DOI 10.1007/s13370-017-0509-5
Fourier-Bessel Dini Lipschitz functions in the space L 2 α, n
S. El Ouadih
1· R. Daher
1Received: 26 June 2015 / Accepted: 6 June 2017
© African Mathematical Union and Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland 2017
Abstract In this paper, using a generalized translation operator, we obtain an analog of Younis’s Theorem 5.2 in Younis (Int J Math Math Sci 9:301–312, 1986) for the generalized Fourier-Bessel transform for functions satisfying the Fourier-Bessel Dini Lipschitz condition in the space L
2α,n.
Keywords Singular differential operator · Generalized Fourier-Bessel transform · Generalized translation operator
Mathematics Subject Classification Primary 46L55 · Secondary 44B20
1 Introduction and preliminaries
Integral transforms and their inverses the Bessel transform are widely used to solve various problems in calculus, mechanics, mathematical physics, and computational mathematics (see [3,7]).
In this article, we obtain an analog of Younis’s Theorem 5.2 in [5] on description of the image under the generalized Fourier-Bessel transform of a class of functions satisfying the Dini Lipschitz condition in weighted function spaces on [ 0 , ∞[ . We now give the exact statement of this theorem.
Suppose that f (x ) is a function in the L
2(R) space (all functions below are complex- valued), .
L2(R)is the norm of L
2(R), and δ is an arbitrary number in the interval (0, 1).
B
S. El Ouadih[email protected] R. Daher
1 Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Sciences Aïn Chock, University Hassan II, Casablanca, Morocco
Theorem 1.1 [12, Theorem 85] Let f ∈ L
2(R) . Then the following conditions are equiva- lents:
(i) f ( x + h ) − f ( x )
L2(R)= O ( h
δ) , as h → 0, 0 < δ < 1, (ii)
|λ|≥r
| f (λ)|
2dλ = O(r
−2δ) as r → ∞, where f stands for the Fourier transform of f .
This theorem has been generalized in the case of noncompact rank 1 Riemannian symmet- ric spaces [10], and was extented in [11] for the generalized Fourier transform in the space L
2(R
n) using a spherical mean operator. The Titchmarsh’s Theorem has been generalized recently for a class of functions satisfying the Lipschitz condition for the Fourier-Bessel transform in [8,9].
On the other hand, Younis Theorem 5.2 [5] characterized the set of functions in L
2(R) satisfying the Dini Lipschitz condition by means of an asymptotic estimate growth of the norm of their Fourier transforms, namely we have:
Theorem 1.2 [5] Let f ∈ L
2(R) . Then the following are equivalents:
(a) f ( x + h ) − f ( x ) = O
hη (log1h)γ
, as h → 0 , 0 < η < 1 , γ ≥ 0, (b)
|λ|≥r
| f (λ)|
2dλ = O
r
−2η(log r)
2γ, as r → ∞, where f stands for the Fourier transform of f .
In this paper, we consider a second-order singular differential operator B on the half line which generalizes the Bessel operator B
α. We obtain an analog of Theorem 1.2 for the generalized Fourier-Bessel transform associated to B in L
2α,n. For this purpose, we use a generalized translation operator.
We briefly overview the theory of generalized Fourier-Bessel transform and related har- monic analysis (see [1,6])
Consider the second-order singular differential operator on the half line B f (x ) = d
2f ( x )
d x
2+ ( 2 α + 1 ) x
d f ( x )
d x − 4n (α + n ) x
2f (x),
where α >
−12and n = 0 , 1 , 2 , .... For n = 0, we obtain the classical Bessel operator B
αf ( x ) = d
2f ( x )
d x
2+ ( 2 α + 1 ) x
d f ( x ) d x . Let M be the map defined by
M f (x ) = x
2nf (x), n = 0, 1, ....
Let L
α,np, 1 ≤ p < ∞ , be the class of measurable functions f on [ 0 , ∞[ for which f
p,α,n= M
−1f
p,α+2n< ∞,
where
f
p,α=
∞0
| f ( x )|
px
2α+1d x
1/p.
If p = 2, then we have L
2α,n= L
2([0, ∞[, x
2α+1).
For α ≥
−12, we introduce the Bessel normalized function of the first kind j
αdefined by j
α( z ) = (α + 1 )
∞ n=0(− 1 )
nz2
2nn !( n + α + 1 ) , z ∈ C, (1)
where ( x ) is the gamma-function (see [4]). The function y = j
α( x ) satisfies the differential equation
B
αy + y = 0,
with the condition initial y(0) = 0 and y
(0) = 0. The function j
α(x ) is infinitely differen- tiable, even, and, moreover entire analytic.
