C AHIERS DE
TOPOLOGIE ET GÉOMÉTRIE DIFFÉRENTIELLE CATÉGORIQUES
I VAN K OLAR
An abstract characterization of the jet spaces
Cahiers de topologie et géométrie différentielle catégoriques, tome 34, n
o2 (1993), p. 121-125
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=CTGDC_1993__34_2_121_0>
© Andrée C. Ehresmann et les auteurs, 1993, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Cahiers de topologie et géométrie différentielle catégoriques » implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions). Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright.
AN ABSTRACT CHARACTERIZATION OF THE JET SPACES by
Ivan KOLARCAHIERS DE TOPOLOGIE ET G~OM~TRIE DIFF~RENTIELLE
CATL~GORIQUES
VOL. XXXIV-2 (1993)
Resume. Nous déduisons une
caractéristique
abstraite desjets d’appli-
cations lisses introduits par C. Ehresmann. Les
jets
d’ordre fini sont les seulsimages homomorphes
de dimension finie des germesd’applications
lisses satisfaisants deux conditions naturelles.
1. Introduction.
Our research was
inspired by
two results in the foundations of differential ge- ometry. On onehand, Palais-Terng, [8],
andEpstein-Thurston, [3],
deduced that every natural bundle over m-dimensional smooth manifolds has finite order. On the otherhand, Kainz-Michor, [4], Eck, (1~,
andLuciano, [7], proved
that everyproduct preserving
bundle functor on the wholecategory
of smooth manifolds is a functor of the"infinitely
nearpoints" by
A.Weil, [9].
Ageneral
idea in both results is that the fact westudy
finite-dimensional manifolds hasfar-reaching
consequences on the structure of thegeometric objects
inquestion.
In the
present
paper we discuss the finite-dimensionalhomomorphic images
of thegerms of
smooth
maps. We deduce that the so-calledproduct property
formulated in section 2 and certainsimple assumptions
on the smoothness of the derivedobjects imply
that the classicaljets
are theonly possibility.
2. The result.
The classical construction of the r-th order
jets
transforms everypair M,
Nof manifolds into a fibered manifold
J~(M, N)
over M x N and every germ of asmooth map
f : M - N at z e M
into itsr-jet j’’ (gerrrax f )
=j.,r, f
EJr(M, N).
The
composition B2
oBl
of germs induces thecomposition
ofr-jets (denoted by
the same
symbol)
Hence the
r-jets
are finite-dimensionalhomomorphic images
of the germs of smooth maps. We aregoing
topoint
out somegeneral properties
of thepairs (J’’, jr)
forallrEfil.
Denote
by G(M, N)
the set of all germs of smooth maps from M into N. Considera rule F
transforming
everypair M,
N of manifolds into a fibered manifoldF(M, N)
over M x N and a
system
Sp of maps CPM,N :G(M, N) --~ F(M, N) commuting
withthe
projections G(M, N) --~
M x N andF(M, N) --~
M x N for allM,
N. Thenwe can formulate the
following requirements
I-IV.I.
(Surjectiveness) Every
~M,Ar1 C*(~) N) - F(M, N)
issurjective.
II.
(Composability)
If~(~i)
=~(~i)
andp(82)
=W(f32),
thenW(B2
oBl)
=~O(B2 0 Pl)-
By
I and II we have a well definedcomposition (denoted by
the samesymbol
asthe
composition
of germs andmaps)
for every
Xi
=~p(Bl ) E, F~ (M, N)y
andX2 = ~p(BZ )
EFy (N, P),.
Letus
writeSpx f
for~(~~rm~/). Every
localdiffeomorphism f :
M -·M
and every smooth map g :N - N
induces a mapF( f, g) : F(M, N) - F(M, Ñ)
definedby
where
f ’ 1
is constructedlocally.
III.
’(Regularity)
Each mapF( f, g)
is smooth.Consider the
product Nl ~- Nl
xN2 ~ N2
of two manifolds. Then we have the induced mapsF(idM, ql) : F(M, N1
xN2)
-~F(M, N1)
andF(idM, q2) : F(M, N,
xN2) - F(M, N2).
BothF(M, Ni)
andF(M, N2)
are fibered manifolds over M.IV.
(Product . property) jF(M,~Vi
xN2)
coincides with the fiberedproduct
jF(M,7Vi) Xj~ F(M, N2)
over M andF(idM, ql), F(idM, q2)
are the induced pro-jections.
