• Aucun résultat trouvé

Quantifier Instantiation Beyond E-Matching

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Quantifier Instantiation Beyond E-Matching"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Quantifier Instantiation Beyond E-Matching

Andrew Reynolds University of Iowa

Modern SMT solvers are considered a mature technology for many frag- ments of quantifier-free constraints, and have recently shown considerable promise as tools for handling quantified constraints as well. Most of the early development in SMT solvers for handling quantified formulas focused on the development of efficient E-matching techniques. This talk surveys some of the recent advances in instantiation-based approaches for quantified formulas in SMT that go beyond E-matching. In particular, we show how approaches based on finding models and conflicts can accelerate the search for (un)satisfiability. We also cover recent techniques for quantified formulas in background theories such as linear arithmetic and bit-vectors, and future challenges in these directions.

Références

Documents relatifs

We prove formally that the first order theory of algebraically closed fields enjoy quantifier elimination, and hence is decidable.. This proof is organized in two

In this paper, based on the results in [1] we introduce a model-based API testing framework for our SMT solver Boolector [16], consisting of the model-based API tester BtorMBT,

Keywords: Interval Analysis, Pose estimation, Quantified set-inversion We consider a mobile robot equipped with a camera that moves in a 2D environment. SIVIA requires bisecting also

Codatatypes are freely generated by their constructors, but in contrast with data- types, infinite constructor terms are also legitimate values for codatatypes (Section

The decision procedure for (co)datatypes is useful both for proving (via negation, in the refutational style) and for model finding [Ge and de Moura, 2009; Reynolds et al., 2013]..

We extended the SMTCoq proof format with proof rules for the new theories, extended SMTCoq’s checker correspondingly to check certificates containing applications of those rules,

We characterize the amount of alternation between blocks of digital quantifiers (having both existential and universal), blocks of real existential quantifiers, and blocks of

In order to do that, we use o-minimality of the structure R A , established in the first part of the paper, and apply an o-minimal Preparation Theorem for functions definable in