A NNALES DE L ’I. H. P., SECTION A
M. D. M ISSAROV
Random fields on the adele ring and Wilson’s renormalization group
Annales de l’I. H. P., section A, tome 50, n
o3 (1989), p. 357-367
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=AIHPA_1989__50_3_357_0>
© Gauthier-Villars, 1989, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Annales de l’I. H. P., section A » implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.
org/conditions). Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
357
Random fields
onthe adele ring and Wilson’s
renormalization group
M. D.
MISSAROV (1) (2)
Centre de Physique Theorique, ( 3) C. N. R. S., Luminy, Case 907,
13288 Marseille Cedex 09
Vol. 49, n° 3, 1989, Physique theorique
ABSTRACT. 2014 We
give
the definitions ofgeneralized
random field onthe adele
ring, corresponding
renormalization group and discuss the discre- tizationprocedure.
Thegaussian
translation andscaling
invariant randomfields are described.
RESUME. 2014 Nous definissons les
champs
aleatoires sur Ie corps desadeles,
Ie groupe de renormalisationcorrespondant
et nous discutons laprocedure
de discretisation. Nous decrivons leschamps gaussiens
invari-ants par translation et par dilatation.
( 1) This work was supported in part by the French Government.
(2) Permanent address: Department of Applied Mathematics, Kazan State University, Kazan, U. S. S. R.
( 3) Laboratoire Propre LP. 7061, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Physique theorique - 0246-0211
1. INTRODUCTION
Recently
there a number of papers which discuss apossible
use of p- adic numbers and adeles instring theory,
statisticalphysics,
quantum mechanics(see [l]-[t3])
have beenpublished.
We have shown
previously (see [1], [2])
that the discretization of somescalar
p-adic
field models are a models ofDyson’s
type, and we have also describednon-gaussian
branch of fixedpoints
ofp-adic
renormalization group. As in the real case(see [14]),
the hamiltonian ofnon-gaussian
fixedpoint
inp-adic
case is ananalytic
renormalization ofprojection
ofcp4-
hamiltonian on the unit ball. Therefore it is natural to
generalize
thistheory
on the adelic case. In theparagraph
2 wegive
the definition of Wilson’s renormalization group forgeneralized
random fields on the adele group and describe thegaussian
branch of translation andscaling (self- similar)
invariant random fields. In theparagraph
3 the discretizationprocedure
is discussed. As a result we have a random fields on the set of rational numbers and definition of renormalization group in this case. This set is "non-distributivering"
with unusual addition andmultiplication.
2. GENERALIZED RANDOM FIELDS ON THE ADELE GROUP AND WILS ON’S RENORMALIZATION GROUP
Let
Q
be the field of rationalnumbers,
R a realcompletion
ofQ, Qp
ap-adic completion
ofQ, where p
is aprime number, Zp
a ball ofp-adic
innteegers
’and
Up
amultiplicative
group of unitswhere ~ I
is ap-adic
norm. The restricted directproduct
of additive groupsR +, p = 2, 3, 5,
... with respect to/?=2, 3, 5,
... is called the adele group ofQ
and is denotedby
A. The restricted directproduct
ofmultiplicative
groupsR, Qp, p
=2, 3, 5,
... withrespect
tothe units
Up, p = 2, 3, 5,
... is called the idele group ofQ
and is denotedby
A*. In otherwords,
A is a set of all sequences of the formwhere
ap E Qp, /?=2, 3,
... andap E Zp
for almostally?.
The setof all such sequences forms a
ring
undercomponentwise
addition andmultiplication.
The additive group of this group is called the group ofAnnales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Physique théorique
adeles. The elements of the group of ideles are sequences
where
~0, ~eQp, ~~0, p = 2, 3,
... foralmost all p. A * is a set of adeles that have an inverse.
A sequence of adeles
~==(~,
...,... )
converges to the adele..., ap,
... )
if it converges to acomponentwise
and if there isan N such that for
are p-adic integers.
The group of adeles
A, being locally
compact, has an invariant measure which we denoteby
da. This measure will be normalizedby
thefollowing
condition
where the
integral
is taken over the compact set Q of adeles..., ap,
... )
for whichThere is a well known Schwartz space of functions on the field of real numbers.
