Publisher’s version / Version de l'éditeur:
Vous avez des questions? Nous pouvons vous aider. Pour communiquer directement avec un auteur, consultez la
première page de la revue dans laquelle son article a été publié afin de trouver ses coordonnées. Si vous n’arrivez pas à les repérer, communiquez avec nous à PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca.
Questions? Contact the NRC Publications Archive team at
PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca. If you wish to email the authors directly, please see the first page of the publication for their contact information.
https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/droits
L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB.
Internal Report (National Research Council of Canada. Division of Building Research), 1959-12-01
READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE.
https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/copyright
NRC Publications Archive Record / Notice des Archives des publications du CNRC :
https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/object/?id=5dc05093-a0e2-41ad-b025-d19d7af181ad https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/voir/objet/?id=5dc05093-a0e2-41ad-b025-d19d7af181ad
NRC Publications Archive
Archives des publications du CNRC
For the publisher’s version, please access the DOI link below./ Pour consulter la version de l’éditeur, utilisez le lien DOI ci-dessous.
https://doi.org/10.4224/20337988
Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at
Restraint and temperature studies on wall of clay brick exposed to fire
PREFACE
The l a r g e f i r e r e s i s t a n c e f u r n a c e s i n t h e F i r e Research Labora%ory of t h e D i v i s i o n a r e
intended p r i m a r i l y f o r r e s e a r c h though t h e y may a l s o be used i n t h e t e s t i n g of p r o p r i e t a r y con- s t r u c t i o n s . Since t h e s e a r e l a r g e f a c i l i t i e s r e q u i r i n g l a r g e and c o s t l y specimens it w i l l
always be t h e aim of t h e Division t o o b t a i n and t o make a v a i l a b l e a s much information a s p o s s i b l e from each specimen c o n s t r u c t e d . The second of two w a l l s c o n s t r u c t e d f o r use d u r i n g t h e i n i t i a l
t r i a l s o f t h e w a l l furnace has now been r e - t e s t e d t o provide supplementary i n f o r m a t i o n on tempera- t u r e measurement and on panel r e s t r a i n t which i s now r e p o r t e d . The a u t h o r , a mechanical e n g i n e e r and a r e s e a r c h o f f i c e r with t h e F i r e Section of t h e D i v i s i o n , i s r e s p o n s i b l e f o r t h e work being done on f i r e r e s i s t a n c e . .
M.B. Hutcheon A s s i s t a n t D i r e c t o r
RESTRAINT AND TENZ'ERATURE STTIDIES ON
WALL OF CLAY B R I C K EXPOSED TO FIRE
T.Z. Harmathy
During t h e commissioning period f o r t h e f i r e r e s i s t a n c e f u r n a c e s i n s t a l l e d i n t h e new F i r e Research Laboratory of t h e Division of B u i l d i n g Research, two masonry w a l l s were c o n s t n ~ c t e d f o r c l o s i n g t h e w a l l
furnace. Following a t r i a l period it was decided t o u t i l i z e them t o provide i n f o r m a t i o n which would be b e n e f i c i a l i n t h e f u t u . r e t e s t i n g and r e s e a r c h program of t h e F i r e Section.
I t was t h e purpose of t h e s e t e s t s t o :
( a ) g a i n experience i n . overcoming problems met d u r i n g a w a l l t e s t ,
( b ) study t h e deformation and t h e r e s t r a i n i n g f o r c e s i n t h e w a l l when exposed t o f i r e ,
( c ) stu.dy d i f f e r e n t methods of measuring t h e unexposed s u r f a c e temperature.
This r e p o r t d e s c r i b e s a t e s t conducted on a
b r i c k w a l l on May
5 ,
1959. DESCRIPTION OF----
THE SPECIIJENClay b r i c k s 2h by 32 by 8 i n c h e s were used t o b u i l d a n u n p l a s t e r e d w a l l 8 i n c h e s t h i c k , 1 3 f e e t - 5 & inches
wide, and 1 2 f e e t - 5 i n c h e s high.
A few weeks b e f o r e t e s t i n g , t h e w a l l had been used f o r c l o s i n g t h e wal.1 f u r n a c e d u r i n g a performance t e s t o f about 1 h o u r ' s d u r a t i o n . 11s a r e s u l t , t h e f i r e - exposed s i d e of t h e wal.1, was s l i g h t l y discoloured. and s e v e r a l f i n e c r a c k s i n th.e brick-work could be d e t e c t e d . The mortar a l s o was damaged, f o r t h e s u r f a c e l a y e r could e a s i l y be rubbed o f f . l l o i s t u r e con-tent of t h e b r i c k was n o t measured, b u t it must have been very low because of t h e previous t e s t .