From (1) we see that
z
lim
→0j
α( z ) − 1
z
2= 0 , (2)
by consequence, there exists c > 0 and η > 0 satisfying
|z| ≤ η ⇒ | j
α(z) − 1| ≥ c|z|
2. (3) From [2], we have
| j
α(x )| ≤ 1, (4)
1 − j
α( x ) = O ( x
2), 0 ≤ x ≤ 1 . (5) For λ ∈ C , and x ∈ R , put
ϕ
λ( x ) = x
2nj
α+2n(λ x ). (6)
From [1,6] recall the following properties.
Proposition 1.3
(c) ϕ
λsatisfies the differential equation
B ϕ
λ= −λ
2ϕ
λ. (d) For all λ ∈ C, and x ∈ R
|ϕ
λ(x )| ≤ x
2ne
|I mλ||x|.
The generalized Fourier-Bessel transform we call the integral transform (see [1]) F
Bf (λ) =
∞0
f (x )ϕ
λ(x )x
2α+1d x, λ ≥ 0, f ∈ L
1α,n.
Let f ∈ L
1α,nsuch that F
B( f ) ∈ L
1α+2n= L
1([ 0 , ∞[, x
2α+4n+1d x ) . Then the inverse generalized Fourier-Bessel transform is given by the formula (see [1])
f (x ) =
∞0
F
Bf (λ)ϕ
λ(x)dμ
α+2n(λ), where
d μ
α+2n(λ) = a
α+2nλ
2α+4n+1dλ, a
α= 1
4
α((α + 1))
2.
From [1,6], we have
Proposition 1.4
(e) For every f ∈ L
1α,n∩ L
2α,nwe have the Plancherel formula
+∞0
| f (x )|
2x
2α+1d x =
+∞0
| F
Bf (λ)|
2dμ
α+2n(λ).
(f) The generalized Fourier-Bessel transform F
Bextends uniquely to an isometric isomor- phism from L
2α,nonto L
2([ 0 , +∞[, μ
α+2n) .
Define the generalized translation operator T
h, h ≥ 0 by the relation T
hf ( x ) = ( x h )
2nτ
α+2nh( M
−1f )( x ), x ≥ 0 , where τ
αhare the Bessel translation operators of order α defined by
τ
αhf ( x ) = c
α π0
f ( x
2+ h
2− 2x hcost ) si n
2αtdt , where
c
α=
π0
si n
2αtdt
−1= (α + 1 )
(π)
α +
12. For f ∈ L
2α,n, we have (see [1])
F
B( T
hf )(λ) = ϕ
λ( h ) F
B( f )(λ), (7)
F
B( B f )(λ) = −λ
2F
B( f )(λ). (8)
2 Fourier-Bessel Dini Lipschitz condition
Definition 2.1 Let f ∈ L
2α,n, and let
T
hf (x) − h
2nf (x)
2,α,n≤ C h
η+2nlog
1hγ, γ ≥ 0, i.e.,
T
hf (x ) − h
2nf (x )
2,α,n= O
h
η+2nlog
1hγ,
for all x in R
+and for all sufficiently small h, C being a positive constant . Then we say that f satisfies a Fourier-Bessel Dini Lipschitz of order η, or f belongs to Lip(η, γ ).
Definition 2.2 If however
T
hf ( x ) − h
2nf ( x )
2,α,n hη+2nlog1h
γ
→ 0 , as h → 0 , γ ≥ 0 ,
i.e.,
T
hf (x) − h
2nf (x)
2,α,n= o
h
η+2nlog
h1γ,
then f is said to be belong to the little Fourier-Bessel Dini Lipschitz class lip(η, γ ).
Remark It follows immediately from these definitions that lip(η, γ ) ⊂ Lip(η, γ ).
Theorem 2.3 Let η > 1. If f ∈ Lip(η, γ ), then f ∈ lip(1, γ ).
Proof For x ∈ R
+and h small, f ∈ Lip(η, γ ) we have T
hf (x) − h
2nf (x)
2,α,n≤ C h
η+2nlog
h1γ.
Then
log 1 h
γT
hf ( x ) − h
2nf ( x )
2,α,n≤ C h
η+2n. Therefore
log
h1γh
1+2nT
hf (x ) − h
2nf (x )
2,α,n≤ C h
η−1, which tends to zero with h → 0. Thus
log
1hγh
1+2nT
hf ( x ) − h
2nf ( x )
2,α,n→ 0 , h → 0 .
