Publisher’s version / Version de l'éditeur:
Vous avez des questions? Nous pouvons vous aider. Pour communiquer directement avec un auteur, consultez la première page de la revue dans laquelle son article a été publié afin de trouver ses coordonnées. Si vous n’arrivez pas à les repérer, communiquez avec nous à PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca.
Questions? Contact the NRC Publications Archive team at
PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca. If you wish to email the authors directly, please see the first page of the publication for their contact information.
https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/droits
L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB.
Internal Report (National Research Council of Canada. Division of Building Research), 1959-01-01
READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE.
https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/copyright
NRC Publications Archive Record / Notice des Archives des publications du CNRC : https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/object/?id=2cf73e2c-d3e8-4bf6-99c8-ea2c079831c9 https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/voir/objet/?id=2cf73e2c-d3e8-4bf6-99c8-ea2c079831c9
Archives des publications du CNRC
For the publisher’s version, please access the DOI link below./ Pour consulter la version de l’éditeur, utilisez le lien DOI ci-dessous.
https://doi.org/10.4224/20386790
Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at
Fire deaths in the province of Ontario 1956 and 1957 Williams-Leir, G.
NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL OF CANADA DIVISION OF BUILDING RESEARCH
FIRE DEATHS IN THE PROVINCE OF ONTARIO
1956-57
by
G. Williams-Leir
Report No. 124
of the
Division of BUilding Researoh
Ottawa
u.
S.
A.
DEATHS PER 100,000 POPULATI ON PER YEAR
セ
OVER 64 -6 2 - 4
L ESS TH AN 2
6 clTlnWI TM POPUI. AllOIllucヲ{セ OiiiV 100.000
PREFACE
The Fire Section of the Division of BUilding Research, National Research Council of Canada, on 1 January
1954,
began a study of deaths caused by fire in the Province of Ontario. DBR Reports Nos. 72 and86
have already been issued on thisstudy. The purpose of this report is to present in statistical form the information obtained in the third and fourth years of the study. Nearly 700 cases have now been covered in the survey.
This investigation was undertaken with the encouragement and co-operation of Mr. W.J. Scott, O.B.E., Q.C., Fire Marshal of the Province of Ontario.
Mr.
R.B. Wallace, Deputy Registrar-General of Ontario, kindly provided the assistance of hisOffice's Vital Statistics Section.
Mr.
C.R. Magone, Q.C., Deputy Attorney General of Ontario, secured the co-operation of LocaL coroners and Crown attorneys and many munic ipal fire officials also supplied useful information. The Division is grateful for all the assistance it has received.For the initial, ッセ pilot stage of this study, one province has been selected as a sample of the Dominion. It is hoped that in a few years the techniques used in conducting the study will be so developed that they can be offered for wider use.
Comments on, or criticisms of, this report will be welcomed.
Ottawa
January
1959
R.F. Legget Director
by
G. Williams-Loir
This is the third of a series of reports (1, 2) on deaths due to fire in Ontario. It ana.lyses the circumstances surroundlne such deaths for the years
1956
and1957
and compares these years with the two previous. The information was gathered, as inprevious year-s , from correspondence and staff investigations. For the first time the survey is supplemented by some
information on fire deaths in Canada generally. This was obtained from the publications of the Dominion Bureau of Statistics and of the Dominion Fire Commissioner's Office. It will be presented as a preliminary to the detailed information derived from the Fire Section's own investigations.
Fire Deaths in Canada
Figure 1 rela tes the nurnber of fire dea ths in Canada to deaths from other causes, both natural and violent. Figure 2 shows the long-term trend of the fire death rate in Canada; the gradual increase since the beginning of the Second World War seems to have been arrested since about
1950.
Figure3
compares the fire death rates for the ten provinces, with Ontario's being close to the national average.Fire Deaths in oョセ。イゥッZ __q・ョ・セセ
The remainder of this report viill be devoted to information derived in the province of Ontario by the Fire Section of the
Division.
The classifications used and the techniques by which information was manipulated have been descrjbed in detail in "Coding Manual for Analysis of Ontario Fire Deaths
1956" (3).
After four years of applicat I on , the systems set down in this coding manual should serve for several years with only minor changes.
- 2 ...
For the purpose of thf.s inquiry a fire death means a death classified under heading E916 of the International Statistical Classification
(4),
namely, "Accident caused by fire and explosion of combustible material". The Vital Statistics Section of the Ontario Registrar-Generalis Office informs the Fire Section of each case it is classifying under this head, and normally these are the cases studied in this survey. Occasionally, cases are rejected or added after further information has been obtained as a result of the Fire Section's inquiries.Sources of Information
Certain fatal fires are visited as soon as possible after the event by a member of the Fire Section who prepares a report. In other cases fires are visited by a member of the Ontario Fire Marshal's staff and his report is made available to the Division.
The Fire Section is informed about other cases through a newsclipping service and by the Vital Statistics Section. Forms are then sent to the fire chief of the municipality conoerned, or, if エィ・セ・ is no fire department, to the local police officer who is requested to supply particulars of the fire.
Specimens of the forms used since March 1956 are included as Appendix II to this report.
The Vital Statistics Section reports on every case; a death is not treated as a fire 、・。エセ until either a report is received from this Section or a report from another source has been discussed with the Vital Statistics Section.
