• Aucun résultat trouvé

Design and assessment of diversified low input cropping systems in southwestern France: an application of agroecological principles aiming at decreasing pesticides and N-fertilizers use

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Design and assessment of diversified low input cropping systems in southwestern France: an application of agroecological principles aiming at decreasing pesticides and N-fertilizers use"

Copied!
3
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-02738225

https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02738225

Submitted on 2 Jun 2020

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access

archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-entific research documents, whether they are pub-lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Design and assessment of diversified low input cropping

systems in southwestern France: an application of

agroecological principles aiming at decreasing pesticides

and N-fertilizers use

Noémie Gaudio, Catherine Bonnet, Didier Raffaillac, Lionel Alletto, Laurent

Bedoussac, André Gavaland, Magali Willaume, Philippe Debaeke, Eric Justes

To cite this version:

Noémie Gaudio, Catherine Bonnet, Didier Raffaillac, Lionel Alletto, Laurent Bedoussac, et al.. Design and assessment of diversified low input cropping systems in southwestern France: an application of agroecological principles aiming at decreasing pesticides and N-fertilizers use. 1. European Conference on Crop Diversification 2019, Sep 2019, Budapest, Hungary. 369 p. �hal-02738225�

(2)

European Conference on Crop Diversification

September 18-21 September 2019, Budapest, Hungary

Design and assessment of diversified low input cropping systems in southwestern

France: an application of agroecological principles aiming at decreasing pesticides

and N-fertilizer use

Noémie Gaudio±1, Catherine Bonnet 1, Didier Rafaillac 1, Lionel Alletto 1,2, Laurent Bedoussac 1,3,

André Gavaland 4, Magali Willaume 1, Philippe Debaeke 1, Eric Justes*1,5 1AGIR, Université de Toulouse, INRA, Castanet-Tolosan, France

2Chambre régionale d'agriculture Occitanie, BP 22107, 31321 Castanet-Tolosan, France 3ENSFEA – BP 226872 Route de Narbonne, 31326 Castanet Tolosan Cedex, France 4Unité Expérimentale Auzeville 0802 – Centre Occitanie Toulouse, France

5CIRAD, UMR SYSTEM, Univ. Montpellier, CIHEAM-IAMM, CIRAD, INRA, Montpellier Supagro, 34398 Montpellier, France

* Speaker

± Corresponding author: noemie.gaudio@inra.fr

1 Introduction

Spatial and temporal diversification of cropping systems (CS) is recognized as a relevant alternative to move towards sustainable agriculture (Duru et al. 2015). It could be achieved by several agronomic levers, and more particularly by lengthening and diversifying crop rotations notably by the introduction of legumes, crop mixtures and multi-services cover crops. In this study, we assumed that diversified CS could reduce the use of pesticides and N fertilizers in South-West France context, while maintaining the economic profit and improving the overall performances of CS in terms of ecosystem services. After designing CS varying by their degree of agro-ecologization, our objective was to illustrate their strengths and weaknesses and discuss the possible way to improve their performances for favoring their adoption by farmers in the future.

2 Materials and Methods

The experiment was located at INRA station in southwestern France (43°53’N, 1°51’W) and was carried out on two rotation cycles of three years each (2011-2013, 2014-2016), each crop of the rotation being present each year. The CS were designed as alternatives to the local two-years reference rotation of durum wheat and sunflower (REF) and were designed based on a lengthening of the rotation (3 years instead of 2), a pesticides reduction of 50%, and a variable reduction of N-fertilizer:

- LI: low-input CS aiming at reducing N-fertilizers by 25%, relying on a rotation of sunflower-durum wheat-sorghum,

- VLI_CM: very low-input CS aiming at reducing N-fertilizers by 50%, relying on a rotation of

sunflower-fababean-durum wheat and including cultivar mixtures (CM),

- VLI_IC: VLI composed of three successive intercrops (IC): sunflower+soybean, then triticale+fababean

(2011-2013) or durum wheat+winter pea (2014-2016), and then durum wheat+winter pea (2011-2013) or soft wheat+fababean (2014-2016).

Each CS was tested with and without cover crops (CC) during the fallow period. Thus, six CS were designed covering an agroecological gradient of reduced inputs use and increased diversification.

ANOVAs were run to compare the six CS and the reference at the rotation scale, considering 4 indicators calculated for each rotation at the year scale: i) the mean semi net margin (€.ha-1, =[Grain yield x Crop price

+ Subsidies] - [Operational charges + Mechanical charges + Fuel]) as an integrative indicator, ii) the mean yield (t.ha-1), iii) the gross proceeds (€.ha-1, = Grain yield x Crop price, which is for intercrops the price of

the mixture) and iv) the N-fertilizer amount (kg N.ha-1).

