On the risks of using dendrograms to measure functional diversity and multidimensional spaces to measure phylogenetic diversity: a comment on Sobral et al . (2016)
Texte intégral
Figure
Documents relatifs
We consider standardization as the dynamic interaction in three spaces (standards in the making, standards in action, and standards in circulation) where diversity reemerges only
For bacterial assemblages, phylogenetic diversity (average similarity among species in a community) and mean community dissim- ilarity (average distance between species)
Nation-Building, Ethnicity and Language Politics in Transition
Thus, the following analyses focus on pools of species at risk of extinction affected by each threat at the global scale (i.e., compared with the global pool of insular endemic
Function "evoeveparam" calculates evenness in the abundance of features (branch units on a phylogenetic [or functional] tree) using parametric indices q feve HCDT , q
Currently, it is unknown whether only specific phospholipids are recruited to the surface of nucleated and/or nascent lipid droplets, whether different lipid droplets are nucleated
We built a phylogenetic tree based on sequences of two genes encoding chloroplast proteins, from which we computed phylogenetic diversity metrics that we compared to
Differences in phylogenetic and functional structure between farmland and forest communities Although farmland and forest assemblages harbor a quite similar number of breeding common