A NNALES DE L ’I. H. P., SECTION A
T OSHIHIRO I WAI
A KITOMO T ACHIBANA
The geometry and mechanics of multi-particle systems
Annales de l’I. H. P., section A, tome 70, n
o5 (1999), p. 525-559
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=AIHPA_1999__70_5_525_0>
© Gauthier-Villars, 1999, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Annales de l’I. H. P., section A » implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.
org/conditions). Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
p. 525
The geometry and mechanics
of multi-particle systems
Toshihiro
IWAIa,
AkitomoTACHIBANAb
a Department of Applied Mathematics and Physics, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-01, Japan
b Department of Molecular Engineering, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-01, Japan Manuscript received 8 April 1997
~1.70,n°5,1999, Physique theorique
ABSTRACT. - This article deals with the
geometry
and mechanics formulti-particle systems.
The center-of-masssystem
is viewed as aprincipal
fibre bundle with structure groupSO(3),
on which a naturalconnection is
defined,
andthereby
rotational and vibrational vectors are definedstrictly.
A natural Riemannian structure and the connectionon the center-of-mass
system
areput together
toprovide
ageometric setting
for thestudy
of thegeometry
and mechanics for the multi-particle system.
Theequations
of motion are discussed inkeeping
with the bundle structure of the center-of-mass
system. Moreover,
the reduction of theequations
of motion is madealong
with a constanttotal
angular
momentum. Inaddition,
variationalequations
are derivedfor the
equations
of motion withvanishing
totalangular
momentum. Inparticular,
at anequilibrium
state, the variationalequations
reduces to thetraditional
equations
of small vibrations. @Elsevier,
ParisRESUME. - Ce travail traite de la
geometric
et de lamecanique
dessystemes
deplusieurs
corps. Lesysteme
du centre de masse est considerecomme un fibre
principal
de groupe structural~(9(3).
11 est muni d’uneconnexion
naturelle, qui permet
dedistinguer
les vecteurscorrespondant
a des rotations de ceux
correspondant
a des vibrations. Encombinant,
sur le
systeme
du centre de masse,geometric
riemannienne et theorie deAnnales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Physique theorique - 0246-0211
Vol. 70/99/05/(c) Paris
connexions,
on forme un cadregeometrique
pour l’étude de lageometric
et de la
mecanique
dessysteme
aplusieurs
corps. Lesequations
dumouvement sont etudiees en
respectant
la structured’ espace
fibre dusysteme
du centre de masse. Desequations
reduites sont formees pourune valeur constante fixee du moment
cinetique
total. Lesequations
des
petites
variations sont obtenues auvoisinage
de mouvements de momentcinetique
total nul. Enparticulier,
lesequations
despetits
mouvements au
voisinage
d’uneposition d’équilibre
se reduisent auxequations
habituelles despetites
vibrations. @Elsevier,
Paris1. INTRODUCTION
Multi-particle systems
are looked upon assupermolecules, gigantic molecules,
in which chemical reactions takeplace.
Thepath along
whichthe chemical reaction takes
place
can be viewed as a curve in the"internal" space, a space of molecule forms
independent
of itsposition
or attitude. Local coordinates in the internal space are called internal coordinates. For
example, configuration parameters
such as bondlengths,
valence
angles
are internal coordinates.Traditionally,
in case of the small vibration of a molecule[ 1 ],
one needs internal coordinatesonly
in thevicinity
of a stableequilibrium position. However,
internal coordinatescan be defined for
configurations
far from a stableequilibrium position.
In this
article,
the internal space is defined to be thequotient
space of the center-of-masssystem by
the action of the rotation groupSO(3).
An additional condition
put
on the center-of-masssystem
will be de- scribed in thefollowing
section.Then,
the center-of-masssystem
is made into aprincipal
fibre bundle with the structure groupSO(3),
the basespace of which is called the internal space.
Further,
a connection is de- finednaturally
on thisSO(3) bundle,
andthereby
rotational and vibra- tional vectors are definedstrictly.
