• Aucun résultat trouvé

Chronic Groin Pain After Open, Transabdominal Preperitoneal and Totally Extraperitoneal Hernia Repair

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Chronic Groin Pain After Open, Transabdominal Preperitoneal and Totally Extraperitoneal Hernia Repair"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

I N V I T E D C O M M E N T A R Y

Chronic Groin Pain After Open, Transabdominal Preperitoneal

and Totally Extraperitoneal Hernia Repair

Markus Scha¨fer

Published online: 4 February 2010

Ó Socie´te´ Internationale de Chirurgie 2010

The advent of endoscopic surgery, developments of mesh technology, and increasing cost containment have domi-nated the debate about inguinal hernia repair during the last decade and a half. In addition, socioeconomic issues (i.e., time to return to work, quality of life) and chronic post-operative pain are being scrutinized.

It has been estimated that 5–10% of patients after inguinal hernia repair suffer from chronic pain that severely impairs daily life [1, 2]. Whereas inflammatory and nociceptive types of pain are rather acute, neuropathic pain represents the typical persistent pain following sur-gery. From a pathophysiologic point of view, nerve dam-age is an obligatory prerequisite for the development of neuropathic chronic pain [2]. The definition of neuropathic pain includes several criteria that must be fulfilled (Table1) [3]. A key feature of neuropathic pain is the combination of sensory loss with paradoxical hypersensi-tivity. Notably, hypoalgesia and hypoesthesia are common sensory disturbances in many patients who have undergone inguinal hernia repair, but its occurrence may be unrelated to chronic pain. There is some evidence that chronic pain ‘‘burns out’’ in half of the patients within 5 years of the operation [4].

Taking a close look at the current literature dealing with chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair, one encounters a bundle of problems and unsolved issues that impairs nearly any meaningful conclusion [2]. Unclear definitions, dif-ferent methods of pain assessment, lack of long-term

follow-up, and improper study design represent the major shortcomings. In addition, patient-related and surgery-related factors must be separately analyzed to differentiate correctly the various aspects of chronic pain. Surgical research has traditionally focused on surgery-related fac-tors (e.g., mesh type, mesh fixation, nerve handling, sur-gical approaches). Patient-related factors have only rarely been investigated. Nevertheless, it is known that preoper-ative inguinal pain, young age, pain at other sites of the body, psychosocial factors, and intensity of acute (early postoperative) pain have a major impact on chronic pain [5]. There is also recent evidence that genetic variations may exert major influence on the susceptibility among individuals [2].

A typical example of the surgical research revealing all the methodological difficulties is provided in this issue of the Journal by Bright and colleagues, who report their series of different types of hernia repair with a particular focus on chronic pain [6]. The authors made considerable efforts to analyze their large experience with hernia surgery to gain detailed insight into the frustrating problem of chronic inguinal pain. Unfortunately, the findings are rather disappointing and of limited value. Why?

M. Scha¨fer (&)

Department of Visceral Surgery, Centre Hospitalier

Universitaire Vaudois, University Hospital, Rue du Bugnon 21, Lausanne 1011, Switzerland

e-mail: markus.schafer@chuv.ch; markus.schaefer@access.unizh.ch

Table 1 Diagnosis of definite neuropathic pain (all factors must be present)

Pain in a neuroanatomically defined area corresponding to a peripheral or central innervation territory

History of a relevant lesion in the nervous system that is temporally related to development of pain

Partial or complete sensory loss in all or part of the painful area with paradoxical hypersensitivity

Confirmation of a nerve lesion by a specific test (surgical evidence, imaging, clinical neurophysiology, biopsy)

123

World J Surg (2010) 34:697–698 DOI 10.1007/s00268-010-0440-5

(2)

First, a clear definition of chronic pain is lacking. As a consequence, attendance in the pain clinic after herniorra-phy had to be used as a substitute for the incidence of chronic pain. Preoperative inguinal pain was not assessed, and no information is given on early postoperative pain and its analgesic treatment. Second, the diagnostic algorithm and methods to assess patients with chronic pain prior to treatment are not mentioned. Of note, ‘‘pain doctors’’ did not even use a quantitative pain scoring system, either for diagnostic assessment or for treatment control. Thus, how could the diagnosis of chronic inguinal pain and a treat-ment rationale be established? Third, important technical aspects of the hernia surgery (i.e., the type of mesh and fixation method, nerve handling) are not completely pro-vided. The human factor (i.e., the individual surgical experience) has not been taken into account despite the fact that there were at least 38 consultant teams involved in the hernia surgery. Fourth, a retrospective study design is not appropriate for assessing postoperative chronic pain.

To improve the quality and reliability of future studies, the Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials (IMMPACT) has recom-mended that six core outcome domains be considered when designing chronic pain clinical trials: pain, physical func-tioning, emotional funcfunc-tioning, participant ratings of improvement and satisfaction with treatment, symptoms and adverse events, and participant disposition [7]. Such standardized outcome measurement in combination with preoperative pain assessment used in a prospective study

design would enable surgeons to obtain evidence-based information on the important issue of chronic inguinal pain concerning its best assessment and treatment, respectively. Furthermore, only multicenter studies using the same protocols can provide adequate patient numbers.

In conclusion, there is increasing knowledge on chronic postoperative pain formation. The surgical community must become aware of those findings to manage patients with chronic pain successfully after inguinal hernia repair.

References

1. Poobalan AS, Bruce J, Smith WC et al (2003) A review of chronic pain after inguinal herniorrhaphy. Clin J Pain 19:48–54

2. Kehlet H, Jensen TS, Woolf CJ (2006) Persistent postsurgical pain: risk factors and prevention. Lancet 367:1618–1625

3. Rasmussen PV, Sindrup SH, Jensen TS et al (2004) Symptoms and signs in patients with suspected neuropathic pain. Pain 110:461– 469

4. Kehlet H (2008) Chronic pain after groin hernia repair. Br J Surg 95:135–136

5. Kalkman CJ, Visser K, Moen J et al (2003) Preoperative prediction of severe postoperative pain. Pain 105:415–423

6. Bright E, Reddy MV, Wallace D et al (2010) The incidence and success of treatment for severe chronic groin pain after open, transabdominal preperitoneal, and totally extraperitoneal hernia repair. World J Surg. doi:10.1007/s00268-010-0410-y

7. Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Farrar JT et al (2005) Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommen-dations. Pain 113:9–19

698 World J Surg (2010) 34:697–698

Références

Documents relatifs

Addiction to pharmaceutical opiates has been noted by the medical community as one of the common side-effects of extended use by patients (such as those suffering from chronic

T hank you for publishing the healthy debate 1 in the May issue of Canadian Family Physician surrounding the article by Dhalla and colleagues on prescribing of opioid

Figure 4.4: The frequencies and amplitudes for spontaneous and miniature excitatory post-synaptic currents (EPSC) in ChAT::EGFP and Non-ChAT cells in horizontal (HS), parasagittal

The most reproducible patterns associated with NP are: (i) tonic hypoactivity of the thalamus contralateral to the painful region; (ii) deficit in

We expected that individuals with better inhibition abilities would show a stronger atten- tional focus on the working memory task and better resist the impulse to turn

[r]

As long as the comparison is not made against a treatment defined as the best quality standard for a specific procedure at the time of the comparison, the value of such

26 Yet another placebo- controlled RCT reported that local anesthetic infusion through two catheters placed—one in the subfascial plane and the other subcutaneously—resulted