Sediment evolution in the mouth of the Seine estuary (France): A long-term monitoring during the last 150 years

(1)

HAL Id: hal-01398539

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01398539

Submitted on 17 Nov 2016

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access

archive for the deposit and dissemination of

sci-entific research documents, whether they are

pub-lished or not. The documents may come from

teaching and research institutions in France or

abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est

destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents

scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,

émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de

recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires

publics ou privés.

Sediment evolution in the mouth of the Seine estuary

(France): A long-term monitoring during the last 150

years

Sandric Lesourd, Patrick Lesueur, Cédric Fisson, Jean-Claude Dauvin

To cite this version:

Sandric Lesourd, Patrick Lesueur, Cédric Fisson, Jean-Claude Dauvin. Sediment evolution in the

mouth of the Seine estuary (France): A long-term monitoring during the last 150 years. Comptes

Ren-dus Géoscience, Elsevier Masson, 2016, 348, pp.442-450. �10.1016/j.crte.2015.08.001�. �hal-01398539�

(2)

Stratigraphy,

Sedimentology

(Geology

of

Sedimentary

Basins)

Sediment

evolution

in

the

mouth

of

the

Seine

estuary

(France):

A

long-term

monitoring

during

the

last

150 years

Sandric

Lesourd

a,

*

,

Patrick

Lesueur

a

,

Ce´dric

Fisson

b

,

Jean-Claude

Dauvin

a

NormandieUniversite´,UNICAEN,M2C,CNRS,UMR6143,24,ruedesTilleuls,14032Caen,France b_GIP_Seine-Aval,_poˆle_re´gional_des_savoirs,_115,_boulevard_de_l’Europe,₇₆₁₀₀_Rouen,_France

1. Introduction

Manyestuarieshavebeensubjectedtostronghuman impacts(Blottetal.,2006;Hossainetal.,2004;Lesourd etal.,2003;MorrisandMitchell,2013;PyeandBlott,2014; Thomasetal.,2002;Tonisetal.,2002;VanderWaletal., 2002;Wolanski,2006;Wolanskietal.,2001).Amongthem themacrotidalSeineestuaryisagoodexample.Duringthe lastdecades,astrongartiﬁcialreductioninthe accommo-dationspace,superimposedonnaturalvariations,hasled to a downstream shift of the sedimentation area. The comparison of old nautical charts and sedimentological data fromthe 19th century shows an increase in ﬁne-grainedsedimentation(i.e.mud,grainsize<63

m

m)inthe outletoftheSeineRiver,aswellasintheshallowwatersof theBayoftheSeine.Themodernﬁne-graineddeposition extendstotheopensubtidalshallowarea(Lesourdetal.,

2001;Lesueuretal.,2003).Asaresultinthemouthofthe Seineestuary,coresshowafiningupregressivesequence thatcorrespondstoashiftfromaninnershelftermwith pebblesandcoarsesands,toanestuarinetermwithmud and fine sand (Lesourd et al., 2001). Moreover, the distribution of superficial sediment is governed by seasonalvariations,dependingonboththeriverdischarge intensityandthewaveactivity(Lesourdetal.,2003):when 55%ofthetotalmouthareaiscoveredbymudattheendof thewinter,thisamountisapproximatelyof24%attheend ofthesummer.

Theaimofthisstudyistounderstandtheevolutionof thesuperficialsedimentation,overthelast150years.The main question isto estimatetheimpactof engineering worksonthesedimentationofanestuary.Thesetofdata onsuperficialsedimentisextensiveenoughandcoherent topermit acorrelation withthehydrodynamiccontext, suchastheriverflowrateonthesedimentation.Beyond this question, this study involves a larger work of monitoring of an estuary submitted to strong human impact since themiddle of the 19th century, using an

ARTICLE INFO

Articlehistory: Received28July2015

Acceptedafterrevision19August2015 Availableonline17December2015 HandledbySylvieBourquin Keywords: Sedimentation Estuary Riverﬂows SeineRiver ABSTRACT

Theaimofthisstudyistounderstandtheevolutionofthesuperficialsedimentation,over thelast150yearsonthemouthoftheSeineestuary.Anindicatoriscreated,calculatingthe percentageareacorrespondingtothedifferentfaciesforeachsetofavailabledata (mid-19thcenturyto2009).Theshiftbetweenthe1970s(16%ofsurfaceareaofmudandmuddy sand),the1990s(about50%)and2009(5%)appearsclearly.Thedecreaseinthemuddy areaisbalancedwithanincreaseofsandymudandmuddysandsurface.Thisevolution could be explainedby riverflowrate activity. TheSeineestuary is anaturally tide-dominatedestuary; however,engineeringactivitieshave increasedtheenergy ofthe channelizedriver.Consideringthefine-grainedfractioninthesuperficialsedimentsand itsvariations,theSeineestuaryhasshiftedtoariver-dominatedsystem.

ß2015Acade´miedessciences.PublishedbyElsevierMassonSAS.Thisisanopenaccess articleundertheCCBY-NC-NDlicense(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/ 4.0/).

* Correspondingauthor.

E-mailaddress:sandric.lesourd@unicaen.fr(S.Lesourd).

ContentslistsavailableatScienceDirect

Comptes

Rendus

Geoscience

ww w . sci e nc e di r e ct . com

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crte.2015.08.001

1631-0713/ß2015Acade´miedessciences.PublishedbyElsevierMassonSAS.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCCBY-NC-NDlicense(http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

(3)

originalsetofdata,usefulformonitoringtheevolutionof theestuary.

