• Aucun résultat trouvé

Phosphorus x Nitrogen limitation in cropland at the global scale

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Phosphorus x Nitrogen limitation in cropland at the global scale"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-03194934

https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-03194934

Submitted on 9 Apr 2021

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-entific research documents, whether they are pub-lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Phosphorus x Nitrogen limitation in cropland at the

global scale

Bruno Ringeval, Marko Kvakić, Laurent Augusto, Philippe Ciais, Xuhui

Wang, Daniel Goll, Nicolas Vuichard, Thomas Nesme, Sylvain Pellerin

To cite this version:

Bruno Ringeval, Marko Kvakić, Laurent Augusto, Philippe Ciais, Xuhui Wang, et al.. Phosphorus x Nitrogen limitation in cropland at the global scale. PSP6 conference ”phosphorus in soils and plants”, Sep 2018, Leuven, Belgium. �hal-03194934�

(2)

Phosphorus x Nitrogen limitation in cropland at the global scale

Bruno Ringeval1, Marko Kvakić1,2, Laurent Augusto1, Philippe Ciais2, Xuhui Wang2, Daniel Goll2,

Nicolas Vuichard2, Thomas Nesme1, Sylvain Pellerin1

1ISPA, Bordeaux Sciences Agro, INRA, 33140, Villenave d’Ornon, France.

2LSCE, LSCE/IPSL, CEA-CNRS-UVSQ, Universite Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France

Besides water, P and nitrogen (N) are key limiting resources explaining the yield gap at the global scale. However, estimates of the contribution of each nutrient alone and together (PxN) to the global yield gap are currently lacking. Previous studies are either based on statistical approaches without distinction between P and N (Mueller et al. 2012) or are process-based but consider only one nutrient (Kvakić et al. 2018). Here we assess how much P, N and PxN limits maize, wheat and rice at the global scale through a process-based and spatially explicit modeling approach. We also investigate if the co-limitation is as frequent as found in natural ecosystems (Harpole et al. 2011). To do so, we confronted the nutrient demand (based on C:nutrient ratio and plant organs simulated by a global crop model without stress) and supply (potential P root uptake or N soil input) for each nutrient taken independently. The magnitude of the limitation in P and N is expressed through a supply:demand ratio (RP and RN respectively).

Then, the effect of the interaction between P and N on the productivity is represented by two formalisms: based on the Liebig law of minimum or the multiple limitation hypothesis, leading to the computation of a supply:demand ratio RNP.

We found that the N and P limitations are of the same order of magnitude at the global scale for each nutrient (RN~RP~0.5), but with strong spatial heterogeneity (Figure 1). When considering

N and P together, the supply:demand ratio (RNP) reaches 0.3. Increasing RNP to 0.7 requires an

increase in N supply of 40-50% and in P supply of 30-35%. The choice of interaction formalism has almost no effect on the current nutrient limitation but a larger effect on the supply increase required to increase RNP. Finally, we estimated that a real co-limitation occurs in ~50% of the

crop area. While our study neglects plant adjustment to nutrient limitation (e.g. change in shoot:root ratio), it improves our understanding of the nutrient limitation in cropland and would also contribute to a better nutrient management at the global scale.

Figure 1: Spatial distribution of the nutrient limitation when N and P are considered independently.

Keywords

interaction phosphorus x nitrogen, nutrient limitation, cropland

References

Harpole WS, Ngai JT, Cleland EE, et al (2011) Nutrient co-limitation of primary producer communities. Ecol Lett 14:852–862. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01651.x

Kvakić M, Pellerin S, Ciais P, et al (2018) Quantifying the Limitation to World Cereal Production Due To Soil Phosphorus Status. Glob Biogeochem Cycles. doi: 10.1002/2017GB005754

Mueller ND, Gerber JS, Johnston M, et al (2012) Closing yield gaps through nutrient and water management. Nature 490:254–257. doi: 10.1038/nature11420

Figure

Figure 1: Spatial distribution of the nutrient limitation when N and P are considered independently.

Références

Documents relatifs

As a second step 100 in the validation process of SMOS soil moisture product, it is necessary to 101 compare SMOS data to other satellite and model output products at the 102

The spatially explicit global datasets used in this study enabled us to represent the drivers that are known to play a role in shaping the P in agricultural soils over the

Methods: We predicted global distributions of community mean specific leaf area, leaf nitrogen concentration, plant height and wood density with an ensemble model- ling approach

UTILISATION M is e à jo u r ❋✐❣✉r❡ ✶ ✕ ❙❝❤é♠❛ s②♥t❤ét✐q✉❡ ❞❡ ❧❛ ❣é♠♦❞é❧✐s❛t✐♦♥✱ ❝♦♠♣♦rt❛♥t ❧❡s ❞✐✛ér❡♥ts t②♣❡s ❞♦♥✲ ♥é❡s ✉t✐❧✐sé❡s✱

In recent decades, an increasing number of meta-ana- lyses has been conducted to estimate the impacts of— most often one—diversification strategy on one or several outcomes related

COURS C1 : GRAPHISME AVEC MATLAB Section 6.4

In this Chapter I will briefly define the conceptual framework of my thesis. My work has been an attempt to understand how global patterns of phytoplankton biodiversity can be

 Publishing abstracts of dissertations and theses by ETD World Center and letting individuals to decide how to publish them publicly..  Developing a network of