• Aucun résultat trouvé

The effect of pathogens and pests on honey bee gene expression

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "The effect of pathogens and pests on honey bee gene expression"

Copied!
3
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-02757923

https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02757923

Submitted on 4 Jun 2020

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access

archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-entific research documents, whether they are pub-lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

The effect of pathogens and pests on honey bee gene

expression

Maria Navajas Navarro, Jean-Francois Martin, Yves Le Conte, . Queen’S

University Belfast

To cite this version:

Maria Navajas Navarro, Jean-Francois Martin, Yves Le Conte, . Queen’S University Belfast. The effect of pathogens and pests on honey bee gene expression. 3. European Conference of Apidology, Sep 2008, Belfast, United Kingdom. �hal-02757923�

(2)

The effect of pathogens and pests on honey bee gene expression

Maria Navajas, Jean-François Martin and Yves Le Conte

Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), Centre de Biologie et Gestion des Populations,Campus International de Baillarguet CS 30 016,34988 Montferrier sur Lez, cedex., FranceEmail: navajas@supagro.inra.fr

The effect of pathogens and pests on honey bee gene expression is a fascinating area of research in itself and can lead to new molecular tools for diagnostics and selection in beekeeping. In this framework, we first investigated Varroa-bee interactions by using a combination of nuc1ear and mitochondrial DNA markers of Varroa destructor to trace the parasite invasion of Apis mellifera

since it shifted from A. cerana. The extremely low worldwide mite genetic diversity found on A. mellifera outside Asia contrasts with the variety of known bee phenotypes regarding their response to the parasite. This prompted us to further explore the response of bees to Varroa, by using a

transcriptional study. We compared parasitized and non-parasitized full-sister pupae, from two different genetic stocks of bees: one susceptible and one resistant toVarroa. We used a honey bee cDNA microarray, which contained a total of ~ 6,778cDNAs representing ~ 5,500 different genes. We identified a set of genes that showed differential expression as a function of parasitization, another set that showed differential expression as a function of bee genotype, and a set of genes affected byboth factors. These patterns, and some of the genes that define them, are mostly involved in olfaction and sensitivity to stimuli. These results agree with the hypothesis that tolerance to Varroa is linked to a more efficient bee hygienic behaviour. In an ongoing work we further explore this hypothesis. Using q-PCR assays, we try to separate immunological and behavioral bee responses and also parasite effects from bee genotype effects.

(3)

'~:::.': .'",:',:.<',-',:'0::-c'.''.::<~

, .. '> .. ,-,,;.~ ....

,. .,:.,., .. ,:~ :_',.':~:,':".-<":,:'., ":':"/,,~:~;-"- ",

-a:11..

~~Rl~mber

200a .

jrclelJR'bPEAN

CON~È~È~CE

OFAPIDOLOGY .

'" .'... _.::', ,:,',.:>".:'.''': ...: , __ . " , " , " ' , c'•.._ ,.:,.,.... .... .".' ' . . .••.:.~.~, .~..., ... , . '. '-. .'. ,';

atthe

C

MBC,Queen'sUrliversity Belfast

97 Lisbûrn Raad

Références

Documents relatifs

When mapped to the honey bee genome sequence and compared to the database of GLEAN3-predicted genes, we found the following matches for the two libraries: In the mucus gland

We provided the foraging honey bees with a large flower array, allowed bees to naturally land on the array, and then counted how many bees visited and landed on focal flowers

In queens inoculated at 6 days post- emergence, the gene expression of eater and vitellogenin in gut tissue was significantly lower in inoculated queens compared to control queens at

Also, I checked each frame of worker comb in the lower two hive bodies of each colony’s hive to see if the bees had added a patch of drone comb, either within the wooden frame

In experiment 1, to follow the performances of bees through the whole procedure, we compared their responses on three given trials: (1) the first conditioning trial

(1987b) Response of foster Asian honeybee (Apis cerana Fabr.) colonies to the brood of European honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) infested with parasitic mite, Varroa jacobsoni

destructor, DEET served as a long-term inhibitor to the response of the chemosensory organ to nurse bee headspace volatiles, whereas in honey bee, it caused short-term inhibition

An amitraz formulation in slow-release plastic strips was tested on infested worker bees in small