TESTING PROCEDURE
t h e t e s t w a s c a r r i e d o u t in accordance w i t h ASTM S p e c i f i c a t i o n E-119. Furnace t e m p e r a t u r e w a s measured by n i n e s y m m e t r i c a l l y d i s p o s e d thermocouples, s i x of which were e n c l o s e d i n s e a l e d $-inch p i p e s of standard-weight
b l a c k wrought s t e e l , as p r e s c r i b e d by t h e t e s t s p e c i f i c a t i o n . The o t h e r t h r e e were p l a c e d i n 13/16-inch OD I n c o n e l
t u b e s of 0.035-inch w a l l t h i c k n e s s , equipped w i t h wrought s t e e l c a p s a t t h e end. Both t h e i n d i v i d u a l t e m p e r a t u r e s a t n i n e p o i n t s and t h e a v e r a g e of t h e n i n e r e a d i n g s were recorded. The f u r n a c e t e m p e r a t u r e was c o n t r o l l e d s o t h a t t h e a v e r a g e t e m p e r a t u r e f o l l o w e d t h e p r e s c r i b e d t e m p e r a t u r e - time c o r r e l a t i o n .
The un.exposed s u r f a c e t e m p e r a t u r e was measured by 1 0 thermocouples, f i v e covered w i t h s t a n d a r d a s b e s t o s pads
6 i n c h e s s q u a r e and 0.4 i n c h t h i c k , s y m m e t r i c a l l y
d i s p o s e d as r e q u i r e d by t h e ASTM S p e c i f i c a t i o n E-119. The
o t h e r f i v e were p l a c e d under pads recommended a s s u b s t i t u t e a i n t h e "Minutes of Meeting of Committee E-5'on F i r e T e s t o f M a t e r i a l s a n d C o n s t r u c t i o n s " (ASiCM), P e b r u a r ~ ~ 1 2 , 1958.
Other methods o f measuring t h e unexposed s u r f a c e t e m p e r a t u r e were a l s o s t u d i e d :
( i ) t h e s t a n d a r d method o f BS S p e c i f i c a t i o n
4769
(ii) a method shown i n Hg. 1.Illhe l o c a t i o n o f t h e d i f f e r e n t thermocouples on t h e unexposed s u r f a c e i s shown
i n
Fig. 2.P r i o r t o t h e t e s t s p e c i a l c a r e had been t a k e n t o s e a l t h e g a p s between t h e f u r n a c e a n d t h e w a l l specimen and t o a d j u s t t h e f u e l f l o w a t each b u r n e r i n o r d e r t o o b t a i n a f a i r l y uniform t e m p e r a t u r e i n s i d e t h e f u r n a c e . Although t h i s t y p e o f w a l l i s g e n e r a l l y u s e d as
a
l o a d - b e a r i n g element, it w a s t h e i n t e n t i o n t o t e s t t h e w a l l a c c o r d i n g t o t h e r e q u i r e m e n t s p r e s c r i b e d f o r non-bearing w a l l s i n o r d e r t o s t u d y t h e v a r i a t i o n of t h e r e s t r a i n i n g f o r c e s d u r i n g the t e s t . A method p r e v i o u s l y r e p o r t e d( 1 ) was i n t e n d e d t o be u s e d t o r e s t r a i n t h e specimen; however,
10 m i n u t e s a f t e r s t a r t i n g t h e t e s t t h e c a p a c i t y r e q u i r e d f o r f u l l r e s t r a i n t exceeded t h a t of t h e h y d r a u l i c l o a d i n g system. From t h i s t i m e on t h e l o a d remained c o n s t a n t a t
a b o u t 180 t o 190 pounds p e r s q u a r e i n c h o f w a l l c r o s s - s e c t i o n a l a r e a , b o t h i n v e r t i c a l and h o r i z o n t a l d i r e c t i o n , a n d t h e h o r i z o n t a l expansion of t h e w a l l w a s r e c o r d e d u s i n g t h e d e v i c e shown i n Pig.
3
of Ref. 1.The l a t e r a l d e f l e c t i o n of t h e w a l l was a l s o measured a t t h r e e p o i n t s h a l f way between t h e t o p and bottom: a t
t h e c e n t r e and a t t h e t w o edges. These measurements were t a k e n a t
5-
t o 10-minute i n t e r v a l s .Immediately a f t e r t h e specimen f a i l e d t h e f u r n a c e
w a s opened and t h e f i r e - e x p o s e d s i d e of t h e w a l l was sub- j e c t e d t o a hose s t r e a m t e s t . T h i s t e s t d i d n o t conform t o t h e AS!t%I s p e c i f i c a t i o n a s t h e w a t e r p r e s s u r e w a s o n l y 30 pounds p e r s q u a r e i n c h gauge and t h e d u r a t i o n of a p p l i - c a t i o n w a s f o r 2$ minutes i n s t e a d of f o r
5
minutes,RESULTS
Uniformity of f u r n a c e temperature was very good throughout t h e t e s t . A f t e r 1 0 minutes t h e maximum d e v i a - t i o n from t h e a v e r a g e was always l e s s t h a n 100°F. A p l o t of t h e average f u r n a c e t e m p e r a t u r e a g a i n s t time i s shown i n Fig. 3. Readings from t h e thermocouples e n c l o s e d in. I n c o n e l t u b e s followed t h e same t r e n d .
