• Aucun résultat trouvé

Blasphemy and Violence. Interdependencies since 1760

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Blasphemy and Violence. Interdependencies since 1760"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Liberas (Ghent, Belgium) in conjunction with the School of History, Religion and Philosophy at Oxford Brookes Universi- ty (Oxford, United Kingdom) and the Leibniz Institute of Eu- ropean History (Mainz, Germany) announce a Call for Papers for a conference and subsequent edited volume on the sub- ject of blasphemy and violence since 1760.

Contributions are invited for a conference to be held at Liberas in Ghent (Kramersplein 23) on March 5th-6th 2020.

Papers delivered at this conference will be expected to be nearing completion with a view to subsequent publication in the second volume of ‘New Perspectives on the History of Liberalism and Freethought’ in early 2021, a new peer- reviewed open access series published by De Gruyter Olden- bourg.

Further details: website Liberas

Blasphemy and Violence. Interdependencies since 1760 of- fers a much-needed analysis of a subject that historians have largely discarded, yet holds great relevance for con- temporary society. Drawing on a variety of chronological and geographical contexts, both conference and volume probe the phenomenon of blasphemy and its potential link to violence from three angles. Firstly, they investigate acts of blasphemy that lead to forms of violence, e.g. when be- lievers physically attack (alleged) blasphemers. Secondly, they examine situations of general societal upheaval in which offences against the sacred are one aspect of a much broader culture of violence. Thirdly, they analyse situa- tions in which believers both internalise and actively de- scribe the hurt stemming from the impact of blasphemy as a species of experiencing violence.

In terms of geography, the focus is on the ‘extended’ Euro- pean world. This includes the Russian and Ottoman Em- pires, but also non-European countries, where the legal systems display explicit European influences (as in the case of e.g. the USA and Australia, where blasphemy legis- lation has strong links with English precedents). This ex- panded geographical approach should facilitate compari- son between societies with a different religious-political framework as well as between various legal conceptions of blasphemy. The chronological scope commences in 1760, which coincides with a shift in the (legal) appreciation of blasphemy; from then onwards, blasphemy was progres- sively tackled as an illness or aberration that needed treat- ment rather than an evil that required punishment. This date is also convenient for a range of theoretical perspecti- ves that address the question of ‘modernisation’ in the his- toriographies of law, religion, crime and punishment, as well as psychiatry (e.g. Michel Foucault’s arrival of the spe-

cialist, Norbert Elias’ civilising process).

Rather than separating the legal history of blasphemy from a socio-cultural analysis of individual case-studies, contributors are specifically invited to draw together both aspects. Thus, each paper / chapter will focus on a specif- ic incident of blasphemy – a landmark case or a series of little-known micro studies –, examine its relationship with violence and briefly discuss the legal background and context surrounding each incident. For this, it can concentrate on any of the following interdependences of blasphemy and violence: (i) blasphemy leading to vio- lence, (ii) violence producing blasphemy, or (iii) blasphe- my as a form of violence. Suggested areas of interest, by no means exhaustive and partly overlapping, include:

Blasphemy and violence around communism and communist ‘scares’

Blasphemy and violence within a revolutionary context

Blasphemy and civil war

Blasphemous violence and religious minorities

Blasphemy within a context of secular-religious conflict: e.g. debates on the freedom of expression / art, public order and morality

Both established and more junior scholars are encour- aged to apply. The conference will function as a space in which to develop similarities and overlaps between the papers.

Liberas generously supports accommodation costs for all speakers. In exceptional circumstances, it can also provide financial assistance towards travel costs; those, who wish to benefit from such funding, should indicate so in their pro- posal. The deadline for this call for papers is August 1st 2019. Participants will be notified by August 15th 2019. To apply, please send a short CV and 500-word summary to the organisers:

David Nash, Professor of History, Oxford Brookes Uni- versity, dsnash@brookes.ac.uk

Eveline G. Bouwers, Senior Research Fellow, Leibniz Institute of European History, bouwers@ieg-mainz.de

Papers will be precirculated before the conference. Inte- rested authors unable to attend the conference can still con- tact the organisers to propose/discuss a chapter.

Call for papers: Blasphemy and Violence. Interdependencies since 1760

Ghent, 5-6 March 2020 (deadline abstracts: 1 August 2019)

Références

Documents relatifs

[r]

Stability is achieved by suitably upwinded test functions, generalizing the classical α-quadratically upwinded and the Hemker test-functions for piecewise linear trial spaces see,

La contribution sur l’Inde (Daud Ali) comporte deux parties : la première porte sur les sources en sanskrit – elle traite des purāṇa, des chroniques de grandes

The polemical exchanges between Stewart and Copleston on the subject of logic, as well as Copleston's reluctance to state in full and explicit terms the points of agreement

It should be noted that in both countries central power has played a key part in assigning public services functions to local governments: in France, for a

For Gueroult, “there is no philosophy without resolution of problems”; “all the great doctrines can be characterized by problems.” 89 And, according to an unpublished

If the t is considered, then the Score estimator based on the pseudo Likelihood ratio when compared with the least favourable critical value is as signi cant as logit (the

The same radices as those in row 1 appear in a list on Lh, 17a, where the heading is on two lines: (1) Radices for the year 1348 according to the Christians; (2) Radices for