2. Background

TheSeineisthelargestriverthatﬂowsintotheEnglish Channel (La Manche). It hasa length of 780km and a catchmentareaof78,000km2_in_which_40%_of_the_French

population and economic activityis concentrated (Paris Basin).TheSeineestuaryistheresultofthedrowningof the Weichselian incised valley during the Holocene transgression (Lefebvre et al., 1974), as is the case of manymodernestuaries(Dalrympleetal.,1992;Fairbridge, 1980;Perillo,1996).Thepresent-daymorphologyofthe downstream partof theSeine is theresultof its ﬁlling duringtheHolocene(Lesueuretal.,2003;Tessier,2012;

Tessieret al., 2010). The downstream partof theSeine estuaryisfunnel-shapedwithamouththatopenstowards thewestwithelongatedsandbarsthataretypicalof tide-dominatedestuaries (Dalrympleetal., 1992).The mean riverdischargeis400m3_/s_(1940–2014_average,

measure-mentatPosesLock,seeFig.1),withmeanextremevalues of200–2000m3_/s1_._The_mean_annual_mass_of_suspended

particulatematter(SPM)intheriverdischargeisestimated tobeabout6105_T/year_(GIP_Seine-Aval),_with_marked

variations over years, extreme values being 1.3105– 1.7106_T/year _{(‘‘Service} _de _navigation _de _la _Seine’’,

unpublished data). The modalities of sediment supply accordingtofreshwaterﬂowhavebeendocumentedin

Avoine(1987),Gue´zennecetal.(1999),andLesourdetal. (2003).A great partofSPM andmud of thestudyarea originates from the catchment area of the Seine River

Fig.1.Mapofsuperﬁcialsedimentinthemouth(088Eto08;49823to49832N)oftheSeineestuary,includingpartofthemainnavigationchannelandthe northernandsouthernchannels,basedonthe2009–2010samplingcampaigndata.Accordingtosiltandclaycontents:sand(<5%),muddysand(5–25%), sandymud(25–75%),mud(>75%).Pebblefaciesareinterpretedasinapreviousstudy(Lesourdetal.,2001;Lesueuretal.,2003)usingdrilling,forthesame area(seeFig.2).

(4)

(Dubrulle et al., 2007). The sediment cover is mostly composedoffine-grainedmaterial(siltandclay).Thetidal amplitudeatLeHavreis3mduringneaptidesand7.5m duringspringtides.Aflowvelocityupto2.5m/s atthe surface (1.60m/s on the bottom) can occur during the risingtide.Thetidalcycleissemi-diurnalwithahighwater slack close to 3h. In the Seine estuary, as in other macrotidalestuaries,thesuspendedsediment concentra-tionintheturbiditymaximum(TM)ismainlygovernedby tidalcurrents(Allenetal.,1980;Avoine,1987;Brenonand LeHir,1999;LeHiretal.,2001;Lietal.,1995;Mitchell etal.,2003,2012;SalomonandAllen,1983;Wells,1995). Thesuspendedsedimentconcentrationvariesfrom0.1to 1g/L, associatedwithfluid mud(100–300g/L),duringa semi-lunartidalcycle.ThetotalmassoftheTMvariesfrom 2105Tduringneaptideto4106Tduringspringtide (Avoineetal.,1981),withalongitudinaloscillationofthe massgravitycentreoftheTMofabout20km.Duringhigh riveroutput,a varying but largeproportion oftheSPM containedintheTMisexpelledouttotheBayoftheSeine (Avoine, 1987). Propagation of swells within the Seine estuary is highly complex and poorly documented. Complexityisduetotheunevenmorphology(sandbars, embankments)and waterdepthsthat varyrapidlywith the tide conditions. Nevertheless, the Seine estuary is mainlysubjectedtowesterlytonorth-westerlyswellsand towavesgeneratedbylocalwindsintheBayoftheSeine, withawesterlydominance.

3. Materialandmethods

Anewsetofsuperﬁcialsedimentssamples(Table1)has beencollectedinthemouthoftheSeineestuaryduringthe years2009–2010(COLMATAGEproject,intheframework of Seine-Aval program). Sample stations were chosen accordingtoaregulargrid(1nauticalmilespacedout).The setofdataconsistsofamainsamplingmadeduringMay 2009 (300 samples). Some additional samples were realizedduringyears2009–2010.Someofthem(27)were reacquiringsamplestationstostudyseasonalvariationsof thesedimentation.Atotalof561sampleswereanalysed.It mustbenoticedthatmappingbymarinegeophysics,such

asside-scansonar,isnotrelevantinthestudyareabecause thepicturesshowgenerallymonotonousacousticsfacies (Lesourd,unpublisheddata). Samplesweretakenwitha ShipekgrabandaReineckbox-corer;severalsampleswere realizedoneachpointtoaccountforlocalfaciesvariations and/orwhenthesampleswerenotrelevant(reworkingof sedimentarylayersduringsampling,oremptygrab).

Each sample wasdescribed and photographed. Sub-samplings were realized according to the sediment structuration. In the case of coarse sediments (gravel), the sediment was sieved in a dry environment using 15 sieveswith Frenchstandard mesh sizes(i.e. AFNOR definition); the particle size distribution of the other sampleswas obtainedwitha Laser CoulterLS230.The sedimentologicalclassificationofsampleswasestablished usingboth structural(asdescribedinthegrab afterthe sampling) and textural (grain size used to reinforce structural description) characteristics. The classification isdisplayedinFig.1.

The2009map(Fig.1)hasbeenobtainedwithmanual correlation(Diesingetal.,2014),usingbathymetricdata associated with a knowledge based on more than 1500 samples realized in the Seine estuary since the 1990s. Areas were drawn using density of points, morphology(limitofbank,trough)andseasonalvariations whenastationwassampledduringtoseveralseasons.The highnumberofsamplespermitstodrawarelevantmap, butneitherthedensityofsamples(toofew)norvariations ofsedimentaryfacies(scatteredgeographicaldistribution) allowustousestatisticalanalysestocreatethemap.GIS softwarewasusedtocalculatetheareacorrespondingto thevariousfacies.

