• Aucun résultat trouvé

Preface

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Preface"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Preface

We are pleased to present theProceedings of the UAI 2016 Workshop on Causality: Foundation to Application, held in Jersey City, USA, on June 29, 2016. The workshop was part of the 32nd Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI 2016), and is the fifth in a series of UAI workshops on causality. Previous editions include theCausal Structure Learning workshop(Catalina Island, UAI 2012), theApproaches to Causal Structure Learning workshop (Seattle, UAI 2013), the workshop on Causal Inference: Learning and Prediction (Quebec City, UAI 2014) and the workshop onAdvances in Causal Inference (Amsterdam, UAI 2015).

The aim of the workshop series is to bring together researchers from different backgrounds, interested in tackling the challenges of causal inference from experimental and observational data. UAI as a conference offers a venue for the latest methodological developments in causal inference. In this iteration of the workshop we tried to complement this strength with a focus on the foundations of causal inference on the one hand, and practical applications on the other. We envisioned this integration of the boundaries of the field as providing a basis for fruitful discussions among researchers who do not usually have offices on the same corridor. While foundations and applications were the focus, we welcomed contributions from all areas relating to the study of causality.

In total we received 13 submissions, each of which was peer-reviewed by two or more external reviewers and at least one member of the program committee. We accepted 4 for oral presentations, and another 4 as posters. In addition we were fortunate to have two very interesting invited talks by Richard Scheines and Benjamin Jantzen and a session on Open Problems. Additional material can be found on the workshop website:

http://people.hss.caltech.edu/~fde/UAI2016WS/

We want to thank the authors and presenters for their contributions, and the members of the program committee for their reviewing service. We also want to thank the organizing committee of the main UAI 2016 conference, in particular Dominik Janzing and Melanie Zeilinger, for their assistance, and Ricardo Silva for his support in his role as chair of the previous workshop. Finally, many thanks to the CEUR-WS team for hosting these proceedings.

February 2017 Frederick Eberhardt (chair)

Elias Bareinboim Marloes Maathuis Joris Mooij Ricardo Silva

(2)

Organizing Committee

Frederick Eberhardt (chair) California Institute of Technology Ricardo Silva University College London

Joris Mooij University of Amsterdam

Marloes Maathuis ETH Zurich Elias Bareinboim Purdue University

Program Committee

Krzysztof Chalupka, Tom Claassen, Robin Evans, Niels Richard Hansen, Antti Hyttinen, Jan Lemeire, Emilija Perkovic, Jonas Peters, Joseph Ramsey, Thomas Richardson, Eleni Sgouritsa, Cosma Shalizi, Shohei Shimizu, Ilya Shpitser, Peter Spirtes and Jiji Zhang.

Références

Documents relatifs

The workshop will provide an opportunity to discuss areas like social recommendation, adaptive technologies, collaborative tools, persuasive strategies, learning analytics

For example, gamification approaches that motivate for learning in lan- guage learning platforms (Duolingo), or tools that automatically give you an overview of your working

The potentials of Deep Learning for CBR include improvement in knowledge aggregation and feature extraction for case representation, efficient indexing and retrieval architectures

Dijkstra and Kooy, [6] in their paper “The Learning model of Smartphone Feedback Applications in the field of e-health applied to the Step Counter The Learning model of Smartphone

In order to explore what happens in such blended learning experience, there is a need for multiple data sources that bring evidence from these different spaces,

Bipin Indurkhya Jagiellonian University, Poland Mark Keane University College Dublin, Ireland Kai-Uwe Kuehnberger University of Osnabruck, Germany Phillippe Langlais University

The literature on case-based reasoning (CBR) that takes time into account is broad. Still, there are aspects that have not been given much consideration. Reasoning about time drives

They explore: advances in medical process mining, taking context into account, which is crucial in medical domains [Canensi et al.]; feature weight learning in a