Original article
Mitochondrial DNA variability in honeybees
and its phylogeographic implications
JM Cornuet, L Garnery
INRA-CNRS, Laboratoire de
Neurobiologie Comparée
des Invertébrés, URA1190, LaGuyonnerie
91440 Bures-sur-Yvette, France
(Received 21 October 1991;
accepted
15 December 1991)Summary —
Aphysical
map of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) of thehoneybee (Apis
mellifera L) hasbeen established with 17 restriction enzymes (46 sites). Elements of the
genic
map have been in- ferred from sequence data. Thesuperimposition
of both maps indicate that the gene order is quite similar between honeybee andDrosophila.
The total length of the mitochondrial genome falls be- tween 16 500 and 17 000bp.
This range is due to severalregions exhibiting length polymorphisms.
Two of them
overlap
with the controlregion,
but a third one isunexpectedly
located between the CO-I and CO-II genes. This lastpolymorphism
is explainedby
the occurrence of variable numbers of 2 related sequences, called P and Q, which arosethrough
tandemduplication. Sequence
data from3
regions
of the mtDNA genome can be used to infer aphylogenetic
tree for 4Apis species:
the re-sulting
treetopology, (florea(dorsata(cerana,mellifera))),
confirms thephylogeny
based onmorphom-
etry and behavior.The mtDNA variability of Apis mellifera indicates 3 major lineages: African colonies (lineage A)
including
intermissa, adansonii, scutellata,capensis
and monticolasubspecies;
mellifera colonies(lineage
M);ligustica,
carnica and caucasica colonies(lineage C).
This distribution is very similar to the 3 evolutionary branches inferred frommorphometric analysis by
Ruttner. The main difference concerns the branch M which, according to Ruttner, includes also intermissa and iberica. From an Asianorigin,
3evolutionary
branches colonizedrespectively
northernEurope (M),
the north- Mediterraneanregion
(C) and Africa (A). Based on theDrosophila evolutionary
rate, thisdivergence
would have occurred between 300 000 and 1300 000
bp.
Apis mellifera I mitochondrial DNA / variability / phylogeny / evolution
INTRODUCTION
Mitochondrial DNA
(mtDNA)
of animals isa
duplex, small, circular, covalently
closedmolecule. Its gene content is
remarkably
conserved across taxa
(Moritz
etal, 1987)
and
comprises
2 ribosomal RNA genes(rRNA, large
and smallsubunits),
22 trans-fer RNA genes
(tRNA)
and 13protein
genes(12
in nematodes where the gene for ATPase 8 islacking;
Okimoto etal, 1990). Intervening
sequences within genes are unknown, spacers between genes are absent or very short and someinstances of
slightly overlapping
genes are known.Consequently,
animal mtDNA is alesson in economy
(Attardi, 1985).
Mole-cules contain a
single non-coding region (D-loop
invertebrates,
A+T-richregion
inDrosophila),
also called the controlregion,
in which
replication
andtranscription
areinitiated.
This
high
gene conservation combined with therelatively
small variation of thenon-coding region
means that most mito-chondrial genomes
comprise
between15 000 and 20 000 nucleotides
(Brown, 1983).
The order in which genes are ar-ranged along
the molecule isgenerally
rather conserved within
phyla,
but somerearrangements
occur betweenphyla.
The
particular
interest of mtDNA inphy- logenetic
studies ismainly
due to 2 fea-tures. The first is the apparent lack of re- combination.
Therefore, genetic
markersare
completely
linked and substitutions areserially
accumulated on the molecule(Har- rison, 1989).
The second is its maternal transmission(at
least inanimals).
Be-cause of these
characteristics,
the evolu- tion of mtDNA isclonal,
even in sexualspecies,
and therelationship
between ma-ternal lineages
isperfectly depicted by
thephylogenetic
tree of the mtDNA molecules.MtDNA has become an
important
mark-er in
evolutionary
studies of natural popu-lations
(Avise
et al,1987).
It hasproved
to beparticularly
useful forApis mellifera,
aspecies
in which few nuclear markers areavailable
(Sheppard
andHuettel, 1988).
Furthermore,
thebiology
of thisspecies
makes itespecially
suited since all the col- ony members share the same mtDNA(mtDNA
is acolony
levelmarker),
and col-onization of new territories is
performed by
swarms,
ie,
females.Given its
sequestration
in mitochondria and itsphysical properties,
mtDNA offers severalpossibilities
forpurification (re-
viewed in
Solignac, 1991). MtDNA
can beseparated
from nuclear DNA on ethidiumbromide-CsCl
gradients (Lansman
etal, 1981). Another
method involvespurifica-
tion of mitochondria
by
differential centrifu-gation
on sucrosegradients.
The mtDNAextracts obtained
through
these methods have beenanalyzed
with restriction en-zymes or cloned for
sequencing.
