Original article
Fluvalinate treatment of queen
and worker honey bees (Apis mellifera L)
and effects on subsequent mortality,
queen acceptance and supersedure
JS Pettis WT Wilson H Shimanuki PD Teel
1
USDA, ARS, Honey
Bee ResearchUnit,
2413 EastHighway
83,Weslaco,
TX 78596;2
USDA, ARS,
Beneficial InsectsLaboratory, Bldg
476,BARC-East,
Beltsville, MD 20705;3
Dept
ofEntomology,
Texas A and MUniversity, College Station,
TX 77843, USA(Received
13 March1989; accepted
4 December1990)
Summary —
Threeexperiments
were conducted on queen and workerhoney
bees(Apis
melliferaL)
to assess effects of treatment with fluvalinateimpregnated (Apistan®) strips.
A 5-d treatment ofworker bees
(weighing
1.4kg
pergroup)
in screenpackages
with a fluvalinatestrip (2.5%
ai,
2.5 x 13cm)
did not increasemortality.
Overwinteredlaying
queens(n
=30),
andnewly
mated queens(n
=60)
were treated in Bentonmailing
cages for 5 d with fluvalinate(Apistan
QueenTabs,
1% ai,
2.5 x 1.3
cm).
All queenmortality
occurred on d 4 and 5 of the treatmentperiod,
which isbeyond
therecommended 3-d-treatment. Neither group of treated queens exhibited a
significant
increase inmortality. However,
attendant worker bees in the second trial exhibited asignificant
increase in mor-tality during
treatment. No differences were observed incolony acceptance
of queens, brood viabili-ty,
orsupersedure
rates at 2 and 6 monthspost-exposure.
Apis
mellifera / acaricide / fluvalinate / side-effect /mortality
INTRODUCTION
Honey bees infested with
theparasitic
mite
Varroajacobsoni (Oudemans) pose
regulatory problems which may
cause re-strictions
onthe
movementof bees. Many
North American beekeepers rely
onbuy- ing package bees and
queens tomaintain
theiroperations. Canada and Mexico
have bannedimportation
of bees from theUnited States
because of Varroa. In order toallow bees
to move from infested areasto
uninfested
areasand
to slowthe spread
ofparasitic mites,
treatments to rid the bees of mites before orduring ship-
ment
have
beensought.
The
relativelow toxicity
tohoney bees
of fluvalinate has been demonstrated by
several researchers (Stoner et al, 1984;
Taylor et al, 1987; Borneck 1988; Hender-
son,
1988; Waller et al, 1988). Colony
treatments to control
V jacobsoni
withflu-
valinate
have also been favorable(Bor-
neck
and Merle, 1987, 1989; Koeniger
*
Correspondence
andreprints
and
Chmielewski, 1988;
Lubinevskiet al, 1988; Ruijter
andVan Den Eijnde, 1989).
Queen mailing cages present
aunique
treatment
problem of exposing
alimited
number of bees and a
queen
to a toxicsubstance
in aconfined environment. Her- bert
et al(1988a) tested amitraz, fluvali-
nate
and cymiazole and found the
1 % a i fluvalinatestrip (Apistan®)*
to be effectiveagainst V jacobsoni
and also of lowtoxicity
to
worker bees during
a3-d
treatmentperiod in small cages. Toxicity
towork-
ers of 2.5-10%
fluvalinate, however,
wasdeemed
objectionable
in the confinedenvi-
ronmentof
the testcages (Herbert
etal, 1988a).
Treatment of worker bees with 2.5% fluvalinate inmailing packages has
also shown
promise (Herbert et al, 1988b;
Witherell and Herbert, 1988).
USDA-APHIS briefly
set up aUS
qua- rantine on movement of bees withVarroa;
after fluvalinate treatment, however,
beescould
movefrom Varroa-infested
to non-infested
areas.Although the efficacy
of flu-valinate against V jacobsoni has been demonstrated,
theeffects
ontreated
queens
and workers
inthe absence of Varroa
needsfurther testing.
The
current studies wereundertaken
toexamine the following: (1), worker mortality
after
treatment in a screenwire mailing package (1.4 kg
perworker group) with
afluvalinate impregnated strip (2.5%
ai);
and
(2),
effect of treatmentwith
a 1%flu-
valinatestrip
on queenmortality, brood
vi-ability,
andcolony acceptance
and super-sedure
rates oftreated queens.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
All
experiments
were carried out on bees of pre-dominately
Italian stock nearWeslaco, TX,
USA. Bees were free of Varroa sp based on al- cohol washes of 500 bees per
colony.