The connection was first introducedby
A. Guichardet
[2],
who made effective use of it to show that rotational motions cannot beseparated
from vibrationalmotions;
suppose a mole- culestarting
from an initialposition performs
a continuous vibrational motion toget
to a finalposition
with the sameshape
orconfiguration
asthe initial one. Then the initial and final
positions
of the molecule are re-lated
by
a pure rotation. Thisimplies
that vibrational motionsgive
rise toAnnales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Physique theorique
a rotation. Cats know this
fact,
who can fall on hislegs
when launched in the air.On the other
hand,
the center-of-masssystem
is endowed with a flat Riemannian metriccoming
from the total kinetic energy. The Riemanniangeometry
and the connectiontheory
for the center-of-masssystem
areput together
toprovide
ageometric setting
for thestudy
ofmulti-particle systems.
Inperforming
thegeometric study, "moving
frames" on the center-of-masssystem
are ofgreat
use.In this
aspect,
thegeometric setting
formulti-particle systems
looks like Kaluza-Kleintheory
which is considered as Riemanniangeometry
ofprincipal
fibre bundles[3].
If amulti-particle system
isreplaced by
acontinuum,
a similargeometric study
will gothrough.
Geometrical Cat’sproblem
for deformable bodies has been treatedby Montgomery [4],
in which a gauge theoretical
point
of view is also taken. See alsoa book edited
by Shapere
and Wilczek[5],
which is a collectionof articles
concerning Berry phases
and deformable bodies.Quite recently, Littlej ohn
and Reinsch alsostudy n -body systems
from the gauge theoreticalpoint
of view[6].
Thepresent
authors started ageometric study
of molecules inquantum chemistry [7],
and one(T.I.)
of authors has set up a
geometric setting
forthree-body systems
in two and three dimensions[8,9]
and forn-body systems
in two dimensions[ 10] .
Classical mechanics in Hamiltonian formalism has beenalready
discussed forn -body systems [ 11 ],
rather in an abstract manner.A
point
to make in this article is to discussn-body systems
from theviewpoint
of Kaluza-Kleingeometry,
and to write outequations
ofmotion in an
explicit
manner.This article is
organized
as follows: Section 2 deals with the center- of-masssystem
as aprincipal SO(3) bundle,
on which a natural con-nection is defined and
thereby
rotational and vibrational vectors are dis-tinguished.
The presence ofnon-vanishing
curvature of this connectionimplies
that rotational motions cannot beseparated
from vibrational mo-tions. In Section
3,
amoving
frame associated with the bundle structure discussed in Section 2plays
akey
role instudying
thegeometric
structureof the center-of-mass
system.
A natural Riemannian metric and the bun- dle structure of the center-of-masssystem
areput together
to determinethe Riemannian
geometry
of the internal space. Inparticular,
sectionalcurvatures of the internal space prove to be
expressible
in terms of thecurvature discussed in Section 2. Section 4 is concerned with
equations
of motion in association with the bundle structure of the center-of-mass
system.
Then two sets ofequations
areobtained;
one is concernedmainly
n° 5-1999.
with
angular variables,
and the othermainly
with internal coordinates.These sets of
equation
are, of course,coupled.
Inparticular,
if the multi-particle system
is assumed to berigid,
the set ofequations concerning angular
variables becomes the Eulerequation
for arigid body,
and if thesystem
consists of freeparticles
withvanishing
totalangular
momentum, the set ofequations concerning
the internal coordinates becomes the geo- desicequation
of the internal space. The reduction of theequations
ofmotion is also discussed
by
use of the conservation of the totalangular
momentum. Section 5 deals with variational
equations
for theequations
of motion obtained in Section 4. In the
vicinity
of anequilibrium
state ofthe
molecule,
the variationalequations
reduce to thoseequations
whichhave been discussed in the traditional
theory
of small vibrations. It is also shown that the sectional curvature of the internal spaceplays,
in thevariational
equations,
a role of an additivepotential
which is apositive
semi-definite
quadratic
form in variation vectors. Section 6 deals with athree-particle system
as anexample.
2. CONNECTION THEORY 2.1. The internal space
In order to define the internal space and internal
coordinates,
it isstrict and of
great
use toexploit
notions from differentialgeometry (see [ 12-14],
forexample).