Primary Classifica tion of Fire Deaths
The appropriate questions to ask when ascertaining the reasons for a fire death vary according to the circumstanoes. Thus, questions about building construction are irrelevant when the death is due to a clothing fire; and when the victim is a small child, there are questions regarding the care taken of the child that do not arise for adults.
In this report, therefore, every fire death has been
classified as ei ther a B death or a C death, where B means "building firelt and C "clothing r tr-e" (precise definitions of these terms
are given in the Coding ManuaL (3)). Every fire death is also either an I death or an A death, where I means "infant or child under seven" and 11. means "aged seven or over".
One indication which supports the view that infant fire deaths form a group for which separate treatment is appropriate is the sudden drop in fire deaths at about age
5
(Fig.7).
The four abbreviations B, C, I and A will be used singly or together in this report without further explanation. It
should be noted that there are four possible combinations - IB, IC, AB, AC - so that an IB death means the death of a child undar seven in a building flre I and so on.
Table I shows how male and female victims were distributed among these primary classifications.
Fatal Fires
The
354
fire deaths reported on resulted from255
fatal fires. The distribution of deaths per fire is given in Table II.Throughout the report the unit of comparison used is the fire death rather than the fatal fire.
Fire Death Rate
.
The "Fire Death Rate" or "FDR" is defined for the purpose of this report as the number of fire deaths per 100,000 population at risk per 12 months. When applied to a limited group, e.g. girls from age 5 to 10, it means the deaths in this group per 100,000
in the group. When applied セッ a limited period, e.g. Tuesdays, it means the fire deaths per 100,000 in twelve months of Tuesdays.
The abbreviation FDR will be used in the report without further explanation.
GeograEhical Distribution of Fire Deaths
The frontispiece is a map showing how the fire death rate varies across Ontario. FOR has been computed by counties and
districts for the four years
1954-57,
but in several cases adjacent counties or districts have been grouped so that no group has apopUlation of less than 50,000 (since in groups smaller than this the FOR would be unduly influenced by a single fatality).
It would be rash to draw conclusions about any single group from just four years' experience, however, since a single fire in which several lives are lost could drastically alter the FOR for a less populous county or group. In spite of this there
4
-is a clear conclusion to be drawn from the map as a キィッャ・セ All the districts (i.e. from Muskoka and Nipissing northwards) have FOR's exceeding
4 -
most exceed6.
In contrast, most of thecounties of southern Ontario have FDR's less than
4.
Most cities with populations over 100,000 have FDR's less than 2, and this governs the rate for the counties in which they lie.Over-all rates for these areas when grouped may be
computed. As shown in Table III, the five cities together have an FOR of about 2. Excluding these cities the rate for the
remainder of the counties (i.e. southern Ontario) is about 3 1/2, while for the districts (i.e. northern Ontario) it is greater than
7.
These three groupings have very different population densities and a negative correlation between population density and fire death rate seems evident.
cィイッョッャッァゥ」。ャセウエイゥ「オエゥッョ of Fire Deaths
. Figures
4,
5
and 6 show the dependence of FDR upon time of year, day of week, and time of day.The worst season for fire deaths is from October to May. Saturday seems to be the worst and Tuesday the best day of the week. More deaths occur at night than during the day, and there is also a heavy incidence of fatal fires around breakfast time. Although in some cases the victim dies in the fire, he may survive for days or weeks in other cases. The time of the fire is the
subject of the graphs, not the time of death. Fire Deaths by Age of Victim
Fire death rate, as defined, is low between ages 10 and 60 and rises sharply at both ends of ttis range (Fig. 8). This could be applied to death rate generally instead of just to fire death rate. Is death by fire primarily an affliction of infancy and old age?
In order to discover whether age has any significallt bearing on death by fire it is instructive to compute the ratio
of fire deaths to all deaths. This ratio is plotted against age in Fig.
9.
The situation is nearly the reverse of that for fire death rate; the ratio is above average for ages between 1 and50,
but falls at both ends of this range. It is conspicuously high for the 。セ・ range 1 to 15 and rises to a peak at age4;
for children aged4
about one death in ten is due to fire.These are therefore the ages when fire is most serious in relation to other causes of death. Some reserve is appropriate since the death rate from causes other than fire is low for
children after the first year of life. The ratio is a ratio of small quantities and consequently is sensitive to small variations. This applies also to the observation that this ratio is more
than twice as high for girls as for boys in the age range
5
to19-If the apparently opposite behaviour of these two graphs seems difficult to understand, the following example may make the position clear. Among 100,000 people, all aged 80, the number of fire deaths in a given period セゥャャ be Ereate£ than among 100,000 people all aged 50 (in a year セエ would be about
16
against3).
Among 100,000 people, however, all of whose deaths occur at age 80, the number of fire deaths will be smaller than for 100,000 people dying at age 50 (about 100 against
500).
One inference to be drawn from Fig.
9
is that death by fire is increasingly improbable for adults. At age 40 the odds against death by fire are 100 to 1; from age 55 on they are 400 to 1 9r higher.Occu:eancy
The occupancies in which the fatal fires took place are set out in Table IV, and comparative figures for the three years
1954-56
are also given. !!!ture ,of Fa tal InjurzTable V shows the nature of the fatal injury that was recorded as the cause of death. When a body is badly burned in a building fire it must be difficult to say whether death was
due to burns, asphyxia or carbon monoxide poisoning and, therefore, the figure for burns may be high.
Building Fire Deaths
The next three sections deal with bUilding fire deaths only - deaths due to ignition of clothing without any bUilding fire are excluded.
