' ~' . 't~~>·
'--.~}
.
~ ~ ~
. -
~ ..
.. ..
_,
' . ' .• ... • .. ._ iJ .
·' ~- percen_t of !\~w employees had no university de~ree ~nd •i9ht c.}•.
,...
. .'l'he med~_pn.
pe~c~~t had at ·l~ast a
· '-· . r i
educational .experi,nce
Master's degr~.
• • • t
fc:>r a.lf new' employees was t~o year.s ..
, ' ;
found that 41.5 percent of -new employees
~ . ~ I '· \ •
teaching
at
'the\ time and . 22 •. 7 .percent.;. I -.._1 .
ca~e 'direc~ly
fromMembria~Unive .rs'ity". Tea~hers/w~r~ ·hi-~ - ~d
- ~ • . . • I
. FJ._nally, ·~ tl was
. . .
\
.. .·' hired w~re already
oth~r
I
·\ ..from other teache~~~ai~ing institutlons, from.other educati_ona;
i~~ti tut- -i-6~-~
OJJtsidef th.e · J?rovince ,·,occupations,. And·
ti' om
the ·r~nks of the' ~
- ...
•
·
.. ,.
·( .. . - · /
•
I
. ~~
(] 0
(
:.·. ·t.
:!.
,
·'
'
. ,.-;-'1
... /
~-v.
-~-•· ,,
•. ' ~ . ~u
' .. v "\. '\!~
.. . .
'l .
· .
.·
i.
·' . ' •• l
. '
'
.,..
. ·.•
...
~ ' -
•,' . . ..
. ' . . .~
f
. .. : ~
. '
~
· ..
··.~
'·
.
.
. _,)• . -
..•
.. _.
.
. ·
r· •
.. "
•• '
• ..
.
.
.: .·ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ; \,
..
I
••
'I · •
~ .. -
. • • ~ "*-· .
t . The wr i"te~ wishes . to exptes·s his· appreciation ta Dr.
. • I
'
' !~ \
! ... . .
~
o~~riis . Tresla:~ ,'~s ~pek.is.o~,
('for~is ·
·guidance andconstructive criticism. ttiroug'no.~t the · master's ,program. -~
rrp·
Dr. Hubert
Kitchen~
a· since:t~~nk-ya:u .
for providing..2,/
. . - . I . .,,;. .
~ --~-..
di~-~c~~on
a11d .J?urpose ..·to_.m~ . cou~se
of ;.stud.Y.· . . : ·~ .
~'· ~r
•. _Gr.atef~ . appreciati.~n i~xpres~~d
to Dr •. Boyce F;_ad$h.am · ·~
·\. ' t . •
'fpr chalie'nging .~e '~0 pursue a worthwhi~e _.and. comprehens~ve
.
. .
·. ...
:. . ...
. ...
. ..thes~s t?p1.c •. , Al~o, ~very speci,al_ thanks_ l.S. exp~essed to ·
:.trr=r
.Ter'#y Boak ~-- D~·-' r'reder ick 'Aldrich -and Professor Jeffrey'
.. . ·,.. ..
. ·,: . . . ·: .· ..,
~- . . .Bu.lcock for 'their· ·-encouraqement.: .. and advice •
. . ...
. ,
' . . :
· · -.~he wr i t'~r- ·~auld l~ke to. express appreciat~C?n .to special
. ' . .
.
.
.., ..friends . .,. ~r. Lenora Perry Faga~, Barbara ~opkins, Sam McGrath .1
~nd
.Shei·la Ander·son. The-ir·compa~~ship too~· t~is ,
wo-rk:beyon~ the level of an ~cademic exercis~.~
·- ...
-·
. .
~.: ·.Special mention is made to all superintendent·s,
, '1
.. ..
_..
'•
' ' I • t •
. ~~-~i.stant· super intenden_tJ and atl· ot~er.s· whose· particip_atiory
·
~n.~
·cooperationd~r
ing a·n.e~remely
·busytim~
of the· s'chool. . ·. . . 4' . . .
.. year tieiped make this ~udy PC!~slble.
: Final-ly, to
my wif~ -~
:NCen,.,a_sp~cial
and heartfeltthan~-you for her -~ncouragement, ·understanding arid patience·
t,._~~ughou t_ t~e . pro~·r am.
,
.~
f ... .
--.
,.
•,'
. ,•
. ' .
. '
'•
-
r..
I '
. f.
I
I
·;
·.!
i
t I
I I j
. , .
.
,
.. .
, ,
"-·"
. ·.--
...
0
•
I .
...
:•'
... .
'•,
.. .... ..
\ "'' •'
~. '~ . .. ..
..
·.
···.· \··:
. '. ' _ _
\..
. - - l, \ ·.. '
'
.
' ~ ... ' ," .. ;,• ' .. · ...
'
. ~ \ ' ' . · ... · . ' ,•. . . 1!\
j
I"
'\.
. . ; ·
•,., .
}
}. '
~·
•
. ,.