Then f ∈ lip ( 1 , γ ) .
Theorem 2.4 If η < ν , then Lip (η, 0 ) ⊃ Lip (ν, 0 ) and lip (η, 0 ) ⊃ lip (ν, 0 ).
Proof We have 0 ≤ h ≤ 1 and η < ν , then h
ν≤ h
η.
Then the proof of this theorem.
3 New results on Fourier-Bessel Dini Lipschitz class Lemma 3.1 For f ∈ L
2α,n, we have
h
4n ∞0
| j
α+2n(λ h ) − 1 |
2| F
Bf (λ)|
2d μ
α+2n(λ)
12
= T
hf ( x ) − h
2nf ( x )
2,α,n. where m = 0, 1, 2...
Proof We use the formulas (6) and (7) we conclude that
F
B( T
hf )(λ) = h
2nj
α+2n(λ h ) F
Bf (λ).
Then
F
B((T
h− h
2nI ) f )(λ) = h
2n( j
α+2n(λh) − 1) F
Bf (λ).
By Proposition 1.4, we have the result.
Theorem 3.2 Let η > 2. If f belong to the Fourier-Bessel Dini Lipschitz class, i.e., f ∈ Lip (η, γ ), η > 2 , γ ≥ 0 .
Then f is equal to the null function in R
+.
Proof Assume that f ∈ Lip (η, γ ) . Then
T
hf (x ) − h
2nf (x )
2,α,n≤ C h
η+2nlog
1hγ, γ ≥ 0.
From Lemma 3.1, we have h
4n ∞0
| j
α+2n(λ h ) − 1 |
2| F
Bf (λ)|
2d μ
α+2n(λ) ≤ C
2h
2η+4nlog
1h2γ. Therefore
∞0
| j
α+2n(λh) − 1|
2| F
Bf (λ)|
2dμ
α+2n(λ) ≤ C
2h
2ηlog
1h2γ.
Then
∞0
| j
α+2n(λ h ) − 1 |
2| F
Bf (λ)|
2d μ
α+2n(λ)
h
4≤ C
2h
2η−4log
1h2γ, Since η > 2 we have
h
lim
→0h
2η−4log
1h2γ= 0 . Then
h
lim
→0 ∞0
| 1 − j
α(λ h )|
λ
2h
2 2λ
4| F
Bf (λ)|
2d μ
α+2n(λ) = 0 . and also from the formula (2) and Fatou Theorem, we obtain
∞0
λ
4| F
Bf (λ)|
2d μ
α+2n(λ) = 0 .
Thus λ
2F
Bf (λ) = 0 for all λ ∈ R
+, then f is the null function.
Analog of the Theorem 3.2, we obtain this theorem.
Theorem 3.3 Let f ∈ L
2α,n. If f belong to lip(2, 0). i.e.,
T
hf (x ) − h
2nf (x)
2,α,n= O(h
2), as h → 0.
Then f is equal to null function in R
+.
Now, we give another the main result of this paper analog of Theorem 1.2.
Theorem 3.4 Let f ∈ L
2α,n. Then the following conditions are equivalents (i) f ∈ Lip(η, γ ) , 0 < η < 1, γ ≥ 0,
(ii)
∞r
| F
Bf (λ)|
2dμ
α+2n(λ) = O
r
−2η(log r)
2γ, as r → ∞.
Proof ( i ) ⇒ ( ii ) . Suppose that f ∈ Lip (η, γ ) . Then T
hf (x ) − h
2nf (x )
2,α,n= O
h
η+2nlog
1hγ, h → 0.
From Lemma 3.1, we have T
hf ( x ) − h
2nf ( x )
22,α,n= h
4n ∞0
| j
α+2n(λ h ) − 1 |
2| F
Bf (λ)|
2d μ
α+2n(λ).
By formula (3), we get
ηh η 2h
| j
α+2n(λh) − 1|
2| F
Bf (λ)|
2dμ
α+2n(λ) ≥ c
2η
42
4 ηh η 2h
| F
Bf (λ)|
2d μ
α+2n(λ).
There exists then a positive constant C such that
ηh η 2h
| F
Bf (λ)|
2dμ
α+2n(λ) ≤ C
ηh η 2h
| j
α+2n(λh) − 1|
2| F
Bf (λ)|
2dμ
α+2n(λ)
≤ C
h
4nT
hf (x ) − h
2nf (x)
22,α,n= O
h
2ηlog
1h2γ.