In order to test the hypothesis that fire deaths are frequently associated with overcrowded living, the gross floor area per resident for each dwelling where a fatal fire ッ」セオイイ・、
6
-The results are given in Table VI and as a histogram in Fig. 10. How far they support the hypothesis depends on what is regarded as overcrowding; this is a matter of opinion. Most people would agree, however, that the 19 per cent of fatalities who had been living in less than 100 square feet per person were overcrowded; perhaps the same could be said of the 39 per cent of fatalities who had less than 150 square feet per ー・イウッョセ To illustrate this density of 150 square feet per person, imagine six people living in a 30-ft square bungalow.
Source of Ignition and r・。ウッセ for fセエセャ InJ.l!.r;L
These are tabulated together in Table VII, for the two years 1956-57 collectively.
1) The source of ignition is frequently unknown since the fire often destroys any evidence. Sometimes the only person who could have known the source was a victim of the fire.
2) Among the known sources of ignition, the most prominent are BウュッォゥョセQi (Sources Nos.
3
and4>
and IIfuel cookers and stoveslt(Nos.
14
and 15).3)
Among the known reasons for fatal injury, by far the most frequent is "asleep in burning building" and next comes "trapped by fire in an exit".Surface Materials
.
The hypothesis that fire deaths are often associated with the use of flammable materials for wall and ceiling finishes was considered worth testing. The finishes in the room where the fatal fire started are considered the most relevant, and these have been
tabulated in Table VIII. Often, but not always, the same material is used throughout a house.
From this it will be seen that in 57 per cent of the cases where the nature of the wall material was known it was
combustible. The same was true in 63 per cent of the cases where the ceiling material was knmvn. These results are similar to those found in 1955. While nothing is known of the numbers of buildings at risk lined with each material these percentages are high enough to make the hypothesis seem plausible.
Fire Department Attendance
Table IX summarizes the available information on atten-dance of fire departments at fatal bUilding fires. In 66 per cent of the cases the death occurred in a municipality having a fire department and this department did attend the fire, sometimes
assisted by others. In 15 per cent of cases the fire was attended either by a fire department from outside the municipality or by a non-municipal firefighting body such as a works fire brigade. In the remaining 19 per cent no organized firefighting body was in attendance.
This information has been tabulated for building firee with clothing fires ・ク」ャオ、・、セ In most clothing fires エセ・イ・ is no need for the attendance of a fire department.
Extent of Fatal Buildins Fires
Table X lists the extent of エセ・ building fires. In more than half the cases the bUilding was destroyed but the fire rarely
ウーイ・。セ to other buildings. Clothing Fire Deaths
The sources of ignition in fatal clothing fires are given in Table VII. The most prominent sources are stoves and ranges, smoking materials and carelessly handled flannnable liquids. Over the 3-year period 1955-57, sixi;y··seven of the 138 C victims were people aged 65 or over; it is rC880nable to suppose that the
elderly are less able to take el1cn"getic measures when their clothing ignites and are less likely to nurvive their burns.
The type of garment Y\')I'n is tabula ted in Table XI and
the fabrics are given in Table XII. The information available shows that cotton is the fabric most frequently involved in a clothing fire. Cotton is of course more generally worn indoors than is any other single fabric.
Table XIII indicates the action taken by the victim when his clothes ignited. Fifty-two people died who had failed to tackle the burning clothing because they were overcome by panic, were relying on other people, or were senile etc. セカ・ョエケMエキッ
others died after trying to beat out or smother the flames. Fire Deaths of Children
-This report has dealt with source of ignition and reason for fatal injury for all fire deaths including those of children. When children are concerned, however, another reason must be
8
-was it that this person -was not able to protect them before a fire or rescue them during it? For convenience and with no
implication of blame this person will .be referred to as the "responsible person", or RP for short.
Over the two years
1956-57,
82 children under seven died in fires, 12 of them through clothing fires. In75
cases the child was under parental care at the time and in54
out of71
cases the "responsible person" was in the age range21-34.
Thus fire deaths of infants cannot generally be attributed to the carelessness of babysitters or to the ゥセョ。エオイゥエケ or senility of the persons having charge of the children.The reasons assigned for failure to safeguard the children are set out in Table XIV. Often throughout the survey it was
difficult to be certain of the most accurate classification. For example, the heading "responsible person in the same bUilding but still not in time to save the child" has been used where a more appropriate heading might have been found if fulle r information had been available. This classification has been used for several cases where the RP was sleeping at the time of the fatal fire. Comments
To be completely effective, a study of this kind should leave in the reader's mind the same general picture as that visualized by those who analysed the original reports.
One scene might be of a rural slum, a shack or house of poor construction usually lacking the servlces which most people now consider necessities and housing too many people, in which normal carelessness often coupled with the influence of liquor allows a fatal fire to start. These cases often make headlines
in local papers and are fully reported.
Another Lmagf.ned picture might be of an elderly fraoil
person whose clothing becomes ignited and who is eventually taken to hospital only to die a few days or weeks later. Fire departments are seldom called in these cases and newspapers do not usually
regard them as news. Often the only information on tbe case comes from the Vital Statistics Section, and it may be received too late for a detailed report. Thus, the picture is indistinct.
The subject matter imposes some limitations on how c omp'l.e t.e a picture can be given in one report. Many of the circumstances
surrounding fire deaths are of a scrappy nature, difficult to reduce to any system; others though highly relevant, are so sordid tha t a separate report would be needed to deal with what is a social rather than a technical problem.