There is a space of test functions on
Qp satisfying
thefollowing
two
requirements:
1. The
function f(ap)
isfinite,
i. e.supp f is
acompact
set.2. There exists n
(depending on f)
such that ifWe say that a sequence of
functions f (ap)
tends to zero if:1. The
functions fi(ap)
are zero outside some fixed compact set(indepen-
dent on
i).
2. There exists a
positive integer
N such that all thefunctions f (aP) satisfy
the condition3. The sequence tends to zero
uniformly
in ap, as i tends toinfinity.
We denote this spase of functions as
S (Qp).
Now we consider functionsf(a)
on the adele group that arerepresentable
in the form of an infiniteproduct
where
f~
E S(R), fp
E S(Qp), p
=2, 3,
..., and for all p, except a finitenumber, fp (ap) =1, when ap
is ap-adic integer,
andfp (ap) = 0 otherwise.
Thus,
theproduct (2 . 4)
converges, and it is easy to see thatf(a)
is acontinuous function on A. The functions of the form
(2.4)
are calledelementary
functions on A. The spaceS (A)
of all functionsf(a)
on Athat are
representable
as finite linear combinations ofelementary
functionsis called Schwartz-Bruhat space
(see [15]). Finally,
let sometopology
onS
(A)
begiven.
Forexample, ~ (a)
-+0, ~ -~
oo, if there exists such represen- tationsm does not
depend
on n, and such Nthat fnk,
p are a characteristic function of the ballZ p
forallp>N,
all n andLet a
generalized
random fieldP( cp)
in the A begiven,
i. e. asystem
ofprobability
distributionsP{ ( cp, f i ),
..., with the usual conditions of accordance(see [16]). Here/i=/i(a), ...~=~(~)
arearbitrary
testfunctions in Schwartz-Bruhat space.
We introduce two groups of continuous transformations on random fields. The group of shift transformations
T2014 {~,
consistsof
where
( tb
cp(a), /(~)) = (q> (a), f(a
+b))
andFixing
the real number a, 1(x2,
we define thescaling operator
where
is a usual absolut value on
R,
and
P( I À 11-«(1./2)
is ageneralized
random field withprobability
distribu-tions
A
generalized
random field is translation andscaling
invariant ifAnnales de l’Institut Henri Poincare - Physique theorique
If cp is a translation and
scaling
invariant random field onA,
then itsbinary
correlation function mustsatisfy
thefollowing
conditionfor all a, b E
A,
~eA*. It is natural to propose thefollowing possible
solution of
(2.12):
But
unfortunately
thefunction a I
is well definedonly
on the idelegroup. Therefore we introduce the
following family
of distributions onS (A):
where y is a real
number,
y 5~-1,
andthe
product
is taken over allprime
p.Note,
that theproduct diverges:
where
Ç(s)
is the Riemann Zeta-function.Moreover,
I = is
equal
to zero for everyNewertheless, g03B3
is well defined as a distribution onS (A).
Ifis an
elementary function,
thenwhere
da~
is the theLebesgue
measure on R. For all p,except
a finite numberand then all the factors in the
product (2.18)
from acertain p
onwardare
equal
to 1. To the whole spaceS (A)
theintegral (2.18)
is extendedby linearity.
Now we can define the
gaussian
random field withbinary
correlation functionFor
elementary
functionsthe
integral (2. 20)
must be understood in thefollowing
sense:For all p with a finite
exception
Thus,
theproduct ( 2 . 21 )
converges.It is easy to
verify
that this correlation functionreally
determines thegaussian
translation andscaling
invariant random field(note,
that the setof
elementary
functions is invariant under the shift andscaling
transforma-tions).
Now we define the Wilson’s renormalization group transformation for the random fields in momentum space
representation. Note,
that the Schwartz-Bruhat space is invariant under Fourier transformation: ifLet a
generalized
random field in the domainbe
given,
i. e. a system ofprobability
distributionsP{ (a,
...,(a,
with the usual conditions of accordance.
Here f (k)
E S(A), supp fi
cQ,
!=1,2,...,~.