All fluvali- natestrips
were manufacturedby
Zoecon Cor-poration.
Worker mortality
To test worker
longevity
after exposure to fluvali- nate, two 1.4kg
workerpackages
were shakenfrom each of 5
strong
colonies inFebruary
1988. One
package
from eachpair
was fittedwith a 2.5 x 13 cm
strip
of 2.5%(a i)
fluvalinatesuspended
under the queen cage. The compan- ion cage contained nostrip (untreated).
Allpack-
ages were
supplied
with 50% sucrose solution(vol:vol)
and acaged
queen.Packages
wereheld for 5 d at 25 ± 2 °C
(mean
±sd). Mortality
counts were taken from the cage floor after 5 d.
From each
package,
3subsamples
of 67 ± 13 bees wereplaced
in wooden cages(7.5
x 13 x4
cm) (Kulincevic
and Rothenbuhler1973). Cag-
es were held in an incubator at 30 ± 1 °C and
supplied
with 50% sucrose solution and water.Daily mortality
counts were recorded for 24 d.Mortality
rates werecompared by
apaired
t-test.Overwintered laying queens
Thirty
overwinteredlaying
queens were re- moved from active colonies inFebruary
1988. Aqueen and 7 attendant worker bees were
placed
in a Benton
mailing
cage(3 x 8 x 2 cm).
Eachcage contained queen
candy
and either anApi-
stan Queen Tab®
(1 %
a i fluvalinatestrip,
2.5 x1.3
cm) stapled
under the screen or nostrip (un- treated). Cages
were held at 25 ± 2 °C for 5 dand
mortality
was recordeddaily.
The 5-d treat-ment
period
was selected because queens be-ing
treated in transit may beexposed
forlonger
than the 3-d label recommendation.
To examine
acceptance
rates of treatedqueens, two 3-frame nuclei were
split
from eachof 15
strong
colonies inFebruary
1988. Nucleiwere left
queenless
for 1 d before queens were introduced inmailing
cages. One treated and 1 untreated queen was introduced into eachpair
* Fluvalinate
(Apistan®) Zoecon, Inc, Dallas, Texas,
USA : Mention of aproprietary product
does notconstitute a recommendation
by
theUSDA,
nor does itimply registration
under FIFRA as amended.of nuclei. Queen cages were inverted on the
top
bars andinspected
2 d later for queen release.Nuclei were examined on the twelfth
day
forqueen
acceptance
and eggproduction.
Addition-ally,
100 cellscontaining
eggs were marked to assess broodviability (Harbo
andSzabo, 1984).
Sixteen d later the 100 cells were examined and those
reaching
the latepupal stage
were record- ed as viable.Newly
matedqueens
A second trial of queen
acceptance
was con- ducted inMay
1988 with 60newly
mated queens from a commercial queen breeder. Eval- uation methods followed the aboveexperiment
with the
following exceptions: 1)
both treated and untreated queens wereshipped by
mail for2 d and then held at 25 ± 2 °C for the last 3 d of the treatment
period; 2), thirty
double brood chamber hives weresplit equally (bees
andbrood), resulting
in 60paired colonies; 3),
colo-nies were relocated to 2 new
apiaries
and leftqueenless
for 1 d before introduction of the test queens;4),
afteracceptance
of queens, colo- nies were examined at 2 and 6-month intervals to assess queen failures. Differences in queenand worker losses were
analyzed using
Fisher’sexact test
(Steel
andTorrie, 1980).
RESULTS
Worker
mortality
The number
ofdead bees per cage after
5 d was notsignificantly different between treated (68
±21), and untreated (81
±12)
groups (t
=1.94,
4df, P
>0.05). Mortality
over
the 24-d period differed between
the treated(51 ± 15),
and untreated(63
±12)
groups (t = 2.45,
4df,
P <0.05).
Overwintered laying queens
During
the 5-d treatment 8 workers and 3queens died
inthe
15cages of the treated
groups
versus 2 workersand
1queen
inthe
15untreated cages (table I). Only
oneworker died
inthe
first 3 d of treatment.The
remaining
workermortality
andall
queen
mortality
occurred on d 4 and 5. To-tal queen losses were not
significantly higher
in the treatedgroup.
Broodviability
did not differ between treated
(89
±6%)
and untreated
(84
±9%) groups.
