• Aucun résultat trouvé

Corrigenda to “Geometric characterization of locally univalent analytic functions, and a generalization”

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Corrigenda to “Geometric characterization of locally univalent analytic functions, and a generalization”"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Corrigenda to “Geometric characterization of locally univalent analytic functions, and a generalization”

by Anatoly Golberg,

Rev. Roumaine Math. Pures Appl. 51 (2006), 5-6 , 633–639

A page is missing in this paper. This is page 639, reproduced below.

Thus, the old page 639 becomes 640.

Letz0be a point of a domainD, where the functionw=f(z) is continu- ous, and letw0 =f(z0). The pointz0 will be called aU-pointof the mapping w= f(z) if there exist two sequences {zi},{zi} (i= 1,2, . . .) of points con- verging to z0, such that the semitangents t,t at z0 lie on different straight lines and all the pointswi =f(zi), wi=f(zi) are different from w0 =f(z0).

We say that the mappingw =f(z) is orientation preserving at the U- pointz0 if the sequences{wi},{wi}have semitangentsT,T atw0 such that if 0<{t,t}< πthen 0≤ {T,T}< π.

Trokhimchuk [8] gave the generalization below of the Bohr and Menshoff theorems for arbitrary continuous functions.

Theorem F. Let w = f(z) be a continuous mapping of the domain D with constant stretching at almost every point z in D, and let this mapping be orientation preserving at almost every U-point. Then the function f(z) is analytic in D. In addition, if there are no U-points of f in D, then f(z) const.

6. GEOMETRIC CONDITIONS FOR ANALYTICITY OF CONTINUOUS FUNCTIONS

Using the local geometric characteristics for arbitrary continuous func- tionsw=f(z) at a pointz∈Dgiven in Section 3, for 1≤p <∞ we denote byIp(z, t) and Op(z, t) the quantities

(7) Ip(z, t) = R(z, t) r(z, t)

R(z, t) r(z, t)

p−1 ,

(2)

684 Corrigenda 2

(8) Op(z, t) =

R(z, t) r(z, t)

p−1

R(z, t) r(z, t).

Since in the case of continuous functions the characteristic neighborhood Gt(z) can be shrunk to a point or to an arc, the quantities (7) and (8) are not determined in the general case except for univalent functions. But, for analytic functions, the values Ip(z, t) and Op(z, t) are finite at least for sufficiently smallt.

Theorem 2. Let a functionf(z) be continuous in a domain D. Assume that for almost every point z D there exists a normal regular system of neighborhoods {Gt(z)} ⊂ D such that the quantities Ip(z, t) and Op(z, t) are finite for sufficiently smallt >0, and that f is orientation preserving at every U-point. If either the inequality

lim sup

t→0 Ip(z, t)

Θ(z)2−p

2

Références

Documents relatifs

Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova, tome 95 (1996),

For these functions, which are strictly finitely multivalent in C , *&#34; generalize representation theorems concerning normalized quasiconformal homeomorphisms of Ö

We conclude with a discussion of the generalized eigenfunctions, esta- blishing their analyticity and certain asymptotic properties (Theorem

Let P denote an extremal problem for univalent functions; by a ge- neral principle of Teichmiiller, there is associated a quadratic differential.. on some

L’accès aux archives de la revue « Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa, Classe di Scienze » ( http://www.sns.it/it/edizioni/riviste/annaliscienze/ ) implique l’accord

Theorem 4.2 states that the (G, Σ)-parking functions biject to a class of oriented forests of G with a property determined by Σ, providing a combinatorial interpretation of the

Ilgiz R. Then by the Riemann mapping theorem there exists a function f which maps the unit disk D centered at the origin conformally onto Ω. This estimate was improved. 178) that B(t)

As mentioned in the introduction in [20] three big classes of functions X were found which are invariant under the best approxima- tion operator ~r The first class