- ·
•
r
', ..
· . I
•.' 'Chapter
/·
\.. .
'.
'... ..
""
' .. •
'
·.-...
INTRODUCTION .• : • ·. • • • • • .- .• • • • • . •. • • . • ·1·
St~Je~~·nt --~~
thePro~~"em
:·. • • • • . • . • . •. . • • .~
4..
The.Jreti.ca~ . F~~mew~~k
. • • ·. • • • • • . ... • . ' 7.·
..
' '/·
._. .sigfif:i?~-nce . ~f- tile -~t:·uay_._··
. .• · • · •• .••••• _ ..
13Del1mitations. • • • • -.. .- • • • .• • • . 1'6
. I .: . . , . . -
· · Limitations • • • • • • ·• .- • • . • • . ~ 17 Asshmptions • • • • - • · • • • •
~
• . • • 18•oetfnitiqn of .Ter •
~
., , ' • • • • • , .or9an~i~ation o~
} \Study~:·
• • • • •~
• • •lQ
'
20
. ··II o. /REVIEW' OF THE LITERATURE 'AND RELATED RESEARCH
·
Dyn(mic~
of the .TeacherLabo~r' M~:rket
,;·. •· • 22. -'. . .
\
. 'Lit rature ~elated to_\ Teacher Supply
,I
a~d~emand _ .-_. ~ ~~ • • . • • •• • • • •. • • 23' H"stotical Per•p~cti~es (1900~1969) • • • • 23' . ·. .
'\-
.rrent ~ersp~ctives (i970~1985) · · . • . • ~ . •26
' ' . ' .
\.
. 'united States .. · • \ . • • • .• • • • • • 27 C~nada
. . .
;.. . . .
\ \\ . . . . . .
· · '.
.•.
·t
New_foundl~nd ·and Labfa~or • • • • • • • 33.. . · .Fi.,crrs •. Affecting
Te~cher
Demancj and Supply 3631~
I ,
·.· ....
.. II ·., ·.:
''1.
"·
'.' :·r:
.
.. ·.''
·I
:. ,.
·'i . •
" ·.'
-~- <~
..
-'~..._..
.~ . . -~
c... . . ....
•• 4 • •
. ' ' I • , · Vi .. '· ...
\ . '• •, .
• • •• " ·•. " ..
,
___ .__, •~ ::'~:~
J_..., ...
. .
'' ',
:\ ;, ;- ..
··. .
.
: .../ .
..•
..
· ..
'
•
•' ...
I
. -
•• •
l ·Chapter'
;
"
I
.. . ·~
I •
I
(
,·_ -.~~·.
.·
.,
.. . ..
.
.
- - - - · " " T '
. .
, j
j
I I '
Enrolment ·characteristics • • •
' • I .
Teache~ .
workforce Charadteri~t
.. ics _; • ·~
• . . . I . .. .
Cha~cter ~s~~~ o~. ~~terti~l ~~a~her~
• . • Polley I.n1t-1at1ves • • o • o • • • • • • • •.I . ' -·.
, Econorn·ic Cqnditions ·. • • • • • • • • • • • D
' .
.
The Relationship ~etween Demand and·Supply
' ~ .
Dyriam.tc · Equili'bri'um • • . ..· .•
'
Surpl~ses·and :·Summary· •.• .
. .
.
~. .
• .. . . . .
. . .
•...
Page
.) . .('.~
. .37
·38
39
40 41
...
-
..·
41
42
. . . . . . . '43'
.t ·
. ~·
44 .
• ~ ' 1
. ·
... . ..
·.\ ' .
. ..
.- v
·.. : \
..... .
\ \
.
.,
. \
. \ I.
\
~··
111.· METHODOLOGY. • • • ! .... ;.... • ... • • • 0 • •
. .
.....
.. ..
,.
Popula~ion ·
...
../' ,' .' . . ..
·~ ·..
.. .
',. .
• I. . . . .
..
.. . .
o• •
. . .
. .
~ ' . . "Development .of.: .th~e Instr~ment • ·•
. . . . - .
,/.(
.. . . . . ,
Validity
. . . . .
. ' .. ,.
·· Reliabili_t i .. ~. • • •
-/'-' ·'
• •
. . . . . . - . . .
Instrument Response
. . .
\. . . . . . . . . .
46 53 53 54
Method of ~a ta ·Analysis • • • • • • •. . ... • • • 56
·-"'tl: PRESENTATION Aifp INTERPRETATION OF DATA
~
• • • ••
57
•
·.
·.
?ract·e~_istics o.~
.Demand .• _ • •~
• · • • : • . . • •~8
·: . ... .· :. . .'_. I?_ern~ni·d. fo_br. T~achedr_!l __ and
1' Adrninistra_!:~-~~-..: __ ·_ .. ~ ____
62
·-~--: _ _ . ·_· _·_. ,
.
.
I I ' •
n Su Ject an Spec alty Areas . ·•· • • ~.. . · ·
... ' '
.
'. .