Newly
matedqueens
During
the 5-dtreatment,
37workers and
2 queensdied
inthe
30treated cages
ver-sus 6 workers and 1 queen in the 30 un- treated
cages (table I). Again mortality
oc-curred
predominantly
on d 4 and 5. In 4cages
all 7 workersdied,
and 2 of thesecages
also lost their queens. Worker mor-tality
wassignificantly greater
in the treat-ed cages (P
<0.05). Total queen
losseswere not
significantly
different.Brood
viability
was 88 ± 0.1 % and 89 ± 0.1 %for the treated
anduntreated queens,
respec-tively.
DISCUSSION
There were no deleterious effects of 2.5%
fluvalinate on worker
mortality after
the 5-dtreatment
period. There
are noknown
rea-sons
for the treated cages
toshow
lowermortality. Similarly,
Herbertet al (1988a)
found
lower
overallmortality
incages treated with
two 2.5% fluvalinatestrips
than cages
containing
onestrip.
The
only
observable effect of fluvalinate wasduring the actual
treatmentperiod
which
was 2d longer than the 3-d label specification.
All queenmortality,
and> 95% of the worker
mortality
occurredduring
the last 2 d of treatment.Queens
that survived the treatmentperiod
showedno differences in
colony acceptance
ratesor
brood viability. Also, queen failures
at 2and
6months
were notdifferent
with thenewly mated
queens tested.In the second
trial,
workermortality
dif-fered. Four of the 30
cages accounted for
75% of workermortality
and 100% of the queenmortality
in the treatedgroup. Septi-
cemia
orundetected pathogens
could beconfounding factors; however,
no visibleevidence of disease
wasnoted,
and noclumping
ofmortality
was observed in the untreatedgroup.
Mortality of attendant workers and
queens inboth trials occurred predomi- nantly
on d 4and
5of the
treatment.Thus the recommended
3-d treatmentperiod
should not be exceeded to reduce adverse effects on queens.
Following
the 5-d treat-ment,
nodetrimental effects
were ob- served inqueen acceptance by the colony,
brood viability,
orlongevity of the newly
mated
queensthrough
a 6-monthperiod.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank M
Holmes,
USDA-APHIS and B and MWeaver, Navasota, Texas,
for theirhelp
inproviding
queens. We thank JLandrum,
ZoeconCorp
forsupplying Apistan® strips
and for finan- cial assitance. Additional thanks go to L Alvarez forhelp
with themanuscript,
and N Buenrostrofor
assisting
withcolony manipulations.
ADietz,
FEischen,
WPlapp,
and two anonymous re- viewers madehelpful
comments on the manu-script.
Résumé —
Traitement des reines et desouvrières d’abeilles ( Apis mellifera L)
au
fluvalinate : conséquences
sur lamortalité, l’acceptation des reines
etla
supersédure. L’action
du fluvalinate sur la reines et lesouvrières d’abeilles
aété éva- luée
enl’absence
duparasite
Varroaja-
cobsoni. Des
ouvrières, regroupées
enpa- quets
de1,4 kg
etplacées dans des boîtes
d’expédition grillagées
ontété exposées à
un ruban
(2,5
x 13cm) imprégné
defluvali-
nate
(2,5%
de substanceactive) pendant
5
j. Cinq paquets
ontété traités,
5 autresont
servi de témoins.
A lafin du traitement
3 échantillonsde
67 ± 13 abeilles ontété
prélevés
dans chacun des 10paquets.
Ces abeilles ont été mises dans des ca-
gettes (7,5
x 13 x 4cm)
avec de l’eau et dusirop à disposition. Leur mortalité, à
la tem-pérature de
30 ± 1°C,
aété observée
pen-dant 24 j :
iln’y
a pas eud’augmentation.
Pour tester
l’action
des rubansimpré- gnés
de fluvalinate à 1 %(Apistan Queen Tabs®)
sur lesreines,
2 tests ontété
faits.Trente reines
pondeuses âgées
demoins
de 4 mois ont
été retirées de leurs
colonies etplacées chacune
dans une caged’expé-
dition en bois
(3 x 8 x 2 cm)
avec 7 ou-vrières accompagnatrices.
Dans 15cages,
un ruban
d’Apistan
aété introduit
sous legrillage,
les 15 autres n’ont pasété trai- tées.