3 Results

The CS (reflecting plant diversification and input effects) and the rotation cycle (reflecting mainly a climate effect) had a significant (p < 0.05) impact on semi net margin (Figure 1A). The effect of the rotation cycle was predominant, and involved a global decrease of semi net margin during the second rotation cycle, highlighting the importance to consider the environment through modelling in order to assess its impacts.

(3)

European Conference on Crop Diversification

September 18-21 September 2019, Budapest, Hungary

Semi net margin decreased following the diversification gradient, with a lower semi net margin for VLI_IC and intermediate values for VLI_CM, partly because no additional costs are linked to grading of grains. Moreover, for a given CS, the presence of CC had globally no significant impact on semi net margin.

Figure 1. Semi net margin (A), yield (B), gross proceeds (C) and fertilizer amount (D) of seven cropping systems differing by their level of diversification: REF (standard local system), LI (low input system), LI_CC (LI with cover crops CC), VLI_CM (very low input system with cultivar mixtures), VLI_CM_CC (VLI_CM with CC), VLI_IC (VLI with intercrops) and VLI_IC_CC (VLI_IC with CC). White dots: rotation 2011-2013, Black dots: rotation 2014-2016.

4 Discussion and Conclusions

When focusing on agro-economic indicators, diversification and the related reduced inputs use were not profitable. Despite the input cost reduction in VLI systems, lower yields (Figure 1B) and gross proceeds (Fig.1C) penalized these diversified CS. In order to study such innovative CS and highlight their potential benefits, new indicators should be taken into account, considering an economic value of the ecosystem services provided by diversification. For example, the strong decrease of N-fertilizer amount in VLI systems (Fig.1D) suggests that they could have a reduced environmental impact compared to LI systems or the REF considering both greenhouse gases emissions and water pollution, as ever demonstrated (Plaza-Bonilla et al. 2018). For this reason, agroecological CS able to deliver on reduce N-fertilizer inputs would require reward. Additionally, soil fertility and biodiversity could also be valuable indicators to highlight the ecosystem services brought by these diversified CS and in particular, the benefits of multi-services CC. In addition, these results suggest that the choice of the crop species and cultivars is crucial. When the CS is less productive, partly because of the decrease in chemical inputs use, choosing species that are characterized by a high price could be relevant, e.g. lentil dedicated to human consumption vs fababean. Finally, intercrops grain products were sold as a mixture while the improvement of agricultural machinery, able to separate grains, could increase their selling price.

References

Duru M, Therond O, Martin G, Martin-Clouaire R, Magne MA, Justes E, Journet EP, Aubertot JN, Savary S, Bergez JE, Sarthou JP (2015). How to implement biodiversity-based agriculture to enhance ecosystem services: a review. Agron Sustain Dev 35, 1259–1281.

Plaza-Bonilla D, Nogue-Serra I, Raffaillac D, Cantero-Martinez C, Justes E (2018). Carbon footprint of cropping systems with grain legumes and cover crops: A case-study in SW France. Agric Syst 167, 92–102.

Figure

Figure 1. Semi net margin (A), yield (B), gross proceeds (C) and fertilizer amount (D) of seven cropping systems differing by  their level of diversification: REF (standard local system), LI (low input system), LI_CC (LI with cover crops CC), VLI_CM  (very

Références

Documents relatifs

Interannual changes in herbaceous standing mass and production Observed separately or all together, herbaceous yields in range- lands, fallowed and cropped fields of one or two

Bioavailability of Cs is controlled not only by the plant uptake and its associated kinetics, but also by the physico-chemical properties of the soil which determine the strength

Our current strategy is to introduce in banana agrosystems nematode- resistant cover plants as associated crops, thus achieving multispecific cropping systems that will be

banana plantations is currently based on the sanitation of the contaminated banana fields, using chemical destruction of existing banana plants and. replanting with

Si les prix des produits phytosanitaires testent stables, dans les trois ans à venir, 80% des agriculteurs envisagent un maintien de leur consommation actuelle; en

In order to increase farm manure production in quantity and quality, and to renew soil fertility in an agroecological way, researchers from dP Asap (Cirad, Cirdes),..

Agroecology is essentially based on the use of biodiversity and ecosystem services in agricultural production, and thus represents a true rupture from the way agriculture has

Shifting from conventional to agroecological based cropping systems faces differerent issues, mostly methodological and technical (Steiner, 1985, Malézieux et al.,