• Aucun résultat trouvé

Show that L(s, χ

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Show that L(s, χ"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

MATH-GA 2210.001: Homework Analytic Number Theory 1

1. Compute the set of Dirichlet characters modulo 8 and modulo 12.

2. Let S ={1,11,21,31, . . .} be the set of positive integers which have the last digit1when written in base 10. Prove thatS has a natural Dirichlet density, and compute it.

3. Let χ be a Dirichlet character modulom,χ(2) 6= 0. Show that

L(s, χ) = (1−2−sχ(2))−1

X

n=0

χ(2n+ 1) (2n+ 1)s. 4. Show that

ζ0(s)

ζ(s) =−X

p

X

m≥1

log p pms

for Re(s)>1, whereζ(s) is the Riemann zeta function.

5. Let γ be the Euler constant:

γ = limN→∞1 + 1 2 +1

3 +. . .+ 1

N −logN.

Verify that

lims→1ζ(s)− 1

s−1 =γ.

1

Références

Documents relatifs

Goal: give explicit criteria for Markov chains on the positive integers starting from large values to have a functional scaling limit.. Motivations

In this literature, we investigate the distribution of the first digit in the sequence of the perfect square numbers and the distribution of the arbitrary positive integer power of

In the case when all the singular fibers of f are of Kodaira type I 1 , Gross-Wilson have shown in [GW] that sequences of Ricci-flat metrics on X whose class approaches c 1 (L)

We consider numeration systems with base β and −β , for quadratic Pisot numbers β and focus on comparing the combinatorial structure of the sets Z β and Z −β of numbers with

Our main concern is to give good estimates for the number of distinct integers at most x which are represented by f in all ranges of x with a particular focus on the

1 See for example on arbitration in Israel : A. Luzon, “More efficient arbitration clauses?”, Sorbonne Student Law Review, 2018, vol. Bourgeois’ article on the legitimacy

Cette contribution sous forme de rapport rédigé sous la direction des Professeurs Mathias Audit (EDS), Georges Bermann (Columbia Law School) et Étienne Pataut

The idea of the proof of Theorem 2 is to construct, from most of the restricted partitions of n into parts in A , many unrestricted partitions of n.. In Section 4, we will prove