La mortalité aété relevée quotidien-
nement
pendant
les5 j qu’a duré
letraite-
ment. Au bout de 5
j,
lesreines, toujours
dans leur cage, ont
été placées
dans desnucléi orphelins; l’acceptation de
la reine etsa
ponte
ontété
observées12 j plus
tard.Le second test a
porté
sur 60 reinesré-
cemment
accouplées
etâgées de
moinsde 2 mois. Elles ont
été traitées
comme ci-dessus
mais enoutre,
onles
aexaminées
2 mois et 6 moisaprès
le traitementpour déterminer
le taux desupersédure.
Lamortalité
des reinestraitées
est survenueles 4eet
5 e j
du traitement maisn’était
passignificativement différente
decelle
des reines nontraitées.
Dans lesecond test, les ouvrières accompagnatrices
ontpré-
senté
unemortalité significativement
ac-crue par
rapport
auxouvrières
non trai-tées. Cette mortalité
accrue due autraitement
peut être évitée
enprécisant
dans
la
notice de limiter letraitement à
3j.
Aucune différence
n’aété notée
concer- nantl’acceptation des
reinestraitées,
laviabilité
du couvain ou le taux dusupersé-
dure
à
2 et 6mois après le traitement.
Apis mellifera / acaricide / fluvalinate
/ effet nonintentionnel / mortalité
Zusammenfassung — Fluvalinat- Behandlung
vonKöniginnen
undArbeitsbienen:
Effekte
auf dienachfolgende Mortalität,
Annahme derKöniginnen und Umweislung. Die Auswirkungen
vonFluvalinat
aufKöniginnen und Arbeitsbienen
wurden inAbwesenheit
vonVarroa jacobsoni geprüft.
Arbeitsbienen wurden in
Gitter- Versandkisten (1,4 kg
Bienen proPaket)
für fünf
Tage
einem Fluvalinat-imprägnierten
Streifen(2,5%
bei einerStreifengröße
von2,5
x 13cm) ausgesetzt. Fünf
Paketewurden behandelt, fünf andere blieben unbehandelt. Nach
denfünf Tagen Behandlungszeit
wurden ausjedem
der 10Versandkisten drei
Proben zuje
67 ± 13Bienen in
Laborkäfigen (7,5
x 13 x 4cm) untergebracht und
mitZuckerlösung und
Wasser
versorgt.
Bei einerTemperatur
von 30 ± 1 °C wurde die Mortalität
dieser Bienen
24Tage lang
beobachtet.Um
die
Effekte von mit 1%Fluvalinat
imprägnierten
Streifen(Apistan Queen Tabs®)
zuprüfen, wurden zwei
Testsdurchgeführt.
30legende Jungköniginnen (weniger
als vier Monatealt)
wurden ihren Völkern entnommenund
mitsieben
Begleitbienen
inHolz-Versandkäfige (3 x
8x 2
cm) gebracht.
In 15Käfigen wurde
unter das
Gitter ein Apistanstreifen gelegt,
15
Käfige blieben unbehandelt. Während
der fünfTage dauernden Behandlung
wurde
täglich
dieMortalität bestimmt.
Nach
Abschluß derBehandlung
wurdendie
Königinnen
ausden Käfigen
weisellosen Kernvölkern zugesetzt und
12Tage später auf Annahme und Eiablage
geprüft. Der zweite Test bestand
aus 60frisch begatteten Königinnen (Alter weniger
als 2Monate),
die wie obenbeschrieben behandelt wurden,
aber mitzusätzlicher Überprüfung
zwei und sechsMonate später
zurFeststellung der Umweislungsrate.
Ergebnisse.
Eine fünfTage währende Behandlung
von Kunstschwärmen(1,4 kg)
in
Versandkästen mit Fluvalinat-
imprägnierten Streifen (2,5%) steigerte
dieSterblichkeitsrate
derArbeiterinnen während einer Periode
von 24Tagen
nicht. Die Mortalität der behandelten
Königinnen beschränkte sich auf die Tage
vier
und fünf derBehandlungszeit,
sie waraber nicht
signifikant
von derSterblichkeit unbehandelter Königinnen verschieden.