If is a
generalized
random field in the domain~n,
we denote
by Sa, Â.
theoperator
of restriction on the domainQ,
The
scaling operator
in momentum spacerepresentation
is defined asAnnales de l’Institut Henri Poincare - Physique ’ théorique ’
where
(o,-1,/)
=(o C~ ’ k)~ .f (k)) _ ~ ~ ~ I «(J (~ /(?. ~)).
The Wilson’s renormalization transformation
R,
is acomposi-
tion of the transformations
Rl
andSa,
1:It is easy to see, that
A
generalized
random field isscaling
invariant inQ,
ifo .
We introduce the Fourier transform of the translation operator as
A random field is called translation invariant if
P(6)=P(to6)
for anyaEA.
A
generalized
random field with zero mean andbinary
correlation functionis translation and
scaling
invariant in Q random field. Hereis a characteristic function of the
Q,
and forelementary
functionsis a characteristic function of the Xp is a characteristic function of the
The
family
ofbinary
correlationfunctions,
which isgiven by (2.31),
describes the
gaussian
brunch of fixedpoints
of the Wilson’s renormaliza- tion group. The veryinteresting,
butquite
morecomplicated
case of adelicnongaussian
branch which bifurcates from thegaussian
one is underpresent
investigation.
3. DISCRETIZATION OF THE RANDOM FIELDS ON THE ADELE GROUP
As is known
(see [14]),
the field of rational numbersQ
can beisomorphi- cally
embedded in thering
of adeles A. With every rational number r is associated the sequence(r, r,
... , r,... ) E A. ( 3 .1)
This sequences are
adeles,
which are calledprincipal
adeles.Moreover,
thering Q
ofprincipal
adeles is discrete in A. The set Q of adeles..., ap,
...)
for whichp = 2, 3,
... is a fundamental domain of the additive group of A relative to thesubgroup
of
principal
adelesQ.
But this natural lattice in A is not
adequate
to the discretizationprocedure
becauseQ
is not invariant under themultiplication by
the idele[with only
trivialexception ~=(1, 1,
...,1, ... )].
Therefore weintroduce other lattice as follows. Let us consider the set of adeles
D={~=(~,
...,~...}. (3.2)
Here Z is a
ring
of rationalinteger
numbers and the function{ap} p
isdefined as follows: if
then
Note,
that if a~D and then a E A *.Every
adele has a formwhere n, np,
mpEZ, p = 2, 3,
... The set of all such adeles forms a "non-distributivering"
under the additionand
multiplication
Note,
that the addition 0153 does not coinside with the usual addition on A.There is one-to-one
correspondence
between the set D and the set of rational numbersQ.
To everyr E Q corresponds
the sequenceAnnales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Physique theorique
where
[ ]
is a usualinteger part
inQ.
On the otherhand,
to every adele a E Dcorresponds
the rational numberwhere
Since all the
numbers ap beginning
withsufficiently large
p areequal
to1, ( 3 . 9)
is well defined. Fora~D aq~Zp,
ifp = 2, 3, ... , 2, 3,
... andSo, d (d -1 (a)) = a
and d isan
isomorphism
between the"ring"
D and the"ring" Q
of rational numbers with non-usual addition andmultiplication
where
~,={r}~=2, 3,
...Let a2, ..., ap,
...}
be anarbitrary
adèle. Then a can berepresented
in the formwhere
r (a) _ ([a~], ~ a2 } 2, ..., {~}~ ...), b=a-r(a).
We see that A isa union of
pairwise disjoint
setsr+Q,
where r ranges over the D.Let cp be a
generalized
random field on A(in
coordinate space represen-tation).
The discretization of cp is defined as a randomfield ç
on D suchthat
where is a characteristic function of the set r+Q.
The action of shift
operation ts on ç
is defined asThe renormalization group transformation is defined as
where
Here we use that ÀQ= s goes over
DÀ.
Note also that if03BB~ ~ 0,
then The definition(3 .17)
is ageneralization
of a block-spin
transformation on the lattice ofinteger
numbers in real case or onthe hierarchical lattice in
p-adic
case.If a
generalized
random field cp is a translation andscaling invariant,
then its discretization is invariant relative to actions tS, s~D and
r03B103BB,
Let us consider the
gaussian
translation andscaling
invariant random field cp, which isgiven by
the correlation function~-2~-~).