The2009data,associatedwithfourothermaps(Fig.2), forma verycomplete andoriginalsetallowinga better understandingofthestoryoftheSeineestuarysediments. 4. Resultsandinterpretation

Thedistributionofsuperﬁcialsedimentsinthemouth oftheSeineestuary(Fig.1)showsin2009–2010a high diversity of facies. Most of the samples correspond to sandymudormuddysand,whereasveryfewofthem(7%)

Table1

SetofsuperﬁcialsedimentssamplescollectedinthemouthoftheSeineestuaryduringtheyears2009–2010(COLMATAGEproject,intheframeworkof Seine-Avalprogram).

Date Numberandmethodof sampling

Source Constructionworkbackground forthestudyarea(seeLesourd etal.,2001)

Flowratebackground (seeFig.3)

19thcentury Northernpart,1834, 364sounding,southernpart, 1883,9310soundings

SHOM,1834–1883 Savageestuary Unknown

1913 30,000soundings SHOM,1913 Constructionworksbut upstream

Unknown 1977 655Shipeckgrabsand

40shortcores

Avoineetal.,1981 Justbeforetheconstructionof majordikes

Normalﬂowratedynamic 1993–1996 1100Shipeckgrabsand

125shortcores,(12sampling campaign)

Lesourdetal.,2001 Continuousconstructionworks Normalﬂowratedynamic

2009 561Shipeckgrabsand 10shortcores(4sampling campaignsin2009–2010)

Thisstudy Continuousconstructionworks Afteralongperiodoflow ﬂowrate

(5)

containmorethan75%ofsiltandclay.Consideringgrain size,mostofsamplesareamixtureofthreemainclasses (>200

m

m,[63–200

m

m],<63

m

m),involvinganunsorted stock of sedimentary material. Sediments<63

m

m are composed ofa constant proportionof coarsesilts ([63– 20

m

m],around30%),ﬁnesilts([20–4

m

m],50%)andclay (<4

m

m,20%).Fourmodesarerevealedbythegrainsize laser analysis (18, 38, 97 and 200

m

m), systematically detected,withvariablerelativeproportions.

This2009map (Fig.1)revealsarepresentationofall facies,withascatteredgeographicaldistribution.Ageneral overviewshows:

thewide sandbarson thetwosidesoftheendofthe navigationchannel;

alargegeographicalrepresentationofsandymudfacies (25to75%ofsiltandclay);

anareaofmuddysandfaciesjuxtaposingcoarsesandin theshallowerwateroftheBayoftheSeine.

Thenorthernchannelischaracterizedby high-scatte-red facies, featuring reworking of both seabed and mudflats(originatedintheformationofanewchannel). The seabedof thenavigation channelis also underthe influenceofpermanentengineeringworks(i.e.dredging) andshowsaninconstantpatternoffacies,essentiallyshell fragmentsandmudpebbles,asdiscussedlater.Anumber of samples correspond to pebble and gravel, generally Flandrianandante-Flandrianmaterial,difficulttosample withgrabs,andmorelocallytheycorrespondtooutcrops ofMesozoicrocks.Akindofspecificsedimentiscomposed

ofverystiffancientblackmudcharacterizingtheseabedof formerchannels,inthenorthernandsouthernmarginsof theestuary.Consideringonlythegrainsize,thisfaciesis ﬁne-grained (more than 85% of silt and clay) but neverthelessmustbeconsideredasoutcrops.Abovemost of this facies, variable and temporary sedimentation includingﬂuidmudorsandripplescanbefound.

Themudfacies(siltandclay>75%)ispoorlyexposed, comparativelytotheformer1996study(seethemapin

Lesourdetal.,2001).Mudcanbefoundaroundthelarge sandbanksandwithintroughs.However,consideringthe visualdescriptionandnotonlythegrainsizeanalysis,silt andclaycanbesampledaslittlemudpebblesofverysoft mud,layeringontheseabed,whateverthefacies. These soft mud pebbles were not included in the grain size measurements,andcouldbefoundalloverthestudyarea, asdiffusemud deposits.Theyprobably correspondtoa residueofﬂuidmuddepositsastheresultoftheexpelling anddepositionofturbiditymaximumduringﬂoodevents. Thesandymudfacies(25to75%ofsiltandclay)was verywellrepresented onthewhole mouthoftheSeine estuary in 2009–2010. This facies occupies the former place of the mud facies, especially in theNorth of the estuary,whereitreplacesmudandcoverscoarsesandand muddysandareas.

Themuddysandfacies(5–25%ofsiltandclay)isalso largely represented on this map, contrasting with the situationin1996,whenveryfewsamplescorrespondedto thisfacies.Morethanarecoveringoftheformerfacies,this appearsasasiltandclayenrichmentofthesand,mostlyon theexternal partof theestuary. So,muddy sandfacies appears:

Fig.2.SedimentaryfaciesevolutionoftheSeineestuaryoverﬁveperiodsoftime(seeFig.1forgrainsizeclassiﬁcation)Redline:delimitationofcommon areaonwhicharecalculatedpercentageareascorrespondingtothedifferentfacies(mud,sandymud,muddysandandsand).SeeTable1forthesourceof data.Accordingtosiltandclaycontents:sand(<5%),muddysand(5–25%),sandymud(25–75%),mud(>75%).Data:SHOM(1834–1883);SHOM(1913);

Avoineetal.(1981);Lesourdetal.(2001).

