Host range and population structure of
Xanthomonas citri
pv.
mangiferaeindicae
Gagnevin L, Guérin F, Vital K, Deloison G, Pruvost O
UMR PVBMT
CIRAD-Université de la Réunion France
There are two types of strains in pv.
mangiferaeindicae
• isolated from mango (Mangifera indica)
• pathogenic on mango
• weakly pathogenic on pepper tree
• isolated on pepper tree (Schinus terebinthifolius)
• pathogenic on pepper tree
• weakly pathogenic on mango
No other characteristic or genetic marker can differenciate them and allow to com-pare them
Populations coexist, almost in a sympatric manner with the two hosts often adjacent
Minisatellites derived from
X. c.
pv.
citri
to characterize
mangiferaeindicae
populations
12 loci identified based on the complete sequence of strain FDC12 using the web tool http://minisatellites.u-psud.fr
• containing repeats of 6 or 7 nucleotides
• primers designed for production of amplicons of 150 to 450 bp
• genome-wide localization
Minisatellite processing is multiplexable for amplification and automated electrophoresis
Analysis of 6 populations from the 2 hosts
179 isolates from 3 sites containing mango trees and pepper trees, considered as 6 populations :
1999 2009 2009
Bassin Martin/Mango (BM/M) Bassin Plat/Mango (BP/M) Grand Fond/Mango (GF/M) Bassin Martin/Pepper tree (BM/P) Bassin Plat/Pepper tree (BP/P) Grand Fond/Pepper tree (GF/P)
• two minisatellites are monomorphic for all populations
• some are polymorphic only within one or a few populations
• most are polymorphic between and within populations
• 81 haplotypes were differenciated
• no haplotype was common to different populations
Questions
• What are the evolutionary and epidemiological relationships between these populations ?
• What tools may help to describe evolution at a very small geographic and probably time scale ? • Can this example help to understand host
shif-ting in xanthomonads ? Differentiation coefficients BM/P BP/P GF/P BM/M BP/M GF/M BM/P 0 BP/P 0.35 0 GF/P 0.17 0.32 0 BM/M 0.53 0.67 0.48 0 BP/M 0.38 0.51 0.35 0.37 0 GF/M 0.29 0.45 0.28 0.32 0.18 0
0.29
BM GF BP BM BP GF H12 (7) H47 (1) H44 (1) H50 (1) H48 (1) H40 (1) H49 (1) H45 (1) H13 (2) H41 (1) H6 (2) H5 (6) H4 (11) H77 (1) H79 (1) H8 (2) H7 (2) H80 (1) H1 (12M) H34 (1) H3 (2) H2 (2) H75 (1) H33 (5) H42 (1) H32 (3) H81 (1) H9 (3) H11 (2) H76 (1) H43 (1) H78 (1) H10 (2) H51 (1) H46 (1) H15 (9) H19 (5) H20 (3) H72 (1) H63 (1) H17 (2) H70 (1) H69 (1) H71 (1) H21 (3) H74 (1) H64 (1) H67 (1) H18 (2) H16 (3) H65 (1) H62 (1) H27 (4) H28 (2) H60 (1) H53 (1) H52 (1) H73 (1) H68 (1) H25 (8) H39 (1) H26 (2) H61 (1) H59 (1) H36 (1) H35 (1) H24 (5) H30 (3) H31 (2) H22 (2) H23 (7) H56 (1) H14 (2) H55 (1) H58 (1) H57 (1) H66 (1) H54 (1) H38 (1) H37 (1) H29 (2) Mango Pepper tree 1.0pepper tree isolates mango isolates
other isolates GF in 1996
Mango
Pepper tree
unweighted neighbour joining tree based on a distance of Manhattan (assuming a step by step evolution)
clonal complexes (evolutionally and epidemiologically related haploty-pes) constructed based on continuous variations of less than 3 repeats, indicating potential primary and secondary founders
Grand Fond
M
P
Conclusions
•
strong differentiation
accor-ding to host
•
temporal and geographical
differentiation
•
no epidemiological
rela-tionships between
popula-tions
•
each population derives
from one or several founders
•