Previously
10-50 workers percolony,
alive or frozen, were necessary to obtain sufficient mtDNA to
complete experiments (eg,
to obtain restrictionprofiles
for onecolony
or to clone restrictionfragments).
This constraint no
longer
exists : asingle
worker per
colony,
stored in pure ethanol for several weeks at roomtemperature,
isnow sufficient for mtDNA
analysis.
FormtDNA restriction
studies,
total DNA is ex- tractedaccording
to asimple procedure (Kocher
etal, 1989) (24 samples
can beroutinely
treated in oneday)
anddigested
with various restriction enzymes
(one
work-er
provides enough
DNA for up to 12 di-gestions).
Afterelectrophoresis, fragments
are transferred to membranes and re-
vealed with a labeled
probe
asalready
de-scribed in, for
instance, Sheppard
et al(1991). Previous
methods areonly
neces-sary to prepare pure mtDNA
probes.
Polymerase
chain reaction(PCR)
isalso a
powerful technique
that canproduce
large
amounts of DNA from minutequanti-
ties of material. Some "universal" or "in- sect"
primers
can be used as well as spe- cificprimers designed
with thehelp
of se-quences available from the literature.
PCR-amplified
DNA can be used for directanalysis (length variation),
restriction(Hall
and
Smith, 1991)
or sequence(Cornuet
etal,
1991;Garnery et al, 1991) analysis.
ORGANIZATION OF THE MITOCHON- DRIAL GENOME IN APIS
In
Apis mellifera,
thegenetic
map,ie,
thenature and
position
of genes on the mole-cule,
isonly partially
known. The available information has been deduced from aphysical
map(restriction map), hybridiza-
tion
experiments
and sequence data. Vla- sak et al(1987) published
the nucleotide sequence of 95% of thelarge
ribosomalRNA gene
(1270 bp).
Crozier et al(1989) sequenced
2 950bp
in aregion
in whichthey recognized
4 tRNA genes(trypto- phan, leucine, aspartate
andlysine),
and 2cytochrome-oxidase
subunit genes(CO-I
and
CO-II).
In thisregion, they
also foundan
unassigned
194bp
sequence, the na- ture of which will be discussed in another section. In the first 185bp
of their se-quence, one can also find a tRNA gene
(ty- rosine), extending
fromposition
56 to 124and transcribed in the
opposite
direction.Furthermore,
between the tRNAtyr and tRNAtrp genes lies a tRNA-like sequence
(with
a GGG in the anticodonposition).
Other sequences will soon be available:
cytochrome
b and ATPases 6 and 8 subu-nit genes
(Crozier
andCrozier,
inpress), part
of the CO-III gene(Koulianos
and Cro-zier, 1991).
Restriction maps of
honeybee
mtDNAhave been
independently
elaboratedby
Smith
(1988),
Crozieret al (1989)
and Cor-nuet
(1989).
The restriction sites of the en-zymes used to establish the
physical
mapcan be searched in available
partial
se-quences of the genome. The
pattern
ob- tained for thesequenced region
can be un-ambiguously superimposed
onto thecorresponding region
of thephysical
map, and then theposition
of the gene or of the block of genesassigned
to aprecise
re-gion
of the genome. Apartial genetic
map has been obtainedby
thisprocedure
for thehoneybee.
The relativeposition
of thegenes and their distances on the map cor-
respond
almostexactly
to their counter- parts in theDrosophila yakuba
map(Clary
and Wolstenholme,
1985) (fig 1). A
similar conclusion has been obtainedthrough
Southern
blotting (Garnery, unpublished data). Considering
that thegenetic
map isgenerally
conserved across taxa and thatthe genome sizes in
Apis
mellifera andDrosophila yakuba
are not verydifferent,
itseems very
likely
that bothspecies
havesimilar
genetic
maps,keeping
in mind thatsome t-RNA genes, at least, have
slightly
different locations
(tryptophan, aspartate, lysine and, perhaps,
someothers). Also,
the
intergenic
sequence between the t- RNA leucine and the CO-II genes has nocounterpart
in Dyakuba
mtDNA. More se-quence data are needed in order to obtain
a definite map of
honeybee
mtDNA.Another feature for which
honeybee
mtDNA is like that of
Drosophila
is in thehigh proportion
of A+T. In the genes so farsequenced,
the A+T content is evenhigher
than in
Drosophila:
76%compared
to 68%and 80%
compared
to 75%, in CO-I andCO-II
respectively (Crozier et al, 1989).
LENGTH POLYMORPHISMS
The total
length
ofhoneybee
mtDNA isvariable, approximately ranging
between16 500 and 17 000
bp .
This range results fromlength variability
in severalregions
ofthe molecule. Smith and Brown
(1990)
have detected 6 locations with
length
vari-ation. Two of them are of small size but others are close to or over 100
bp.