LetXo
be the space of all theennuples
x =
(~-i,..., xN)
of the nucleusposition
vectors xa E}R3,
a =1,...,
N.As is
well-known,
the translationaldegrees
of freedom aregotten
rid of fromXo
togive
rise to the center-of-masssystem
The rotation group
SO(3)
acts on X in a natural manner,In what
follows,
we assume that the molecularconfigurations
are notrectilinear. This means that the
subspaces
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincare - Physique theorique .
are assumed to be of dimension
greater
than orequal
to2;
dim 2.Then,
if hx = x for h ESO(3)
and for x ~ X with dim2,
one hash =
identity.
Thus the groupSO(3)
actsfreely
onX,
so that thequotient
space
X/SO(3)
becomes a manifold. Forsimplicity,
we denoteby
thesame letter X the subset of X with dim 2. Now the X is made into
a
principal
fibre bundle over thequotient
space,where 7r is the natural
projection. By
definition of thequotient
space,a
point
of M is anequivalence
class of molecularconfigurations
whichare
mutually
connectedby rotations,
so that any molecularconfiguration
of an
equivalence
class has the same form orshape.
The M is referred to as the internal space, whose local coordinates are called internal coordinates. In[4,5],
M is called theshape
space. We notice also here thatshape
spaces were first introducedby
D.G. Kendall[ 15]
and are studiedfurther in statistics
[ 16] .
To introduce a local coordinate
system
inX,
we use the localtriviality
of the
,S(~ ( 3 )
bundle(2.4),
where U is an open subset of M. Then one has a local
section
or inX,
whichis, by definition,
a map of U to Xsatisfying
yr o or =being
theidentity
map of M.Hence,
anypoint
isexpressed
as x =
along with q~
Uand g~ SO(3).
The local cross sectionor is realized as follows:
Fixing tentatively
the form of the moleculeby specifying
apoint q~ U ,
welay
the molecule in the spaceR3
in such away that each
particle, designated by
c~, is set aswhere
Ca03B1(q)
and ea, a =1, 2, 3,
are functionsof q
and the standard basisof
}R3, respectively. Eqs. (2.6)
define a local section cr. Anexample
ofhow to
lay
the molecule in will begiven
in Section 6. Then we rotate the moleculelaid,
toget
eachparticle
to take itsposition,
Vol. n° 5-1999.
which is a realization of x = Thus we can describe molecule’s
configurations
in terms of local coordinates(qi)
E U and g E’S’3(3), x=l,2,...,/=dimM.
_2.2. Connection
In what
follows,
rotational and vibrational vectors are defined on Xstrictly according
to[2,11 ] .
To thisend,
a metricds 2
and a connection form cv, which areclosely
related with the kinetic energy and theangular
momentum of the
molecule, respectively, play a key role;
the metric is defined to beand the connection form to be
where
( ~ )
denotes the standard innerproduct
inI~3,
and R : --+SO(3)
is the vector space
isomorphism
definedby
and
Ax
--+ is the inertia tensor defined at x E X for u; Eby
We notice here that
Ax
is asymmetric positive-definite operator
for x with dim2,
so thatAx exists.
Infact,
one hasand ’
thereby
= 0 for some w , if and ’only
if w x xa o =0,
0 ==
1, 2,...,
N . Ifu; ~ 0,
the last conditionimplies
that all the xaAnnales de l’Institut Henri Poincare - Physique " theorique "
lay
in the line determinedby
w, which contradicts ourassumption
thatdim 2. Thus = 0 if and
only
if w = 0 .Let us also be reminded of fundamental
properties
of R andAx :
These are easy to prove
by straightforward
calculation. Note also that the Liealgebra so(3)
is endowed with a natural innerproduct
definedby
andequal
to.
On the above
setting-up,
we are to define rotational and vibrational vectorsdefinitely.
Rotational vectors are defined to be infinitesimalgenerators
of the5’0(3) action,
which turn out to beexpressed
asIn terms of differential
operators,
the rotational vector(2.17)
takes theform
where J is the total
angular
momentumoperator.
Atangent
vector v =( v 1, ... ,
to X at x is called a vibrational vector, if it isorthogonal
to any rotational vector at x with
respect
to the metric(2.8). Hence,
thetangent
vector v =( v 1, ... ,
is shown to be a vibrational vector, if andonly
ifThis is also
equivalent
toVol. n° 5-1999.
Moreover,
we have topoint
out that the cvsatisfies,
for rotational vectors,and is
subject
to the transformationThe
proof
can be carried outby using
the definition(2.9)
and theproperties (2.13)-(2.15).