After four year-s of inve stiga tion some facts are clear and definite. One can foretell, for instance, that next year the fire death rate in northern Ontario will again be higher tban in the cities, that more children under five will be lost than between ages 10 and 15, that many people will be trapped by fire while sleeping and that many reports will be received with important details missing.
Other questions still remain unanswered, however. Why are stoves so often the cause or source of tragic fires? Why do so many parents fail to save their children even when they are in the same bUilding at the time of the fire? What circumstances lead to people being 'overtaken by fire' when there seems to have been no obsta ole to their escape?
It is difficult to estimate when or how a satisfactory answer to these and other questions will be reached.
Acknowledgments
Miss J.R. Evans and Miss G. Zuan3 assisted ably in the preparation of the material here reported.
References
1.
3·
Shorter, G.W. and G. Williams-Leir. Fire deaths in the province of Ontario, 1954. Report No. 72 of the Division of Building Research, National Research Council, Ottawa. s・ーエ・ョセ・イ
1955, 20p. 7 Figso
Williams-Leir, G. Fire deaths in the province of Ontario, 1955. Report No. 86 of the Division of Building Research, National Research Council, Ottawa. September 1956, 25p. 7 Figs.
Williams-Leir, G. Coding manual for analysis of Ontario fire deaths, 1956. Report No. 100 of the Division of Building Research, National Researoh Council, Ottawa. September 1956, 2lp. 1 Fig.
Manual of the International Statistical Classification of diseases, injuries and causes of death. World Health
Organization, Geneva, 1948, Vol. 1, pp. 263, 305-307, 311. 1958 Municipal Direotory, Department of Nunicipal Affairs,
APPENDIX I
QUALITY AND COMPLETENESS OF REPORTING
An account of the quantity of reports and the quality of reporting will be given, using the following code taken from the Coding NBnual (3). Code
-A B C D E VS Source of ReEor.tFire Section, Division of Building Research Office of the Ontario Fire Marshal
Police Fire Chief Newsclipping Vital Statistics
Reports A, B, C and D have an advantage over E and VS in that they attempt to answer a questionnaire which was carefully designed to elicit the information desired.
Table XV shows the number of each class of report received. This is less significant than Table XVI which shows for each case the kind of report on which the survey had to rely. For instance, there might be only a newsclipping and the particulars would be taken from this; in another case when there is both a newsclipping and a fire chief's report, the newsclipping would be used only to fill in any omissions in the report. The tables show that over
the three years there has been a decline in the numbers of the A and B reports and an increase in the D reports.
In
42
per cent of fire deaths over the 3-year period, a report has been available from an officer mainly devoted toinvestigations of fires. In another
45
per cent the officer making the report has received a questionnaire which indicates the exact information needed from him. He usually completes it with care and skill. In the remaining13
per cent only a brief formal report or a newspaper account is available.A brief but systematic study has been made of the completeness of the information supplied by each type of source in a typical
From the table it will be seen that all sources supply good answers to such questions as: reason for fatal injury in building fire, reason for infant's fatal injury_ All but VS
report well on time of day. Victim's reaction in clothing fires, number of residents and area of bUilding are well handled in most cases by A and B but poorly by C and D only. The nature of the fabric ignited in clothing fires is reported on fairly well by A, B, C and D only. A and B deal much better with wall and
ceiling linings than do C and D.
As an example of the deficiencies in reporting on wall and ceiling finishes the reply Itwa l l boa r dlt is not sufficiently
specific and must be treated as "unknown". Regarding the source of ignition of fatal fires, the more expert reporting officers give a higher proportion of Itunkn own " , indicating that the others
IIppiGセョ IX IT
I:nt:l 1 H':SC'[H'ch Council :)lviriol, of BIJUHnc Ite s e ar-ch
l"irp. Heseareh Sect.iol'l
Firo Fatalit;y Inv0stication For-m HQセ
F'ull addrc.3F of .fire (number, street, -'uniciDality, and county or district)
Date of fire
Area On a 30parate sheet,')lease give, Ti'"""You can.. an outline sketch plan of each
stor-ey of the bu L'l d Lng , wi tl1 approximate -e a s ur-ements , Show »o Lrrt where fire started lind where bodies were found.
セh、エィ Hb。セ・ュ・ョエO」・ャャ。イMZMMMMヲエN (Ground floor: -(Hie;her storeys:
==
Length ft. セッキ manl
storeys? (exclud ng basement)How many people normally resided in the bUilding?
'vas basement used as liVing guarters? Yes/No/No basement eXisted/Don't know
*
Construction of exterior walls'( clapboard, brick veneer, solid brick-;・セヲ」 ZセLN ... - - - Mセ - - -
_ . _
-Interior finish of room where fire started
h-iallpapered lath &: plaster; painted gy,)sum wall board, etc. )
( L) Ivalls (ii) Ceil1ng_
did the fire start?
Source of ignition (lamp,range,etc.) _
1:Jhat fuel (if any) did i t use?(oil,gas,elec.) ._
l,r,Jhat first ignited?(curtains,bedding,etc.) . _
and W'1Y? (lamp knocked over, pLay Lng with ma'tc he sj etc , )
セQィ・イ・ did fire start, &: on which storey? How
Ta)
( b)
(e)
( :1)
rJW many deaths from this fire?
- - - - _ .