Actually,
the 2adjacent
small size(20 bp) variations,
both detected on BclI di-gests,
could be the result of one site loss and one sitegain.
The sequence of the CO-I gene(Crozier et al, 1989),
where thethree concerned
BclI sites,
notedd,
e and fin
figure
1, are located,provides
apossible
clue: 20
bp upstream
of BclI e, there is a motif(TGACCA)
which is one transitionaway from a BclI site
(TGATCA),
this tran-sition
being
located at the unconstrained thirdposition
of the codon. Combined with the loss of BclI e, thegain
of thispotential
site would then
explain
these 2 size varia- tions.Most
large
scale size variations encoun-tered in various animal
species
have beenfound in or near the control
region
of themtDNA molecule. This seems to be the
case for 2 of the
larger
variations inhoney-
bee mtDNA.
They
arerespectively
locatedbetween PstI a and Xbal b and between Xbal b and AccI c.
According
to ourputa-
tivegenetic
map, these 2regions
include aportion
of the A+T richregion.
For the Xbalb - Accl c
region,
Smith and Brown(1990)
propose that a variable number of tandem
repeats
80-100bp
inlength
may have caused the size variation.The size variation located between BclI f and BclI g is the
largest
and best charac- terized(Cornuet
etal, 1991). In
the inter-genic region
between the tRNAleu and CO-II genes, 2types
of sequences have been identified: P and Q which are 54 and 194-196bp long, respectively.
The firstone, P, is
optional.
When it ispresent,
itcan take 2 forms
respectively
called P andP
o
which differby
a15-bp
deletion in themiddle of the sequence. The size variation
in this mtDNA
region
results from the oc-currence/absence of P
(or P o )
and a vari-able number of Q. The
following
genomes have been found:Q, PQ, PQQ, PQQQ, P
o
Q, P o QQ, P o QQQ,
andP o QQQQ (the
last one was not observed
by
us, but itsexistence is inferred from the data of Hall and
Smith, 1991).
The sequence Q is
actually composed
of 3
subunits, Q 1 , Q 2
andQ 3 ,
which showstrong
similarities in theprimary
and sec-ondary
structures with the 3’ end ofCO-I,
the tRNAleugene and
P o , respectively.
Theduplication
followedby
thedivergence
ofthis block can
explain
the appearance of the Q sequence but theorigin
of the P se-quence and hence of the
Q 3
sequence re-mained
unexplained.
In order to elucidatetheir
origin,
we examined theregion
be-tween the
tRNA leu
and CO-II genes inclosely
relatedspecies (Apis cerana, A
dorsata and A
florea)
and in two relatedApidae :
Bombus lucorum andXylocopa
violacea. These
Apis species
have an in-tergenic
sequence of 89, 24 and 32bp,
re-spectively,
whereas the last 2species
donot have a
single
nucleotide between these genes. Twopossible
scenarios for theorigin
of these sequences have beengiven (Cornuet
et al,1991), one
of which isillustrated in
figure
2. It has beensuggest-
edby
Cornuet et al(1991)
that this inter-genic region might
function as anorigin
ofreplication.
HIGH EVOLUTIONARY RATES OF MITO- CHONDRIALLY ENCODED PROTEINS
Crozier et al
(1989)
havecompared
thesubunits CO-I and CO-II of
Drosophila
andApis using Xenopus
and Mus as out- groups. The number of amino acidreplace-
ments was
respectively
3.6 and 1.9 timeshigher
in thelineage leading
toApis
thanof that
leading
toDrosophila. However,
these values are averages for the 280
Myr
of
divergence
between the 2species
andmay not
necessarily
reflect thepresent day
ratio between the amino acidreplace-
ment rates of these
species.
In short-term
evolution,
90% of nucleo- tide substitutions are silent mutations.Therefore,
there is no directrelationship
between amino acid
replacement
and nu-cleotide substitution rates when consider-
ing
relatedspecies
andpopulations
of thesame
species.
Additional sequences
(ATPase
6,ATPase 8 and
cytochrome
b genes(Cro-
zier and
Crozier, personal communication)
confirm the
higher
amino acidreplacement
rate of mtDNA encoded
proteins along
theApis lineage.
EVOLUTION OF THE GENUS APIS
The
phylogeny
ofApis species
is still anopen
question, especially given
the recentdescription
of A andreniformis(Wu
andKuang, 1987)
and A koschevnikovi(Koeni-
ger
et al,
1988;Tingek et al, 1988).
A com-prehensive review,
based onmorphology
and
behavior,
has beengiven by
Alexan-der
(1991).
Molecular data are
especially
suited toaddress
phylogenetic questions (Hillis
andMoritz, 1990). Recently,
nucleotide se- quence data of mtDNA have been used toproduce phylogenetic
trees of the 4 "old"Apis species :
cerana,dorsata,
florea and mellifera(Garnery et al, 1991). The analy-
sis was based upon the sequence of 269 nucleotides located at the 5’ end of the CO-II gene. In the consensus tree, it was found that A mellifera and A cerana separ- ated after thedivergence
of A florea and Adorsata,
but the(cerana-mellifera)-dorsata-
florea trifurcation remained unsolved.
