• Aucun résultat trouvé

Willingness-to-pay for a probabilistic flood forecast : a risk-based decision-making game

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Willingness-to-pay for a probabilistic flood forecast : a risk-based decision-making game"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-01529271

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01529271

Submitted on 30 May 2017

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access

archive for the deposit and dissemination of

sci-entific research documents, whether they are

pub-lished or not. The documents may come from

teaching and research institutions in France or

abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est

destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents

scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,

émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de

recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires

publics ou privés.

Willingness-to-pay for a probabilistic flood forecast : a

risk-based decision-making game

L. Arnal, M.H. Ramos, E. Coughlan, H.L. Cloke, E. Stephens, F. Wetterhall,

S-J Andel, F. Pappenberger

To cite this version:

L. Arnal, M.H. Ramos, E. Coughlan, H.L. Cloke, E. Stephens, et al.. Willingness-to-pay for a

prob-abilistic flood forecast : a risk-based decision-making game. EGU General Assembly 2016, Apr 2016,

Vienna, Austria. 1 p. �hal-01529271�

(2)

Geophysical Research Abstracts Vol. 18, EGU2016-7232, 2016 EGU General Assembly 2016

© Author(s) 2016. CC Attribution 3.0 License.

Willingness-to-pay for a probabilistic flood forecast: a risk-based

decision-making game

Louise Arnal (1,2), Maria-Helena Ramos (3), Erin Coughlan (4), Hannah L. Cloke (1,5), Elisabeth Stephens (1), Fredrik Wetterhall (2), Schalk-Jan van Andel (6), Florian Pappenberger (2,7)

(1) Department of Geography and Environmental Science, University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom, (2) ECMWF, Forecast Department, Reading, United Kingdom, (3) IRSTEA, Catchment Hydrology Research Group, UR HBAN, Antony, France, (4) Red Cross/Red Crescent Climate Centre, The Hague, the Netherlands, (5) Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom, (6) UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education, Delft, the Netherlands, (7) School of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom

Forecast uncertainty is a twofold issue, as it constitutes both an added value and a challenge for the forecaster and the user of the forecasts. Many authors have demonstrated the added (economic) value of probabilistic forecasts over deterministic forecasts for a diversity of activities in the water sector (e.g. flood protection, hydroelectric power management and navigation). However, the richness of the information is also a source of challenges for operational uses, due partially to the difficulty to transform the probability of occurrence of an event into a binary decision. The setup and the results of a risk-based decision-making experiment, designed as a game on the topic of flood protection mitigation, called “How much are you prepared to pay for a forecast?”, will be presented. The game was played at several workshops in 2015, including during this session at the EGU conference in 2015, and a total of 129 worksheets were collected and analysed. The aim of this experiment was to contribute to the understanding of the role of probabilistic forecasts in decision-making processes and their perceived value by decision-makers. Based on the participants’ willingness-to-pay for a forecast, the results of the game showed that the value (or the usefulness) of a forecast depends on several factors, including the way users perceive the quality of their forecasts and link it to the perception of their own performances as decision-makers. Balancing avoided costs and the cost (or the benefit) of having forecasts available for making decisions is not straightforward, even in a simplified game situation, and is a topic that deserves more attention from the hydrological forecasting community in the future.

Références

Documents relatifs

the introduction of patient choice of hospital for elective care; new general practitioner (GP), consultant and dental services contracts; the establishment of the National

Beware again; however, for the appearance of naiveté can be an effective means of deceit (see Law 21, Seem Dumber Than Your Mark). And even genuine naiveté is not free of the snares

Section 19 of the Reform Act places a statutory requirement on each organization involved in the commissioning and delivery of health and social care to provide information about

Special thanks go also to officials at the Scottish Government and at the Information Services Division (ISD) of NHS National Services Scotland for their assistance in providing

Responsibility for most aspects of health policy is devolved to the National Assembly for Wales and exercised by the Welsh Government, including the Minister for Health and

The purpose of our study is to try to fit a POMDP- based latent growth model using Bayesian methods to a set of data documenting the development of Reading skills in a number

Breast palpation / clinical breast exam (CBE) Not generally available at the public primary health care level. Generally available at the public primary health

human sensitivity toward nature allows mankind to be seen as belonging to the Whole, and of his close friendship with Patrick Geddes,7 another upholder of “think global, act local.”