• Aucun résultat trouvé

viii Contents

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "viii Contents"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Contents

English summary v

Nederlandse samenvatting vi

Resum ´e en francais vii

List of abbreviations x

IUPAC code for ambiguous nucleotides x

List of organisms names xi

Foreword xii

1 The Hox gene family 1

1.1 Hox genes: a hundred years’ story . . . 1

1.1.1 From fruitfly mutants to the bithorax complex . . . 1

1.1.2 Organisation in gene clusters and spatial colinearity . . . 3

1.1.3 1980s: The homeobox gene family . . . 4

1.1.4 Discovery of Hox genes in vertebrates . . . 4

1.1.5 1990s: Clustering and colinearity are a common rule . . . 5

1.1.6 2000s: Some exceptions to the cluster rule . . . 6

1.2 The homeobox superfamily of transcription factors . . . 8

1.2.1 Hox gene definition . . . 8

1.2.2 Homeodomain proteins are transcription factors . . . 8

1.2.3 Classification of homeobox genes . . . 10

1.3 The multiple roles of Hox proteins . . . 11

1.3.1 Roles during development . . . 11

1.3.2 Roles in adults . . . 13

1.3.3 Roles in cancers . . . 13

2 Evolution of Hox genes and clusters 15 2.1 The metazoan phylogeny . . . 15

2.2 Hox genes throughout the animal kingdom . . . 19

2.2.1 Classification in homology groups . . . 19

2.2.2 Hox genes and clusters in bilaterians . . . 20

2.2.3 Homeobox genes in non-bilaterian metazoans . . . 31

2.3 Models for the origin and evolution of the Hox genes . . . 33

2.3.1 Reconstructing the Hox content of the bilaterian ancestor . . . 33

2.3.2 The ProtoHox in the Cnidaria-Bilateria ancestor . . . 34

2.4 Methods to classify Hox sequences in homology groups . . . 35

2.4.1 Methods to produce Hox sequences: implications for further studies . . . 35

2.4.2 Phylogenetic tree reconstruction . . . 36

2.4.3 Sequence similarity and Hox ’signatures’ . . . 38

3 Transcriptional regulation by Hox proteins 41 3.1 Hox transcription factors and their cis-regulatory elements . . . 41

3.1.1 Hox target genes . . . 41

3.1.2 Hox cofactors . . . 44

3.2 Detecting cis-regulatory elements with pattern matching . . . 45

3.2.1 Building and describing a motif . . . 45

3.2.2 Pattern matching: scanning a sequence with a motif . . . 48

3.3 Computational approaches applied to search for Hox target genes . . . 50

4 Objectives of the thesis 53

viii

(2)

5 Classification of Hox proteins with HoxPred 55

5.1 HoxPred: a motif-based approach to classify Hox sequences . . . 55

5.2 HoxPred in action: annotation of teleost Hox sequences . . . 68

5.3 Insights into the evolution of Hox and ParaHox genes in metazoans . . . 73

5.3.1 Introduction . . . 73

5.3.2 Methods . . . 75

5.3.3 Results . . . 76

5.3.4 Discussion . . . 89

6 Detection of cis-regulatory elements with RSAT 93 6.1 RSAT: a suite of tools for regulatory sequence analysis . . . 93

6.2 matrix-scan: a comprehensive matrix-based pattern matching program . . . 103

6.3 A guide to detect cis-regulatory elements and modules with RSAT . . . 122

6.4 Application of cis-regulatory element detection to the HoxB1 study case . . . 135

6.4.1 PSSM construction . . . 135

6.4.2 PSSM quality . . . 136

6.4.3 Detecting the annotated PH and PM binding sites . . . 138

6.4.4 Random controls . . . 147

6.4.5 PH and PM site predictions upstream theMeis1gene . . . 148

6.4.6 Conclusions . . . 148

7 General discussion and Perspectives 151 7.1 Detection of cis-regulatory elements with pattern matching . . . 151

7.1.1 Analysis of the HoxB1 target genes . . . 151

7.1.2 Could this approach be used at the scale of a vertebrate genome ? . . . 152

7.1.3 Could this approach be extended to other Hox transcription factors ? . . . 153

7.2 Classification of Hox sequences with HoxPred . . . 154

7.2.1 Considerations for working with Hox sequences . . . 154

7.2.2 HoxPred: a program to classify Hox sequences . . . 155

7.2.3 Evolution of Hox genes . . . 156

7.2.4 Evolution of Hox clusters: hypothetical organisation of the Urbilateria Hox cluster . . . . 158

7.2.5 Xenoturbellida and Acoelomorpha: towards the origins of bilaterians ? . . . 160

References 164

Curriculum vitae 174

ix

Références

Documents relatifs

These Pbx interacting partners, corresponding to homeodomain (Hox, Meis/Prep, Pdx1) and non- homeodomain (FoxC1, HPIP, ZFPIP, Smad, NR, MyoD) proteins, display more temporally

L’observation la plus convaincante de ce point de vue est que les séquences des fragments d’ADN immunoprécipités par cha- cune des protéines reflètent les diffé-

D’autres sont plus nou- veaux, voire surprenants : (1) les lophophoriens se rapprochent des Tro- chozoa dans un ensemble « Lophotro- chozoa » ; (2) les plathelminthes, sou-

De plus, les résidus compo- sant le bras amino-terminal de l’homéodomaine des protéines HOX, qui, eux, interagissent avec la base 6, jouent manifestement un rôle in vivo dans

ensemble dans une classe de gènes retrouvés chez des vertébrés puis chez tous les eucaryotes [2].. Ils codent tous pour un motif appelé horneobox (d'où gène

Représentation schématique de l'expression de certains des gènes des complexes HOX- 1 et HOX-2 dans le cerveau postérieur à dif­ férents stades du développement

To address this question, we focused our attention on the LexA regulator, whose peptidic sequence is highly conserved across bacteria, and for which distinct DNA-binding motifs

Dans ce contexte, l’oxyde de graphène réduit (rGO) est un très bon candidat comme support pour ce type de matériau catalytique en raison de sa stabilité vis-à-vis