-\</a8 there, or will Ye"'/No
*
there be, BTl inquest? セvias the
Did any
(If yes,
fire confined to: Room of origin/Storey of origin/Building or did it extend to other buildintj(s)? fire de artment attend this fire?
state which fire de oar tme nt .
of origin/*
iLly further remarks (Reverse side or seo ar-at e sheet mav be use d also)
'118as-; send-any-avaIlabIe--photo'j;:raf'hs, and state what payment is requlrcd.-L'J.CY Vlill be returned if not needed.
PLEAS£!; ALSO COMPLETE BLUE FORM; 0NE COPY FOR EAC:i FATALrry.
Fire Research Section Fire Fatality Invcstipation Form (II)
REPORT ON FIRE VICTIM
(l-'lease complete one form for each fatality) Name of victim
1. BUILDING FIRE
Ace Sex _
'.f:lereabouts in the building did the victim obtain 'lis injuries? \'11ention which storey)
Why was the victim trapped or otherwise unable to escape?
2. CLOTHING FIRE If the fatality was due to the victim's clothing becoming
ignited:-How did this happen? _
;'!hat did the victim and others present do about it?
What was the type of garment first ignited? (shirt,skirt,etc.) Fabric: state main constituent (co ton, wool, etc. )
If available, please send an unburnt piece of the
if possible a square foot or moreo iGnited garment,
Ho•• old was this person?
3. INFANT If the victim was a ch i.Ld less than seven years
old:-Who was the oerson in chari-J) of or resp(;nsible for the child?
(e.e. parent. babysitter,etc.)
Was the responsible person with the child: in the same room?
same storey? _ _ _ _ Same building? ,
fur away was he/she? _ _ _
if not , how
If the responsible ?erson was not in the same building as the child at
the time of the fire, how long had he/she been away? _
If the responsible person セ there, why was he/She unablp tu safeL,uard
the infant?
4. If the questions above do net fit the ci.r-cumstanc e s , pLea s o Live your own
account on another sheet, or on the back of this one,
l'LEASE ALSO COt'1.t'LETI';; FClm (I) rml',RT eN }i'ATAL nnE
Date セ . _
Hank or pusition
l)elJart1;lc n t
-National Research Council
A-3
Division of BUilding Research Fire Research Section.
FIRE FATALITY INVESTIGATION I"ORM III
1. Name of Deceased: Surname: 2. Sex: 4. Date of death: 5. Place of death: 6. Place of residence: Given names: 3. Age: Month by name: Reg. No. Year:
vIs
Code No.7. Date of fire or explosion: Month by name: Year:
8. Did fatal fire or explosion occur at home, in industry, or in a public place?
9. How was the injury sustained? E
10. Nature of injury and cause of death: Nセnセ セ
11. Was there an autopsy? An inquest?
12. Findings of autopsy and/or verdict of inquest:
13. Any further particulars:
Date of report:
FIRE DEATHS BY SEX -
4
PRIMARY CLASSIFICATIONS (ONTARIO1954-7)
1956-57
FourI
I
years IC*
IE セセ AC*
AB*
Total1954-7
i ! jI
I i I i Male8
44
50
130
232
414
Female4
26
38
54
122
284
: , Total12
70
88
184
354
698
IC - Infant under seven, clothing fire
IB
-
"
It II building fireセセ
AC - Person over seven, clothing fire ',- AB
-
II It Itbuilding fire
TABLE II
HOW MANY DEATHS OCCUR FROM EACH FIRE?
(ONTARIO
1956-57)
Number of Fires 'I Deaths per Deaths i fire
1956-7
1956
1957
!
!
93
I I I I11
204
17
14
!2
62
4
2
"3
18
2
2
I4
16
2
5
5
35
1
1
6
12
1
07
7
-354
-GEOGRAPHICAL INCIDENCE: RELATION OF FIRE DEATH RATE TO POPULATION DENSITY (ONTARIO
1954-7)
Fire Deaths
Population
I
Fire AreaI
;
!
4
yearsPeople
1955
:
death (thousands peri
1954 1955
I1956 . 1957
!
1954-7
I
(thousands) rate lof sq miles) sq mileI r I ! i Metropolitan Toronto 1
28
17
I
24
16
!85
1303
1.63
I81
i1.67
Hamilton lセIi
2
15
221.j.
ottawa6.
14
14
2\
36
214
, 4.21
i v-Jindsor2:
04
6
!
I12
128
12.34
London3
1
2
1
!7
98
' 1.79
Subtotal- 5
largest cities43
33
46
33
155
1967
' 1.97
0.29
68$0
Remainder of southern'95
1 Ontario88
79
94
356
2572
3.46
39.4
65.2
Northern Ontario42
59
30
56
!
187
645
7.25
324
1.99
I
I Total - Ontario173
171
I
170
184
698
5184
3.37
TABLE IV
OCCUPANCY IN WHICH FATAL FIRE OCCURRED
In detail for
2
years AggregateOccupancy
1956-7
for four years1C: .:l-. IB ';r AC oil- AB
*
1954-7
Residential
Unshared separate dwelling
6
44
18
it
281
I Shared ""
-
7
2
45
Apartment1
5
2
9
36
Rooming house-
-
1
6
17
Barracks etc.-
-
-
-
5
Hotel-
-
-
14
16
Summer cottage-
1
5
2
12
Shack or one-room dwelling
-
6I
2
16
50
Dwelling - no further particulars2
-
Rセ
6
91
Other or mixed-
3
11
27
Subtotal9
j66
57
153
580
Non-residential Industrial-
-
14
I16
43
Mercantile-
-
1
1
3
Office-
-
-
-
-Institution, e.g. hospital,
home for aged
-
-
4
2
12
Place of restraint, e.g. jail
-
-
-
-
-Place of assembly-
-
1
-
1
Farm out-building-
-
2
-
7
Stationary vehicle-
-
-
4
10
Outdoors3
-
8
-
27
other or mixed-
h
1
8
15
Subtotal3
4
31
31
118
--TOTAL12
70
88
184
698
IC - Infant under seven, clothing fire IB - It
"
It building fireセイ
,
AC - Person over seven, clothing fire AB - 1\ 1\ It
,
building fireNATURE OF FATAL INJURY
In detail for two years Aggregate
1956-7
forNature of fatal injury four [ears
rc«
IB-l}!
