• Aucun résultat trouvé

Multi-scale modeling of sunflower crop responses to genetic and environment variations

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Multi-scale modeling of sunflower crop responses to genetic and environment variations"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-02956666

https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02956666

Submitted on 3 Oct 2020

HAL

is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire

HAL, est

destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Multi-scale modeling of sunflower crop responses to genetic and environment variations

Gosseau Florie, Fanny Bonnafous, Prune Pégot-Espagnet, Brigitte Mangin, Nicolas Langlade, Pierre Casadebaig

To cite this version:

Gosseau Florie, Fanny Bonnafous, Prune Pégot-Espagnet, Brigitte Mangin, Nicolas Langlade, et al..

Multi-scale modeling of sunflower crop responses to genetic and environment variations. Second Inter-

national Crop Modelling Symposium : iCROPM 2020, Feb 2020, Montpellier, France. �hal-02956666�

(2)

373

Second International

Crop Modelling Symposium February 3-5, 2020

Le Corum, Montpellier, France Book of abstracts

iCROPM 2020- Poster presentation Session III: linking crop/plant models and genetics

Session III: linking crop/plant models and genetics

S3-P.03

Multi-scale modeling of sunflower crop responses to genetic and environment variations.

Gosseau Florie1 ([email protected]), Bonnafous Fanny1, Pegot­Espagnet Prune1, Mangin Brigitte1, Langlade Nicolas1, Casadebaig Pierre2

1 UMR LIPM, INRA, Castanet-Tolosan, France; 2 UMR AGIR, INRA, Castanet-Tolosan, France

Current research in genomics and ecophysiology strive to improve gene­to­phenotype predictions beyond methods based solely on genetic information such as whole genome prediction (WGP). Predictive approaches coupling quantitative genetics and crop modeling are designed, either with an emphasis on ecophysiology or on statistics, according to the modeling scale of traits: from molecular to crop level (Bustos­Korts et al., 2016).

Gene­to­phenotype predictions are generally carried to predict the breeding values from genome­wide informa- tion using statistical models. The difficulty with this method lies in the prediction of non­additive gene effect and gene­by­environment interactions. Crop simulation models, by representing dynamic responses of crop and soil processes to the environment, are successfully used to predict phenotypic plasticity for agronomical traits (Chenu et al., 2017). Therefore, coupling quantitative genetics and process­based modeling should improve the accuracy of breeding value prediction, with different options depending on the phenotypic distance, as illustrated by Hammer et al. (2016).

This study aims to predict the performance of a panel of sunflower hybrids in different farming environments, and therefore to identify the most promising genotypes and key physiological traits controlling yield stability and adap- tation to future climatic scenarios. Our multiscale modeling strategy proceeded in two steps: (1) building whole genome prediction models to predict a set of component traits as a function of allelic combination of genotypes and (2) predicting the hybrid yield as a function of component traits, environmental variables and management practices using a crop simulation model (Casadebaig et al., 2016). We evaluated the accuracy of this multiscale model on a multi­environmental network (13 environments) where the training population was phenotyped and on independent trials with non­observed genotypes and environments (9 environments).

Over these 22 environments, we found that the overall accuracy of our multi­scale model was worse than the accuracy of a single genomic prediction model fitted for crop yield. The WGP model showed a good accuracy on the training environments and on the test environments including hybrids selected for their yield range. However, the multiscale model showed a better accuracy than the WGP model in 4 out 9 test environments, specifically when tested hybrids were not selected for their extreme yield levels.

Overall, we identified new bottlenecks related to the design of combined crop and genetic models, such as the definition of component traits articulating genomic and ecophysiological models and the environment(s) used to train the genomic models.

…/…

Références

Documents relatifs

In particular, although both GAL3 YJM978 and GAL3 Y12 strains were binary respon- ders at all galactose concentrations tested, the model attributed this behavior to different

We propose in this article a review of the literature on the ability of molecular simulation techniques such as Molecular Dynamics (MD), Monte Carlo (MC) simulations,

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des

almost identical to that of the ADD-POE model when using the simulated data, which indicated that when dense SNPs are used for prediction, modeling a relatively “rare” effect

This paper describes a model for the modeling of the functional relationships using belief function theory and its validity is illustrated by addressing the issue of combining

Figure 4 summarizes the proposed development process distinguishing two main roles: the architect, who is assumed to be an expert in the given domain,

Such a non- local fatigue stress analysis of a fretting cracking was first developed using a process value stress analysis (i.e. the stress state used to compute

Figure 6: Information transfer rate comparison over different decoding segment dura- tions for the backward model, the baseline CCA implementation using an LRA classifier (CL), and