The
geometric
role of the Axiom IV will be discussed in section 5.(At
the level of germs, we have a canonical identificationG(M, Nl x N2 )
=G(M, Nl ) x M G(M, N2).)
The main result of the
present
paper is thefollowing
asertion.Theorem 1. For every
pair (F, p) satisfying
I-IV there exists aninteger
r > 0 such that(F, Sp)
=(Jr, jr).
3. The induced functor in dimension k.
For
every k
E N we define an induced functorFk
on thecategory Mf
of allsmooth manifolds and all smooth maps
by
where the
subscript
0 indicates the fiber over 0E IIBk,
andby
for every smooth map
f :
M -~ N.By
III each mapFk f
is smooth and IVimplies
that each
functor Fk
preservesproducts.
Since
Fk
preservesproducts,
it coincides with a Weilfunctor,
see(1), [4], [7].
LetAk
be thecorresponding
Weilalgebra
andNk
be itsnilpotent
ideal. LetE(k)
bethe
ring
of all germs of smooth functions onIIBk
at 0 andm(k)
=Go(ll8k, R)o
be itsmaximal ideal.
By [5]
or[6], Ak
is a factoralgebra E(k)/.Ak ,
whereAk
is an idealof finite
codimension,
and the intersectionNk
=.Ak
nm(k)
is the set of all germsB E Go (II~’~‘, II8)o satisfying
where
6
is the germ of the constant function 0. Thisyields
thefollowing
"substitution
property"
ofN1c
Since
Nlr,
is an ideal of finitecodimension,
there exists aninteger
rk such thatThe minimum of such
integers
is called the order ofAx .
Assume rk is minimal.Then beside
(3)
it also holdsWe recall that
Tk
denotes the functor of k-dimensional velocities of order rby Ehresmann, [2].
Lemma 2. The functor
Fk
is the velocities functorT~.
Proof.
We have to proveWe deduce the
opposite
inclusion to(3) by
contradiction. We show that if there exists andelement B £ m(k)’’k +1 satisfying
B ENk ,
then the substitutionproperty
(2) implies m(k)’’’~
CNk . Indeed, by (3)
we may assume that B is the germ of a non-zeropolynomial ~.
SinceNk
is anideal,
we may furtherassume Q
is ahomoge-
nous
polynomial
ofdegree
rk . 0 Let b EIIBk
be apoint
such thatQ(b) #
0. Consider themap h : IRI: -+ II~k, h(x)
=xlb,
x =(zij ... , xk)
EIRk.
ThenQ o h
=~(b)(xl)’’k . By
the substitutionproperty Q(b)(Xl)rlc E Nk
andQ(b) #
0implies (xl)’’x E Nk.
Consider further the map
h : IR~ 2013~ R~, h(xl, ..., xk) - (clxl
+ ... + CkXk,0, ... , 0)
witharbitrary
cl, ... , ck E ll8. Then(c1 x1
+... +ck xk )’’k
ENk
for allcl , ... , ck . If we evaluate this
expression
andinterpret
cl , ... , ck asundetermined,
we obtain that each monomial of
degree
rkbelongs
to~4.
Hencem(k)’’x
CJVk , QED.
4. The end of the proof.
In the next step we use the
following
property ofr-jets,
which isequivalent
totheir standard definition and can be verified
by
direct evaluation.If
two germsgermz f ,
gerrrlz g EGx (M, N)y satisf y jo ( f
0b)
=jo (g o b) for
all b : II~ ---~ M withb(O)
= x, thenj§ f
=jxg.
This iseasily
extended to thefollowing
assertion.Lemma 3.
If jo ( f o ~)
=jo (g o E)
for alls : 1~k --~
M with£(0)
= x, thenjz f
=j’g.
I’roof.
For everymap 6 : ?
- M we construct, E = 6 o p~ where pi :R k
2013~ R is theproduct projection
to the first factor. Thenjo ( f 0 C)
=jó(g 0 C)
has the samecoordinate
meaning
asj5(/
o6)
=jo (g o ~), QED.
Lemma 4. It holds rk = ri for all
k, I
E lY.Proof. By
Lemma 2 we know that for everyf,
g:Ii~k --~
M the condition~po f
= ~po9means
jo’‘ f
=jo’‘ g
with maximal rk. For every h EGo (R 1, II~k)o
we have~po( f oh) _ po (g
oh) . By
definitionof ri
thisimplies jo‘ ( f
oh)
=jo’ (g
oh) .