(6)

inthewesternpartoftheestuary,widelyovertheformer areaofmuddysand;

on the northwestern part of the estuary where the correspondingsurfaceareasincrease;

alongthenortherncoast.

Theformerstudy(Lesueuretal.,2003;Lesourdetal., 2003)showedthatthemuddyarea(i.e.muddysandand sandymud)didnotpasstothewestovertheGreenwich meridian;thislimit isupto28Waccordingtothenew sampling.

Thesandfacies(lessthan5%ofsiltandclay)ispoorly represented in the mouth of the Seine estuary, mainly extendingatshallowdepths,onbothsidesoftheendofthe dikes.Sandformsthetopofwidebanks,thenorthernone beingmainlycomposedofthixotropicsandandprobably suppliedbytheKannickdepositofsedimentdredging.

Some of the 2009 facies are very speciﬁc and new, comparedtothe1996map(Fig.2).Itisthecaseofshells layers,withsamplesthatmaycontainupto99%inweight ofshells,eitherasfragmentsorentire.Someofthemare foundattheseabedofthenavigationchannelandnorthern channel;othersareoverlappinglocallyaseabedofgravels andpebbles.Thesedeposits,easilytransported,originate intheerosionandsortingofsedimentbytidalcurrentsand swells,butalsounderthedredgingworksofthenavigation channel and Port 2000 works. Another speciﬁc facies correspondstomudpebbles.Theyweredescribedinthe former 1996 situation (Lesourd et al., 2003), but very locallyandaslowerfrequencies,andlayeringabovethe surface of other sediments. They were foundjust after strong gales that had eroded stiff mud deposits. In the presentstudy,theyappearasanindividualfacies,dueto theirwideextensionoverthewholestudyareaandtheir high amounts in the corresponding sediments: mud pebbles representup to 30% in weight of the samples. Theyarepebblesofstiffmud,mixedwithamuddysandor sandymud.Theseheterometricpebblesarefoundinthe navigation channel and in the northern channel, and, dependingonthelocation,aretheresultof:

dismantling of the seabed by dredging works (in the navigationchannel);

erosionofdepositsbyswells;

erosionofstiffmudofthenorthernmudﬂatassociated with theshiftingof thenorthernchannel (due tothe embankmentsofLeHavrePort2000works).

Theevolutionofsuperficialsedimentsfrom1834–1883 to1993–1996 was described and discussed by Lesourd etal.(2001).Thecontributionofournewdatahighlights the more recent evolution and the relative impact of hydrodynamicparameters(essentiallyriverflowrates)on thesedimentation(Fig.2).Inthemiddleof19thcentury, theSeineestuarywasstillconsideredasa ‘‘savage’’(i.e. pristine) estuary, because it was not yet affected by dredging or the effects of major port works. In 1913, construction works are still localised upstream. During year1977and after,constructionsare importantin the estuary(major dikes finished in 1980). 1993–1996 and

2009situations are alsocharacterizedby strong human impact.Inthemiddleofthe19thcentury,about65%ofthe superficialsedimentsweresands,transitingoveroutcrops of gravel and pebble, especially in the northern area. Muddy facies,poorly represented, wereassociated with troughs.In1913,sandsoccupiedthemostpartofthestudy area; in thenorthern area, sand ridges covered former gravel and pebble outcrops. Mud was found only in troughs.Accordingtothe1977situation,gravelandpebble outcropshavebeencoveredbysandandsandymud;the mostfrequentfacieswerestillsandy,but thetotalmud area had increased. In the 1993–1996 situation, sand formedwide sandbanks. Muddyand sandymud facies wereprevailing, spreading over sand,aroundthebanks andatthebottomofthechannels.Theincreaseinmuddy facies was thenexplained by themodificationof water circulation, according to the construction of new dikes (Lesourdetal.,2003).The2009situationcorrespondsto theremovalofthefine-grainedsediments,thedecreasein mud being balancedby theincrease in mixedmaterial, sandymudandmuddysand;therehasbeenalsoaclear westwardextensionofmuddysand.

TheSeineRiverﬂowrateshavebeenmeasuredfromthe 1940s.Fig.3showsthenumberofdayswithaﬂowrate exceeding700m3_/s,_which_is_a_rough_threshold_estimate

fromwhichflow ratecouldbehighenoughtoinducea significantsedimentationinthemouth(Gue´zennecetal., 1999).Theflowratemustbestrong,butalsolongenough toinduce‘‘estuarinefloods’’(Garnaudetal.,2002,2003), expellingtheTMandassociatedfluidmudovertheareaof themouth.Duringtheendofthe1970s,thehydrological contextwasastrongandprolongedlowflowrateperiod (e.g.,onlyafewdayswithflowrate>700m3_/s_in_1977).

Duringthemid-1990s(1996map,Fig.2),thenumberof dayswithriverfloodswassignificant(until140in1995), whereasbefore2009,thenumberofdayswithhighflow rate was moderate (max 77), so that no strong fine sedimentation occurred during a period of about nine years.