Demand for Subjec~ Teachers
. . . . .
. .
.: Demand .fo~ Special Education Personnel·
. . .
.
'.
. De~and for Administrat?rs
. . . .
..
0 • • • vii.
.
. 65
70
' 71
. . ,..
...
-
.. . .
· .
. \
.~-~~·~~::·-...
'
. .
L
"'·
. .
. :
. . ··
.. .'
...
. ' .. .'/ ' :·
.
. . -; . . .
: I .)
,, :
j' • • : '" . • ••• - • • ~.,' ~-•
. ~· '
! .
I I
: ~ . ;
..
·.\ ,·
•
\ Chapter ./ I
. .
Page-, I
\('
. .
. .
'.· ....
',
. .
'' .
'
\ lv.
.... .
· • ·
•
.... .
• ' ' '1. (l
Demand for Teachers and Adm'in1stra'tors by Sel~c·ted. Geographic and Derrtographic
Character~stics • • • • • • • ; • • • • ~5
Demand by· ~'chooi Dis.trlct
' .
. .
•••
• 75. 77
. -
'. . .
·o~mand ·byi:co~uni ty Size··
fe~nd b~School
Size • • • ...
.. . . .
83 . .IYemand ;bY ~Region • • ·J •• • • • • • ;. 88
· ..
-·
Satisfaction with Teachers and Admi~istrators
· · "Se.eking En\ployinent in the Education b • ·
M~rketplace · • • ~ • ~· ·.• . • .~ · • • •. ~ . ! •• • .• 9 8 :
sa t'i " sfactio~ . "*' w'i
th. . A~ailable
.. Supply.
·. ·.
• ' • . •. 9a
t+filcti:on
wi,th<:a?di~at~s . ~nt~i:vie.wed
\ 100 ·· C aracte:r is~i?s of the~ Supply· ~f Nf~ Teachers and Adm1n1strators • .• • ; ·• • •· · . .-. • . • 104
·.Gener.al 'ch'Aracb~r i•ics of New Employe·es ., • 104 New Teachers by Specialty and: Region... .. • 109 New Admini'st~ators by Pos~tion. and Reg.ion • 117 .Prior. Activit-i-es of New .Emp,loy,ees • • • • • 0122
., . • ·-r~
I> ;-
U,· .
·Summary • • • • • • • ,, . ., • • • •· • . • • 128
-
'·
SUMMARY, FINDINGS, . C(>NCLPS.lONS I AND .REqOMMENDATIONS • • • • • •
.'sununary
. . . . .
Findings .• · • • • Conclusions
R~commendatioris
. .
· viii
·"'
.
.
.
• ·•
. . .
~.~
. . .
.•
. . .
-
<I •
. . . . . . .
129.
•. . .
•.
129. . . .
131. . . . .
139' 142
. . . . .
·~
4 ...
'
~ ·
..
'.
'
.
' , . . · .. . . ~ '\.
.•
. .
;<~ . .'/,: .
.,
' .
·I
\ .
,v.~ ,, . '-·,' -
'·1";
. . ·· . .
.•
. .
.• :: "-'!
\
'(
..
1
•
... . . -
,.
. r'
..
....
' I'
. ·:.J '
...,·;
.... .
I
. .
·.
.· - . ..
. .
'.
.
:--.0 i
·.
...
'
'-''
Chapter· __ Page
•
,, I • ftiJIJt
.
.'
~ecorrune~~a-~_ions fo·r/.~r.ther · !le:Search Ot1\e_r · Reco~endatio s .. • ~ • • • • .•
. .
.• • ; 142- 14-3
.. . .
0
.
•.'Bibliography '
. . . . . . .
145r / .
App~ndi:x A: Support Documentation
~ .
. .
·'. . .. .
153Appendix. B: ·survey Instrument i _ .• . . . 157
·. - '
. ·. .
· Appen_d,
i'x .. c:
Survey I~~.tr.umen.t .2 • • • • • • • • 161 .· . - ~
.
. • .._,; .
. Appendix· D: . +nsfrument validation .- ; ., . • • • • 1t·a · ·
. . . . . . c .· .. . · . . ' . ..
Appendix/ E: CrQss· Reftrl;!nce of· Re~earch· . . .
Qu~-t'i.ons ~ith the· Instrument ( 2.). Question·s •• ·171
~pp~ix
F:.tis~
of_· UrbWt ...~~u~it~·~s
.• .• • • • 173 •. I
/
.
.....
.. ..
#"'
. .
I :...
..
..
':':•>::·/;
' ' • ·~. ,1'"'
..... }
. , .
.
.. .
.. .
•
•: '
'.
.
'• ~-·~
..
'V" .
.
..
: .~
.
. •
-~ .
:··
..
. ~
. . (
. ....... .
o .
. ix
..
. ·
.
\ . .
.,. . .....
:· .
·.·' ...
• "1!,
.A_ · .
·. · . ·.~ --·
I •
·.p
>, .·_ ....
. '·
•.· ,·