We
proceed
to describe rotational and vibrational vectors in local coordinates defined in(2.7).
Let 03C9aand Ja
be thecomponents
of 03C9 and of J withrespect
to the fixed frame ea,respectively,
We note here that from
(2.22)
thecomponents
of the connectionform,
transform
according
toNow,
from(2. 21 )
it follows that =R(ea),
whichimplies
that c~aare dual to
Ja.
The forms cvatogether
withdq‘
constitute a local basis of the space of one-forms onX,
whichsatisfy
To be strict in
notation,
we have to use 7r*d q for dqi ,
which is thepull-
back of
dqi,
but we used q
i for notationalsimplicity. By using
anddqi,
we can determine vectorfields through
The 03BEj and Ja
areput together
to form a local basis oftangent
vector fields on X. We note here that from(2.27)
and(2.20)
it follows that the vectorfield
is vibrational.Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Physique theorique
For local
expression
of we are to write out(2.9)
in the local coordinatesgiven by (2.7). Writing
outdxa,
we have theexpression
We here denote the
components
of the Maure-Cartan formd g g -1 by
and set
Then,
from(2.9), (2.28), (2.29),
and(2.30),
it follows thatIn gauge
theory,
is called aYang-Mills potential
and denotedusually by Af [ 14] .
To write out 6~ of(2.29)
in terms of Eulerangles ~~a )
=(c~, 8, 1/1),
we take g as .,Then, Eq. (2.29)
is written out togive
We notice further that
Eqs. (2.25)
and(2.31) imply
that~8a
aresubject
tothe transformation
Vol. n° 5-1999.
The infinitesimal version of
(2.34)
with g = isexpressed
aswhere is the
antisymmetric symbol
with B123 = 1.As for the local
expression
of~l ,
weobtain,
from(2.27)
and(2.31 ),
This is a
unique
vibrational(or horizontal)
vector field which is in one-. to-one
correspondence
with i on U C M . In connectiontheory,
~l
=(a/aqi)*
is called the horizontal lift ofa/aqi,
which we denoteby ai
in short in the below.Moreover, owing
to(2. 31 ),
the firstequation
of
(2.26)
reduces to == whichprovides
the well-known localexpression of Ja
asIn
addition,
we have to touch upon the transformationproperty
of thecomponents
of the inertia tensor;Indeed, Eq. (2.15) gives
rise to the transformation ofA (x) _ (Aab(x)):
The infinitesimal transformation of
(2.39)
for g = proves to begiven by
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincare - Physique " theorique "
In
conclusion,
we remark that the connection form vanishes in thedirection
of dilatation. Infact,
the infinitesimalgenerator
of the dilatationE is
given by
for which
vanishes;
This means that À is a vibrational vector field
by
definition.2.3. Curvature
On
using (2.24), (2.35),
and(2.36),
the rotational vectorfields Ja
and the vibrational vector fields
ai
are shown tosatisfy
thefollowing
commutation relations
where
Fi~
is defined to beThe middle
equation
of(2.43)
means that twoindependent
vibrational vectorfields, al
and arecoupled
togive
rise to an infinitesimal rotation. This factimplies
that molecular vibrations cannot beseparated
from rotations. Another
implication
is that the distributionspanned by
is not
completely integrable
in the sense of Frobenius[ 17],
so thatthere are no submanifolds to which are
tangent.
If there were sucha
submanifold, only
vibrational motions would takeplace
onit,
and itwould be able to be identified with
(an
open submanifoldof)
the internal space M .We turn to the curvature
form,
which is defined to beIn the
ordinary
connectiontheory,
in which the structure group is assumed to act on aprincipal
bundle to theright [ 12],
the minussign
in the
right-hand
side of(2.45)
should bereplaced by
theplus sign.
Letthe
components
of ~2 be denotedby
Then a calculation
provides
On the other
hand,
thetheory
of connectiongives
the formula[ 12]
Then
Eqs. (2.43)
and(2.48)
areput together
toprovide
In view of
(2.49)
and(2.43),
we understand that the presence ofnon-vanishing
curvature makes itimpossible
toseparate
rotation from vibration.In
addition,
wegive
the transformationproperty
of the curvature form.From
(2.22)
and(2.45)
it follows thatThen the
components
of S2 aresubject
to the transformationAnnales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Physique theorique
Alternatively,
one finds thatIn
conclusion,
we wish to show that the 03A9 vanishes for the vector Àgiven by (2.41 ).