For each set of available data, mid-19th century, 1913, 1977, 1993–1996 and 2009, the percentage of areascorrespondingtotheﬁvemainfacies(mud,sandy mud,muddysand,sandandgravel,andpebble)overthe same total area of the mouth (Fig. 2)were calculated (Fig.4).Itﬁrstshowstheverygoodconsistencyofthis sedimentologicalindicatorwiththeevolutiondescribed with maps, even with the oldest charts based on the tallow sounding method (19th century, 1913). The proportionofgravelandpebble,hardground,andsand remained constant up to 1977. Nevertheless, from 1913 to 1977, a slight variation occurred between mud and sandy mud (due to the distinction between mud and sandy mud donesince the 1997 study). The shiftbetweentheendofthe1970s(16%ofsurfacearea of mudandmuddy sand)andthe1990s(about50% in surfaceofmudandmuddysand)appearsclearly.Itmust benoticedthatthesiltationoftheSeineestuaryisstill nowadaysimportant, butwhilethe1993–1996 muddy areascorrespondedtothicklayers(10cmtolocallyupto 1m)ofmudcoveringasandyandgravellysubstratum, mostsamplesin2009correspondtoamixofsandand

(7)

mudwithoutanyinternalstructure.So,thedecreasein thetotalmuddyareawasfromabout40%in1996to5% in2009,balancedbyanincreaseinsandymud(from14% to24%)andmuddysand(from6to22%)surfaces.During

this time, the total area corresponding to sand has remainednearlythesame.Thereisalsoaslightincrease in hardground surfaces,corresponding tooutcropping stiffmud.

Fig.3.Annualoccurrenceofflood/highflowrateeventsoverthe1941–2011period.Blackline:numberofdayswhentheflowrateexceeded700m3 /s, roughestimatethresholdfromwhichtheflowratecouldbehighenoughtoinduceasignificantsedimentationinthemouth.Thisnumberisanapproachto measuretheflowrateduringayear.Greyline:numberofdayswhentheflowrateexceeded1500m3_/s,_which_is_a_{significantly}_strong_flow_rate_for_the_Seine estuary.

Fig.4.Percentagesofareascorrespondingtothedifferentfacies(mud,sandymud,muddysandandsand)intheirproportionofthecommonestuarymouth area(reddelimitation,Fig.2),calculatedforeachsetofavailabledata(19thcentury/around1850,1913,1977,1993–1996and2009).Accordingtosiltand claycontents:sand(<5%),muddysand(5–25%),sandymud(25–75%),mud(>75%).Sandymudfaciesisnotdiscriminatedfor1834/1883and1913,and mergedwithmudfacies.

(8)

5. Discussion

Superficialsedimentationofestuariesevolves accord-ing to multi-decennial and seasonal time-scales, as describedintheHudsonRiver(Woodruffetal.,2001)or in theHumber-Ouse(Uncles et al., 1998). In the lower Seineestuary(Lesourdetal.,2003),superficialsediments havebeenshowntobesubmittedtosignificantseasonal changesduringtheyears1993–1996:mudandsandymud covered55%ofsurfaceduringwinter,whentheturbidity maximum commonly shifted toward themouth during highriverflows,inducingmuddeposition,whereas24%of the surface was characterized by mud and sandy mud duringthesummerperiod.Attheendofthewinter, fine-grainedsedimentcanbereworkedandscatteredoverthe estuary,apartbeingtransportedupstream(channelsand feedingtheTM),anotherpartbeingexpelledtotheBayof theSeine.

Thenewsetofsamplescollectedin2009–2010includes anumberofreacquiringsamplingstations(RSS).Seasonal variationswereverylightforbothgrainsize(%<63

m

m) andfacies.Thisinvolvesaweakimpactofmudsuppliesby theriverduring few highﬂowrate periods.Areaswith strong seasonal evolution are seabed composed of stiff mud,occasionallycoveredwithsandorﬂuidmud.Areas withslightvariationsareessentiallylocalizedaroundsand banks,suggestingamovingboundaryofthesebanks,with avariationoffaciesfromsandymudtomuddysand.

Theevolution ofsuperﬁcialsedimentsisanindicator characterizingthemorphological evolution ofthe Seine estuary.Maps haveshown aclearevolution from sand-dominated seabed, as generallyin estuaries (Dalrymple etal.,1992;Perillo,1996)toseabedmainlycomposedof sandymud,thenmud.Thisevolutioniscorrelatedwiththe anthropogenicevolutionofestuary(Lesourdetal.,2001; MorrisandMitchell, 2013;Thomasetal.,2002;Vander Waletal.,2002;Wolanski,2006).Theevolutionillustrated bythe2009dataischaracterizedby:

astrongdecreaseinthetotalmudfaciesarea(facieswith morethan75%ofsiltandclay);

ashiftfrommudandsandymudtomuddysand; a decrease in sandy area balanced by an increase in

muddysandarea;

theextensionofthemuddysandareaby4kmbeyond theformerknownboundaries.

The ﬁne-grained sediment did not disappear in the studyarea,buthasspreadovertheestuaryandhasbeen incorporated in the sandy fraction. The silt and clay contentoftheSeineestuaryisalsostillsigniﬁcant.

Theratiobetweenthemud-dominatedarea(surfaceof mud and sandy mud) and the sand-dominated area (surfaceofsandandmuddysand) isagoodindicatorof thetemporalchangesofthesuperﬁcialsediment(Fig.5).It is calculated over a common area on theﬁve maps,as shown in Fig. 2. Before 1977, this ratio was around 0.25.Thechangebetween1977and1993–1996appears veryclearly,witharatioincreasingupto1.5. Themost recentdata(2009)correspondtoaratioof0.54,illustrating

thepersistenceofthesiltandclaycontentinthesediment andaspreadingofmudoverthearea.Siltandclaycontent increasebysettlingontheseabedandmixingbycurrent andswell.Stiffmudpebblesarespeciﬁcsourcesofsiltation when they rest on the top of the seabed and are transported by tidal currents and swells. Eroded by abrasion,theyreleasea ﬁne-grainedmaterial,mainlyin thewaterbutalsoinsidethesediment.Asobservedinthe mostrecentsamples,theycanbeincorporatedintosandor muddysand.Trappedmudballsarealsomixedwithinthe sediment,leadingtoaninternalmudsupply.Observations ofmanygrabcontentsshowpebblesbeingeroded(friction wear), sothat theyappear as‘‘ghosts’’of mud pebbles, their boundaries being erased when integrated in the sandymatrix.