AC'il- abセQッ195 -7
i
Asphyxia
-
27
2
62
185
Burns
12
36
86
90
439
Carbon monoxide poisoning
-
7
-
24
64
other injuries
-
-
-
8
10
Total
12
70
88
184
698
IC - Infant under seven, clothing fire
IB -
"
"
"
,
building fire*
AC - Person over seven, clothing fireTABLE VII
T'dO aセhcts OFBcauセf i'F FIRE DEATH" (ON'TAhIr l':'5t and IS'57)
セilding FIRE ljeathセ )_ Total B Total C deaths deaths 39 313 37 35 4 6 8 2 30 1 1 3 1 23 6 1 2 9 17 1 2 5 5 9 11 3 5 10 1 2 1 1 1 4 2 3 19 ILl 1 17 (, 1 3 3 1 2 8 1 8 B 3 9 3 1 7 106 13 13 2 25 9 2 9 2511 100 32 33 1 31 30 :?9 28
a
26 --
I - - - - 1-
--
1 I 7 5 1 I - 1 I 2 1 1 - - -5 2-
1 I - -: I 1 - 2 - - -6 - --
1 --
- - 1 --
-7 -- -
I-
- - - -8-
1 - - -I --
1- -
-Source 9- -
- -- -
- - --
- -of 10 - -- -
-I - - - -Igni tion 11 3 - - - -I-
- - 1 - 1 -I 12-
-- -
1 - - --ia
- -- - -
- 1 - - --
1I
10 2 - - - --
1 - - 1 -15 3 9 1 -- - -
1 1-
- 1 16 --
-
- - - - - 1 - - 1 17 1 --
- -- -
- - - - -18 2 3- -
1 - - - -19 1 : - - 1 -- -
- 5 --
-Unknown 40 20 2 2 3 - 1 5 9-
1 -MセM⦅NM TOTAL 95 40 5 4 6-
S 9 2? - 4 IiReason for fatal injury
Key: Source of ignition
1 Building iBnited as result of clothing fire. 2 Playing with matches, flames.
3 :'omeone fell asleep while smoking.
4 Other instances of smoking.
5 Injudicious use of flammable liquids. 6 Use of onen f'Lame s , welders' spark", etc.
7 mJrning rubbish not in incinerator; bonfires.
8 Explosions.
9 ZG・ャヲMセ・。エゥョァ or spontaneous ignition.
10 Incendiarism.
Faulty maintenance or use of: Flectrical
-11 Cooking or cooking-heating appliances. 12 cpace-heating apoliances.
13 Other, including Wiring, lighting, radios, Christmas trees, etc.
Non electrical
-14 Cooking or cooking-heating appliances. 15 cpace-heating appliances.
16 Other, including lamps, chimneys and flues, etc.
17 Faulty design of appliances. 18 Faulty installation of appliances. 19 Other known sources, including mechanical
failures not adequately described by nos. 11 to 113.
Reason for fatal injury
21 Asleep in burning building and did not wal,e in time to attcm:ot escape (including coma induced by drugs, ャゥセャッイL etc.)
Trapped by fire owing to:
22 Fire in anyone of the available exits. 23 Failure to find exit in darkness, smoke, etc. 24 Inability to open exit door.
25 Attempt to warn or save other(s). 26 Attempt to save material objects.
27 Loss of judgment due to fire (e.g., panic). 2R Loss of judgment due to other circumstances
(e.g., liquor, drugs).
29 Being overtaken by rapidly spreading fire, or fumes from the fire.
30 Forest/grass fire. 31 Other known reasons. 32 i,easons unknown.
33 rxplosions
34 Injured as a result of being engaged in fire-fighting or salvage operations -jllring fire. 35 Injured because of panic of otrcrs セイ・ウ・ョエN
3h Injured by falls, falling objects, etc. while escaping from fire.
37 InfBnt, Bnrt no other reason applicable, tut see 'l'able XIV.
38 セGイGョイGャー・、 I.o c aus e l-edr-Ld de n , invalid, injured
「セQGHIイ・ fire, 01' セーョゥャ・N
セL 1
.
I "T""---,ri---.,A-i I.