We obtain
2rr
| F
Bf (λ)|
2d μ
α+2n(λ) ≤ C
r
−2η(log r)
2γ, where C
is a positive constant. Now,
∞r
| F
Bf (λ)|
2d μ
α+2n(λ) =
∞ i=0 2i+1r2ir
| F
Bf (λ)|
2d μ
α+2n(λ)
≤ C
r
−2η(log r)
2γ+ (2r)
−2η(log 2r)
2γ+ (4r)
−2η(log 4r)
2γ+ · · ·
≤ C
r
−2η( log r )
2γ1 + 2
−2η+ ( 2
−2η)
2+ ( 2
−2η)
3+ · · ·
≤ K
ηr
−2η(log r)
2γ, where K
η= C
(1 − 2
−2η)
−1since 2
−2η< 1.
Consequently
∞r
| F
Bf (λ)|
2d μ
α+2n(λ) = O
r
−2η( log r )
2γ, as r → ∞.
(ii ) ⇒ (i). Suppose now that
∞r
| F
Bf (λ)|
2dμ
α+2n(λ) = O
r
−2η( log r )
2γ, as r → ∞,
and write
T
hf ( x ) − h
2nf ( x )
22,α,n= h
4n( I
1+ I
2), where
I
1=
1/h0
| j
α+2n(λ h ) − 1 |
2| F
Bf (λ)|
2d μ
α+2n(λ), and
I
2=
∞1/h
| j
α+2n(λ h ) − 1 |
2| F
Bf (λ)|
2d μ
α+2n(λ).
Using the inequality (4), we get I
2≤ 4
∞1/h
| F
Bf (λ)|
2d μ
α+2n(λ) = O
h
2ηlog
1h2γ, as h → 0 . Set
φ(λ) =
∞λ
| F
Bf (x )|
2dμ
α+2n(x).
From formula (5) and integration by parts, we have I
1= −
1/h0
| j
α+2n(λ h ) − 1 |
2|φ
(λ) d λ
≤ −h
2 1/h0
λ
2φ
(λ)dλ
≤ −φ 1
h
+ 2h
2 1/h0
λφ(λ)dλ
≤ 2h
2 1/h0
λ
1−2η(log λ)
−2γdλ
≤ C
1h
2ηlog
h12γwhere C
1is a positive constant, and this ends the proof.
References
1. Al Subaie, R.F., Mourou, M.A.: The continuous wavelet transform for a Bessel type operator on the half line. Math. Stat.1(4), 196–203 (2013)
2. Abilov, V.A., Abilova, F.V.: Approximation of functions by Fourier-Bessel sums. Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn.
Zaved. Mat.8, 3–9 (2001)
3. Vladimirov, V.S.: Equations of mathematical physics, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1971, Nauka, Moscow (1976)
4. Levitan, B.M.: Expansion in Fourier series and integrals over Bessel functions. Uspekhi Math. Nauk6(2), 102–143 (1951)
5. Younis, M.S.: Fourier transforms of Dini-Lipschitz functions. Int. J. Math. Math. Sci.9(2), 301–312 (1986). doi:10.1155/S0161171286000376
6. Al Subaie, R.F., Mourou, M.A.: Transmutation operators associated with a Bessel type operator on the half line and certain of their applications. Tamsii. oxf. J. Inf. Math. Scien29(3), 329–349 (2013)
7. Sveshnikov, A.G., Bogolyubov, A.N., Kratsov, V.V.: Lectures on mathematical physics, Nauka, Moscow (2004) (in Russian)
8. Daher, R., El Hamma, M., El Ouadih, S.: An analog of Titchmarsh’s Theorem for the Generalized Fourier- Bessel transform. Lobachevskii J. Math.37(2), 114–119 (2016)
9. El Ouadih, S., Daher, R.: Generalized Fourier-Bessel transform of(η, γ )-Bessel-Lipschitz functions in the spaceLα,pn. MATEMATIKA31(2), 143–148 (2015)
10. Platonov, S.S.: The Fourier transform of functions satisfying the Lipschitz condition on rank 1 symmetric spaces. Sib. Math. J46(6), 1108–1118 (2005)
11. Daher, R., Boujeddaine, M., El Hamma, M.: Generalization of Titchmarsh’s theorem for the Fourier transform in the SpaceL2(Rn), Afr. Mat. doi:10.1007/s13370-015-0368-x
12. Titchmarsh, E.C.: Introduction to the theory of Fourier Integrals. Claredon , oxford, 1948, Komkniga.
Moxow (2005)