In order to solve this
polytomy,
we haveextended the sequences from the 4 spe-
cies,
and that of Bombus lucorum, takenas
outgroup:
to the 269previously reported nucleotides,
we have added 187 nucleo- tides in the 3’ end of CO-I and 185 nucleo- tides in thelarge
rRNA subunit(fig 3).
Thisprovides
a total of 641 sites of which 61are informative. Two methods of tree re-
construction, Parsimony (PAUP v3.0)
andNeighbor-Joining (Saitou
andNei, 1987)
have been
applied. Bootstrap
values(per- centages computed
on 1 000replicates)
are
given
for every internal branch. Both methodsgive
the sametopology (fig 4).
The
present
results confirm the closerrelationship
between A mellifera and A ce- rana. Inaddition,
the trifurcation(mellifera-
cerana,
dorsata, florea)
foundby Garnery
et al
(1991)
ispartially
resolved: both treessupport
theearly divergence
of A florea.Although bootstrap
values are nothigh enough
to consider that thisstudy
is con-clusive,
theconsistency
of these mtDNAanalyses
withmorphometric,
behavioral(Alexander, 1991)
andallozymic (Shep- pard
andBerlocher, 1989)
characters is noticeable.The mtDNA
evolutionary
rate has notbeen calibrated in
Hymenoptera.
The mostclosely
related group of insects for whichevolutionary
rates have been estimated isDrosophila,
which exhibits a rate of diver-gence between
lineages
of 2% perMyr
forthe main bulk of mtDNA
(DeSalle
etal,
1987; Monnerotet al, 1990),
a value com-parable
to that observed in mammalianspecies (Brown
etal, 1982).
This valuemust be
accepted only
with caution forApis.
Thedivergence
between A melliferaand A cerana, based on the above 643
bp,
is
equal
to 8.5%.However,
the 3 se-quenced fragments
do notnecessarily
pro- vide arepresentative
value of the diver- gence for the whole molecule. Thecomparison
of restriction maps of bothspecies (53
restrictionsites) gives
a 13.7%divergence (Garnery
etal, unpublished data) which,
after deduction of the nucleo- tidediversity
in the ancestralspecies,
pro-vides an estimate of 5.9
Myr,
inperfect agreement
with the former estimate(Gar-
nery
et al, 1991).
EXISTENCE OF THREE MAJOR mtDNA LINEAGES IN APIS MELLIFERA
MtDNA
variability
has beeninvestigated
within and between
subspecies by
restric-tion enzymes
(Moritz
etal,
1986;Smith,
1988; Smith andBrown,
1988, 1990; Cor- nuet, 1989; Hall andSmith, 1991)
and se-quencing (Cornuet et al,
1991; Koulianos andCrozier,
in press;Garnery
et al, un-published data). Sampling
isgreater
withrestriction enzymes
(more
colonies ana-lysed),
but the data are more accurate withsequences
(more
nucleotidesassayed).
The 2
approaches
arelargely congruent.
Restriction
sitevariability
inApis
mellife-ra is
large:
22 out of 46 restriction sitesmapped
inhoneybee
mtDNA are absent inat least one
colony.
In asample
of 68 colo- nies from 10 differentsubspecies (Garnery
et
al, unpublished observations),
20 differ-ent
haplotypes
have been scored and the average nucleotidediversity (ie,
the aver-age difference between 2 mitochondrial genomes taken at random in the
species)
is
equal
to 1.9%. Thelargest
nucleotidedistance reaches 4% and has been ob- served between a
colony
of A m melliferaand a
colony
of A m carnica(Smith
andBrown, 1990).
The
corresponding
values obtained with sequence data arelower, essentially
be-cause sequences have been obtained for
regions evolving
moreslowly
than thewhole genome.
Nevertheless,
the600-bp
sequences of 11 colonies from 8
subspe-
cies
appeared different,
even those of thesame
geographic origin.
A clear
picture
emerges from mtDNAvariability
inApis
mellifera: colonies andsubspecies
are clustered into 3major
line-ages
A,
M andC,
whichcorrespond
re-spectively
to thefollowing (Smith, 1991;
Garnery et al, unpublished data):
- an African
lineage (A) including
all themtDNA
types
detected insubspecies
inter-missa, adansonii, scutellata, capensis
and monticola;- a west-Mediterranean
lineage (M)
corre-sponding
to Ammellifera;
- a north-Mediterranean and Caucasian lin- eage
(C) including
thesubspecies ligusti-
ca, carnica and caucasica.