From(2.9)
and(2.11 ),
we observe that the connection form c~ is invariant under the dilatation x h~ et x .Hence,
the Lie derivative of c~ withrespect
to Àvanishes; ,C~,c~
= 0. From this and from(2.42)
and(2.45),
one verifies thatwhere
~(-)
stands for the interior derivative[ 17] .
Onsetting ~, _ ~ ~.i ai ,
Eq. (2.53)
readsimplying
that the curvature form isdegenerate
in the direction of À.3. RIEMANNIAN GEOMETRY 3.1. Canonical affine connection
We are to
study
the infinitesimaldisplacement,
dx =(~i,...,
of x~X. Since 03C9a and
dqi
form a local basis of the space ofone-forms,
dx is
put
in the form’
or
where
Ba
=(B1a, B2a,..., BNa) and Bi = (B,’, B 2 , ... ,
are deter-mined to be -
respectively.
Thesystem {Ba, Bi}
is called amoving
frame in the center- of-masssystem
X(for
anelementary
treatment ofmoving frames,
see[ 18] ),
whichgives conversely
rise toJa
andai through
The differentials of the
moving
frame areput
in the formwhere are
one-forms,
which are called the connection forms of the canonical affine connection of X[ 12,18] .
These connectionforms are
expressed
aswhere are called the coefficients of the canonical affine connection. We have here to
distinguish
...,/J
from The formerforms are concerned with the canonical affine connection on the
tangent
bundleTX,
and the latter with theprincipal ~’(9(3)
bundle X 2014~ M.3.2. Levi-Civita connection
In what
follows,
westudy
what results from the fact that the canonical affine connection stated above is a flat Levi~Civita connection of the Euclidean space X. The metric definedon
X wasalready given by (2.8),
which is
clearly
a flat metric.Eqs. (2.8)
and(3.2)
areput together
togive
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Physique theorique
On the other
hand,
from the definition(3.3)
ofBa
andB«,
we canverify
that
where
Aab
are thecomponents
of the inertia tensorgiven by (2.38).
Onlooking
at the last term of theright-hand
side of(3.7) along
with(3.4),
we see that the define a metric tensor ai~ on the internal space
M,
In
fact,
sinceds2
is invariant under theS’0(3)
action and sinceai
and~/~qi are
in one-to-onecorrespondence,
areindependent
ofSO(3),
and therefore well defined on M. Thus the metric
ds2 expressed
as(3.7)
becomes
We choose to describe
Eqs. (3.8)
and(3.9)
aswhere the center dot indicates the inner
product
withrespect
to the metricds2..
,.
We have to note here that the map yr : X --+ M becomes a Riemannian submersion
[ 19]
since jr has maximal rank and since n* preserveslengths
of horizontal
(i.e.,
vibrational in ourcase)
vectors.We
proceeds
to the structureequations
of Cartan[ 18] .
Since X is a Euclidean space, one haswhich mean that the affine connection has no torsion and
vanishing
curvature,
respectively.
From(3.12)
it follows that the coefficientsappearing
in theright-hand
sides of(3.6) satisfy
In
fact,
the left-hand side of(3.12)
are written out asHence,
the condition(3.12) along
with(3.15) brings
about(3.14),
as iswanted. It is to be noted that the
Eqs. (3.14)
are also obtainedby operating
x with the vector fields
(2.43).
Before
studying
what results from(3.13),
we are to differentiate(3.11)
to obtain the condition that the canonical affine connection on X be a
metric connection
[ 18] . Differentiation
of the lastequation
of(3 .11 ) gives
Then,
it follows thatAnnales de l’Institut Henri Poincare - Physique " theorique "
The first
equation
of(3.17)
and the relationT1~ _
from(3.14) imply
that are
equal
to the Christoffelsymbols
formed from the metric tensorwhere =
(al~ ) -1.
Put another way, the Levi-Civita connection onthe center-of-mass
system X
endowed with the metricds2
induces the Levi-Civita connection on the internal space M endowed with the metricd q
This fact isalready pointed
out in[3 ] .