TheSeineRiverflowshavebeenmeasuredattheupper limitoftheestuaryfrom1941uptotoday(GIPSeine-Aval). Duringtheendofthe1970s,flowratesweregenerallyvery low(Fig.3),whichcouldexplaintheremainingofsandy areas,eventakingintoaccountthefactthatengineering workwasalreadyfinishedupstreambeforethisperiod.For theyears1993–1996,periodsofhighflowratesoccurred frequently, although 2009 data were collected after differentconditions;superimposedonseasonalvariations, long periods (about 9years) of low river flows (when storage of fine-grained sediments occurred within the estuary)weredisruptedbyfewandshortperiodsofhigh river discharges (when mud supply increased in the downstreampartoftheestuary).Beforeandduringyears 1993–1996,flowrateswerestrongenoughtodisplacethe turbidity maximum downstream, to expel it from the navigation channeland totrigger a highsedimentation rateofmudintothemouthoftheestuary.So,highsupply ofmudinvolvedadepositionofthicklayersoffine-grained sediment.Undertheseconditions,thesedepositsarethen reworkedanddispersedallovertheestuary,accordingto seasonalvariations,asdescribedabove.Whensuppliesof estuarinefine-grainedsedimentsaretooweak,reworking

Fig.5.Ratioofmuddyarea(mudandsandymud)tosandyarea(sandand muddysand),calculatedforthe19thcentury,1913,1977,1993–1996 and2009,onacommonarea(reddelimitation,Fig.2).

(9)

processes by waves and tidal currentsdominate. These otherconditionsleadtothemixingofthelowquantityof mudwithsands.ThispatternwasshownintheinnerBay oftheSeine(Garnaudetal.,2002).Thethinpebblesofvery softmudoftenobservednowadaysarealsoalightversion of ﬁne-grained sedimentation processdescribed for the years 1990s. Theimportance of highriver ﬂowsversus tidaldynamicshasalsobeendescribedinotherEuropean estuaries (e.g., Blott et al., 2006; Mitchell et al., 2012; Thomas et al., 2002), Western Australian estuaries (Wolanski et al., 2001) or subtropical estuaries (Van MarenandHoekstra,2004;Wangetal.,2013).

The present-day distribution of sedimentary facies illustrates a spreading of fine-grained sediment, beyond formerboundaries,butalsoontheseabedoftheBayofthe Seine,wheresedimenthadalwaysbeen,untilnow,described ascoarsesandorgravellysand.Therepartitionofsuperficial sediment in 2009 looks like the repartition of facies in summerduringthe1990s,i.e.afterthereworkingofthemud depositedduringthepreviouswinterconditions.Thefacies corresponding to 2009 are also the product of the long reworkingofdepositsofthepreviousyearswithmoderate riverflows.Suchanobservationsuggestingaglobalerosion oftheestuaryarereinforcedbyotherobservations: thepresenceofnumerousshellfragments,

characteriz-ingstrongreworkingandsortingofsediment;

the presence of thixotropic sands, attesting to an unstabledeposit;

thepresenceofoutcropsofblack,old(dozensofyears) and verystiff mud, showinga striping ofpresent-day sediments;

thepresenceofmud pebblesbeingerodedwithinthe sediment;

theabundanceofmudpebblesabovetheseabed,evenif mostofthemareassociatedwithdredgingworkinthe navigationchannelanddismantlingofnorthernmudﬂat inthenorthernchannel(Cuvilliezetal.,2009).

TheSeineestuaryisanaturallytide-dominatedestuary, accordingtotheclassificationofDalrympleetal.(1992); however, engineering activities, including building of embankments and dikes, have induced the infilling of lateralareas,thestrongreductionoftheavailableamount of space and has led to a downstream shift of the sedimentation area and increased the energy of the channelized river. Nevertheless, nowadays, the role of theriverhasincreasedanditsconsequenceisanexpelling oftheTMandhighmudsupplyinthemouthoftheSeine estuary.DuetotheexpellingofTM,thebeachesoftheBay oftheSeinearedistalpartsoftheSeineestuarinesystem (Dubrulleetal.,2007).Whentheriverflowsarehighfor long enough, they provide mud supply and deposition everywinter,and especially duringthefirstmajor high flow event. When theriver flows are low, mud supply remainsweak,andreworkingbywavesandtidalcurrents dominates. Then, the superficial sedimentation is also characterized by erosionalfeatures, includingmixing of sand and mud, mud pebble production, sorting of sediments.

Wepointoutthefactthatitisdifficulttoidentifythe influence of man-made versus natural influence on the sedimentology.Allthestudies(e.g.,Avoineetal.,1981)on long-termevolutionofmorphologicalcharacteristicshave shownthatanthropogeniceffectsaredominantonnatural evolution.Furtherworkisneededtoclearlydeterminethe influence of construction work and dredging versus hydrologicalinfluencealone onthedistributionof sedi-menttypes,butafirstapproachistoconsidermaintenance dredgingasabackgroundnoiseonsedimentation. 6. Conclusion

The classification of superficial sediment is an effectiveindicatortomonitortheevolutionofanestuary froma morphosedimentological pointof view.Prior to 1977 studies, the Seine estuary was globally made of sands,ascommonlydescribedinnaturalestuariesunder temperate climate. By comparison with this former situation, in 1996, a shifting to a mud-dominated sedimentation was described. This evolution was explained by the modification of river flow rate dynamics induced by new engineering works (dikes and dredging) in the navigation channel that had increasedthepowerofwinterriverflowrates, increas-ing the expelling and deposition of the turbidity maximum in the mouth of the estuary. According to themost recentsamplingcampaign (2009),data show anobviousreductionofthetotalsurface ofmudfacies area,balancedbyalargespreadingoffine-grained(silt and clay) sedimentation over the whole Seine estuary mouthandanincreaseinthesiltandclaycontentinthe proximal marine sandy deposit, suggesting an ‘‘intra-sedimentarysilting’’.