The status of the
subspecies
iberica will be discussed in the sectionEvolutionary history
ofApis
mellifera.The nucleotide
diversity
within the spe- cies isequal
to 1.9%. The values of this average nucleotide distance between the differentlineages (ie,
onehaplotype
takenat random in one
lineage
and the second in the otherlineage)
are as follows:-
lineage
A -lineage
C = 2.1 %;-
lineage
A -lineage
M = 2.8%;-
lineage
C -lineage
M = 3.3%.WITHIN LINEAGE mtDNA VARIABILITY The within
lineage diversity
is much lower than betweenlineages:
0.25, 0.30 and0.07% for
lineages A,
C andM, respective- ly.
The lowerdiversity
found inlineage
Mmay not be
significant.
This may be due to the fact that theproportion
of the Mlineage
sampled
is smaller than for otherlineages.
Variability
has been found within everysubspecies
in which several colonies have been examined. Because of thevariability
within
subspecies,
it is oftenimpossible
toclearly
discriminate between some sub-species
of the samelineage.
Forinstance,
the same
haplotype (according
to the re-striction
map)
has been found in intermis- sa,iberica,
adansonii and scutellata.The number of nucleotides
sequenced
is still too small to
figure
out if it will bepossible
tounequivocally
discriminate be- tween all thesubspecies
within alineage.
Direct
sequencing
of DNAamplified through
thepolymerase
chain reaction willcertainly
be the mostpowerful
tool forsuch a discriminative
objective.
It is none-theless necessary to
apply
thistechnique
to a sequence with an
appropriate
evolu-tionary
rate. The mtDNAregions
that havebeen
sequenced
so far evolve tooslowly
for this purpose.
Current data on
honeybee
mtDNA arethen insufficient to discriminate between all the
recognized subspecies,
but as soon assequences for the most variable
regions (eg,
the A+T richregion)
are known, it islikely
thatsubspecies
andpossibly popula-
tions will be discriminated between
using
this method.
EVOLUTIONARY HISTORY OF APIS MELLIFERA
Figure
5provides
aNeighbor-Joining phy- logenetic
tree of 8subspecies (1 colony
per
subspecies)
based on sequence data from the CO-I - CO-IIregion.
Itclearly
shows
(very high bootstrap values)
the 3distinct mtDNA
lineages.
These
lineages correspond
to a racialand
geographical
division of thespecies
which
strongly corresponds
to Ruttner’shy- potheses.
Based onmorphometrical
data, Ruttner et al(1978) recognized
3 "evolu-tionary
branches" :- the branch "M" goes from intermissa to mellifera
through iberica;
- the branch "C" encompasses
cecropia,
carnica and
ligustica;
- the branch "A" is made up of most of the African
subspecies.
This subdivision of the
species
is sup-ported by
aphylogenetic analysis
of allo-zyme data of
Sheppard
and Hueftel(1988). However,
the number of races was too small tofully
validate the existence of all 3 branches.The 3
major lineages
of the mtDNAphy- logenetic
tree inApis
mellifera are in gen- eralagreement
with the branches recog- nizedby
Ruttner et al(1978).
Thecongruence is so
high
that the same sym- bols(M,
C andA)
have beengiven
to themtDNA
lineages. However,
somediscrep-
ancies exist.
The main
discrepancy
concerns theSpanish
transition between intermissa and mellifera.Although
Ruttnerproposed
aprogressive step
between 2subspecies
ofthe same
branch,
mtDNA reveals a secon-dary
contact between 2distantly
relatedlineages (Smith
etal, 1991). Spain
ap- pears as ahybrid
zone between the sub-species
mellifera andintermissa,
the latterunambiguously exhibiting
the African mito-chondrial
type.
Both mitochondrialtypes coexist,
but the melliferatype
is dominant in the northern half of the Iberianpeninsula
whereas the African
type
is dominant in the south. The north to south clines found formorphometrical (Cornuet
and Fres-naye,
1989)
as well asallozymic
charac-ters
(Cornuet, 1982),
which wereformerly
considered as
arguments
in favor of Rutt- ner’s view, can bealternatively interpreted
as the result of a
hybridization
process be- tweenevolutionary
branches.Actually,
asecondary
contact between 2 distantbranches
(M
andC)
was theexplanation given
for thepattern
ofallozymic variability
found in the
Ligurian
coast(Cornuet, 1983)
or in the Aosta
valley (Badino
etal, 1982).
The
only
difference is thegeographic
ex-tension of the
hybrid
zone which is muchlarger
inSpain
than inItaly.
This differencecan be
explained by
the lack of natural ob- stacles inSpain
and alsoperhaps by
bee-keepers’
influence.Another
discrepancy
relates to an addi-tional
branch,
laterproposed by
Ruttner(1988).
Thisbranch,
named"O",
includesmeda,
anatoliaca and caucasica.Although
meda and anatoliaca are
missing
in oursample,
this branch is notsupported by
mtDNA data which show that caucasica is close to
ligustica
and carnica andbelongs unequivocally
to the samelineage.