The differentiation of the first and the second
equations
of(3 .11 ) yields
and
respectively. Eqs. (3.19), (3.20),
and the second of(3.17) along
with(3.14)
areput together
toprovide
with and
n°
Inserting (2.40)
into(3.21 ),
we find thatwhich may be written in a
symmetric form,
if :=03A3e 0393eadAec
isintroduced;
3.3. Riemann curvature
We
proceed
tostudy
what results from(3.13),
thevanishing
curvaturecondition. From
d(dBa)
=0,
one obtainsand from =
0,
If
7~
vanishedidentically,
the internal space M would be able to be identified with a submanifold of X. ThenEqs. (3.28)
and(3.29)
wouldprovide
theRicci, Codazzi,
and Gaussequations
for the submanifold M of X.However,
there are no submanifolds to which aretangent,
so that the above
equations
are viewed asgeneralizations
of theRicci, Codazzi,
and Gauss ones[19].
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Physique theorique
One of the consequences of
geometric
interest from the secondequation
of(3.29)
is thatwhere are the
components
of the Riemann curvature tensor formedfrom aij,
Inserting (3.23)
and(3.24)
into(3.30)
results inNote here that the second term of the left-hand side of
(3.32)
isindependent of g,
ESO(3),
since areindependent of g
because of
(2.52)
and(2.39). Eq. (3.32)
is aspecialized
form of O’ Neill’s formula[ 19],
which links the Riemann curvatures of the total space and that of the base space of a Riemannian submersion. On account of(3.32),
the Ricci tensor and the scalar curvature defined as
Rij
:==03A3k Rkikj
andas R : _
~i~ respectively, satisfy
These formula are also found in
[6].
In
conclusion,
we mention of sectional curvature. Let]~ i u and
~i be mutually orthogonal
unittangent
vector fields on M. Then the sectional curvature for theplane K spanned by (ui)
and(V)
at apoint
q E M is defined to be
which
takes,
from(3.32),
the formWe note here that the
right-hand sides
of(3.36)
isindependent of g
E~0(3).
Since theright-hand
side of(3.36)
is aquadratic
form in thequantity
we observe that~K
isnon-negative. However,
it isunlikely
thatI~K
isstrictly positive,
since M is not acompact
space. Infact,
for a class ofplanes,
theKK
vanishes. To showthis,
we take thevector ~,
given by (2.41 ).
Since ~, is a vibrational vector fieldby definition,
the
projected
vector is anon-vanishing tangent
vector field on M.If K is a
plane including
then the sectional curvatureKK
vanisheson account of
(2.54)
and(3.36). Furthermore,
the Ricci tensor is non-negative
aswell,
which is known from
(3.33).
We see also that the Ricci tensor vanishes for u ==7r~
on account of(2.54).
This means that the Ricci tensor is notstrictly positive.
We willgive
anexample
of in Section 6.4.
EQUATIONS
OF MOTION4.1.
Setting
upequations
of motionIn this
section,
we are to obtain theequations
of motion for multi-particle systems
in theLagrangian
formalismadapted
for the bundle structure of the center-of-masssystem
X. To thisend,
theLagrangian
formalism described in terms of
"quasi-coordinates"
is ofgreat
use[20- 23],
a brief review of which is as follows: For localexpression
of theequations
ofmotion,
it is sufficient for us to work in an open subsetW
ofLet ~, ~
=1, 2,...,
3 N -3,
be a local coordinatesystem
inW. Let
XÀ and 03B803BB
be a local basis of vector fields and its dual onW, respectively,
which are denotedby
respectively,
with¿À
=8~. Then,
onehas,
afterdifferentiation,
It is clear that
03B303BB03C303BA
isanti-symmetric
in 03C3 and K .Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Physique theorique
Let
be
"quasi-velocities",
the time derivatives of"quasi-coordinates".
Theequations
of motion can be described in terms ofquasi-velocities n ~
andcoordinates ~ ~ .
We express theLagrangian L (~ , ~ )
asThen the
Lagrangian equations
of motion for L * takes the formwhere
X(5
and are the vector fields and the coefficientsgiven
in(4.1 )
and
(4.2), respectively. Occasionally,
thesymbols
are used forX ~ .