.
iBセB
CEILING 0 F.; F.
s::: I 0 0 0 : H 0 ッセ s:: Inc. r-l Com.I
r-l 'd :s:0 rl i as as lD'd s::: III ..,.----"...-..- +;) ...-.,. '. +> セ s::: ..':l:: +> Gセ 1 2 5 6 a 11 12 13 14 15 16 a 'rl al C- oE-4 E-4 _セ セ E-4
" ( 1 35
-
-
-
35-
- -
-
-
4 1 4-
1 LjOs
Inc.セ セ
-
17-
-
17 2-
2-: I LI-
-
-
21 H-
-
- - -
-
- -
-
-
-
-
-
-« 2 2 3 3 5 3-
- -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-I Total Inc. 35 19- -
54 i 5-
2-
-
4 11-
1 66 I (1112-
-
- -
-
-
-
-
- ) 12-t-
1-
2-
-
-
-
- -
3 15-
5 20 3- -
3 Com. <ia
-
-
- - - -
- - -
- I 4-
-
21- -
-
25-
-
25 3-
9-
-
12-
1 13 15- -
-
-
!-
-
- - - -
-
-
-
-
-16- -
- -
,-
5-
-
- -
18 23-
2 25 I ! i 4 78 8 1 86 Total Com.-
- -
-
-
21 23 9-
21-Mixed Com.& Inc. 3
-
-
-
I 3- -
-
6- -
6 23 14 I I Unknown I 1
-I
1 2-
1-
-
-
3-
49 53 i I I Total 139 19- - i
58 : 28 4 26 15-
25 98 2 61 219 I Non-residential 35 IClothing fire deaths 100
I
KEY
I
-
TOTAL fire deaths 354Inc.
=
incombustible Ontario 1956-7Com.
=
combu stible1
=
lath and plaster2
=
plasterboard5
=
ceramic tile6
=
other or mixed Inc.11
=
wood12
=
plywood13
=
soft fibreboard14
=
pressed paperboard15
=
hardboardTABLE IX
FIRE DEPART}ffilff ATTENDANCE AT FATAL
BUILDING FIRES (ONTARIO
1956-57)
C A S E S
r
1956
1957
TotalI
Fire attended solely by PD of
I
Ii
the municipality concerned.
73
I
72
145
I
I
Fire attended by another ,
1
1
municipal FD
3
!
17
20
I
Fire attended by both the
I
I
above18
I
I4
22
I
I
I j
I
Fire attended by some other
I I
i
I
fire fighting service, I
e.g. a works fire brigade
8
7
15
F'ire attended by the latter
4
and by municipal F'D (8)
3
1
No FD attended, or not knownI
whether a FD attended
I
21
27
48
126
Total B cases
1 1 28
I
254SIZE OF FATAL BUILDING FIRES
1956 1957
Contents only of room wher-e
the fire started 7 2
Damage confined to room of
I
origin 8 38
Damage confined to story 12 I
,
9I
Damage confined to building 80
I
75Fire extended to other
I
buildings 9
-Unknown or not applicable 10
4
Total 126
I
128 II
.1
TABLE XI STYLE OF GARMENT
Style of garment
1956
1957
Total----,
Male victims: Shirt4
711
Trousers-
5
5
Jacket, sweater3
I
25
1 Coveralls-
I3
3
Pyjamas3
I
25
Dressing gown1
1
2 Other1
I2
2l-
I Unknown13
I11
I
I
, I ; I _ I ....-
h I I,
'Subtotal25
I33
58
i
I
!I
I Female victims: I Blouse-
!I-
-
I
Skirt-
I
2 Ii2
! Jacket, sweater-
I1
1
!
Dress, apron, smock
5
I10
15
IPyjamas, nightgown
3
II2
5
I ! Dressing gown4
I
1
I5
i Other-I
-
I-
I
Unknown 7 7 II14
I
! --Subtotal19
I
i23
42
!セ
i ..- . - --:--.
! I h, Total44
I
56
100
,-
-
---
!FABRIC WORN BY VICTIM OF CLOTHING FIRE
I
Predominant Textile
1955
1956
1957
Total-
セ⦅N Cotton11
9 24 Tャセ Wool3
1
2 6 Rayon-
2-
2 Nylon-
1
23
Plastic-
-
1
1
Silk1
-
-
1
Linen1
-
-
1
Unknown 2231
I
2780
i , i 1 --' ! i Total38
44
I
56
138
Iセ 'IIi _ _ _ _• _ _ _ _ _.--4TABLE XIII
WHAT ACTION DID THE VICTIM TAKE?
1955 1956 1957 3totalyears
Tried to beat or
smother fire 10 3 9 22
Tried to use water or
other extinguishant 1 2 2 5
Tried to remove clothing 1 1
-
2Unable to take effective action because infant,
senile or invalid 8 5 6 19 No effective action (influence of liquor or drugs)
-
1-
1 No effective action (panic) 4 6 6 16No need to act: others
took action innnediately 1 6 10 17
Other reactions 1 1 5
7
Unknown 12 19 18 49
WHY WAS THE PARENT OR OTHER PERSON RE8PONSIBLE NOT ABLE TO SAFEGUARD THE CHILD FIRE VICTIM?
1956 1957
Responsible person busy saving other person(s) or trying to
Responsible person injured (non-fatally) in the same fire
Responsible person injured fatally in the same fire
Someone performed hazardous operation 'in presence of infant
Responsible person's jUdgment impaired (e.g. by liquor or drugs)
Responsible person's judgment impaired (e.g. panic, hysterics, etc.)
Responsible person not there, or not in time, and no further particulars Responsible person not there: had left
infant for
5
minutes or moreResponsible person in same building at time of fire, but was not in time to save infant
Other known reasons Unknown Total 6 10
5
19
2 134
6
5
23
2 2 619
1 248
TABLE XV
GROSS numberセ OF EACH CLASS OF REPORT
Number of cases
Source of report reported on
1955 1956 1957
Fire Section of D.B.R. (A) 25
44
3Office of the Onto Fire Marshal (B) 72 33 66
Police (C) 37 16 34
Fire Chiefs (D) 73 78 116
Newsc1ippings (E) 127 130 135
TABLE XVI
IN HOW MANY CASES DOES THE SURVEY
RELY ON EACH CLASS OF REPORT?
