• Aucun résultat trouvé

Do competition and predation risk affect weed seed selectivity in granivorous carabid beetles ?

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Do competition and predation risk affect weed seed selectivity in granivorous carabid beetles ?"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-02739560

https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02739560

Submitted on 2 Jun 2020

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Do competition and predation risk affect weed seed selectivity in granivorous carabid beetles ?

Alice Charalabidis, David Bohan, Sandrine Petit, F.X.

Dechaume-Moncharmont

To cite this version:

Alice Charalabidis, David Bohan, Sandrine Petit, F.X. Dechaume-Moncharmont. Do competition and

predation risk affect weed seed selectivity in granivorous carabid beetles ?. International Conference of

Ecological Sciences Sfécologie-2016, Société France d’Ecologie (FFSPN). FRA., Oct 2016, Marseille,

France. �hal-02739560�

(2)

Do competition and predation risk affect weed seed selectivity in granivorous carabid beetles?

Alice Charalabidis

1

, David Bohan

1

, Sandrine Petit

1

, and Fran¸cois-Xavier Dechaume-Moncharmont

2

1

Agro´ ecologie – Institut national de la recherche agronomique (INRA) : UMR1347, Universit´ e de Bourgogne – 17 rue Sully, BP 86510, F-21000 Dijon, France

2

Biog´ eosciences – Universit´ e de Bourgogne, CNRS : UMR6282 – 6 Bvd Gabriel 21000 DIJON, France

Abstract

Carabid beetles consume substantial amounts of weed seeds and appear to be good can- didates for the biological control of weeds in arable fields. Yet, their selection criteria for certain seeds are still not clearly understood.

When foraging in-field, individuals have to deal with competition and predation exerted by conspecifics or other species of carabid beetles; they, thus, often face a trade-off between staying safe (i.e. avoiding predation or starvation) and taking the time to assess the quality of the food. We hypothesize that, in order to maximise their fitness, carabid individuals will modify their pattern of food selection (choosiness) while foraging under varying levels of risk.

To test this hypothesis, the foraging behaviour of the seed feeding carabid beetle Harpalus affinis was examined under 4 different experimental conditions: i) predation risk; ii) in- traspecific competition; iii) interspecific competition; and, iv) control. All the risks were simulated using chemicals cues from conspecific beetles or different species of carabid beetles (predatory or granivorous).

Our results show that when foraging under a risk of predation or competition for food, H.

affinis individuals reduced their choosiness, and that the risk of predation affected choosiness twice as much as competition. This finding suggests that H. affinis individuals are able to finely adjust their choosiness in response to the level of risk they face, potentially in order to maintain their food intake while reducing their exposure to risk

Keywords: predator, prey, intraspecific competition, interspecific competition, choosiness, carabid beetles

Speaker

sciencesconf.org:sfecologie2016:107438

Références

Documents relatifs

On the dynamics of predation risk perception for a vigilant forager.. Etienne Sirot,

However, even at this restricted scale, the interaction between gorse and its seed predators is in agreement with the three ecological predictions of Thompson (2005) under

We predicted that predation risk associ- ated with hunters would influence moose habitat selection: Avoidance responses would be stronger during the day when hunting was allowed,

 positive effect on maize field species richness in late summer.  Presence at this period of forest and autumn breeder species --> maize field may be used by

To cite this version: Alignier, Audrey and Meiss, Helmut and Petit, Sandrine and Reboud, Xavier Postdispersal weed seed predation ranged between 19 to 84% per

In any given carabid community, made up of a mix of different species and guilds of carabids with different foraging strategies, intraguild interference would induce a range

We assessed the effect of the cover area of grassland in the landscapes surrounding fields at different spatial scales, on both in-field seed-eating

VHHGVL]H+RQHNHWDO6HHGVWKDWH[FHHGHGPJ LQ ZHLJKW LH G. hederifolia ZHUH UDUH- O\FRQVXPHGLQWKHODERUDWRU\DQGWKH¿HOG7KHUHZHUH KRZHYHU GLIIHUHQFHV LQ WKH FRQVXPSWLRQ RI VPDOO