We are to
apply
theseequations
to ourmulti-particle system
in the open subsetTr~(~) ~
U xSO(3)
referred to in(2.5).
From(2.26)
and(2.27),
the
system
of one-forms isgiven by
and the dual
system
of vector fields is written asThen, Eqs. (2.47), (2.49),
andd(dqi)
== 0provide,
whencompared
with(4.2),
with the other all
vanishing.
To express theLagrangian L*,
weintroduce
quasi-velocities according
to(4.3) by
where
úJ~
are definedthrough (2.31 )
asThen,
from(3.10) together
with thepotential
functionV,
one has theLagrangian
The
application
of(4.5)
to(4.11 )
thenprovides
PROPOSITION 4.1. - The
Lagrangian equations of
motionof
a mole-cule are
given by (4.12)
and(4.13)
in termsof
internal coordinatesqi
and
quasi-velocities
Apoint
to make is thatthey
contain the the struc-ture constants Eacb
of
the structure groupSO(3)
and the curvatureFi~
onthe bundle X ~ M.
We are
going
to look into(4.12).
In the vector notation with A =(Aab)
and cvt =
(c~a ) ,
onehas, by using (2.40),
so that
Eq. (4.12)
comes to beexpressed
asSince the total
angular
momentum isexpressed
asas is
easily
seen from(2.9), Eq. (4.15)
isput
in the formIf the
potential
is rotationalinvariant,
thisequation implies
the conserva-tion of the total
angular
momentum.Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincare - Physique theorique
On the other
hand, Eq. (4.13)
becomeswhich proves to be
equivalent
toIf the molecule is allowed to be
regarded
as arigid molecule,
thevariables
(qi)
arefixed,
so thatV, and xa
are constant in(ql ),
andhence
03B2ai
= 0 from(2.30). Thus,
one has = 0 and~*jV
=0,
sothat
Eq. (4.19)
is satisfiedidentically.
On the otherhand, Eq. (4.15)
canbe shown to be
equivalent
to the Eulerequation
for arigid body
with thetorque -J(V).
To thisend,
we first calculate the time derivative of A in the vectornotation,
where we have used
(2.40).
Puttogether, Eqs. (4.15)
and(4.20) provide
the
equation
for therigid body,
Further,
fromEq. (2.31 ),
one has cvt =(9~
=((9~)
on account of~8a
=0,
so that
Eq. (4.21 )
becomesWhat to do for us is to rewrite this
equation
in terms of constant inertiatensor. To this
end,
we are to evaluate A =A(x)
at aspecific point
~ogiven by (2.6) along
with(qi)
fixed. We denoteby Ao
the matrix A evaluated at xo. ThenEq. (2.39) implies
that A = Onusing
thisVol. n°
relation, Eq. (4.22)
turns intoIncidentally,
from(2.29)
one verifies thatgg-l
=R(Ot),
so that=
Therefore, Eq. (4.23)
turns over into apreferable
formwhich is the Euler
equation
for arigid body
with~It J (V)
theangular velocity
in thebody
and thetorque, respectively, [24].
We notein addition that =
In the case of molecular
dynamics,
thepotential
function V is assumedto be
rotationally invariant,
so that one hasThus we have the
following.
PROPOSITION 4.2. -
If the potential
isrotationally invariant,
thenEq.
(4.12),
a partof
theequations of motion, implies
the conservationof
the total
angular
momentum.Moreover, if
the molecule is assumed to berigid, Eq. (4.12)
becomesequivalent
to the Eulerequation for
arigid body
4.2. Reduction of the
equations
of motionIn what
follows,
under theassumption
that thepotential
functionis
rotationally invariant,
we treat the totalangular
momentum L as aconstant vector, and
thereby
reduce theequations
of motion.Eq. (4.19) along
with(4.16)
and(4.25)
can beput
in the formwhere use has been made of
03A3b AabAbc
=Sac.
Thisequation
was alsofound in
[6].
Annales de Henri Poincaré - Physique théorique
,
What to note about
(4.26)
is that thisequation
is not in a closedform, if
L is fixedduring
the motion. Infact,
theright-hand
side containsangular variables, i.e., depends
onSD(3) through Aab
and but theleft-hand side is
independent
ofSO(3).