During the three described periods, the hydrological conditions were different: low river flow rates in the 1977study,mediumtohighflowratesforthe1993–1996 study,longperiodoflowflowratesintherecentstudyof 2009.Whentheflowrateishighandlongenough(usually each year), mud dominates over the mouth. On the contrary, when the dynamic of tide and swell is not dominatedby flow ratepower, estuaryrecoversa tide-dominatedsedimentarydynamics,involvingadispersalof mud,evenifthesiltandclayfractioninthesandremains high. Theimportanceofriver flowratein thesediment dynamics appears also very significant, even dominant since muddy feature of superficial sedimentation is controlled by the presence/absence of significant flow rates.

TheSeineestuaryisagoodexampleofaman-altered estuary,sincetherespective influenceofthethreemain hydrodynamicparameters(flowrate,tideandswell)have been modified. Modifications of morphology induce modifications ofsedimentary dynamics,in a proportion thatthesedimentationinthemouthoftheestuaryisnow mainlyinfluencedbyriverflows,asaprevalentlong-term signal on tidal currents, even in a megatidal context. Considering the fine-grained fraction in the superficial sedimentsanditsvariationsalongthelast150years,the Seineestuaryhasshiftedfromatide-dominatedtoa river-dominatedsystem.

(10)

References

Allen,G.P.,Salomon,J.-C.,Bassoulet,P.,DuPenhoat,Y.,DeGranpre,C., 1980.Effectsoftidesonmixingandsuspendedsedimenttransportin macrotidalestuaries.Sediment.Geol.26,69–90.

Avoine,J.,1987.SedimentexchangesbetweentheSeineestuaryandits adjacentshelf.J.Geol.Soc.144,135–148.

Avoine,J.,Allen,G.P.,Nichols,M.M.,Salomon,J.-C.,Larsonneur,C.,1981.

SuspendedsedimenttransportintheSeineestuary,France.Effectof made-manmodiﬁcationsonestuary-shelfsedimentology.Mar.Geol. 40,119–137.

Blott,S.J.,Pye,K.,VanderWal,D.,Neal,A.,2006.Long-termmorphological changeanditscausesintheMerseyEstuary,NWEngland. Geomor-phology81,185–206.

Brenon,I.,LeHir,P.,1999.ModellingtheTurbidityMaximumintheSeine Estuary(France):identiﬁcationofFormationProcesses.Estuar.Coast. ShelfSci.49,525–544.

Cuvilliez,A.,Deloffre,J.,Laﬁte,R.,Bessineton,C.,2009.Morphological responsesofanestuarineintertidalmudﬂattoconstructionssince 1978 to 2005: the Seineestuary (France). Geomorphology 104, 165–174.

Dalrymple,R.W.,Zaitlin,B.A.,Boyd,R.,1992.Estuarinefaciesmodels: conceptualbasisandstratigraphicimplication.J.Sediment.Petrol.62, 1130–1146.

Diesing,M.,Green,S.L.,Stephens,D.,Lark,R.,Stewart,H.A.,Dove,D.,2014.

Mappingseabedsediments:comparisonofmanual,geostatistical, object-basedimageanalysisandmachinelearningapproaches. Con-tinentalShelfRes.84,107–119.

Dubrulle,C.,Lesueur,P.,Boust,D.,Dugue´,O.,Poupinet,N.,Laﬁte,R.,2007.

Sourcediscriminationofﬁne-graineddepositsoccurringonmarine beaches:theCalvadosbeaches(easternBayoftheSeine,France). Estuar.Coast.ShelfSci.72(1–2),138–154.

Fairbridge,R.W.,1980.Theestuary:itsdeﬁnitionandgeodynamiccycle. In:Olausson,E.,Cato,S.L.I.(Eds.),Chemistryandbio-geochemistryof estuaries.JohnWiley&Sons, pp.1–35.

Garnaud,S.,Lesueur,P.,Lesourd,S.,Poupinet,N.,Brun-Cottan,J.C.,2002.

Caracte´risationdesvariationslithologiquessaisonnie`resdes se´di-mentsdelabaiedeSeineorientale;impactdescruesdelaSeine (France).C.R.Geoscience334,323–330.

Garnaud,S.,Lesueur,P.,Clet,M.,Lesourd,S.,Garlan,T.,Laﬁte,R., Brun-Cottan,J.C.,2003.Holocenetomodernﬁne-grainedsedimentationon amacrotidalshoreface-to-inner-shelf setting (eastern Bayof the Seine,France).Mar.Geol.202,33–54.

Gue´zennec,L.,Laﬁte,R.,Dupont,J.P.,Meyer,R.,Boust,D.,1999. Hydrody-namicsofsuspendedparticulatematterinthetidalfreshwaterzone ofamacrotidalestuary(theSeineestuary,France).Estuaries22(3A), 717–727.

Hossain,S.,Eyreb,B.D.,McKeec,J.J.,2004.Impactsofdredgingondry seasonsuspended sedimentconcentration in theBrisbane River estuary,Queensland,Australia.Estuar.Coast.ShelfSci.61,539–545.

Lefebvre,D.,Huault,M.-F.,Guyader,J.,Giresse,P.,Hommeril,P., Larson-neur,C.,1974.Leprismealluvialdel’estuairedelaSeine:synthe`se se´dimentologique,stratigraphiqueetpaleógeógraphique.Bull.d’Inf. Geól.Bass.deParis39,27–36.

