• Aucun résultat trouvé

Trade in services and trade in goods: differences and complementarities

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Trade in services and trade in goods: differences and complementarities"

Copied!
29
0
0

Texte intégral

Loading

Figure

Table 1 Regressions on basic gravitational variables  (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) Ln_dist_cap -0.840*** -0.782*** -0.750*** -0.806*** -0.797*** -0.793*** [0.015] [0.018] [0.017] [0.018] [0.019] [0.019] Ln_dist_cap_inter contig_inter 0.130*** 0.079*** 0.087***
Table 6 Trust and contract enforcement
Table 7 Networks
Table 8 Labor markets  (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) years_edu_i 0.071*** years_edu_i 0.160*** [0.011] [0.013] years_edu_i_inter 0.089*** years_edu_j 0.093*** [0.017] [0.010] years_edu_j 0.039*** high_edu_i 0.009*** [0.008] [0.002] years_edu_j_i
+6

Références

Documents relatifs

more฀economic฀ gains฀ to฀ the฀ European฀ consumers฀ than฀ the฀ current฀ EC฀ proposal,฀ and฀

In addition to the implementation of the FTA with the U.S, the ongoing negotiations with the EU of a preferential agreement in service sectors represent an

This study investigates the impact of the international openness in tourism services trade on wage inequality between highly skilled, semi-skilled and unskilled

Degree of openness and comparative advantage in cross-border trade in services 6 While more than half of value added of OECD comes from services industries (74.2 % in 2002),

The process of liberalization shall take place with due respect for national policy objectives and the level of development of individual Members, both overall and in individual

The fourth robustness test relaxes the assumption that labour market frictions are common across all countries and estimates them separately for OECD and no-OECD

Furthermore, although the analysis empirically shows that the job creation effect of services exports is weaker than that of manufacturing or agricultural, when we take into

OECD (1990-06-01), “Trade in Information, Computer and Communication Services, No.. 21”, OECD Digital Economy