Thisimplies
that we need anotherequation
forangular
variables in order to obtainequations
of motion in the closed form.However,
we can observethat,
if L is constant, theright-
hand side of
(4.26)
is invariant under the rotation aboutL, i.e.,
under the action of h E5’0(3) satisfying
L. Infact,
issubject
to thetransformation
the same transformation as
A"B
andsubject
to(2.52).
We haveto notice here that
Eq. (4.27)
is a consequence of the fact that9~
isinvariant under the
SO(3) action;
=9~
the infinitesimal version of which is[9~ Ja]
=0,
the lastequation
of(2.43).
Thus we need inreality equations
forangular
variables which do notkeep
L invariant. Since the set of h ESO(3) satisfying
hL =L, L ; 0,
forms asubgroup SO(2),
theangular
variables we need lie on thesphere S2 ^_. 5’(3(3)/5’(9(2).
To findequations
onS2,
we consider the vector definedby
where g ~ 5’0(3)
is theangular
variable introduced in(2.7).
Themagnitude
ofh,
of course,conserved; ~~ I
===
const, and hence 7JL varies in thesphere S2.
A calculationalong
with == showsthat ~l is
subject
to theequation
To look into
(4.29),
we use the relationresulting
from(4.10), (4.16),
and.
(4.28),
where
Ao
is the inertia tensor evaluated at xo = cr(q),.
and~8°
:=g-1 ~8i
isa
vector 03B2i
==(03B2ai)
evaluated also at xo(see
the transformationproperty (2.34)
and(2.39)). Then, Eq. (4.29)
is rewritten asn°
This is the
equation
for~, depending
on internal coordinates.Returning
toEq. (4.26),
we have to rewrite itby replacing g
for L. Tothis
end,
we use the formulae(2.52)
and(4.27).
ThenEq. (4.26)
becomesexpressible
aswhere the
subscript
0 indicates that thosequantities
are evaluated at xo =or (~).
The second term of theright-hand
side of(4.32)
is ageneralization
of the Lorenz force in
electrodynamics.
Thequantity ( ak A -1 ) o ( A -1
=(Aab))
in the first term of theright-hand
side of(4.32)
turns out to beput
in the formwhich can be verified
by using (2.36)
and aconsequence of
(2.40).
From(4.33),
the first and the third terms of theright-hand
side of(4.32)
areput together
to be written asthe first term of which stands for minus the
gradient
of an effectivepotential.
Thus we have found thatEq. (4.32)
is written asPROPOSITION
4.3. -Along
with the conservationof
the totalangular
momentum, the
equations of
motion are reduced to(4.35)
and(4.31 ).
Theset
of
theseequations
is reminiscentof Wong’s equation [25], if
the termsappearing
in(4.34) are droppedfrom
theright-hand
sideo,f’(4.35).
In thecase
o, f ’
L =11 =0, Eq. (4.35)
reduces to the usual Newton’sequations of
motion on the internal space, andEq. (4.31 )
vanishes.Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincare - Physique theorique
4.3.
Equilibrium
statesWe are to consider the
equilibrium
state of the molecule with non-vanishing
totalangular
momentum. From(4.31 )
and(4.35),
it followsthat the
equilibrium
state determinedby (q ,11 )
== 0 occurs under the conditionsThe first condition of
(4.36)
means that 11 has to be aneigenvector
ofAo 1; Ao 111= ~,c-111,
where ~c is aneigenvalue
ofAo,
whichdepends
onq, of course. Then the second
equation
of(4.36)
becomeswhere use has been made of the relation
~Z~
= The condition(4.37)
wassuggested
in[6]
in the name of the condition for relativeequilibria.
PROPOSITION 4.4. - The
shape of
the molecule in the relative librium(, .A)
= 0 is determined&y (4.37).
Now suppose that an
equilibrium
state with L =0,
described as ~o.undergoes
a small amount ofchange
in L. We denote!!L~/2
aninfinitesimal
parameter.
ThenEq. (4.37)
has aone-parameter
solution~(~) satisfying
where qo =
?(0).
Differentiation ofEq. (4.38)
withrespect
to E at £ = 0provides
Assume that qo is a
non-degenerate equilibrium position,
thatis,
theHessian matrix for V at qo is