• Aucun résultat trouvé

Réussite et échec en langues de spécialité

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Réussite et échec en langues de spécialité"

Copied!
5
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

36

th

Annual APLIUT

1

conference

“Success and Failure in Languages for Specific Purposes”

IUT Nantes, Nantes University 22, 23 & 24 May 2014

Call for Papers

What does the term “success” mean in the field of LSP (Languages for Specific Purposes)? What do we mean by “failure”? If the concepts of success and failure seem to be interdependent, are they mutually exclusive? Is failure a necessary step on the route to success? And in the pursuit of excellence, which has become one of the major stakes in higher education since the Bologna Process (1999 & 2003) and the Lisbon Strategy (2000), is failure for some necessary for the success of others? Does this last statement imply the creation of an elite with “good”, “less good” and “bad”

institutions, teachers and students (Levy 2000).

At a time when no aspect of higher education seems exempt from assessment (Romainville, Goasdoué & Vantourout 2012), has the time come to reaffirm that success and failure are relative, even arbitrary concepts? How should we define them? How should we measure them? How should we take them into account to improve teaching programmes in higher education?

The 36th APLIUT conference will provide the opportunity for teachers and researchers to explore the question of success and failure in teaching, learning and assessment the field of LSP. Perhaps it is time to question the meaning of these terms in language learning now that the levels defined by the CEFRL2 nearly 15 years ago seem to be the unique reference source for “objectively”

measuring the success or the failure of a learner or of a programme. This process implies not only a re-examination of the CEFRL, of language certifications and of assessment in general - whether it be of students, teachers, researchers or universities themselves.

Among the questions under examination are success and failure in higher education (Romainville &

Michaut 2012) in relation to language teaching, the relationship between success & failure in language learning and motivation (Williams 1997, Dörnyei 2012), self-efficacy (Bandura 2003), learning strategies of successful students (Amadieu 2012), learner autonomy (Rivens 2012) or, marking, correction & assessment (Tardieu 2009).

This conference will allow us to explore the current limits of learning and teaching in LSP and how we can move beyond these limits. This may include the use of the various resources which characterise many of the learning situations in higher education, such as use of ICT tools, self- access language centres, CLIL3, international exchange programmes, etc., which may all contribute to successful language learning but which may also lead to or include failures.

The aim of this conference will therefore be to examine, as comprehensively as possible, the concepts of success and failure in LSP by approaching the question from different angles such as those offered by pure research, by examples of classroom practice and by action-research projects which are commonly a feature of language teaching research.

Ø Submissions should fall into one of the following five areas:

1 – The meaning of the terms “success” and “failure” in LSP: What do these terms mean?

What are the perceptions and expectations of these terms of students, teachers, institutions and

1 APLIUT: Association of Language Teachers in Technical University Institutes (www.apliut.com)

2 CEFRL: Common European Framework for Reference in Languages.

3 CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning.

(2)

2 those outside higher education? What are the consequences of success and failure in languages on students, teachers, institutions and those outside higher education? What distinctions may be drawn between success and failure? How should teachers and students deal with errors? Etc.

2 – Measurement tools: What tools should be used for measuring success or failure in LSP?

Should the focus be on quality or quantity? What importance should be given to the CEFRL?

What importance should be given to language certification? How important is giving grades?

What guidelines exist for assessing language teaching programmes? Which are the most appropriate assessment methods for given aims and outcomes? What are the consequences of assessment on success or failure? Etc.

3 – Contributing factors to success and failure in higher education: What are the external factors which contribute to success or failure in languages in higher education? What are the links between motivation and success or failure in languages? What is the relationship between feelings of self-efficacy and motivation in languages? Between learning strategies and success and failure?

4 – Complementary resources for teaching and learning languages: What are the advantages and the limitations of innovative complementary resources which often characterise language teaching in higher education, such as ICT tools, self-access language centres, CLIL and international exchange programmes? Etc.

5 – Stakeholders and their relationship to success and failure in languages: What are the perceptions and representations of success and failure in languages of the various stakeholders (students, teachers, researchers, Institutions, those outside higher education)? How does the assessment of teaching impact on teaching programmes? How should teachers be trained to enable LSP students to succeed? How can LSP teaching programmes best ensure graduate employability? Etc.