In the
general
classification of geo-graphic
distribution of mtDNAvariability
made
by
Avise et al(1987), Apis
melliferabelongs
tocategory
I, which shows a dis- continuousdivergence pattern, geographi- cally
structured and characterizedby
lev- els ofdivergence
muchhigher
betweenthan within
regions. According
to these au-thors,
thispattern,
which isquite
common,is
explained by "long
term, extrinsic(ie
zo-ogeographic)
barriers to geneflow,
suchthat
conspecific populations
occupyeasily recognizable
branches on anintraspecific evolutionary
tree" and/orby
"extinction of intermediategenotypes
inwidely
distribut-ed
species
with limiteddispersal
and gene flowcapabilities".
After the remarkable
spread
of African- ized bees inAmerica,
one cannot consider thatApis
mellifera has "limiteddispersal capabilities". Therefore,
the firstexplana-
tion appears correct for
honeybees:
thecurrent
pattern
results from along-term
separation
of 3 branches whichdiverged
allopatrically.
In
Apis mellifera,
the mitochondrial ge-nome is structured not
only
at the level of the 3major lineages
butalso, although
toa lesser extent, within each of these 3 line- ages, ie at the level of
subspecies.
Thissuggests
that thedivergence
of themtDNA
types
is not the result ofindepen-
dent
genetic
drift onpreviously highly poly- morphic populations
but, moreprobably,
was
mainly
established in theirrespective present-day geographic
areas, ie in allo-patry. Consequently
thedivergence
oftheir mtDNA can be used to estimate the age of the
populations.
The
period
of installation of the 3 main mtDNAlineages
wasprobably comprised
between -1.3 and -0.3
Myr.
The first valuecorresponds
to the age ofdivergence
oftheir
mtDNA, allowing
for the extent ofpol- ymorphism
withinlineages (see
Wilson etal,
1985 for theprinciple).
The second- datecorresponds
to thebeginning
of thedifferentiation of the genomes within the main
lineages;
as thevariability
withinthese
lineages
is alsostructured,
the 3 an-cestral
populations
werealready
inplace
at this time. Both calculations
imply
the ac-ceptance
of a 2%divergence
perMyr.
These estimates can be
compared
to allo-zyme based estimates taken from
Shep- pard
and Berlocher’s article(1989).
Ac-cording
to theirfigure
1, Nei’s distance between mellifera andcarnica-ligustica
isapproximately equal
to 0.04.Applying
theformula t = 5D
(Nei, 1987),
this leads to avalue of 200 000 years which agrees well with the above estimates.
Résumé — La variabilité de l’ADN mito- chondrial chez l’abeille
domestique
etses
implications phylogéographiques.
L’ADN mitochondrial
(ADNmt)
de l’abeilledomestique (Apis
melliferaL)
est une mo- lécule circulaire dont la taille varie de 16 500 à 17 000paires
de bases. Sa cartephysique,
établie à l’aide de 17 enzymesde
restriction, comprend
46 sites. Laconnaissance de la
séquence
d’un certain nombre degènes
codant pour lagrande
sous-unité de l’ARN
ribosomique (IrRNA),
trois sous-unités de la
cytochrome oxyda-
se
(CO-I,
CO-II etCO-III),
les ATPases 6 et 8, lecytochrome
b et 5 ARN de transfert(tyrosine, tryptophane, leucine, aspartate
et
lysine)
apermis
de superposer la cartephysique
et cesquelques
éléments de lacarte
génétique.
Cesrésultats,
encore in-complets,
mettent en évidence une simili-tude
remarquable
de laposition
desgènes
chez l’abeille et
drosophile.
L’étendue de variationindiquée plus
haut pour la lon- gueur totale de la moléculeprovient
del’existence de
plusieurs régions présentant
des variations de
longueurs.
Deux de cesrégions
incluent vraisemblablement la ré-gion
decontrôle,
dite «riche en A+T» chezla
drosophile
ou«D-loop»
chez les verté-brés. Cette
région,
où s’initientréplication
et
transcription
del’ADNmt,
est lesiège privilégié
de variations delongueur
chezde nombreuses
espèces
animales.À
la dif- férence des autres insectes connus, la ré-gion comprise
entre CO-I et CO-IIprésen-
te un
important polymorphisme
de taillechez
l’abeille,
dû à l’existence d’un nombre variable de deuxséquences
notées P etQ. La
première peut
manquer;lorsqu’elle
est
présente, toujours
en un seulexemplai-
re, elle
peut comporter
ou non une inser- tion centrale de 15pb.
Laséquence Q, longue
de 194 à 196bp,
estprésente
à unou
plusieurs (2,
3 ou4) exemplaires répé-
tés en tandem. En raison des similitudes de
séquence
et de structure secondaireentre Q et la
séquence
située en 5’, il esttrès
probable
que laséquence
Q résulted’une
duplication.