LeHir,P.,Ficht,A.,SilvaJacinto,R.,Lesueur,P.,Dupont,J.P.,Laﬁte,R., Brenon,I.,Thouvenin,B.,Cugier,P.,2001.Finesedimenttransportand accumulationsatthemouthoftheSeineestuary(France).Estuaries 24(6B),950–963.

Lesourd,S.,Lesueur,P.,Brun-Cottan,J.C.,Auffret,J.P.,Poupinet,N.,Laignel, B.,2001.Morphosedimentaryevolutionofamacrotidalestuary sub-jectedtohumanimpact;theexampleoftheSeine(France).Estuaries 24(6B),940–949.

Lesourd,S.,Lesueur,P.,Brun-Cottan,J.C.,Garnaud,S.,Poupinet,N.,2003.

Seasonalvariationsinthecharacteristicsofsuperﬁcialsedimentsina macrotidalestuary(theSeineinlet,France).Estuar.Coast.ShelfSci.58 (1),3–16.

Lesueur,P.,Lesourd,S.,Lefebvre,D.,Garnaud,S.,Brun-Cottan,J.C.,2003.

HoloceneandmodernsedimentsintheSeineestuary(France):a synthesis.J.Quat.Sci.18(3–4),339–349.

Li,Z.H.,Nguyen,K.D.,Brun-Cottan,J.C.,Martin,J.M.,1995.Numerical simulationoftheturbiditymaximumtransportintheGironde estu-ary(France).Oceanol.Acta17(5),479–500.

Mitchell,S.B.,Couperthwaite,J.S.,West,J.R.,Lawler,D.M.,2003. Measur-ing sediment exchangerates onan intertidalbank at Blacktoft, HumberEstuary,UK.Sci.TotalEnviron.314–316,535–549.

Mitchell,S.B.,Uncles,R.J.,Akesson,L.,2012.Observationsofturbidityin theThamesestuary.WaterEnviron.J.26,511–520.

Morris,R.K.A.,Mitchell,S.B.,2013.Haslossofaccommodationspacein the Humber estuary led to elevated suspended sediment concentrations? Int.J.Front.Construct.Eng.2(1),1–9.

Perillo,G.M.E.,1996.Deﬁnitionsandgeomorphologicclassiﬁcationsof estuaries.In:Perillo,G.M.E.(Ed.),Geomorphologyandsedimentology ofestuaries.Elsevier, pp.17–47.

Pye,K.,Blott,S.J.,2014.ThegeomorphologyofUKestuaries:theroleof geological controls, antecedent conditions and human activities. Estuar.Coast.ShelfSci.150,196–214.

Salomon,J.C.,Allen,G.P.,1983.Roˆlese´dimentologiquedelamare´edans lesestuairesa` fortmarnage.CompagnieFranc¸aisedesPe´troles,Notes etMe´moires18,35–44.

Tessier,B.,2012.Stratigraphyoftide-dominatedestuaries.In:Principles oftidalsedimentology,pp.109–128.

Tessier,B.,Delsinne,N.,Sorrel,P.,2010.Holocenesedimentaryinﬁllingof atide-dominatedestuarinemouth.Theexampleofthemacrotidal Seineestuary(NWFrance).Bull.Soc.geol.France181,87–98.

Thomas,C.G.,Spearman,J.R.,Turnbull,M.J.,2002.Historical morphologi-calchangeintheMerseyEstuary.Cont.ShelfRes.22,1775–1794.

Tonis,I.E.,Stam,J.M.T.,VandeGraaf,J.,2002.Morphologicalchanges of theHaringvliet estuary afterclosure in1970. Coast. Eng. 44, 191–203.

Uncles,R.J.,Stephens,J.A.,Harris,C.,1998.Seasonalvariabilityofsubtidal andintertidaldistributioninamuddy,macrotidalestuary:the Hum-ber-Ouse,UK.In:Black,K.S.,Paterson,D.M.,Cramp,A.(Eds.), Sedi-mentaryProcessesintheIntertidalZone.Geol.Soc.London,Spec. Publ.139,pp.211–219.

VanderWal,D.,Pye,K.,Neal,A.,2002.Long-termmorphologicalchange intheRibbleestuary,NorthwestEngland.Mar.Geol.189,249–266.

VanMaren,D.S.,Hoekstra,P.,2004.Seasonalvariationofhydrodynamics andsedimentdynamicsinashallowsubtropicalestuary:theBaLat River,Vietnam.Estuar.Coast.ShelfSci.60,529–540.

Wang,Y.,Dong,P.,Oguchi,T.,Chen,S.,Shen,H.,2013.Long-term(1842– 2006)morphologicalchangeandequilibriumstateoftheChangjiang (Yangtze)estuary,China.Cont.ShelfRes.56,71–81.

Wells,J.T.,1995.Tide-dominatedestuariesandtidalrivers. Geomorphol-ogyandsedimentologyofestuaries.In:Perillo,G.M.E.(Ed.), Dev. Sediment.53,179–205.

Wolanski,E.,2006.Theevolutiontimescaleofmacro-tidalestuaries: examplesfromthePaciﬁcRim.Estuar.Coast.ShelfSci.66(3–4), 544–549.

Wolanski,E.,Moore,K.,Spagnol,S.,D’Adamo,N.C.,Pattiaratchi,C.,2001.

Rapid,human-inducedsiltationofthemacro-tidalOrdRiverestuary, WesternAustralia.Estuar.Coast.ShelfSci.53,717–732.

Woodruff, J.D., Geyer, W.R., Sommerﬁeld, C.K., Driscoll, N.W., 2001.

SeasonalvariationofsedimentdepositionintheHudsonRiver estu-ary.Mar.Geol.179,105–119.