Die
Begleitbienen
im zweiten Versuchzeigten
einesignifikant erhöhte
Sterblichkeitsrate gegenüber
unbehandelten Bienen. Eine erhöhte Sterblichkeitsrate
infolge
derBehandlung
könnte dadurch vermieden
werden,
daß in denBegleitvorschriften
dieBehandlung
auf drei
Tage begrenzt
wird.Hinsichtlich
der Annahme der behandeltenKöniginnen
in den
Völkern,
derLebensfähigkeit der
Brut oder der Umweislungsrate
wurden beider Untersuchung
zwei und sechs Monatenach der Behandlung keine Unterschiede
festgestellt.
Apis mellifera
/Akarizide
/Fluvalinat
/Mortalität
REFERENCES
Borneck R
(1988) Fluvalinate,
aninteresting
molecule
against
Varroajacobsoni.
In: ProcEC
Experts’ Meeting
on Varroatosis/BadHomburg,
15-17 October 1986(Cavalloro R, ed) Balkema, Rotterdam, 223-229
Borneck
R,
Merle B(1989)
New test for Varroa control withApistan® (fluvalinate).
In: ProcEC-Experts’ Group/Udine, Italy,
28-30 Nov1988 (Cavalloro R, ed) Luxembourg,
315-330Borneck
R,
Merle B(1987)
Nouveaux essais de lutte antivarroa avec fluvalinate. Abstr 31st IntCongr Apic
WarsawApimondia,
Buchar-est, 351-352
Harbo
JR,
Szabo TI(1984)
Acomparison
of in-strumentally
inseminated andnaturally
matedqueens. J
Apic
Res23(1):
31-36Henderson CE
(1988)
Test of controlagents
for Varroajacobsoni
inhoney-bee packages.
In:Africanized
Honey
Bees and Bee Mites(Needham
etal, eds)
Ellis HorwoodLtd, UK,
380-386Herbert EW
Jr,
WitherellPC,
Shimanuki H(1988a)
Control of Varroajacobsoni
on hon-ey bees in queen cages and small
laboratory
cages
using amitraz,
fluvalinate andApitol®.
Am Bee J
128(4), 289-292
Herbert EW
Jr,
BruceWA,
Shimanuki H(1988b)
Control of Varroa
jacobsoni
onhoney
bees inpackages using Apistan®.
Am Bee J128(9),
615-616
Koeniger N,
Chmielewski(1988)
A new ap-proach
tochemotherapy
of varroatosis. In:Proc EC
Experts’ Meeting
on Varroatis/BadHomburg,
15-17 October 1986(Cavalloro R, ed) Balkema, Rotterdam,
231-236Kulincevic
JM,
Rothenbuhler(1973) Laboratory
and field measurements of
hoarding
behaviorin the
honeybee (Apis mellifera).
JApic
Res12, 179-182
Lubinevski
Y,
SternY,
SlabezkiY, Lensky Y,
Ben-YossefH,
Gerson U(1988)
Control ofVarroa
jacobsoni
andTropilaelaps
claraemites using Mavrik® in
Apis
mellifera colonies undersubtropical
andtropical
climates. Am Bee J128(1), 48-52
Ruijter
ADe,
Van DenEijnde
J(1989)
Field ex-periments
to determine theefficacy
ofApi-
stan® on Varroa mites in bee colonies and the effects onspring development
of treatedcolonies. In: Proc
EC-Experts’ Group/Udine, Italy,
28-30 Nov 1988(Cavalloro R, ed)
Lux-embourg,
331-337Steel
RGD,
Torrie JH(1980) Principles
and Pro-cedures
of Statistics.
McGrawHill Inc,
pp 633 StonerA,
WilsonWT,
Moffett JO(1984)
Effectsof
longterm feeding
of low doses of fenvaler- ate or fluvalinate in sucrose syrup onhoney
bees
Apis
mellifera in standard-size field col- onies. J Ga Entomol Soc19(4), 490-498 Taylor KS,
WallerGD,
Crowder LA(1987)
Im-pairment
of a classifical conditioned re-sponse of the
honey
bee(Apis
melliferaL) by
sublethal doses of
synthetic pyrethroid
insec-ticides.
Apidologie 18(3), 243-252
Waller
GD,
EstesenBJ,
BuckNA, Taylor KS,
Crowder LA
(1988)
Residual life andtoxicity
to
honey
bees(Hymenoptera, Apidae)
of se-lected
pyrethroid
formulationsapplied
to cot-ton in Arizona USA. J Econ Entomol
81 (4),
1022-1026
Witherell
PC,
HerbertEW,
Jr(1988)
Evaluationof several
possible
treatments to control Var-roa mite Varroa
jacobsoni (Oud)
onhoney
bees in