L’examen de laséquen-
ce
correspondante
chez d’autresespèces d’Apis indique
que laséquence
Pprovien-
drait, elle aussi, d’uneduplication plus
an-cienne et limitée au
gène
voisin du tRNAleucine. Des
analyses
réalisées par Cro- zier et al sur le taux deremplacement
desacides aminés dans l’évolution des
gènes
CO-I et CO-II
indiquent
que ce taux serait de 2 à 3 foisplus
élevé dans lalignée
conduisant à
Apis
que dans celle condui- sant à ladrosophile. Toutefois,
ces diffé-rences sont des moyennes sur les 280 millions d’années
qui séparent
ces deux li-gnées
de leur ancêtre commun; elles n’im-pliquent
pas nécessairement que cette évolution accélérée soit encore à l’œuvre actuellement. Un arbrephylogénétique
aété construit à
partir
d’uneséquence
de651
bp
établie chez 4espèces d’Apis (mel- lifera,
cerana, dorsata etflora)
et chezBombus lucorum considéré comme réfé-
rence externe. La
topologie
de l’arbreconfirme celle trouvée par Alexander
(1991)
àpartir
de caractèresmorphologi-
ques et
comportementaux: (florea(dorsata (cerana,mellifera))).
Ensupposant
que le taux d’évolution de l’abeille au cours des derniers millions d’années estidentique
àcelui de la
drosophile,
soit 1% par milliond’années,
lesespèces A
cerana et A melli-fera auraient
divergé
il y a environ 6 millions d’années.L’analyse
de la variabili-té de l’ADNmt de l’abeille
domestique, qu’elle
concerne les données de restrictionou de
séquence,
met en évidence l’exis- tence de 3lignées majeures,
notéesA,
Met
C;
ellescorrespondent respectivement :
aux colonies africaines
(lignée A)
desraces
intermissa, adansonii, scutellata,
ca-pensis
et monticola; aux colonies de racemellifera
(lignée M);
aux colonies de raceligustica,
carnica et caucasica(lignée C).
Cette distribution
rappelle
étonnamment les trois branches évolutives que Ruttner avait inférées àpartir d’analyses morpho- métriques.
Laprincipale
différence concer- ne la branche Mqui,
selonRuttner,
s’éten- dait del’Afrique
du Nord(intermissa) jusque
dans le nord del’Europe (mellifera)
en
passant
par lapéninsule ibérique (iberi- ca).
D’unpoint
de vuemitochondrial,
larace intermissa est
typiquement
africaineet la race iberica est un
mélange graduel
des
types
africain(dominant
ausud)
etmellifera
(dominant
aunord).
La distribution
géographique
desespè-
ces actuelles du genre
Apis
conduit à pen-ser
qu’Apis
mellifera estoriginaire
d’Asie.De
là,
seraientparties
3grandes
nappes, l’unepeuplant l’Europe
par le nord(corres- pondant
à lalignée M),
l’autrelongeant
lenord de la Méditerranée
(lignée C)
et latroisième envahissant
l’Afrique (lignée A).
L’ampleur
des distancesnucléotidiques
entre
lignées
est difficilementcompatible
avec une
séparation
des nappesposté-
rieure à la dernière
glaciation.
En se fon-dant sur le taux d’évolution de l’ADNmt de la
drosophile,
cet événement se serait pro- duit entre -300 000 et -1300 000 ans.Apis
mellifera / ADN mitochondrial / va-riabilité /
phylogénie
/ évolutionZusammenfassung —
Die Variabilität der mitochondrialen DNA derHonigbie-
nen und die
phylogeographischen
Fol-gerungen. Die mitochondriale DNA
(mtDNA)
der Biene ist ein zirkuläres Mole- kül mit einer Größe von 16 500 bis 17 000Basenpaaren.
Seinephysische Karte,
er-stellt mit Hilfe von 17
Restriktionsenzymen,
umfaßt 46 Stellen
(sites).
Die Kenntnis derSequenz
für einegewisse
Anzahl von Genen, welche diegroße
Untereinheit der ribosomalen DNA(IrRNA),
drei Unterein- heiten für dieZytochromoxydase (CO-I,
CO-II und
CO-III),
die ATP-asen 6 und 8, dasZytochrom
b und 5 Transfer-RNAs(Tyrosin, Tryptophan, Leucin, Aspartat
undLysin)
hat esermöglicht,
diephysische
Karte und diese Elemente der
genetischen
Karte miteinander zu
vergleichen.
Die Re-sultate, obgleich
nochunvollständig,
erge- ben eine bemerkenswerteÄhnlichkeit
der Position der Gene bei der Biene und beiDrosophila.
