• Aucun résultat trouvé

Random effect Models for Quality of Life Analysis in Oncology

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Random effect Models for Quality of Life Analysis in Oncology"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-01213704

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01213704

Submitted on 9 Oct 2015

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Random effect Models for Quality of Life Analysis in Oncology

Antoine Barbieri, C Bascoul-Mollevi, Christian Lavergne

To cite this version:

Antoine Barbieri, C Bascoul-Mollevi, Christian Lavergne. Random effect Models for Quality of Life Analysis in Oncology. 35th Annual Conference of the International Society for clinical Biostatistics (ISCB), Aug 2014, Vienna, Austria. �hal-01213704�

(2)

ICM - 208, rue des Apothicaires - Parc Euro médecine - 34298 Montpellier cedex 5, France Tél. : 04 67 61 31 00 Fax: 04 67 41 08 59 E-mail : [email protected]

Directeur: Pr Jacques DOMERGUE

Random effect Models for Quality of Life Analysis in Oncology

A Barbieri(1,2),C Bascoul-Mollevi(1), C Lavergne(2)

(1) Unité de Biométrie, Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM) - Val d’Aurelle (2) Institut de Mathématiques et de Modélisation de Montpellier (I3M), Université de

Montpellier 2

In Oncology, the Health-related Quality of Life (QoL) has become an essential criterion in clinical trials. However, the longitudinal analysis of this criterion is complex and non-standardized. Indeed, the observations are obtained through self- questionnaires (Patient-Reported Outcomes) and there are both multiple responses, repeated and ordinal ones.From a statistical standpoint, QoL is not directly measurable and is considered as a latent trait which is accessible through responses to items.To evaluate QoL in most cancer clinical trials, the QLQ-C30 questionnaire has been used. Nowadays, the statistical analysis is done on a score from the EORTC recommendations, corresponding to the average of item responses.

Longitudinal competing models are exploitedsuch as a linear mixed model (LMM) classically used for score modelling and generalized linear mixed models (GLMM)employedfor ordinal categorical data. The latter model familybuilds on the Item Response Theory (IRT) and allows considering raw data (item responses).

Regarding the longitudinal analysis, the IRT models are proposed as an alternative to LMMandextended to take into account the clinical covariates and data characteristics.

These presented models were compared through the analysis of a dataset from a clinical trial and then a simulation studywas performed. The IRT model for polytomous data is quitecomplex and fastidious to estimate the regression coefficients and topredict the random effects. Finally, a less complex approach of linearization advanced by Schall in 1991 is proposed to estimate these GLMM in order to complete the simulation study.

Références

Documents relatifs

ues. The univariate t-model was the closest, although the residual scale pa- rameter is not directly comparable with the residual variance of the Gaus- sian model.

By starting from a natural class of robust estimators for generalized linear models based on the notion of quasi-likelihood, we define robust deviances that can be used for

We focus on Marginal Longitudinal Generalized Linear Models and de- velop our variable selection technique for these models.. Generalized Linear Models (GLM, McCullagh and Nelder,

Our purpose is to derive the best linear unbiased estimator (BLUE) of the expected value of observations and the quadratic unbiased estimators (QUE) of the covariance

21th Annual Conference of the International Society for Quality of Life Research (ISOQOL), Oct 2014, Berlin, Germany.. However, HRQoL longitudinal analysis remainscomplex and

In this section, we adapt the results of Kappus and Mabon (2014) who proposed a completely data driven procedure in the framework of density estimation in deconvo- lution problems

The problem of handling missing data in generalized linear mixed models with correlated covariates is considered when the missing mechanism con- cerns both the response variable and

By construction, the method MI-PLS proposed by Bastien (2008) will not take into account the random effect and then for assessing the contribution of our method we have