Ø Proposals must be one of the two following formats:

Presentations of new and original research / review of existing research: research papers presenting current theories or models relating success and failure in languages, epistemological issues concerning success and failure in higher education, new and original research projects concerning success and failure in language teaching and learning and in disciplines such as linguistics, neurolinguistics, CALL, ergonomics, etc.

Presentations of classroom practice: papers presenting innovative teaching programmes with LSP students in relation to the theme of success or failure of the various stakeholders (students, teachers, researchers, Institutions, those outside higher education).

Ø Papers may given in English or in French.

Proposals should be sent by email with the following form completed and attached before 15 March 2014

to Linda TERRIER : linda.terrier@univ-tlse2.fr

Acceptance/rejection notices will be sent to authors via email by 10 avril 2014

Ø Authors may submit articles resulting from papers given for publication in the journal

Recherche et pratiques pédagogiques en langues de spécialité (Vol. XXXIV, n° 2, June 2015).

Scientific Committee for the 36th annual APLIUT conference:

Nicolas BAILLERES – senior lecturer, IUT ‘A’ Toulouse, Université Toulouse 3

(3)

Dan FROST – senior lecturer, Université de Savoie

Noëlla GAIGEOT (APLIUT president) – lecturer, Université du Mans Nathalie HASCOËT – senior lecturer, Université d’Avignon

Marie-Annick MATTIOLI – senior lecturer, IUT Paris-Descartes, Université Paris Descartes Julie MORERE – senior lecturer, IUT Nantes, Université de Nantes

Linda TERRIER (President of the scientific committee) – senior lecturer, Université Toulouse 2-Le Mirail

Jean-Luc WOLF – lecturer, IUT Schiltigheim-Louis Pasteur, Université de Strabourg

Following pages (pages 4 & 5): Form to be completed and returned for proposals.

(4)

4

36

th

Annual APLIUT conference

“Success and Failure in Languages for Specific Purposes”

IUT Nantes, Nantes University 22, 23 & 24 May 2014

Paper Proposal

Proposals should be sent by email with the following form completed and attached before the 23 February 2014

to Linda TERRIER : linda.terrier@univ-tlse2.fr

AUTHOR INFORMATION

Name: ...

Institution: ...

Address: ...

...

Telephone (professional): ...

Telephone (mobile): ...

Email: ...

Other useful information: ...

Biography of the author(s) (approx. 50 words per author)

The proposed paper is in the following area:

1 - The meaning of the terms “success” and “failure” in LSP 2 - Measurement tools

3 - Contributing factors to success and failure in higher education 4 - Complementary resources for teaching and learning languages

5 - Stakeholders and their relationship to success and failure in languages

(5)

Format of the proposed paper :

Presentations of new and original research / review of existing research Presentations of classroom practice

Required equipement:

P C & videoprojector Internet connection Loudspeakers

Other (Please specify): ……….

Title of paper: ...

...

Abstract in English (150 to 200 words):

Abstract in French:

Références

Documents relatifs

Organizational analysis of the coopetition within an inter-organization community of practice by the dynamics of participation/reification (Wenger, 1998) by exchanges between

I use “teaching” here in a broad sense, as I am not only interested in the impact of constructivism on the practice of teaching, but also in its impact on the role of the teacher,

One of the new groups targeted teacher education and professional development (TWG18), another focused on teacher knowledge, beliefs and identity (TWG20), and TWG19

Post made a start with his method of generalization: he in- troduced the truth-table method for propositional logic (isolated from Prin- cipia) and proved that this logic is

Within the context of TWG15, the term assessment, and the role of technology within assessment, incor- porates two perspectives: the assessment of teachers’ individual knowledge

Under the technology of independent learning of students, we mean a goal-directed and personally-oriented process of subject-subject interaction between the teacher and the

Yin (Eds), Proceedings of the 23rd International seminar on Research in Music

The data of this study highlights that living separately from the rest of family, higher maternal age, later initiation of breastfeeding, no possibility of breast- feeding at