Thebinary
correlation function of its
discretization ç
isequal
towhere
Op=Zp. r = (r ~, r2,
... , r p,... ),
s2, ..., sp,
... ).
It is easy to see that the functioncoinsides with the
binary
correlation function of thegaussian
translation andscaling
invariant(self-similar)
random process on the lattice of rationalinteger
numbers( see [16]),
and the functioncoinsides with the
binary
correlation function of thegaussian
translation andscaling
invariant random field on the hierarchical lattice ofp-adic purely
fraction numbers(see [1], [2], [18]-[21]).
for suffi-ciently large p,
theproduct ( 3 . 18)
converges.So,
exists as a usual function.
Note,
thatrED,
sED and r-s must be understood 0 in the sense ’ of the "non-distributive"ring
D.Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Physique ’ theorique ’
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work was done at the Centre de
Physique Theorique,
C.N. R. S.-Luminy,
Marseille. The author would like to thank Prof. J. Bellisard for useful discussions.REFERENCES
[1] E. Y. LERNER and M. D. MISSAROV, The Scalar Models of p-Adic Quantum Field Theory and Hierarchical Model of Dyson, submitted to Teor. Mat. Fiz.
[2] E. Y. LERNER and M. D. MISSAROV, P-Adic Feynman and String Amplitudes, preprint CPT-88/P 2126, C.N.R.S.-Luminy.
[3] I. V. VOLOVICH, Number Theory as the Ultimate Physical Theory, preprint C.E.R.N.-
TH. 4781/87.
[4] I. V. VOLOVICH, Teor. Mat. Fiz., Vol. 71, 1987, p. 337; Classical and Quantum Gravity,
Vol. 4, 1987, p. L83.
[5] B. GROSSMAN, Phys. Lett. B, Vol. 197, 1987, p. 101.
[6] P. G. O. FREUND and E. WITTEN, Phys. Lett. B, Vol. 199, 1987, p. 191.
[7] L. BREKKE, P. G. O. FREUND, M. OLSON and E. WITTEN, Non-Archimedian String Dynamics, University of Chicago, Preprint EFI-87-101.
[8] I. YA. AREF’EVA, B. G. DRAGOVIC and I. V. VOLOVICH, Phys. Lett. B, Vol. 200, 1988,
p. 512.
[9] J. L. GERVAIS, Phys. Lett. B, Vol. 201, 1988, p. 306.
[10] E. MARINARI and G. PARISI, Phys. Lett. B, Vol. 203, 1988, p. 52.
[11] I. YA. AREF’EVA, B. G. DRAGOVIC and I. V. VOLOVICH, Phys. Lett. B, Vol. 209, 1988, p. 445.
[12] B. L. SPOKOINY, Phys. Lett. B, Vol. 209, 1988, p. 401.
[13] C. ALACOQUE, P. RUELLE, E. THIRAN, D. VERSTEGEN and J. WEYERS, Phys. Lett. B, Vol. 211, 1988, p. 59.
[14] P. M. BLEHER and M. D. MISSAROV, Commun. Math. Phys., Vol. 74, 1980, p. 255.
[15] I. M. GEL’FAND, M. I. GRAEV and I. I. PYATETSKII-SHAPIRO, Representation Theory
and Automorphic Functions, Saunders, London, 1966.
[16] I. M. GEL’FAND and N. Y. VILENKIN, Applications of Harmonic Analysis, Academic Press, 1964.
[17] Y a. G. SINAI, Theory of prob. and its appl., Vol. 21, 1976, p. 63.
[18] P. M. BLEHER and Y. G. SINAI, Commun. Math. Phys., Vol. 45, 1975, p. 247.
[19] P. COLLET and J. P. ECKMANN, A Renormalization Group Analysis of the Hierarchical Model in Statistical Mechanics, Lect. Notes Phys., Vol. 74, 1978, pp. 1-199.
[20] P. M. BLEHER, Commun. Math. Phys., Vol. 84, 1982, p. 557.
[21] K. GAWEDZKI and A. KUPIAINEN, Journal of Stat. Physics, Vol. 29, 1982, p. 683.
( M anuscrit reçu le 27 1988.)