The v a r i a t i o n of t h e t e m p e r a t u r e of t h e unexposed s u r f a c e of t h e speoimen was a l s o uniform. Those t h e m o - c o u p l e s which r e p r e s e n t e d i d e n t i c a l methods gave v e r y n e a r l y i d e n t i c a l t e m p e r a t u r e s , t h e maximum d i f f e r e n c e always b e i n g l e s s t h a n 20°P. The s u b s t i t u t e ASTM method y i e l d e d n o t i c e a b l y lower r e a d i n g s t h a n t h e s t a n d a r d ASTM method. The a v e r a g e d i f f e r e n c e i n c r e a s e d s t e a d i l y and toward t h e end of t h e t e s t i t w a s 2g0E', The BS method
gave much lower r e a d i n g s t h a n t h e ASTM methods. O n t h e o t h e r hand, no s i g n i f i c a n t d i f f e r e n c e w a s found between t h e t e m p e r a t u r e s o b t a i n e d a c c o r d i n g t o t h e B r i t i s h method and t h e method shown i n Fig. 1.
V a r i a t i o n of t h e unexposed s u r f a c e temperature i s a l s o p l o t t e d i n F i g , 3 . The curve r e p r e s e n t i n g t h e ASTM
method shows t h e a v e r a g e of t h e s t a n d a r d and s u b s t i t u t e measurements.
I n Pig.
4
l a t e r a l d e f l e c t i o n and n e t change i nwidth o f t h e w a l l a r e shown. C o n t r a c t i o n of t h e w i d t h caused by a p p l i e d l o a d w a s measured on t h e day f o l l o w i n g t h e t e s t . When p l o t t i n g F i g . 4 t h i s v a l u e w a s added t o t h e r e c o r d e d v a l u e s of t h e w a l l expansion, so t h a t curve A a c t u a l l y r e p r e s e n t s t h e n e t change i n width i n c a s e of a f r e e l y expanding w a l l . The e f f e c t of t h e a p p l i e d l o a d on t h e l a t e r a l d e f l e c t i o n was found t o be n e g l i g i b l e ; t h e r e f o r e c u r v e s B1,
Br,
Bc and B can a l s o be r e g a r d e d as approximately r e p r e s e n t a t i v e of t h e deformation w i t h no imposed l o a d .According t o t h e ASm method of temperature measurement t h e average temperature of t h e unexposed
s u r f a c e reached t h e l i m i t i n g v a l u e (75
+
250 = 325OP) i n 4 h o u r s and 47 minutes.Both t h e exposed and t h e unexposed s u r f a c e s of t h e w a l l were f r e q u e n t l y i n s p e c t e d d u r i n g t h e t e s t ; s e r i o u s
c r a c k s o r o t h e r damage were n o t i c e d . & r i n g t h e hose
stream t e s t t h e m o r t a r mas washed away t o a n average depth of
15
i n c h e s and p i e c e s of b r i c k were s e p a r a t e d from t h e exposed s u r f a c e .DISCUSSION
The thermocouples enclosed i n t h e Inconel t u b e s y i e l d e d temperature r e a d i n g s p r a c t i c a l l y i d e n t i c a l t o t h o s e g i v e n by t h e thermocouples i n t h e s t a n d a r d wrought s t e e l pipes. However, from t h e p o i n t of view of r e s i s t a n c e t o c o r r o s i o n and sagging a t high t e m p e r a t u r e s t h e Inconel t u b e s a r e much s u p e r i o r . T h e i r u s e f o r thermocouple p r o t e c t i o n i s , t h e r e f o r e , recommended.
Since t h e temperatures o b t a i n e d from t h e unexposed s u r f a c e a c c o r d i n g t o t h e BS method were almost i d e n t i c a l t o t h o s e measured as shown i n Pig. 1, i t can be concluded
t h a t t h e B r i t i s h method g i v e s v e r y n e a r l y t h e t r u e s u r f a c e temperature. The e x p l a n a t i o n i s t h a t t h e temperature
drop caused by conduction through t h e thermocouple w i r e s
i s a l m o s t completely compensated by t h e temperature r i s e due t o the low e m i s s i v i t y o f t h e copper d i s k .
The r e s i s t a n c e t o h e a t flow of t h e s u b s t i t u t e ASTh4 pads proved somewhat lower t h a n t h a t o f t h e s t a n d a r d ASTM peds.
1. Harlnathy, T. 2 . R e s t r a i n t and Temperature S t u d i e s on
lJ1all o f Cinder Concrete Blocks Exposed t o F i r e ,
th
=
THERMOCOUPLE
WIRES
W
=
WALL
C CEMENT
FIGURE I
0
STANDARD. ASTM
.SUBSTITUTE ASTM
0
BRITISH STANDARD
@
METHOD SHOWN
IN
FIGURE
I
18 16 14 n -12 Y
x
10g
z
90 80 70 h 6 0 -r
Y I I I ICURVE A NET CHANGE IN WIDTH
-
CURVE BL LEFT SIDE LATERAL DEFLECTION-
CURVE B, RIGHT SlDE LATERAL DEFLECTIONCURVE B, CENTRAL LATERAL DEFLECTION
- CURVE B CENTRAL LATERAL DEFLECTION
-
RELATIVE TO SIDE DEFLECTIONc