Number of cases Source of report
1955 1956 1957 Total
Class A report available 25
セ
3 72B report but no A available 60 63 149
C report but no A or B 21 8
セセ
53D report but no A, B or C 41 62 18l
E report but no A, B, C or D 9 10 7 26
Vital Statistics report only 15 20 9
44
i
Total 171 170 QXlセ rI 525
COMPLETENESS OF REPORTING (ONTARIO NセYUVMUWI
-
,.-Soupce of Report
A or B C or D E V.S.
Question
---Proportion of cases where answer is "unknown"
Hour of day
1/136
22/1723/17
23/23
Area and number of residents in B
fires in residences
9/123
41/87
6/6
2/2
Source of ignition
61/136
44/172
3/11
7/23
Why was infant not
safeguarded?
0/48
3/31
0/3
0/0
Fabric in clothing fire
6/10
25/60
i9/10
15/17
i
J
Victim's reaction in I
clothing fire
1/10
15/60
I!6/10
15/17
j
Reason for fatal injury
2/126 ..
5/112
iI
1n building fires I
1/7
1/6
I
I
Wall or ceiling lining \
in building fires in
residences
9/123
48/87
6/6
2/2
Example: In the second column, second row, there is the fraction
41/87;
this means that there were87
building fires in residences where a C or a D report was made but no A or B report. Of these87,
the dimensions of the building or the number of residents (or both) were givenas "unknown" or "uncertain" in
41
cases.NATURAL DEATHS 121276
01
FURTHER ANALYSED BELOW TRANSPORT SUICIDE FI RE 4208 1226 628FALLS DROWN ING OTH E R
1582 783 2258
FIGURE I
FIRE COMPARED WITH OTHER CAUSES OF
UJ4
•
l-•
e:(•
•
Cl::•
•
:I: l-e:( UJ 0•
•
• •
•
•
•
•
•
• •
•
•
2 30 32 34 36 38 42 44 46 48 52 56 0'1 0 0 I'-N· V 10 10 0'1 m YEAR m m FIGURE 2TREND OF FIRE DEATH RATE. (CANADA 1929-57)
(BASED ON DOMINION FIRE COMMISSIONER'S STATISTICAL REPORTS)
7 6 5 UJ l-e:( Cl:: 4 :r: l-e:( UJ o 3 UJ 0:: ii: 2 NATIONAL AVERAGE
1
- - - --B.C. ALTA SASK MAN ONT QUE N.B. N.S. P.E.I. NFLD
FIGURE 3
FIRE DEATH RATE BY PROVINCES. (CANADA 1951-6)
698 CASES 5 UJ 1-4 e:t a: J: セ 3 UJ o UJ セR LL J F M A M J J A SON 0 FIGURE 4
FIRE DEATH RATE BY MONTHS. (ONTARIO 1954 -7) VイMMMNNNNLNNNMMッイMMMNMLMMMtMMNMLMMMセM ... 698 CASES 5 UJ セT a: J: I-<2:3 UJ o セR LL OL..-_-..L.._ _"'-_...L.._ _. l . . . - _ - - L ._ _..L...-_... 5 M T
w
T F 5 FIGURE 5 iFIRE DEATH RATE BY DAY OF WEEK. (ONTARIO 1954 -7)
7 6 lJJ
...
«5
0:: :I:...
«4
lJJo
lJJ 0::: 3 -u,2
555 CASES WITHKNOWN TIME OF OCCURRENCE
MID 2
NIGHT
4 6 8 10 NOON 2 4 6 8 10 MID
NIGHT
FIGURE 6
90 80 70 60 40 50 AGE 30 20 10 2 8 10r__---,...--..,...----,.--"""T"""--.,r---...,...--.,..---ro---, (f) :I: セV w c UJ セT LL FIGURE 7
NUMBER OF FIRE DEATHS EACH YEAR IN EACH ONE YEAR AGE GROUP. (ONTARIO 1954 -7)
10r---...,....--.,..---,.---r---r---...,...--..,...-,...--.., w8 I- W セ :I: a::
...
:I:...
6 a::0 LLo.: セ UJ セ[ZZI 0 ' 0 セ。ZZ w4..
C) a:: a:: + LL 0 0 LLCX) 2 10 20 30 40 50 AGE 60 70 80 90 FIGURE 8FIRE DEATH RATE BY AGE OF VICTIM. (ONTARIO 1954-7)
to-z6 LIJ u a:: LIJ Q.4 2 10 20 30 40 50 AGE 60 70 80 90 FIGURE 9
PROPORTION OF DEATHS THAT ARE DUE TO FIRE.
(ONTARIO 1954-7) 5r--....--.,...-,.--..,...----r--...---,r---r-...,.----_ >-0:: <3: 0::4 t-m 0:: ex 00 3 I-Z :::> -2 >-u Z L&.J :::>1 o L&.J 0:: LL. 256 B CASES IN RESIDENCES 50 70 100 150 200 300 500 700 1000
SQUARE FEET PER PERSON
FIGURE 10
WAS THE FIRE VICTIM'S DWELLING OVERCROWDED?