Das obenangegebene
Ausmaß der Variation der
Gesamtlänge
des Moleküls stammt aus mehreren Re-
gionen,
die eineLängenvariation
aufwei-sen. Zwei von diesen
Regionen
umfassenwahrscheinlich die
Kontrollregion,
bezeich-net als ’Reich an A+T’ bei
Drosophila
oder’D-loop’
bei Wirbeltieren. DieseRegion,
wo die
Replikation
undTranskription
dermtDNA
beginnt,
ist bei zahlreichen Tierar- ten derbevorzugte
Sitz vonLängenvaria-
tionen. Zum Unterschied zu anderen be- kannten Insekten
zeigt
dieRegion
zwi-schen CO-I und CO-II bei der Biene einen beträchtlichen
Polymorphismus
derGröße. Er kommt von einer variablen Anzahl von zwei
Sequenzen,
die als P undQ benannt werden. Die erstere kann
fehlen;
wenn sie aber vorhanden ist(immer
nur in einemExemplar),
kann sieeine zentrale
Einfügung
von 15bp
enthal-ten - oder auch nicht. Die
Sequenz Q,
194-196
pb lang,
ist in einem oder in meh-reren
(2,
3 oder4) Examplaren
als Tan-demduplikation
vorhanden. Auf Grund derSequenzähnlichkeiten
und der sekundärenStruktur von Q und der
Sequenz
bei 5’, istes sehr
wahrscheinlich,
daß dieSequenz
Q aus einer
Duplikation
entsteht. Die Un-tersuchung
derentsprechenden Sequenz
bei anderenApis-Arten
weist darauf hin, daß auch dieSequenz
P aus einer-älterenDuplikation entstanden,
und auf ein Gen inder Nachbarschaft der Leucin-tRNA be- schränkt ist. Die von Crozier und Mitarbei- tern
durchgeführten Analysen
über dieRate des Austauschs der Aminosäuren in der Evolution der Gene CO-I und CO-II weisen darauf
hin,
daß diese Rate in derzu
Apis
führenden Linie 2- bis 3-mal sohoch ist wie in der zu
Drosophila
führen-den Linie. Aber diese Unterschiede sind
Mittelwerte,
die eineZeitspanne
von 280Millionen Jahren
betreffen,
welche diese beiden Linien von ihremgemeinsamen
Vorfahren trennen; das bedeutet also
nicht,
daß diesebeschleunigte
Evolutionnotwendigerweise
auchgegenwärtig
statt-findet. Ein
phylogenetischer
Baum wurdeauf
grund
einerSequenz
von 651bp
für 4Apis-Arten (mellifera,
cerana, dorsata undflorea) konstruiert,
mit Bombus lucorum als externe Referenz. Die räumliche Anord- nung des Baumes stimmtgut
mit der vonAlexander
(1991)
nachmorphologischen
und Verhaltens-Merkmalen
gefundenen
überein
(florea(dorsata(cerana, mellifera))).
In der Annahme, daß die Evolutionsrate der Biene im Verlaufe der letzten Jahrmil- lionen mit der von
Drosophila
identischist,
das heißt 1% pro Million
Jahre,
hätten sich die beiden Arten A cerana und A melliferaungefähr
vor 6 Millionen Jahrengetrennt.
Die
Analyse
der mtDNA-Variabilität der WestlichenHonigbiene ergibt
sowohl nach den Daten der Restriktion oder der Se- quenzen die Existenz von dreiHauptlinien,
die als
A,
M und C bezeichnetwerden;
es sind dies:i)
afrikanische Völker(Linie A)
mit den Rassen intermissa,
adansonii,
scu-tellata, capensis
undmonticola; ii)
Völkerder Rasse mellifera
(Linie M); iii)
Völkerder Rassen
ligustica,
carnica und caucasi-ca
(Linie C).
DieseEinteilung
erinnert in überraschender Weise an die drei evoluti-ven
Zweige,
die Ruttner aufgrund morpho-
metrischer
Analysen abgeleitet
hat. DerHauptunterschied
betrifft denZweig M,
dersich nach Ruttner von Nordafrika
(intermis- sa)
über die Iberische Halbinsel(iberica)
bis nach
Nordeuropa (mellifera)
erstreckt.Nach den Befunden an den Mitochondrien ist die Rasse intermissa eine
typisch
afri-kanische
Rasse,
und die Rasse iberica einegraduelle Mischung
von afrikanischenTypen (dominierend
imSüden)
und mellif-era-Typen
vorherrschend im Norden. Diegeographische Verteilung
dergegenwärti-
gen
Apis-Arten
führt zu demGedanken,
daßApis
mellifera aus Asien stammt. Von dort wären dreigroße
Ströme ausgegan- gen; der eine bevölkerteEuropa
vonNorden
(Linie M),
ein zweiter zogentlang
der Nordküste des Mittelmeers
(Linie C)
und der dritte