Hencejo‘ f
=jr’
gby
Lemma 3. Since rk ismaximal,
we have rk > ri.Replacing k
and1,
we, obtainthe converse
relation rl ~!
rk ,QED.
Denote
by
r the common value of all rk . Then it suffices to deduce that eachF(M, N)
is the associated fiber bundleF(M, N)
=pr M(T:nN)
to the rth order frame bundleP’’M(M, Gm)
with respect to thejet
action of its structure groupG’*
on
Tm N,
m =dimM. For every v Ep; M, v
=Sp( V)
we define v :F~ (M, N) - 7;~
Nby 3(p(B)) = ~(B
oV).
It holds~(B
oV) = ~(B)
o~(v)
and~(v) - jrV, p(B
oV)
=j’’(B o v).
For W =V o H, j’’H
EG~,
we havefv(W(B)) = p(B
oV)
op(H) = j’’ (B
oV) o j’’ (H).
Hence we have the standard situation of the smooth associated bundles. Thiscompletes
theproof
of Theorem 1.5. Final remark.
We conclude with a clarification of the
geometric meaning
of therequirement
IV. There is a
general procedure
how to construct thehomomorphic images
of thegerms of smooth maps which uses an
arbitrary
bundle functor E on thecategory
~i f
of all manifolds. Let .F.M denote thecategory
of smooth fibered manifolds and theirmorphisms
and let B :.F.M 2013~.M/be
the base functor.By
a bundlefunctor on
Mf
we mean a functor E :.J1~I f -->
.~’.J1~(satisfying B
o E =idm4 j
andthe localization condition:
for every manifold M and every open subset i : U ~
M,
EU is the re- striction of the fibered manifold EM --> M over U and Ei is the inclusion E~7 ~ EM.By
the localization property, for every smooth mapf :
M -;N,
the restrictionEx f : Ea.M 2013~ E~(x) N
ofE f
to the fiberE:t:M
of EM over x E Mdepends
ongerm.,
f only.
Definition 5. Let E be a bundle functor on
Mf.
We say that two smooth mapsI, 9 :
M --+ N determine the sameE-jet at:c6M,ifE’;r/= Exg.
Thecorresponding equivalence
class will be denotedby jx f or j E (germx f ) .
Write
JE(M, N)
for the set of allE-jets
of the smooth maps of M into N.Since E is a
functor, jE(g
of)
is characterizedby Ex(g
of)
=E f~x)g
oEx,f ,
so that the
composability
property IIalways
holds.However,
thefollowing example
demonstrates that theproduct property
IV need not to be satisfied. IConsider the k-th exterior power
A k T : ./i~t f --~
0M of thetangent
func-tor T.
Clearly, AkT
does not preserveproducts for k >_
2. If dimMk,
thenAk TM
is identified with M. HenceJn~ T (M, N)
is identified with M x N when-ever dimM k or dimJ1’ k.
Therefore,
ifdimM ~ k, dimNl k, dimN2
k anddimNi+dimN2 _> k,
then(M
xNi)
xM(M
xN2)
= M xN,
xNZ,
which isnot
isomorph.ic
toJnk T (M, Nl
xN2).
REFERENCES
[1]
Eck, D.J., Product preserving functors on smooth manifolds, J. Pure and Applied Algebra42 (1986),
133-140.[2]
Ehresmann, C., Oeuvres complètes et commentées, Parties I-1 et I-2, Suppléments au VolumeXXIV
(1983)
des Cahiers Topo. Géom. Diff..[3] Epstein, D. B. A.; Thurston W. P., Transformation groups and natural bundles, Proc. London Math. Soc. 38(1979), 219-236.
[4]
Kainz, G.; Michor, P.W., Natural transformations in differential geometry, Czechoslovak Math. J.37(1987),
584-607.[5]
Kolá0159, I., Covariant approach to natural transformations of Weil functors, Comment. Math.Univ. Carolin.
27(1986),
723-729.[6]
Kolá0159, I.; Michor, P.W,; Slovák, J., Natural operations in differential geometry, to appear.[7]
Luciano, O. O., Categories of multiplicative functors and Weil’s infinitely near points, NagoyaMath. J.
109(1988),
69-89.[8]
Palais, R. S.; Terng, C. L., Natural bundles have finite order, Topology16(1977),
271-277.[9]
Weil, A., Théorie des points proches sur les variétés différentielles, Colloque de topol. et géom.diff., Strasbourg, 1953, 111-117.
DEPARTMENT OF ALGEBRA AND