• Aucun résultat trouvé

Flawed health care system, strong family physicians

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Flawed health care system, strong family physicians"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Vol 64: MAY | MAI 2018 |Canadian Family Physician | Le Médecin de famille canadien

397

Cet article se trouve aussi en français à la page 000.

COLLEGE

}

COLLÈGE P R E S I D E N T ' S M E S S A G E

Flawed health care system, strong family physicians

Guillaume Charbonneau MD CCMF FCMF

I

-

- n February 2018, the Canadian Institute for Health Information published the results of the Commonwealth Fund’s international survey on the views and experiences of seniors from 11 developed countries regarding their own health care systems.1 The survey revealed some very interesting data.

First, it’s amusing to note that Canadian seniors have more chronic diseases and take more medication but perceive themselves as healthier.

A pretty odd result. We could certainly generate sev- eral hypotheses to explain this contradiction. Some poli- ticians might tell us that Canada is such a great country to live in that it increases our positive perceptions of our own health. As physicians, we might say that we treat many asymptomatic chronic diseases and that, conse- quently, people perceive themselves as healthier than the sum of their medications and diseases. Strange indeed.

The most worrying outcome is that our seniors are less satisfed with the general quality of their health care (67% compared with a 76% average).1 On the other hand, the most reassuring revelation was that their level of satisfaction with their primary care providers was higher than the international average.

Compared with seniors from other countries, a higher percentage of Canadian seniors thought their regular doctors

• were more knowledgeable about important informa tion related to their health,

• dedicated suffcient time to them,

• explained issues in a way that was easy to understand,

• encouraged them to ask questions,

• sufficiently involved them in decisions concerning their treatments and health,

• helped them coordinate their care with other special ists and hospitals,

• discussed healthy choices (nutrition, exercise, alcohol, etc) with them, and

• had reviewed their medications during the past 12 months.1

More Canadian seniors had an end-of-life plan.1 They were more likely to have discussed it with their loved ones and prepared documentation indicating power of attorney in case of incapacity.

However, the area in which we did less well was access.

Fewer Canadian seniors were able to book an appoint- ment in less than 48 hours (41% vs 56%) and at night or on weekends (38% vs 51%), and they were more likely to use emergency services for problems that could have been treated by their primary care providers (31% vs 28%).1

This presents a real challenge for us. How can we improve access to primary care in Canada? A 21st- century family physician cannot be available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. The key is teamwork, with help from other health care professionals. Canadian provinces must continue to invest in the Patient’s Medical Home model and family physicians must assume strong leadership roles within these organizations to improve access.

We must be creative to fnd ways to improve access.

In my group, we have a physician available for walk-in appointments every day and we also introduced advanced access, but it was not enough to respond to demands over the short term. Therefore, we asked every physician to add 2 walk-in windows at the end of their work day, open to all patients within the group. These appointments could only be made the same morning. This greatly improved access for our patients over the short term.

At a time when daily pressure on family physicians to see more patients more quickly is immense, it is good to see that our work on the ground is appreciated. We have issues with access that must be solved, but we are performing well in how our patients experience primary care. We tend to be hard on ourselves, but this survey reminds us of the old saying in French: Quand on se regarde, on se désole, quand on se compare, on se console (When we look at ourselves, we feel bad; when we com- pare ourselves, we console ourselves).

I believe that these results demonstrate how invalu- able our contribution to the Canadian health care sys- tem really is. Every day we hear the media talk about the failures of our health care system, but we never hear them talk enough about the extraordinary work done by our family physicians.

Reference

1. Canadian Institute for Health Information. How Canada compares. Results from the Commonwealth Fund’s 2017 international health policy survey of seniors—accessible report. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Institute for Health Information; 2018. Available from:

www.cihi.ca/sites/default/fles/document/cmwf-2017-text-alternative-report-en- web.pdf. Accessed 2018 Apr 9.

Cet article se trouve aussi en français à la page 398.

Références

Documents relatifs

At a system level, we can rethink health programs to not only better coordinate high-user care, but help family physicians to address the SDOHs of high users.. Gawande details

The ability of the health care and pharmaceutical indus- try (HPI) to infuence the decision making of family phy- sicians through its relationship with the CFPC makes it crucial

We stand in a position of having to make decisions which are right, proper, decent decisions that may be hard for the immediate future but decisions that must safeguard

Finally, we consider the high level of interest in men- tal health issues to be an additional strength; this bodes  well  for  future  implementation  of 

Family  physicians  should  have  clear  ideas  about  what  they  need  to  know  about  team  functioning  before  they  assume  formal  (ie,  paid)  roles 

Many physicians not working in youth clinics reported seeing no adolescents with these mental health problems during the last year (between 8% and 18% of CLSC

The next phase in our research, which we have just started, is to conduct focus groups with family physi- cians aimed at exploring all of the questions that

344 Canadian Family Physician • Le Médecin de famille canadien d VOL 5: MARCH • MARS 2005.. Refl